Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Nothing gives Israel a special right to invade neighbors, bulldoze their homes, and create a DMZ.

Nothing gives Israel a special right to invade neighbors, bulldoze their homes, and create a DMZ.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
192 Posts 40 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mcnado@mstdn.socialM mcnado@mstdn.social

    Nothing gives Israel a special right to invade neighbors, bulldoze their homes, and create a DMZ.

    US voters must make anyone supporting the Israeli state unelectable until support for this bullshit stops.

    netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    netraven@hear-me.social
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @mcnado Ultimately it comes to AIPAC and shadow money which banks are happy to facilitate. Unless the banks are regulated and forced to pay for their crimes, then this will never stop. The banks can't be regulated without getting good candidates in... which can't get in because... circular logic. We're back to the billions of dollars spent bribing officials.

    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
      R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
    • netraven@hear-me.socialN netraven@hear-me.social

      @mcnado Ultimately it comes to AIPAC and shadow money which banks are happy to facilitate. Unless the banks are regulated and forced to pay for their crimes, then this will never stop. The banks can't be regulated without getting good candidates in... which can't get in because... circular logic. We're back to the billions of dollars spent bribing officials.

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @Netraven @mcnado

      yeah but despite all of the shadow money we can still vote

      especially in the primaries coming up

      so many elections are decided by such a small percentage

      and such a large percentage don't vote

      yeah not all of them are leftists but if leftists did show up imagine the difference

      the problem is this sort of mindless cynicism, that something is inevitable. it's not

      vote, assholes

      why would anyone give dark money what it wants by not voting?

      pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP pascaline@mastodon.nlP 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • mcnado@mstdn.socialM mcnado@mstdn.social

        Nothing gives Israel a special right to invade neighbors, bulldoze their homes, and create a DMZ.

        US voters must make anyone supporting the Israeli state unelectable until support for this bullshit stops.

        crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        crazyeddie@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @mcnado I guess I'm off the hook for voting ever again then 😛

        Except my non-vote doesn't do anything but increase the value of any other vote so...

        I can't even kill myself to stop supporting those fucks.

        pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC crazyeddie@mastodon.social

          @mcnado I guess I'm off the hook for voting ever again then 😛

          Except my non-vote doesn't do anything but increase the value of any other vote so...

          I can't even kill myself to stop supporting those fucks.

          pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          pine_affinity@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          why are you pretending like third parties don’t exist?
          @crazyeddie @mcnado

          crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

            @Netraven @mcnado

            yeah but despite all of the shadow money we can still vote

            especially in the primaries coming up

            so many elections are decided by such a small percentage

            and such a large percentage don't vote

            yeah not all of them are leftists but if leftists did show up imagine the difference

            the problem is this sort of mindless cynicism, that something is inevitable. it's not

            vote, assholes

            why would anyone give dark money what it wants by not voting?

            pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            pine_affinity@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            why would I vote for this party?
            https://www.commondreams.org/news/schumer-israel-aid
            @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

            benroyce@mastodon.socialB screwturn@mastodon.socialS tagyourtoe@mastodon.socialT 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP pine_affinity@mastodon.social

              why are you pretending like third parties don’t exist?
              @crazyeddie @mcnado

              crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              crazyeddie@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @Pine_Affinity @mcnado Because they don't.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP pine_affinity@mastodon.social

                why would I vote for this party?
                https://www.commondreams.org/news/schumer-israel-aid
                @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @Pine_Affinity @Netraven @mcnado

                you don't vote for them

                you show up in the primaries and you replace them

                the problem is this "dems suck" whine then people don't show up in the primaries out of useless pathetic indolence. so nothing changes

                pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                  @Pine_Affinity @Netraven @mcnado

                  you don't vote for them

                  you show up in the primaries and you replace them

                  the problem is this "dems suck" whine then people don't show up in the primaries out of useless pathetic indolence. so nothing changes

                  pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pine_affinity@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  The Hill believes a leadership change is unlikely.
                  https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5807683-schumer-future-senate-leadership/
                  @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB thepoliticalcat@mastodon.socialT 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP pine_affinity@mastodon.social

                    The Hill believes a leadership change is unlikely.
                    https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5807683-schumer-future-senate-leadership/
                    @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @Pine_Affinity @Netraven @mcnado

                    this is an inversion of responsibility

                    if you vote, the party answers to you

                    if you don't vote, the party answers to dark money and spineless centrists who do vote

                    if we vote, we may fail. if we don't vote, we *will* fail. so why would you want to define your political consciousness as acceptance of fascism? you understand that is what your cynical "unlikely" is about right? cynicism is acceptance. do you accept fascism? i don't think so. so vote

                    pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                      @Pine_Affinity @Netraven @mcnado

                      this is an inversion of responsibility

                      if you vote, the party answers to you

                      if you don't vote, the party answers to dark money and spineless centrists who do vote

                      if we vote, we may fail. if we don't vote, we *will* fail. so why would you want to define your political consciousness as acceptance of fascism? you understand that is what your cynical "unlikely" is about right? cynicism is acceptance. do you accept fascism? i don't think so. so vote

                      pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pine_affinity@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      It’s not my cynicism, it’s an assertion by The Hill.
                      Pockets of Dems have been calling for him to step down for over a year and here we are. By what mechanism will that change?
                      @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB a_minion@mastodon.socialA 06fxsts@mastodon.online0 A 4 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP pine_affinity@mastodon.social

                        It’s not my cynicism, it’s an assertion by The Hill.
                        Pockets of Dems have been calling for him to step down for over a year and here we are. By what mechanism will that change?
                        @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @Pine_Affinity @Netraven @mcnado

                        by voting

                        sitting back and passing your responsibility to dem leadership to magically change is absurdity

                        i am confused why you think that's a valid position

                        you mob the primaries, you replace them

                        proof it works?

                        mamdani

                        dem centrists opposed him every step of the way. and yet he won

                        how?

                        because people showed the fuck up

                        you have to change the way you think about the problem

                        don't depend upon assholes who will never change to change

                        vote

                        pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                          @Pine_Affinity @Netraven @mcnado

                          by voting

                          sitting back and passing your responsibility to dem leadership to magically change is absurdity

                          i am confused why you think that's a valid position

                          you mob the primaries, you replace them

                          proof it works?

                          mamdani

                          dem centrists opposed him every step of the way. and yet he won

                          how?

                          because people showed the fuck up

                          you have to change the way you think about the problem

                          don't depend upon assholes who will never change to change

                          vote

                          pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pine_affinity@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          Asking them to eject a leader who illegally and unconditionally supports a genocidal nation is wanting magic?

                          This should be the bare minimum to exist as a political party much less a human being.

                          @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB screwturn@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP pine_affinity@mastodon.social

                            Asking them to eject a leader who illegally and unconditionally supports a genocidal nation is wanting magic?

                            This should be the bare minimum to exist as a political party much less a human being.

                            @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @Pine_Affinity @Netraven @mcnado

                            if no one on the left shows up, spineless corporatist dems win, because spineless corporatist dems show up to vote

                            but what you are saying is you want people you know are rotten to the core to suddenly and magically grow a conscience and resign?

                            rather than, you know, just getting off your ass and voting them out?

                            that's the way it works

                            why would you argue against the only way to remove them, and argue for a behavior which ensures their continuing power?

                            pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP pascaline@mastodon.nlP 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                              @Pine_Affinity @Netraven @mcnado

                              if no one on the left shows up, spineless corporatist dems win, because spineless corporatist dems show up to vote

                              but what you are saying is you want people you know are rotten to the core to suddenly and magically grow a conscience and resign?

                              rather than, you know, just getting off your ass and voting them out?

                              that's the way it works

                              why would you argue against the only way to remove them, and argue for a behavior which ensures their continuing power?

                              pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pine_affinity@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              Because that doesn’t work.

                              Link Preview Image
                              Chuck Schumer responds to growing anger after he agreed to Republican spending bills

                              Senate Minority Leader rejected any calls for his resignation, standing behind his decision to vote with Republicans to keep the government open

                              favicon

                              The Independent (www.independent.co.uk)

                              @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

                              J benroyce@mastodon.socialB screwturn@mastodon.socialS popolon@snac2.popolon.orgP 4 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP pine_affinity@mastodon.social

                                Because that doesn’t work.

                                Link Preview Image
                                Chuck Schumer responds to growing anger after he agreed to Republican spending bills

                                Senate Minority Leader rejected any calls for his resignation, standing behind his decision to vote with Republicans to keep the government open

                                favicon

                                The Independent (www.independent.co.uk)

                                @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

                                J This user is from outside of this forum
                                J This user is from outside of this forum
                                jakekb@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @Pine_Affinity @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado I really don't understand why can't Americans accept that the democratic party is an imperialist party for the elites that doesn't answer to its people. Why can't you build actual grassroot movements and put forward your own candidates that are not compromised by the democratic party systems of control? Far easier task than changing the democratic party from within.

                                pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP benroyce@mastodon.socialB mikelovesbikes@hear-me.socialM 3 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                  @Netraven @mcnado

                                  yeah but despite all of the shadow money we can still vote

                                  especially in the primaries coming up

                                  so many elections are decided by such a small percentage

                                  and such a large percentage don't vote

                                  yeah not all of them are leftists but if leftists did show up imagine the difference

                                  the problem is this sort of mindless cynicism, that something is inevitable. it's not

                                  vote, assholes

                                  why would anyone give dark money what it wants by not voting?

                                  pascaline@mastodon.nlP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pascaline@mastodon.nlP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pascaline@mastodon.nl
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @benroyce

                                  Yes! Voting!
                                  And not be purists who only vote for The Perfect Candidate. Because not voting for The Perfect Candidate means voting by omission: for the bad guys.

                                  @Netraven @mcnado

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J jakekb@mastodon.social

                                    @Pine_Affinity @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado I really don't understand why can't Americans accept that the democratic party is an imperialist party for the elites that doesn't answer to its people. Why can't you build actual grassroot movements and put forward your own candidates that are not compromised by the democratic party systems of control? Far easier task than changing the democratic party from within.

                                    pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pine_affinity@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    It’s like brainwashing. We’ve been voting for ‘the best possible’ Dem candidates for decades and it brought us to this exact moment.

                                    @JakeKb @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB screwturn@mastodon.socialS a_minion@mastodon.socialA 3 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J jakekb@mastodon.social

                                      @Pine_Affinity @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado I really don't understand why can't Americans accept that the democratic party is an imperialist party for the elites that doesn't answer to its people. Why can't you build actual grassroot movements and put forward your own candidates that are not compromised by the democratic party systems of control? Far easier task than changing the democratic party from within.

                                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      @JakeKb @Pine_Affinity @Netraven @mcnado

                                      a 3rd party divides the left vote and ensures MAGA domination

                                      we need to take over the democrats. i don't like it. it's just the most feasible option

                                      the problem with international observers like yourself is you come from a different voting system

                                      the usa is FPTP

                                      meaning there will only ever be 2 parties (we need RCV to fix that)

                                      it's not corruption, it's math

                                      educate yourself before commenting on the matter next time:

                                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger%27s_law

                                      pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                        @Pine_Affinity @Netraven @mcnado

                                        if no one on the left shows up, spineless corporatist dems win, because spineless corporatist dems show up to vote

                                        but what you are saying is you want people you know are rotten to the core to suddenly and magically grow a conscience and resign?

                                        rather than, you know, just getting off your ass and voting them out?

                                        that's the way it works

                                        why would you argue against the only way to remove them, and argue for a behavior which ensures their continuing power?

                                        pascaline@mastodon.nlP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pascaline@mastodon.nlP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pascaline@mastodon.nl
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @benroyce

                                        There is ALWAYS something one won't agree with. People always have something to complain about, something they miss, they can have different opinions on something.
                                        It is all about moving in the right, general direction. Holding hands with one another, moving together, getting on the bus accepting annoying stops, but knowing that in the end, we will end up where we want to be, and in the process getting rid of those who are not willing to move.

                                        @Pine_Affinity @Netraven @mcnado

                                        pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • pine_affinity@mastodon.socialP pine_affinity@mastodon.social

                                          It’s like brainwashing. We’ve been voting for ‘the best possible’ Dem candidates for decades and it brought us to this exact moment.

                                          @JakeKb @benroyce @Netraven @mcnado

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @Pine_Affinity @JakeKb @Netraven @mcnado

                                          on the contrary, it's people not voting because they are uneducated how our voting system works that makes us stuck

                                          we can't have 3rd parties

                                          not because of corruption, but because of math

                                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger%27s_law

                                          we need ranked choice voting to fix that

                                          then we can have stable viable 3rd parties

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups