Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I was reading along and then I got to this part.

I was reading along and then I got to this part.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
24 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ambiguous0@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    ambiguous0@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    ambiguous0@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #12

    @dogiedog64 @prietschka @timnitGebru and if you're 18 you clearly don't have enough perspective yet. We need plurality in representative govt, not age-ism. There are plenty of people aged 60-90 that invented this technology and culture and understand it well, they just aren't politicians. You were posting videos from Al Jourgensen, 67, think he doesn't understand today's culture? He knows how its promoted and licensed pretty well. The problems are the ideas, not the years.

    dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD prietschka@mastodon.socialP ceartas@mastodon.worldC 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • ambiguous0@mastodon.socialA ambiguous0@mastodon.social

      @dogiedog64 @prietschka @timnitGebru and if you're 18 you clearly don't have enough perspective yet. We need plurality in representative govt, not age-ism. There are plenty of people aged 60-90 that invented this technology and culture and understand it well, they just aren't politicians. You were posting videos from Al Jourgensen, 67, think he doesn't understand today's culture? He knows how its promoted and licensed pretty well. The problems are the ideas, not the years.

      dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
      dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
      dogiedog64@app.wafrn.net
      wrote last edited by
      #13

      @prietschka@mastodon.social @ambiguous0@mastodon.social @timnitGebru@dair-community.social

      Nope, the geezers gotta go. Average age in the house and senate is, I believe, currently late 50s to early 70s. Unacceptable.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ambiguous0@mastodon.socialA ambiguous0@mastodon.social

        @dogiedog64 @prietschka @timnitGebru and if you're 18 you clearly don't have enough perspective yet. We need plurality in representative govt, not age-ism. There are plenty of people aged 60-90 that invented this technology and culture and understand it well, they just aren't politicians. You were posting videos from Al Jourgensen, 67, think he doesn't understand today's culture? He knows how its promoted and licensed pretty well. The problems are the ideas, not the years.

        prietschka@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        prietschka@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        prietschka@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #14

        @ambiguous0 @dogiedog64 @timnitGebru No, no, no, the problem is the age and the length of tenure in our legislature,

        100% it is the problem. Geezers gotta go. This isn't "ageism" as people, especially old people who do not want to give up power, love to scream.

        Sorry, if you're 60 and in Congress, you should be thinking about retirement. If you're 70, you should be required to retire (read: forced out). If you're 80 and in Congress you should've left over a decade ago.

        Unnacceptable.

        prietschka@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • prietschka@mastodon.socialP prietschka@mastodon.social

          @ambiguous0 @dogiedog64 @timnitGebru No, no, no, the problem is the age and the length of tenure in our legislature,

          100% it is the problem. Geezers gotta go. This isn't "ageism" as people, especially old people who do not want to give up power, love to scream.

          Sorry, if you're 60 and in Congress, you should be thinking about retirement. If you're 70, you should be required to retire (read: forced out). If you're 80 and in Congress you should've left over a decade ago.

          Unnacceptable.

          prietschka@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          prietschka@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          prietschka@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #15

          @ambiguous0 @dogiedog64 @timnitGebru As I stated above: Rosa de Lauro was first elected in the New Haven area in 1990 and is 83 years old.

          A freshman at Yale could've voted for this woman in 1990 at the age of 18 and returned to campus today, or moved back to New Haven this month, and be voting for her in November's election.

          That 18 year old would be 54 today.

          It is **entirely** unacceptable that these geezers squat in their seats for decades like this.

          This isn't ageism.

          ambiguous0@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • prietschka@mastodon.socialP prietschka@mastodon.social

            @ambiguous0 @dogiedog64 @timnitGebru As I stated above: Rosa de Lauro was first elected in the New Haven area in 1990 and is 83 years old.

            A freshman at Yale could've voted for this woman in 1990 at the age of 18 and returned to campus today, or moved back to New Haven this month, and be voting for her in November's election.

            That 18 year old would be 54 today.

            It is **entirely** unacceptable that these geezers squat in their seats for decades like this.

            This isn't ageism.

            ambiguous0@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            ambiguous0@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            ambiguous0@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #16

            @prietschka @dogiedog64 @timnitGebru sure sounds like it to me. You've lost the battle if you attack their demographics instead the actual issues. Stay focused

            dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • alper@sfba.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              alper@sfba.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              alper@sfba.social
              wrote last edited by
              #17

              @dogiedog64 @prietschka @timnitGebru
              50 sounds that old to you huh!?!

              dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • alper@sfba.socialA alper@sfba.social

                @dogiedog64 @prietschka @timnitGebru
                50 sounds that old to you huh!?!

                dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                dogiedog64@app.wafrn.net
                wrote last edited by
                #18

                @prietschka@mastodon.social @alper@sfba.social @timnitGebru@dair-community.social

                Yup. You don't hate the elderly enough.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ambiguous0@mastodon.socialA ambiguous0@mastodon.social

                  @prietschka @dogiedog64 @timnitGebru sure sounds like it to me. You've lost the battle if you attack their demographics instead the actual issues. Stay focused

                  dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dogiedog64@app.wafrn.net
                  wrote last edited by
                  #19

                  @prietschka@mastodon.social @ambiguous0@mastodon.social @timnitGebru@dair-community.social

                  Sounds like you don't hate the elderly enough. They overwhelmingly vote for regressive and Fascist policy, and refuse to pay meaningful taxes. They should not have a say in political debates.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ceartas@mastodon.worldC ceartas@mastodon.world

                    @ambiguous0 @dogiedog64 @prietschka @timnitGebru

                    76 and saddened by the ageism in this thread. I hate the entrenched Dem Gerontocracy as much as young people do, I just don’t ascribe the problem exclusively to age, so much as the DC bubble these folks have lived in for decades. They listen only to each other, and their donors. What I don’t get is WHY they cling to power, seeking to spend their last coherent years in a toxic environment like DC.

                    ceartas@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
                    ceartas@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
                    ceartas@mastodon.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #20

                    @ambiguous0 @dogiedog64 @prietschka @timnitGebru

                    These “geezers” have been repeatedly reelected because as incumbents, they get party money and support. Thus the electorate, for my 55 years as a voter, has been continuously forced to choose whichever of 2 candidates will do the least harm. The system is so fucked up that it probably cannot be reformed except by dismantling it and building something else. Just a geriatric old hippie’s opinion…

                    dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ambiguous0@mastodon.socialA ambiguous0@mastodon.social

                      @dogiedog64 @prietschka @timnitGebru and if you're 18 you clearly don't have enough perspective yet. We need plurality in representative govt, not age-ism. There are plenty of people aged 60-90 that invented this technology and culture and understand it well, they just aren't politicians. You were posting videos from Al Jourgensen, 67, think he doesn't understand today's culture? He knows how its promoted and licensed pretty well. The problems are the ideas, not the years.

                      ceartas@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
                      ceartas@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
                      ceartas@mastodon.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #21

                      @ambiguous0 @dogiedog64 @prietschka @timnitGebru

                      76 and saddened by the ageism in this thread. I hate the entrenched Dem Gerontocracy as much as young people do, I just don’t ascribe the problem exclusively to age, so much as the DC bubble these folks have lived in for decades. They listen only to each other, and their donors. What I don’t get is WHY they cling to power, seeking to spend their last coherent years in a toxic environment like DC.

                      ceartas@mastodon.worldC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ceartas@mastodon.worldC ceartas@mastodon.world

                        @ambiguous0 @dogiedog64 @prietschka @timnitGebru

                        These “geezers” have been repeatedly reelected because as incumbents, they get party money and support. Thus the electorate, for my 55 years as a voter, has been continuously forced to choose whichever of 2 candidates will do the least harm. The system is so fucked up that it probably cannot be reformed except by dismantling it and building something else. Just a geriatric old hippie’s opinion…

                        dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dogiedog64@app.wafrn.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #22

                        @prietschka@mastodon.social @ambiguous0@mastodon.social @ceartas@mastodon.world @timnitGebru@dair-community.social

                        The Geezers ALSO get reelected because Boomers have, for the last 50+ years, held a massively disproportionate amount of political sway as a voting bloc, and they almost exclusively vote for other Boomers. The world was literally rewritten for them in the 60s, 70s, and 80s, and they've spent 50 years fighting tooth and bloody nail to make sure they maintained that power through institutional calcification and gerrymandering.

                        All at the expense of their kids. And their grandkids. And their great grandkids. You can look at the raw statistics; Boomers come out on top in basically every observable metric of wealth and security. They've literally robbed their descendants of a future in order to pad their retirements. And now society is crumbling because they've burned down all the social supports and ways to build wealth or prosperity, just in time for them to die posh deaths in Florida or the Bahamas.

                        YOU DON'T HATE THE ELDERLY ENOUGH.

                        prietschka@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • timnitgebru@dair-community.socialT timnitgebru@dair-community.social

                          I was reading along and then I got to this part. 🙄

                          "Further, and frighteningly, some very knowledgeable people fear that what was once seen as science fiction could soon become a reality, and that is that superintelligent AI could become smarter than humans, could become independent of human control, and pose an existential threat to the human race. "

                          Folks, Bernie has been fully captured by the TESCREAL bundle

                          Just a moment...

                          favicon

                          (justfacts.votesmart.org)

                          rrb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rrb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rrb@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #23

                          @timnitGebru CBC podcast with lecture from a literature professor explaining how AI hype has been lifted from sci-fi novels without any intellectual rigor. (ie The AI doomer statements are just quoting golden age of sci-fi tropes as science fact)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD dogiedog64@app.wafrn.net

                            @prietschka@mastodon.social @ambiguous0@mastodon.social @ceartas@mastodon.world @timnitGebru@dair-community.social

                            The Geezers ALSO get reelected because Boomers have, for the last 50+ years, held a massively disproportionate amount of political sway as a voting bloc, and they almost exclusively vote for other Boomers. The world was literally rewritten for them in the 60s, 70s, and 80s, and they've spent 50 years fighting tooth and bloody nail to make sure they maintained that power through institutional calcification and gerrymandering.

                            All at the expense of their kids. And their grandkids. And their great grandkids. You can look at the raw statistics; Boomers come out on top in basically every observable metric of wealth and security. They've literally robbed their descendants of a future in order to pad their retirements. And now society is crumbling because they've burned down all the social supports and ways to build wealth or prosperity, just in time for them to die posh deaths in Florida or the Bahamas.

                            YOU DON'T HATE THE ELDERLY ENOUGH.

                            prietschka@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            prietschka@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            prietschka@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #24

                            @dogiedog64 @ambiguous0 @ceartas @timnitGebru Let's just get out of poor Gebru's timeline with this awful thread.

                            A 76 year old Boomer throwing around self-serving accusations of "ageism" when one plainly states "old people should not hold power forever" is just to be expected.

                            This woman is part of a generation where any suggestion they cannot hold power forever throws them into an inchoate rage. It's to be expected.

                            Let's just get out of Gebru's replies.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups