Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
144 Posts 57 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

    What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

    It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

    From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

    From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

    or beyond.

    ein_wesen@social.raccoon.collegeE This user is from outside of this forum
    ein_wesen@social.raccoon.collegeE This user is from outside of this forum
    ein_wesen@social.raccoon.college
    wrote last edited by
    #10
    @futurebird logarithms!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      @jmax

      Exponential growth is growth that explodes. The rate an exponential is growing is increasing.

      How fast the exponential function is growing is larger when the function is larger. The bigger x, the steeper it gets.

      This is true for all kinds of exponentials with different (positive >1) bases but if you want the function where the rate of growth is *exactly* the value of the function that is e^x

      That's what I think of first but I don't think it's simple enough.

      suetanvil@freeradical.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
      suetanvil@freeradical.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
      suetanvil@freeradical.zone
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      @futurebird @jmax

      I have a math degree and did not understand e until now.

      (tbf to me, I mostly studied computer-related stuff that doesn't use e.)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

        What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

        It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

        From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

        From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

        or beyond.

        pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
        pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
        pizzademon@mastodon.online
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        @futurebird yeah, I echo a lot of above. I could answer test questions correctly about Euler's identity but I didn't *get* it in my bones. Always felt that if I could understand it that I could UNDERSTAND.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_identity

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

          What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

          It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

          From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

          From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

          or beyond.

          meowthias@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
          meowthias@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
          meowthias@mastodon.world
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @futurebird I would like an explanation for why pi goes on forever. Is it evidence we are living in a simulation? Is it because if you trace the circumference of a circle with your finger you never reach a beginning or an end? Is it a message from the gods?

          peace@mstdn.caP futurebird@sauropods.winF asakiyume@wandering.shopA llewelly@sauropods.winL seanplynch@mastodon.socialS 8 Replies Last reply
          0
          • meowthias@mastodon.worldM meowthias@mastodon.world

            @futurebird I would like an explanation for why pi goes on forever. Is it evidence we are living in a simulation? Is it because if you trace the circumference of a circle with your finger you never reach a beginning or an end? Is it a message from the gods?

            peace@mstdn.caP This user is from outside of this forum
            peace@mstdn.caP This user is from outside of this forum
            peace@mstdn.ca
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            @Meowthias @futurebird

            This is so cool .. you guys are talking about pi so early in the morning. Makes me hungry 😉

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

              What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

              It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

              From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

              From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

              or beyond.

              cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC This user is from outside of this forum
              cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC This user is from outside of this forum
              cford@toot.thoughtworks.com
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @futurebird How a proof is both irrefutable and can have mistakes.

              futurebird@sauropods.winF llewelly@sauropods.winL 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • jmax@mastodon.socialJ jmax@mastodon.social

                @futurebird Why e is special. I understand why, but I've never seen a good short explanation, nor do I have one.

                geonz@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
                geonz@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
                geonz@mathstodon.xyz
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @jmax @futurebird I think that is the nature of the understanding.
                We have to work through the layers to get to the understanding.
                Sometimes it stays built, and sometimes we have to rebuild it N + 1 times 😉
                There is something amazing though, when one of mine *gets* a thing.
                Tuesday I had a "Memorized it all" student talking to a "reason it all" and the second one built the comprehension for dividing fractions and then MARVELED at when he just multiplied by the reciprocal without visualizing it etc... it still worked!!!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • meowthias@mastodon.worldM meowthias@mastodon.world

                  @futurebird I would like an explanation for why pi goes on forever. Is it evidence we are living in a simulation? Is it because if you trace the circumference of a circle with your finger you never reach a beginning or an end? Is it a message from the gods?

                  futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                  futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                  futurebird@sauropods.win
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @Meowthias

                  Pi goes on forever because if you take the diameter of a circle and try to wrap it around the circle there is no simple ratio between these lengths.

                  Now why isn't there a simple ratio? With a hexagon the diameter fits three times. So, why can't exactly three diameters make up the circumference of a circle?

                  I'm thinking about how to answer this without just going "it's Euclidian space" which isn't a real explanation.

                  Maybe someone else can help here.

                  meowthias@mastodon.worldM leadegroot@bne.socialL gustodon@mas.toG cheeseness@mastodon.socialC khleedril@cyberplace.socialK 12 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC cford@toot.thoughtworks.com

                    @futurebird How a proof is both irrefutable and can have mistakes.

                    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                    futurebird@sauropods.win
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    @cford

                    What proof are you thinking of that's like this. I tend to think a proof with "mistakes" is simply not a proof.

                    cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                      What is a math concept or theorem that you wish there were a better explanation of?

                      It could be from arithmetic: Why is adding fractions so complicated?

                      From grade-school algebra: Why does the teacher get so sad and angry if I just √(x²+y²)=x+y

                      From the calculus: Why do I need to write dx with the integral?

                      or beyond.

                      jtnystrom@genomic.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jtnystrom@genomic.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jtnystrom@genomic.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @futurebird what precisely constitutes proof? (I know to some degree now but remember that when we first encountered the idea in school, proofs weren’t defined, just illustrated by example.)

                      futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • meowthias@mastodon.worldM meowthias@mastodon.world

                        @futurebird I would like an explanation for why pi goes on forever. Is it evidence we are living in a simulation? Is it because if you trace the circumference of a circle with your finger you never reach a beginning or an end? Is it a message from the gods?

                        asakiyume@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
                        asakiyume@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
                        asakiyume@wandering.shop
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        @Meowthias @futurebird I have a story about someone who believes the repeating .333 needs to be freed from that repetition. I wrote it because as a kid I couldn't believe that it would never end, even though it manifestly never ended. Similar sort of preoccupation.

                        meowthias@mastodon.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC cford@toot.thoughtworks.com

                          @futurebird How a proof is both irrefutable and can have mistakes.

                          llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                          llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                          llewelly@sauropods.win
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          @cford @futurebird I can't explain it, but I blame Kurt Gödel and the incompleteness theorem.

                          cford@toot.thoughtworks.comC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                            @Meowthias

                            Pi goes on forever because if you take the diameter of a circle and try to wrap it around the circle there is no simple ratio between these lengths.

                            Now why isn't there a simple ratio? With a hexagon the diameter fits three times. So, why can't exactly three diameters make up the circumference of a circle?

                            I'm thinking about how to answer this without just going "it's Euclidian space" which isn't a real explanation.

                            Maybe someone else can help here.

                            meowthias@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                            meowthias@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                            meowthias@mastodon.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #22

                            @futurebird I'm a little nervous that if you explain it in a way that makes sense to my English major brain the universe might get unplugged.

                            willyyam@mastodon.socialW pencilears@mastodon.eternalaugust.comP 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                              @Meowthias

                              Pi goes on forever because if you take the diameter of a circle and try to wrap it around the circle there is no simple ratio between these lengths.

                              Now why isn't there a simple ratio? With a hexagon the diameter fits three times. So, why can't exactly three diameters make up the circumference of a circle?

                              I'm thinking about how to answer this without just going "it's Euclidian space" which isn't a real explanation.

                              Maybe someone else can help here.

                              leadegroot@bne.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                              leadegroot@bne.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                              leadegroot@bne.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              @futurebird @Meowthias my theory for a while now, has been that the value of pi is a result of the curvature of space - somewhere else pi might be a whole number

                              khleedril@cyberplace.socialK meowthias@mastodon.worldM 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • jtnystrom@genomic.socialJ jtnystrom@genomic.social

                                @futurebird what precisely constitutes proof? (I know to some degree now but remember that when we first encountered the idea in school, proofs weren’t defined, just illustrated by example.)

                                futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                futurebird@sauropods.win
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                @jtnystrom

                                People will try to blow this up into something much more complex but a proof is simply a convincing and correct *deductive* argument. It's a series of sentences (logical statements such as "If A then B") that you string together to justify a more concise and useful statement. "The sum of the interior angles of parallel lines is 180"

                                jenesuispasgoth@pouet.chapril.orgJ darkling@mstdn.socialD 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                  @Meowthias

                                  Pi goes on forever because if you take the diameter of a circle and try to wrap it around the circle there is no simple ratio between these lengths.

                                  Now why isn't there a simple ratio? With a hexagon the diameter fits three times. So, why can't exactly three diameters make up the circumference of a circle?

                                  I'm thinking about how to answer this without just going "it's Euclidian space" which isn't a real explanation.

                                  Maybe someone else can help here.

                                  gustodon@mas.toG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gustodon@mas.toG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gustodon@mas.to
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @futurebird I'm sorry if this question is boring but I'm a simpleton.

                                  Can you "fool" pi with a circle that is distinctly a shape with 360 sides? I remember making clocks with LOGO and some of the circle discussions were interesting.

                                  P valthonis@dice.campV faithisleaping@anarres.familyF 3 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • meowthias@mastodon.worldM meowthias@mastodon.world

                                    @futurebird I would like an explanation for why pi goes on forever. Is it evidence we are living in a simulation? Is it because if you trace the circumference of a circle with your finger you never reach a beginning or an end? Is it a message from the gods?

                                    llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    llewelly@sauropods.win
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @Meowthias @futurebird if we lived in a simulation, somewhere, somehow, pi would be found to repeat, terminate, or crash the simulation with an unhandled floating point exception.

                                    meowthias@mastodon.worldM J 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gustodon@mas.toG gustodon@mas.to

                                      @futurebird I'm sorry if this question is boring but I'm a simpleton.

                                      Can you "fool" pi with a circle that is distinctly a shape with 360 sides? I remember making clocks with LOGO and some of the circle discussions were interesting.

                                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                                      phosphenes@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #27

                                      @Gustodon @futurebird

                                      Is every regular polygon perimeter-to-radius ratio rational?

                                      If so, then could you show Pi is irrational by solving a polygon, adding another side, then solving it, and adding another side, so the student understands that with infinite sides, the fine adjustments go on forever?

                                      futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • meowthias@mastodon.worldM meowthias@mastodon.world

                                        @futurebird I'm a little nervous that if you explain it in a way that makes sense to my English major brain the universe might get unplugged.

                                        willyyam@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        willyyam@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        willyyam@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #28

                                        @Meowthias @futurebird I wasn't worried about that... until now 😞

                                        😉

                                        meowthias@mastodon.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                          @Meowthias

                                          Pi goes on forever because if you take the diameter of a circle and try to wrap it around the circle there is no simple ratio between these lengths.

                                          Now why isn't there a simple ratio? With a hexagon the diameter fits three times. So, why can't exactly three diameters make up the circumference of a circle?

                                          I'm thinking about how to answer this without just going "it's Euclidian space" which isn't a real explanation.

                                          Maybe someone else can help here.

                                          cheeseness@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cheeseness@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cheeseness@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #29

                                          @futurebird @Meowthias I don't think I have much that can help, but I feel like it's important to note that a regular hexagon doesn't have a consistent "diameter" (distance between two opposing corners is not equal to the distance between two opposing sides)

                                          evan@cosocial.caE 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups