So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions:
-
So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions:
LLM contributions policy (#826) · Issues · Embeddable Common-Lisp / ECL · GitLab
I guess that we'll have to tackle this problem sooner or later, so better do it now. We didn't have so far LLM contributions (except from one minor...
GitLab (gitlab.com)
Long story short: no LLM code in the codebase whatsoever until a legislative consensus is reached (and then we may reevaluate it).
-
So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions:
LLM contributions policy (#826) · Issues · Embeddable Common-Lisp / ECL · GitLab
I guess that we'll have to tackle this problem sooner or later, so better do it now. We didn't have so far LLM contributions (except from one minor...
GitLab (gitlab.com)
Long story short: no LLM code in the codebase whatsoever until a legislative consensus is reached (and then we may reevaluate it).
Imho it is a moderate stance, unlike saying "never" or embracing potentially tainted code in foss projects.
-
So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions:
LLM contributions policy (#826) · Issues · Embeddable Common-Lisp / ECL · GitLab
I guess that we'll have to tackle this problem sooner or later, so better do it now. We didn't have so far LLM contributions (except from one minor...
GitLab (gitlab.com)
Long story short: no LLM code in the codebase whatsoever until a legislative consensus is reached (and then we may reevaluate it).
I'm not ever accepting LLM contributions regardless of legislative consensus.
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic