Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions:

So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
ecllisp
3 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jackdaniel@functional.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jackdaniel@functional.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jackdaniel@functional.cafe
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions:

    https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/work_items/826

    Long story short: no LLM code in the codebase whatsoever until a legislative consensus is reached (and then we may reevaluate it).

    #lisp

    jackdaniel@functional.cafeJ kazinator@mstdn.caK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • jackdaniel@functional.cafeJ jackdaniel@functional.cafe

      So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions:

      https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/work_items/826

      Long story short: no LLM code in the codebase whatsoever until a legislative consensus is reached (and then we may reevaluate it).

      #lisp

      jackdaniel@functional.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jackdaniel@functional.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jackdaniel@functional.cafe
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Imho it is a moderate stance, unlike saying "never" or embracing potentially tainted code in foss projects.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jackdaniel@functional.cafeJ jackdaniel@functional.cafe

        So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions:

        https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/work_items/826

        Long story short: no LLM code in the codebase whatsoever until a legislative consensus is reached (and then we may reevaluate it).

        #lisp

        kazinator@mstdn.caK This user is from outside of this forum
        kazinator@mstdn.caK This user is from outside of this forum
        kazinator@mstdn.ca
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @jackdaniel

        I'm not ever accepting LLM contributions regardless of legislative consensus.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups