<![CDATA[So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions:]]>So project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions:

Link Preview Image
LLM contributions policy (#826) · Issues · Embeddable Common-Lisp / ECL · GitLab

I guess that we'll have to tackle this problem sooner or later, so better do it now. We didn't have so far LLM contributions (except from one minor...

favicon

GitLab (gitlab.com)

Long story short: no LLM code in the codebase whatsoever until a legislative consensus is reached (and then we may reevaluate it).

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/88ac69e5-131b-47da-babd-5332b55c6b92/so-ecl-project-also-reached-a-conclusion-what-to-do-with-llm-contributionsRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 07:46:19 GMTSun, 19 Apr 2026 16:52:05 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions: on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 17:08:36 GMT]]>@jackdaniel

I'm not ever accepting LLM contributions regardless of legislative consensus.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mstdn.ca/users/Kazinator/statuses/116432471096158894https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mstdn.ca/users/Kazinator/statuses/116432471096158894Sun, 19 Apr 2026 17:08:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So #ecl project also reached a conclusion what to do with LLM contributions: on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 16:57:51 GMT]]>Imho it is a moderate stance, unlike saying "never" or embracing potentially tainted code in foss projects.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://functional.cafe/users/jackdaniel/statuses/116432428797049845https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://functional.cafe/users/jackdaniel/statuses/116432428797049845Sun, 19 Apr 2026 16:57:51 GMT