Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 9GW datacentre approved.

9GW datacentre approved.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
109 Posts 68 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • shivviness@beige.partyS shivviness@beige.party

    @quixoticgeek

    People need to understand that these datacentres are not just for generating fun pics, they're intended to replace workers en masse, and they're going to ultimately replaces wages.

    And there's no way Universal Basic Income will be even considered, and notwithstanding the BS that Musk has been spouting recently in favour of UBI.

    pst@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
    pst@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
    pst@tldr.nettime.org
    wrote last edited by
    #50

    @Shivviness
    Add to this the surveillance/analysis/control (Palantir) that will be run on these systems.

    @quixoticgeek

    shivviness@beige.partyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo

      @quixoticgeek hang on the thing runs on gas, so an f1 engine gives a vague idea of how much gas its going to need. ~A Saturn five first stage fuel tank every fifteen minutes (rounding to a nice round number)

      If you've ever seen a person standing next to a Saturn five you have an idea how utterly absurd an amount of fuel that is.

      With out the pipeline that places shuts down. And we thought the back hoe through the fiber link was a bad problem.

      profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
      profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
      profpatsch@mastodon.xyz
      wrote last edited by
      #51

      @mindpersephone @quixoticgeek Okay those comparisons are kind of really unusable, you should compare a GW to the average electricity use of about 1 million homes (without heating/cooling)

      profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP profpatsch@mastodon.xyz

        @mindpersephone @quixoticgeek Okay those comparisons are kind of really unusable, you should compare a GW to the average electricity use of about 1 million homes (without heating/cooling)

        profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
        profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
        profpatsch@mastodon.xyz
        wrote last edited by
        #52

        @mindpersephone @quixoticgeek The question here is if there’s a market to this much compute, do you think the average person will consume an extra 1kW for inference in 2030? Maybe in the US where natural gas is free right now.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pst@tldr.nettime.orgP pst@tldr.nettime.org

          @Shivviness
          Add to this the surveillance/analysis/control (Palantir) that will be run on these systems.

          @quixoticgeek

          shivviness@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
          shivviness@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
          shivviness@beige.party
          wrote last edited by
          #53

          @pst @quixoticgeek

          Precisely.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

            @CppGuy you'd need 45km² of solar to generate 9GW or solar, but assuming the sun is only out for a ⅓rd of the time, you'd probably need closer to 135km², plus the battery storage...

            moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
            moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
            moopet@toot.cafe
            wrote last edited by
            #54

            @quixoticgeek @CppGuy make the solar array 1km wide and run it around the equator. Punctuate it with datacentres every 45km and turn them on and off as the sun goes around. Simple.

            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • moopet@toot.cafeM moopet@toot.cafe

              @quixoticgeek @CppGuy make the solar array 1km wide and run it around the equator. Punctuate it with datacentres every 45km and turn them on and off as the sun goes around. Simple.

              quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quixoticgeek@social.v.st
              wrote last edited by
              #55

              @moopet @CppGuy datacentre workloads are not despatchable. Also most of the equator is under water.

              moopet@toot.cafeM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                @moopet @CppGuy datacentre workloads are not despatchable. Also most of the equator is under water.

                moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                moopet@toot.cafe
                wrote last edited by
                #56

                @quixoticgeek @CppGuy they can fill floats with natural gas and extend the road over the sea.

                andniz@c.imA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                  Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                  Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                  The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                  timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                  timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                  timwardcam@c.im
                  wrote last edited by
                  #57

                  @quixoticgeek But if it's in a desert it's using locally produced solar power with zero emissions, isn't it?

                  vatvslpr@c.imV 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                    9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                    Link Preview Image
                    New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                    The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                    favicon

                    Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                    accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    accordionbruce@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #58

                    @quixoticgeek @inthehands
                    They just need to add a geothermal plant to run on the extreme heat generated by the data center

                    And feed that power back to run the data center ♻️

                    Free energy! ⚡️

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP peteriskrisjanis@toot.lv

                      @freya @quixoticgeek yeah this pretty much a scam project, considering that AI usage is falling and crash is inevitable

                      lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lovemakeshare@sunny.garden
                      wrote last edited by
                      #59

                      @peteriskrisjanis @freya @quixoticgeek This was my immediate reaction. Almost none of these projects are actually building anything - it's all an imitation of growth on paper.

                      I miss when these companies made things.

                      Also on behalf of Canada I apologize for Kevin O'Leary, although he has tried his best to distance himself from us for decades.

                      jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                        9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                        Link Preview Image
                        New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                        The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                        favicon

                        Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                        twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        twipped@twipped.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #60

                        @quixoticgeek it's running on methane, so it emits NOx and SOx instead of CO2.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mycotropic@beige.partyM mycotropic@beige.party

                          @ehproque @quixoticgeek

                          See the Colorado River is filled up with water from snow melt that's is eternal, neverending and limitless so.......

                          ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                          ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                          ehproque@neopaquita.es
                          wrote last edited by
                          #61

                          @mycotropic @quixoticgeek as one of tens of non-Americans, I had to look it up and it looks like it's doing great!

                          Link Preview Image
                          mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                            9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                            Link Preview Image
                            New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                            The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                            favicon

                            Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                            freyjfreyj@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                            freyjfreyj@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                            freyjfreyj@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #62

                            @quixoticgeek It's not approved yet. Let's hope it never gets approved.
                            https://www.ksl.com/article/51489496/amid-questions-and-concerns-box-elder-county-leaders-delay-action-on-data-center-proposal

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                              9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                              Link Preview Image
                              New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                              The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                              favicon

                              Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                              aznorth@framapiaf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                              aznorth@framapiaf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                              aznorth@framapiaf.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #63

                              @quixoticgeek
                              lmao wtf is this world mg ngl doomed we all are… T_T

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • remittancegirl@mstdn.socialR remittancegirl@mstdn.social

                                @quixoticgeek And not a single panel of solar?

                                And... when it fails, will they turn it into another detention centre for people they don't like?

                                tubemeister@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tubemeister@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tubemeister@mstdn.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #64

                                @Remittancegirl @quixoticgeek Covering the whole thing in solar panels would still be just a tiny drop in the ocean of that 9 GW though.

                                Take one of those solar car ports as an example I happen to have some data for: Roughly 70x15 meter, with 360 solar panels. Its max power output ever is 164 kW. That's about 450W per panel, pretty much its theoretical maximum capacity.

                                You'd need over 50000 of these things to get to 9 GW and that's before you factor in things like clouds, and nights.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ehproque@neopaquita.esE ehproque@neopaquita.es

                                  @mycotropic @quixoticgeek as one of tens of non-Americans, I had to look it up and it looks like it's doing great!

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mycotropic@beige.party
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #65

                                  @ehproque @quixoticgeek

                                  "Water for the Las Vegas valley is piped from the bottom of Lake Mead, through what is known as “the third straw.” The Southern Nevada Water Authority built that pipe at a cost of around $1.5 billion, and it is the only pipe operating now. The two others are no longer below the lake’s surface.

                                  The Colorado River supplies 90% of the water for Southern Nevada, and provides water for 40 million people on its course to the Mexican border and out to the Gulf of California."

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Water woes: Colorado River getting less snow, sending projections for Lake Mead lower

                                  Forecasts keep going from bad to worse for water in the West, and a new report released Friday brought more bad news for the outlook at Lake Mead.

                                  favicon

                                  KLAS (www.8newsnow.com)

                                  As long as the policy is "do not use water in any way" then I agree with that article!

                                  ehproque@neopaquita.esE quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • bouriquet@mastodon.socialB bouriquet@mastodon.social

                                    @quixoticgeek That means 6GW of heat get dissipated into the atmosphere one way or another. Energy is neither created nor destroyed, just released into the atmosphere from where it was bound up as natural gas.
                                    What’s the impact of 6GW of additional heat on the climate?

                                    iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    iwein@mas.to
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #66

                                    @bouriquet not much.

                                    The heat itself from the datacenter is negligible compared to other sources of heat from the earth's perspective.

                                    The CO2 emissions however are the problem, because they help trap heat from the sun.

                                    The sun irradiates the earth with ~0.18EW which is around 10.000 times the power that human civilization uses in total. So adding a few GW to that isn't going to move the needle.

                                    Except these datacenters run on fossil fuel 🤦‍♂️

                                    @quixoticgeek

                                    bouriquet@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                      Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                                      Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                                      The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                                      iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      iwein@mas.to
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #67

                                      @quixoticgeek how is it going to change weather patterns? It certainly might, I guess, but are there any simulations of this that you know of?

                                      quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                        Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                                        Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                                        The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                                        jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jmaris@eupolicy.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #68

                                        @quixoticgeek my hope is none of this dumb shit ever gets built and the bubble bursts well before that.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mycotropic@beige.partyM mycotropic@beige.party

                                          @ehproque @quixoticgeek

                                          "Water for the Las Vegas valley is piped from the bottom of Lake Mead, through what is known as “the third straw.” The Southern Nevada Water Authority built that pipe at a cost of around $1.5 billion, and it is the only pipe operating now. The two others are no longer below the lake’s surface.

                                          The Colorado River supplies 90% of the water for Southern Nevada, and provides water for 40 million people on its course to the Mexican border and out to the Gulf of California."

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Water woes: Colorado River getting less snow, sending projections for Lake Mead lower

                                          Forecasts keep going from bad to worse for water in the West, and a new report released Friday brought more bad news for the outlook at Lake Mead.

                                          favicon

                                          KLAS (www.8newsnow.com)

                                          As long as the policy is "do not use water in any way" then I agree with that article!

                                          ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ehproque@neopaquita.es
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #69

                                          @mycotropic @quixoticgeek you could make it policy that it has to rain every day

                                          mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups