Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
144 Posts 57 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

    What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

    It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

    From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

    From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

    or beyond.

    jakobtougaard@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jakobtougaard@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jakobtougaard@mastodon.online
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @futurebird
    Last summer I read "Is math real?", by #eugeniacheng with great pleasure. A key takeaway for me is to ask "when", instead of "why". The question becomes more open and interesting. E.g. "when is 1+1=2?" is open for discussing why one apple plus one apple is two apples, but one pile of sand plus one pile of sand is still only one pile of sand.

    jakobtougaard@mastodon.onlineJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

      It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

      From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

      From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

      or beyond.

      jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jmax@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @futurebird Why e is special. I understand why, but I've never seen a good short explanation, nor do I have one.

      jmax@mastodon.socialJ futurebird@sauropods.winF geonz@mathstodon.xyzG 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • jakobtougaard@mastodon.onlineJ jakobtougaard@mastodon.online

        @futurebird
        Last summer I read "Is math real?", by #eugeniacheng with great pleasure. A key takeaway for me is to ask "when", instead of "why". The question becomes more open and interesting. E.g. "when is 1+1=2?" is open for discussing why one apple plus one apple is two apples, but one pile of sand plus one pile of sand is still only one pile of sand.

        jakobtougaard@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jakobtougaard@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jakobtougaard@mastodon.online
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @futurebird
        This relates to your question. For example, instead of a teacher correcting a student for saying that sqrt(x^2)=x, it is better to ask when it is true. If you already know that x is positive, you can ignore the negative solution, as we routinely do.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jmax@mastodon.socialJ jmax@mastodon.social

          @futurebird Why e is special. I understand why, but I've never seen a good short explanation, nor do I have one.

          jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jmax@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @futurebird A young lady I was trying to impress at the time asked me that question during her struggles with calculus. I would greatly have preferred an alternative to waving my hands. The desire for a simple answer has bugged me ever since.

          (She was not, in fact, impressed.)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jmax@mastodon.socialJ jmax@mastodon.social

            @futurebird Why e is special. I understand why, but I've never seen a good short explanation, nor do I have one.

            futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
            futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
            futurebird@sauropods.win
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @jmax

            Exponential growth is growth that explodes. The rate an exponential is growing is increasing.

            How fast the exponential function is growing is larger when the function is larger. The bigger x, the steeper it gets.

            This is true for all kinds of exponentials with different (positive >1) bases but if you want the function where the rate of growth is *exactly* the value of the function that is e^x

            That's what I think of first but I don't think it's simple enough.

            jmax@mastodon.socialJ suetanvil@freeradical.zoneS 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

              @jmax

              Exponential growth is growth that explodes. The rate an exponential is growing is increasing.

              How fast the exponential function is growing is larger when the function is larger. The bigger x, the steeper it gets.

              This is true for all kinds of exponentials with different (positive >1) bases but if you want the function where the rate of growth is *exactly* the value of the function that is e^x

              That's what I think of first but I don't think it's simple enough.

              jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jmax@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @futurebird Yeah. It's not hard, but it's very resistant to extensive simplification.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

                It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

                From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

                From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

                or beyond.

                ein_wesen@social.raccoon.collegeE This user is from outside of this forum
                ein_wesen@social.raccoon.collegeE This user is from outside of this forum
                ein_wesen@social.raccoon.college
                wrote last edited by
                #10
                @futurebird logarithms!
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                  @jmax

                  Exponential growth is growth that explodes. The rate an exponential is growing is increasing.

                  How fast the exponential function is growing is larger when the function is larger. The bigger x, the steeper it gets.

                  This is true for all kinds of exponentials with different (positive >1) bases but if you want the function where the rate of growth is *exactly* the value of the function that is e^x

                  That's what I think of first but I don't think it's simple enough.

                  suetanvil@freeradical.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                  suetanvil@freeradical.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                  suetanvil@freeradical.zone
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @futurebird @jmax

                  I have a math degree and did not understand e until now.

                  (tbf to me, I mostly studied computer-related stuff that doesn't use e.)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                    What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

                    It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

                    From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

                    From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

                    or beyond.

                    pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pizzademon@mastodon.online
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @futurebird yeah, I echo a lot of above. I could answer test questions correctly about Euler's identity but I didn't *get* it in my bones. Always felt that if I could understand it that I could UNDERSTAND.

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_identity

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                      What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

                      It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

                      From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

                      From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

                      or beyond.

                      meowthias@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                      meowthias@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                      meowthias@mastodon.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @futurebird I would like an explanation for why pi goes on forever. Is it evidence we are living in a simulation? Is it because if you trace the circumference of a circle with your finger you never reach a beginning or an end? Is it a message from the gods?

                      peace@mstdn.caP futurebird@sauropods.winF asakiyume@wandering.shopA llewelly@sauropods.winL seanplynch@mastodon.socialS 8 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • meowthias@mastodon.worldM meowthias@mastodon.world

                        @futurebird I would like an explanation for why pi goes on forever. Is it evidence we are living in a simulation? Is it because if you trace the circumference of a circle with your finger you never reach a beginning or an end? Is it a message from the gods?

                        peace@mstdn.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                        peace@mstdn.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                        peace@mstdn.ca
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @Meowthias @futurebird

                        This is so cool .. you guys are talking about pi so early in the morning. Makes me hungry 😉

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                          What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

                          It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

                          From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

                          From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

                          or beyond.

                          cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cford@toot.thoughtworks.com
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          @futurebird How a proof is both irrefutable and can have mistakes.

                          futurebird@sauropods.winF llewelly@sauropods.winL 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • jmax@mastodon.socialJ jmax@mastodon.social

                            @futurebird Why e is special. I understand why, but I've never seen a good short explanation, nor do I have one.

                            geonz@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
                            geonz@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
                            geonz@mathstodon.xyz
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            @jmax @futurebird I think that is the nature of the understanding.
                            We have to work through the layers to get to the understanding.
                            Sometimes it stays built, and sometimes we have to rebuild it N + 1 times 😉
                            There is something amazing though, when one of mine *gets* a thing.
                            Tuesday I had a "Memorized it all" student talking to a "reason it all" and the second one built the comprehension for dividing fractions and then MARVELED at when he just multiplied by the reciprocal without visualizing it etc... it still worked!!!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • meowthias@mastodon.worldM meowthias@mastodon.world

                              @futurebird I would like an explanation for why pi goes on forever. Is it evidence we are living in a simulation? Is it because if you trace the circumference of a circle with your finger you never reach a beginning or an end? Is it a message from the gods?

                              futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                              futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                              futurebird@sauropods.win
                              wrote last edited by
                              #17

                              @Meowthias

                              Pi goes on forever because if you take the diameter of a circle and try to wrap it around the circle there is no simple ratio between these lengths.

                              Now why isn't there a simple ratio? With a hexagon the diameter fits three times. So, why can't exactly three diameters make up the circumference of a circle?

                              I'm thinking about how to answer this without just going "it's Euclidian space" which isn't a real explanation.

                              Maybe someone else can help here.

                              meowthias@mastodon.worldM leadegroot@bne.socialL gustodon@mas.toG cheeseness@mastodon.socialC khleedril@cyberplace.socialK 12 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC cford@toot.thoughtworks.com

                                @futurebird How a proof is both irrefutable and can have mistakes.

                                futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                futurebird@sauropods.win
                                wrote last edited by
                                #18

                                @cford

                                What proof are you thinking of that's like this. I tend to think a proof with "mistakes" is simply not a proof.

                                cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                  What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

                                  It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

                                  From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

                                  From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

                                  or beyond.

                                  jtnystrom@genomic.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jtnystrom@genomic.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jtnystrom@genomic.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #19

                                  @futurebird what precisely constitutes proof? (I know to some degree now but remember that when we first encountered the idea in school, proofs weren’t defined, just illustrated by example.)

                                  futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • meowthias@mastodon.worldM meowthias@mastodon.world

                                    @futurebird I would like an explanation for why pi goes on forever. Is it evidence we are living in a simulation? Is it because if you trace the circumference of a circle with your finger you never reach a beginning or an end? Is it a message from the gods?

                                    asakiyume@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    asakiyume@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    asakiyume@wandering.shop
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #20

                                    @Meowthias @futurebird I have a story about someone who believes the repeating .333 needs to be freed from that repetition. I wrote it because as a kid I couldn't believe that it would never end, even though it manifestly never ended. Similar sort of preoccupation.

                                    meowthias@mastodon.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC cford@toot.thoughtworks.com

                                      @futurebird How a proof is both irrefutable and can have mistakes.

                                      llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      llewelly@sauropods.win
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @cford @futurebird I can't explain it, but I blame Kurt Gödel and the incompleteness theorem.

                                      cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                        @Meowthias

                                        Pi goes on forever because if you take the diameter of a circle and try to wrap it around the circle there is no simple ratio between these lengths.

                                        Now why isn't there a simple ratio? With a hexagon the diameter fits three times. So, why can't exactly three diameters make up the circumference of a circle?

                                        I'm thinking about how to answer this without just going "it's Euclidian space" which isn't a real explanation.

                                        Maybe someone else can help here.

                                        meowthias@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        meowthias@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        meowthias@mastodon.world
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #22

                                        @futurebird I'm a little nervous that if you explain it in a way that makes sense to my English major brain the universe might get unplugged.

                                        willyyam@mastodon.socialW pencilears@mastodon.eternalaugust.comP 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                          @Meowthias

                                          Pi goes on forever because if you take the diameter of a circle and try to wrap it around the circle there is no simple ratio between these lengths.

                                          Now why isn't there a simple ratio? With a hexagon the diameter fits three times. So, why can't exactly three diameters make up the circumference of a circle?

                                          I'm thinking about how to answer this without just going "it's Euclidian space" which isn't a real explanation.

                                          Maybe someone else can help here.

                                          leadegroot@bne.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          leadegroot@bne.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          leadegroot@bne.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @futurebird @Meowthias my theory for a while now, has been that the value of pi is a result of the curvature of space - somewhere else pi might be a whole number

                                          khleedril@cyberplace.socialK meowthias@mastodon.worldM 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups