Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 9GW datacentre approved.

9GW datacentre approved.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
109 Posts 68 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

    Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

    Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

    The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

    jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jmaris@eupolicy.social
    wrote last edited by
    #68

    @quixoticgeek my hope is none of this dumb shit ever gets built and the bubble bursts well before that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mycotropic@beige.partyM mycotropic@beige.party

      @ehproque @quixoticgeek

      "Water for the Las Vegas valley is piped from the bottom of Lake Mead, through what is known as “the third straw.” The Southern Nevada Water Authority built that pipe at a cost of around $1.5 billion, and it is the only pipe operating now. The two others are no longer below the lake’s surface.

      The Colorado River supplies 90% of the water for Southern Nevada, and provides water for 40 million people on its course to the Mexican border and out to the Gulf of California."

      Link Preview Image
      Water woes: Colorado River getting less snow, sending projections for Lake Mead lower

      Forecasts keep going from bad to worse for water in the West, and a new report released Friday brought more bad news for the outlook at Lake Mead.

      favicon

      KLAS (www.8newsnow.com)

      As long as the policy is "do not use water in any way" then I agree with that article!

      ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
      ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
      ehproque@neopaquita.es
      wrote last edited by
      #69

      @mycotropic @quixoticgeek you could make it policy that it has to rain every day

      mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mycotropic@beige.partyM mycotropic@beige.party

        @ehproque @quixoticgeek

        "Water for the Las Vegas valley is piped from the bottom of Lake Mead, through what is known as “the third straw.” The Southern Nevada Water Authority built that pipe at a cost of around $1.5 billion, and it is the only pipe operating now. The two others are no longer below the lake’s surface.

        The Colorado River supplies 90% of the water for Southern Nevada, and provides water for 40 million people on its course to the Mexican border and out to the Gulf of California."

        Link Preview Image
        Water woes: Colorado River getting less snow, sending projections for Lake Mead lower

        Forecasts keep going from bad to worse for water in the West, and a new report released Friday brought more bad news for the outlook at Lake Mead.

        favicon

        KLAS (www.8newsnow.com)

        As long as the policy is "do not use water in any way" then I agree with that article!

        quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
        quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
        quixoticgeek@social.v.st
        wrote last edited by
        #70

        @mycotropic @ehproque

        That's why the Colorado river never makes it as far as the sea. The whole river gets stolen.

        https://youtu.be/_0U0YWsuFpU?

        wesdym@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • iwein@mas.toI iwein@mas.to

          @quixoticgeek how is it going to change weather patterns? It certainly might, I guess, but are there any simulations of this that you know of?

          quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
          quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
          quixoticgeek@social.v.st
          wrote last edited by
          #71

          @iwein well evaporative cooling puts a shit ton of moisture in the atmosphere.

          iwein@mas.toI 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

            9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

            Link Preview Image
            New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

            The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

            favicon

            Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

            dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dianea@lgbtqia.space
            wrote last edited by
            #72

            @quixoticgeek

            9GW of datacenter... how many Unix shell accounts, UseNet News servers, Nginx web servers, is that? Will that serve a trillion times the number of people on this planet? Does this mean I can download my favorite Linux distribution faster?

            Wow...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

              9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

              Link Preview Image
              New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

              The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

              favicon

              Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

              natesiggard@m.ai6yr.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
              natesiggard@m.ai6yr.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
              natesiggard@m.ai6yr.org
              wrote last edited by
              #73

              @quixoticgeek I wonder how that salt dust will do to the servers when blowing off the dry lake bed after they kill it?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                @iwein well evaporative cooling puts a shit ton of moisture in the atmosphere.

                iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                iwein@mas.to
                wrote last edited by
                #74

                @quixoticgeek yes, and significant heat, so possibly extra rain locally?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL lovemakeshare@sunny.garden

                  @peteriskrisjanis @freya @quixoticgeek This was my immediate reaction. Almost none of these projects are actually building anything - it's all an imitation of growth on paper.

                  I miss when these companies made things.

                  Also on behalf of Canada I apologize for Kevin O'Leary, although he has tried his best to distance himself from us for decades.

                  jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jpaskaruk@growers.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #75

                  @lovemakeshare @peteriskrisjanis @freya @quixoticgeek that fucking piece of fuck

                  lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • moopet@toot.cafeM moopet@toot.cafe

                    @quixoticgeek @CppGuy they can fill floats with natural gas and extend the road over the sea.

                    andniz@c.imA This user is from outside of this forum
                    andniz@c.imA This user is from outside of this forum
                    andniz@c.im
                    wrote last edited by
                    #76

                    @moopet @quixoticgeek @CppGuy still a better idea than data centers in orbit

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                      9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                      Link Preview Image
                      New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                      The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                      favicon

                      Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                      kentnavalesi@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kentnavalesi@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kentnavalesi@mstdn.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #77

                      @quixoticgeek That bubble can't burst soon enough.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • timwardcam@c.imT timwardcam@c.im

                        @quixoticgeek But if it's in a desert it's using locally produced solar power with zero emissions, isn't it?

                        vatvslpr@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                        vatvslpr@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                        vatvslpr@c.im
                        wrote last edited by
                        #78

                        @TimWardCam @quixoticgeek
                        Of course not. If you read the article, it's going to be using some kind of natural gas powered generation, "At full buildout, the campus would reach 9 GW, all produced on-site through a connection to the Ruby Pipeline, a 680-mile interstate natural gas line that crosses northern Utah on its route from Wyoming to Oregon."

                        vatvslpr@c.imV 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                          @ehproque dunno. I'm scared of the answer.

                          cppguy@infosec.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cppguy@infosec.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cppguy@infosec.space
                          wrote last edited by
                          #79

                          @quixoticgeek @ehproque

                          I did a back-of-the-envelope calculation a few months back, suggesting that 1GW is enough to evaporate 33 megalitres of water per day. Obviously, at 9GW, you're looking at nine times that. That number is obscenely, meaninglessly large, so picture a cube measuring 42m × 42m × 42m, fill it to the brim with room-temperature water, and then boil it all off in one day. That's the same volume as a decent-sized tower block.

                          Where are they going to find 300 megalitres a day in the desert? How long can they keep that up? How large are the aquifers they're depleting? What effect will it have on the stability of the ground they're building on? When they dump that much water and heat into the atmosphere every day, what effect will it have on the local climate? What effect will it have when the #AI bubble bursts and they stop doing it?

                          ehproque@neopaquita.esE 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • vatvslpr@c.imV vatvslpr@c.im

                            @TimWardCam @quixoticgeek
                            Of course not. If you read the article, it's going to be using some kind of natural gas powered generation, "At full buildout, the campus would reach 9 GW, all produced on-site through a connection to the Ruby Pipeline, a 680-mile interstate natural gas line that crosses northern Utah on its route from Wyoming to Oregon."

                            vatvslpr@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                            vatvslpr@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                            vatvslpr@c.im
                            wrote last edited by
                            #80

                            @TimWardCam @quixoticgeek
                            I don't know if the AI boom was designed specifically to justify building a bunch more fossil fuel powered generating capacity, but that sure looks like it's an effect. It stinks, because building a ton of renewable power would be a nice consolation prize for the AI boom collapsing.

                            rupert@mastodon.nzR 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ jpaskaruk@growers.social

                              @lovemakeshare @peteriskrisjanis @freya @quixoticgeek that fucking piece of fuck

                              lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lovemakeshare@sunny.garden
                              wrote last edited by
                              #81

                              @jpaskaruk @peteriskrisjanis @freya @quixoticgeek Not the *specific* words I would have used, but yes.

                              Did you know he acquired and killed The Learning Company so hard it almost took down Mattel? And maybe took the whole edutainment software industry with it? 'member that? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

                              Link Preview Image
                              SoftKey - Wikipedia

                              favicon

                              (en.wikipedia.org)

                              jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cppguy@infosec.spaceC cppguy@infosec.space

                                @quixoticgeek @ehproque

                                I did a back-of-the-envelope calculation a few months back, suggesting that 1GW is enough to evaporate 33 megalitres of water per day. Obviously, at 9GW, you're looking at nine times that. That number is obscenely, meaninglessly large, so picture a cube measuring 42m × 42m × 42m, fill it to the brim with room-temperature water, and then boil it all off in one day. That's the same volume as a decent-sized tower block.

                                Where are they going to find 300 megalitres a day in the desert? How long can they keep that up? How large are the aquifers they're depleting? What effect will it have on the stability of the ground they're building on? When they dump that much water and heat into the atmosphere every day, what effect will it have on the local climate? What effect will it have when the #AI bubble bursts and they stop doing it?

                                ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                ehproque@neopaquita.es
                                wrote last edited by
                                #82

                                @CppGuy @quixoticgeek where did they find the water to make a city in the desert? 🤷🏻‍♂️ They'll bring it from elsewhere. And what will the people of elsewhere drink? Brawndo! What your body craves!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                  9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                  The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                  favicon

                                  Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                  scm@sfba.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  scm@sfba.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  scm@sfba.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #83

                                  @quixoticgeek According to Wikipedia: “In 2024, Utah had a total summer capacity of 10.3 GW through all of its power plants”

                                  So it’s going to basically use the equivalent of all the power generated in Utah

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                    9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                    The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                    favicon

                                    Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                    dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dougfir@m.ai6yr.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #84

                                    @quixoticgeek
                                    Did you also note the proposed site is served by one 2 lane road? Back when they were building the natural gas pipeline, the one 6 room motel in the area was pretty busy. All other workers had to drive about 1½ hours from any sort of accommodation.

                                    dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                      9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                      The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                      favicon

                                      Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                      wtarbiat@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wtarbiat@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wtarbiat@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #85

                                      @quixoticgeek may not even get built lol.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • vatvslpr@c.imV vatvslpr@c.im

                                        @TimWardCam @quixoticgeek
                                        I don't know if the AI boom was designed specifically to justify building a bunch more fossil fuel powered generating capacity, but that sure looks like it's an effect. It stinks, because building a ton of renewable power would be a nice consolation prize for the AI boom collapsing.

                                        rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rupert@mastodon.nz
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #86

                                        @VATVSLPR @TimWardCam @quixoticgeek It's who's funding it.

                                        timwardcam@c.imT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ehproque@neopaquita.esE ehproque@neopaquita.es

                                          @quixoticgeek how much water then? Where's it coming from?

                                          dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dougfir@m.ai6yr.org
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #87

                                          @ehproque @quixoticgeek
                                          They claim they will pump groundwater, purify it because it is too salty as is, then send the hot water to the Great Salt Lake. This site is a long ways from the Colorado River.
                                          There is ample area out the covered only in salt grass to install enough solar power including batteries for nights and cloudy days to power the entire united states, let alone some data centers.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups