Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "Where to buy a non-Apple, non-Google smartphone"

"Where to buy a non-Apple, non-Google smartphone"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
librem5linuxphonepureosfreedom
78 Posts 32 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • aamfp@fosstodon.orgA aamfp@fosstodon.org

    @janvlug
    Except for the fact that they all are way out of my budget for a phone (I don't want to waste more than 200 € for a phone!), I'm not sure all "mandatory" apps I have to use are compatible with those phones (bank, government, SPID, school and health-related, ...) and anyway I won't spend such money unless I'm sure of that.
    Sorry, would really love to switch (especially to EU phones!), but can't afford that.

    janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    janvlug@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #68

    @AAMfP The force to using #apps from #bigtech is really annoying. There is a page in Dutch about it:

    Link Preview Image
    Bied weerstand tegen appdwang! | appdwang.nl

    Bied weerstand tegen appdwang en laat je geen apps opdringen! Op appdwang.nl vind je praktijkvoorbeelden en argumenten om duidelijk te maken wat je van appdwang vindt.

    favicon

    (appdwang.nl)

    Personally, I resist using apps that only are provided and work on big tech platforms. I manage to do most of what I want.

    Regarding the price, see: https://mastodon.social/@janvlug/116510085888567116

    #appdwang

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM mihamarkic@mastodon.social

      @janvlug How so? If an American company is hosting the cloud (regardless of what software they use), they fall under US jurisdiction no matter where data is stored. And US jurisdiction is a huge risk. If you care about your data that is.

      janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      janvlug@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #69

      @mihamarkic Yes, but the FOSS itself is not hosted. If you use for example #PureOS you just install it on your phone (or other device). It is self hosted on your device, so not under US jurisdiction.

      So, using a US cloud provider means US jurisdiction, which I also do not want to fall under that for my data.

      But for example, I self host #Nextcloud, and use that with PureOS on my #Librem5 (and other computers). This is perfectly fine even regarding the fact that PureOS is not EU based.

      mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM lucyinchat@app.wafrn.netL 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • janvlug@mastodon.socialJ janvlug@mastodon.social

        @mihamarkic Yes, but the FOSS itself is not hosted. If you use for example #PureOS you just install it on your phone (or other device). It is self hosted on your device, so not under US jurisdiction.

        So, using a US cloud provider means US jurisdiction, which I also do not want to fall under that for my data.

        But for example, I self host #Nextcloud, and use that with PureOS on my #Librem5 (and other computers). This is perfectly fine even regarding the fact that PureOS is not EU based.

        mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mihamarkic@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #70

        @janvlug Yep, agreed, no problems with the data there.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • okias@floss.socialO okias@floss.social

          @janvlug @khleedril @signalapp I wouldn't recommend compromising Signal's security by using third-party builds. Sadly, the arm64 Electron version isn't fixed yet (same problem on my Asahi laptop), and it's hard to say when it will be. For now, I use Flare—the only missing feature is calls, which I really miss.

          janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          janvlug@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #71

          @okias @khleedril @signalapp

          I agree on the fact that using third-party builds imposes a risk. Unfortunately, Signal has not been very #MobileLinux friendly. But I think things are getting better and better. There is als an official #appimage in the making. Not sure if it will run on arm64 though.

          Link Preview Image
          Major expansion of Signal for Linux, announces AppImage

          Signal Desktop will soon be officially released as an AppImage. This will make Signal accessible on all Linux distributions, not just Debian-based systems.

          favicon

          AboutSignal (aboutsignal.com)

          okias@floss.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • janvlug@mastodon.socialJ janvlug@mastodon.social

            @mihamarkic Yes, but the FOSS itself is not hosted. If you use for example #PureOS you just install it on your phone (or other device). It is self hosted on your device, so not under US jurisdiction.

            So, using a US cloud provider means US jurisdiction, which I also do not want to fall under that for my data.

            But for example, I self host #Nextcloud, and use that with PureOS on my #Librem5 (and other computers). This is perfectly fine even regarding the fact that PureOS is not EU based.

            lucyinchat@app.wafrn.netL This user is from outside of this forum
            lucyinchat@app.wafrn.netL This user is from outside of this forum
            lucyinchat@app.wafrn.net
            wrote last edited by
            #72

            @janvlug@mastodon.social @mihamarkic@mastodon.social

            A slightly clearer way to say this: “Well, yeah. But you don’t have to use a host in the US. For example, you can host it yourself or on a VPS far away from the US.”

            mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM janvlug@mastodon.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • lucyinchat@app.wafrn.netL lucyinchat@app.wafrn.net

              @janvlug@mastodon.social @mihamarkic@mastodon.social

              A slightly clearer way to say this: “Well, yeah. But you don’t have to use a host in the US. For example, you can host it yourself or on a VPS far away from the US.”

              mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mihamarkic@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #73

              @lucyinchat @janvlug It's not just do not host in the US. It's more like hosting with US providers where data might still be contained within the EU and at the same time not secure.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • lucyinchat@app.wafrn.netL lucyinchat@app.wafrn.net

                @janvlug@mastodon.social @mihamarkic@mastodon.social

                A slightly clearer way to say this: “Well, yeah. But you don’t have to use a host in the US. For example, you can host it yourself or on a VPS far away from the US.”

                janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                janvlug@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #74

                @lucyinchat

                Thanks, but let me add to this: if you use a host in e.g. the EU, but the company providing the host is a US company, you are still under US jurisdiction. So it is not the location of the host that is important, but the jurisdiction of the company providing the host.

                @mihamarkic

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • janvlug@mastodon.socialJ janvlug@mastodon.social

                  @okias @khleedril @signalapp

                  I agree on the fact that using third-party builds imposes a risk. Unfortunately, Signal has not been very #MobileLinux friendly. But I think things are getting better and better. There is als an official #appimage in the making. Not sure if it will run on arm64 though.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Major expansion of Signal for Linux, announces AppImage

                  Signal Desktop will soon be officially released as an AppImage. This will make Signal accessible on all Linux distributions, not just Debian-based systems.

                  favicon

                  AboutSignal (aboutsignal.com)

                  okias@floss.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  okias@floss.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  okias@floss.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #75

                  @janvlug @khleedril @signalapp it's same underlying tech (e.g. Electron), thus no. There is open big about arm64, but not much progress there.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S stonykark@mstdn.ca

                    @janvlug what languages are the APIs available in?

                    janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    janvlug@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #76

                    @stonykark I do not really understand your question. The API's of what? Are you referring to the #Librem5? The Librem 5 is basically just a Linux device. The operating system is by default #PureOS, a #Debian derivative.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • huntingdon@mstdn.socialH huntingdon@mstdn.social

                      @janvlug

                      Sure, everyone can have a Librem5 smartphone, if they want to pay double for it and triple for the monthly access and fees.

                      Great idea. Needs a more affordable business model.

                      janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      janvlug@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      janvlug@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #77

                      @huntingdon

                      Regarding the price see: https://mastodon.social/@janvlug/116510085888567116

                      There are no is no monthly fee for the #Librem5 itself. You can use it with the provider of your choice.

                      You can take a totally optional #PureOS subscription though: https://puri.sm/posts/pureos-optional-subscription-added-to-advance-development/ Such subscription will help funding the advancement of PureOS. Which in the end will also help the #MobileLinux eco system.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • aamfp@fosstodon.orgA aamfp@fosstodon.org

                        @janvlug
                        Except for the fact that they all are way out of my budget for a phone (I don't want to waste more than 200 € for a phone!), I'm not sure all "mandatory" apps I have to use are compatible with those phones (bank, government, SPID, school and health-related, ...) and anyway I won't spend such money unless I'm sure of that.
                        Sorry, would really love to switch (especially to EU phones!), but can't afford that.

                        debacle@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                        debacle@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                        debacle@framapiaf.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #78

                        @AAMfP @janvlug

                        I have a classic #Pinephone with #Mobian. Was around 240 € back then, IIRC. Of course, none of the apps you mentioned would work on it, which is one of the reasons I bought that #smartphone in the first place 🙂 I don't want such apps, if they aren't #freeSoftware.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups