Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 9GW datacentre approved.

9GW datacentre approved.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
109 Posts 68 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP peteriskrisjanis@toot.lv

    @freya @quixoticgeek yeah this pretty much a scam project, considering that AI usage is falling and crash is inevitable

    lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
    lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
    lovemakeshare@sunny.garden
    wrote last edited by
    #59

    @peteriskrisjanis @freya @quixoticgeek This was my immediate reaction. Almost none of these projects are actually building anything - it's all an imitation of growth on paper.

    I miss when these companies made things.

    Also on behalf of Canada I apologize for Kevin O'Leary, although he has tried his best to distance himself from us for decades.

    jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

      9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

      Link Preview Image
      New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

      The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

      favicon

      Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

      twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      twipped@twipped.social
      wrote last edited by
      #60

      @quixoticgeek it's running on methane, so it emits NOx and SOx instead of CO2.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mycotropic@beige.partyM mycotropic@beige.party

        @ehproque @quixoticgeek

        See the Colorado River is filled up with water from snow melt that's is eternal, neverending and limitless so.......

        ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
        ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
        ehproque@neopaquita.es
        wrote last edited by
        #61

        @mycotropic @quixoticgeek as one of tens of non-Americans, I had to look it up and it looks like it's doing great!

        Link Preview Image
        mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

          9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

          Link Preview Image
          New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

          The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

          favicon

          Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

          freyjfreyj@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          freyjfreyj@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          freyjfreyj@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #62

          @quixoticgeek It's not approved yet. Let's hope it never gets approved.
          https://www.ksl.com/article/51489496/amid-questions-and-concerns-box-elder-county-leaders-delay-action-on-data-center-proposal

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

            9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

            Link Preview Image
            New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

            The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

            favicon

            Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

            aznorth@framapiaf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
            aznorth@framapiaf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
            aznorth@framapiaf.org
            wrote last edited by
            #63

            @quixoticgeek
            lmao wtf is this world mg ngl doomed we all are… T_T

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • remittancegirl@mstdn.socialR remittancegirl@mstdn.social

              @quixoticgeek And not a single panel of solar?

              And... when it fails, will they turn it into another detention centre for people they don't like?

              tubemeister@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
              tubemeister@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
              tubemeister@mstdn.social
              wrote last edited by
              #64

              @Remittancegirl @quixoticgeek Covering the whole thing in solar panels would still be just a tiny drop in the ocean of that 9 GW though.

              Take one of those solar car ports as an example I happen to have some data for: Roughly 70x15 meter, with 360 solar panels. Its max power output ever is 164 kW. That's about 450W per panel, pretty much its theoretical maximum capacity.

              You'd need over 50000 of these things to get to 9 GW and that's before you factor in things like clouds, and nights.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ehproque@neopaquita.esE ehproque@neopaquita.es

                @mycotropic @quixoticgeek as one of tens of non-Americans, I had to look it up and it looks like it's doing great!

                Link Preview Image
                mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                mycotropic@beige.party
                wrote last edited by
                #65

                @ehproque @quixoticgeek

                "Water for the Las Vegas valley is piped from the bottom of Lake Mead, through what is known as “the third straw.” The Southern Nevada Water Authority built that pipe at a cost of around $1.5 billion, and it is the only pipe operating now. The two others are no longer below the lake’s surface.

                The Colorado River supplies 90% of the water for Southern Nevada, and provides water for 40 million people on its course to the Mexican border and out to the Gulf of California."

                Link Preview Image
                Water woes: Colorado River getting less snow, sending projections for Lake Mead lower

                Forecasts keep going from bad to worse for water in the West, and a new report released Friday brought more bad news for the outlook at Lake Mead.

                favicon

                KLAS (www.8newsnow.com)

                As long as the policy is "do not use water in any way" then I agree with that article!

                ehproque@neopaquita.esE quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • bouriquet@mastodon.socialB bouriquet@mastodon.social

                  @quixoticgeek That means 6GW of heat get dissipated into the atmosphere one way or another. Energy is neither created nor destroyed, just released into the atmosphere from where it was bound up as natural gas.
                  What’s the impact of 6GW of additional heat on the climate?

                  iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                  iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                  iwein@mas.to
                  wrote last edited by
                  #66

                  @bouriquet not much.

                  The heat itself from the datacenter is negligible compared to other sources of heat from the earth's perspective.

                  The CO2 emissions however are the problem, because they help trap heat from the sun.

                  The sun irradiates the earth with ~0.18EW which is around 10.000 times the power that human civilization uses in total. So adding a few GW to that isn't going to move the needle.

                  Except these datacenters run on fossil fuel 🤦‍♂️

                  @quixoticgeek

                  bouriquet@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                    Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                    Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                    The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                    iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                    iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                    iwein@mas.to
                    wrote last edited by
                    #67

                    @quixoticgeek how is it going to change weather patterns? It certainly might, I guess, but are there any simulations of this that you know of?

                    quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                      Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                      Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                      The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                      jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jmaris@eupolicy.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #68

                      @quixoticgeek my hope is none of this dumb shit ever gets built and the bubble bursts well before that.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mycotropic@beige.partyM mycotropic@beige.party

                        @ehproque @quixoticgeek

                        "Water for the Las Vegas valley is piped from the bottom of Lake Mead, through what is known as “the third straw.” The Southern Nevada Water Authority built that pipe at a cost of around $1.5 billion, and it is the only pipe operating now. The two others are no longer below the lake’s surface.

                        The Colorado River supplies 90% of the water for Southern Nevada, and provides water for 40 million people on its course to the Mexican border and out to the Gulf of California."

                        Link Preview Image
                        Water woes: Colorado River getting less snow, sending projections for Lake Mead lower

                        Forecasts keep going from bad to worse for water in the West, and a new report released Friday brought more bad news for the outlook at Lake Mead.

                        favicon

                        KLAS (www.8newsnow.com)

                        As long as the policy is "do not use water in any way" then I agree with that article!

                        ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                        ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                        ehproque@neopaquita.es
                        wrote last edited by
                        #69

                        @mycotropic @quixoticgeek you could make it policy that it has to rain every day

                        mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mycotropic@beige.partyM mycotropic@beige.party

                          @ehproque @quixoticgeek

                          "Water for the Las Vegas valley is piped from the bottom of Lake Mead, through what is known as “the third straw.” The Southern Nevada Water Authority built that pipe at a cost of around $1.5 billion, and it is the only pipe operating now. The two others are no longer below the lake’s surface.

                          The Colorado River supplies 90% of the water for Southern Nevada, and provides water for 40 million people on its course to the Mexican border and out to the Gulf of California."

                          Link Preview Image
                          Water woes: Colorado River getting less snow, sending projections for Lake Mead lower

                          Forecasts keep going from bad to worse for water in the West, and a new report released Friday brought more bad news for the outlook at Lake Mead.

                          favicon

                          KLAS (www.8newsnow.com)

                          As long as the policy is "do not use water in any way" then I agree with that article!

                          quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                          quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                          quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                          wrote last edited by
                          #70

                          @mycotropic @ehproque

                          That's why the Colorado river never makes it as far as the sea. The whole river gets stolen.

                          https://youtu.be/_0U0YWsuFpU?

                          wesdym@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • iwein@mas.toI iwein@mas.to

                            @quixoticgeek how is it going to change weather patterns? It certainly might, I guess, but are there any simulations of this that you know of?

                            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                            quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                            wrote last edited by
                            #71

                            @iwein well evaporative cooling puts a shit ton of moisture in the atmosphere.

                            iwein@mas.toI 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                              9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                              Link Preview Image
                              New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                              The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                              favicon

                              Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                              dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dianea@lgbtqia.space
                              wrote last edited by
                              #72

                              @quixoticgeek

                              9GW of datacenter... how many Unix shell accounts, UseNet News servers, Nginx web servers, is that? Will that serve a trillion times the number of people on this planet? Does this mean I can download my favorite Linux distribution faster?

                              Wow...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                Link Preview Image
                                New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                favicon

                                Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                natesiggard@m.ai6yr.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                natesiggard@m.ai6yr.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                natesiggard@m.ai6yr.org
                                wrote last edited by
                                #73

                                @quixoticgeek I wonder how that salt dust will do to the servers when blowing off the dry lake bed after they kill it?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                  @iwein well evaporative cooling puts a shit ton of moisture in the atmosphere.

                                  iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  iwein@mas.to
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #74

                                  @quixoticgeek yes, and significant heat, so possibly extra rain locally?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL lovemakeshare@sunny.garden

                                    @peteriskrisjanis @freya @quixoticgeek This was my immediate reaction. Almost none of these projects are actually building anything - it's all an imitation of growth on paper.

                                    I miss when these companies made things.

                                    Also on behalf of Canada I apologize for Kevin O'Leary, although he has tried his best to distance himself from us for decades.

                                    jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jpaskaruk@growers.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #75

                                    @lovemakeshare @peteriskrisjanis @freya @quixoticgeek that fucking piece of fuck

                                    lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • moopet@toot.cafeM moopet@toot.cafe

                                      @quixoticgeek @CppGuy they can fill floats with natural gas and extend the road over the sea.

                                      andniz@c.imA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      andniz@c.imA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      andniz@c.im
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #76

                                      @moopet @quixoticgeek @CppGuy still a better idea than data centers in orbit

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                        9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                        The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                        favicon

                                        Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                        kentnavalesi@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kentnavalesi@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kentnavalesi@mstdn.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #77

                                        @quixoticgeek That bubble can't burst soon enough.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • timwardcam@c.imT timwardcam@c.im

                                          @quixoticgeek But if it's in a desert it's using locally produced solar power with zero emissions, isn't it?

                                          vatvslpr@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                                          vatvslpr@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                                          vatvslpr@c.im
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #78

                                          @TimWardCam @quixoticgeek
                                          Of course not. If you read the article, it's going to be using some kind of natural gas powered generation, "At full buildout, the campus would reach 9 GW, all produced on-site through a connection to the Ruby Pipeline, a 680-mile interstate natural gas line that crosses northern Utah on its route from Wyoming to Oregon."

                                          vatvslpr@c.imV 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups