Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 9GW datacentre approved.

9GW datacentre approved.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
109 Posts 68 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • remittancegirl@mstdn.socialR remittancegirl@mstdn.social

    @quixoticgeek And not a single panel of solar?

    And... when it fails, will they turn it into another detention centre for people they don't like?

    mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
    mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
    mycotropic@beige.party
    wrote last edited by
    #46

    @Remittancegirl @quixoticgeek

    GPUs are going to be used for paving roads!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

      9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

      Link Preview Image
      New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

      The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

      favicon

      Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

      bouriquet@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bouriquet@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bouriquet@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #47

      @quixoticgeek That means 6GW of heat get dissipated into the atmosphere one way or another. Energy is neither created nor destroyed, just released into the atmosphere from where it was bound up as natural gas.
      What’s the impact of 6GW of additional heat on the climate?

      iwein@mas.toI 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

        9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

        Link Preview Image
        New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

        The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

        favicon

        Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

        zompetto@mastodon.artZ This user is from outside of this forum
        zompetto@mastodon.artZ This user is from outside of this forum
        zompetto@mastodon.art
        wrote last edited by
        #48

        @quixoticgeek as Ed Zitron loves to remind us, _approved_ does not mean it will ever get built.

        This will be fought tooth and nail at every inch of the process.

        - YouTube

        Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.

        favicon

        (www.youtube.com)

        Edit: fixed the name! Added a link.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

          Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

          Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

          The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

          naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
          naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
          naturemc@mastodon.online
          wrote last edited by
          #49

          @quixoticgeek plus the use of drinking water. In Spain, they already have desertification made by a data center ...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • shivviness@beige.partyS shivviness@beige.party

            @quixoticgeek

            People need to understand that these datacentres are not just for generating fun pics, they're intended to replace workers en masse, and they're going to ultimately replaces wages.

            And there's no way Universal Basic Income will be even considered, and notwithstanding the BS that Musk has been spouting recently in favour of UBI.

            pst@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
            pst@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
            pst@tldr.nettime.org
            wrote last edited by
            #50

            @Shivviness
            Add to this the surveillance/analysis/control (Palantir) that will be run on these systems.

            @quixoticgeek

            shivviness@beige.partyS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo

              @quixoticgeek hang on the thing runs on gas, so an f1 engine gives a vague idea of how much gas its going to need. ~A Saturn five first stage fuel tank every fifteen minutes (rounding to a nice round number)

              If you've ever seen a person standing next to a Saturn five you have an idea how utterly absurd an amount of fuel that is.

              With out the pipeline that places shuts down. And we thought the back hoe through the fiber link was a bad problem.

              profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
              profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
              profpatsch@mastodon.xyz
              wrote last edited by
              #51

              @mindpersephone @quixoticgeek Okay those comparisons are kind of really unusable, you should compare a GW to the average electricity use of about 1 million homes (without heating/cooling)

              profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP profpatsch@mastodon.xyz

                @mindpersephone @quixoticgeek Okay those comparisons are kind of really unusable, you should compare a GW to the average electricity use of about 1 million homes (without heating/cooling)

                profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
                profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
                profpatsch@mastodon.xyz
                wrote last edited by
                #52

                @mindpersephone @quixoticgeek The question here is if there’s a market to this much compute, do you think the average person will consume an extra 1kW for inference in 2030? Maybe in the US where natural gas is free right now.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • pst@tldr.nettime.orgP pst@tldr.nettime.org

                  @Shivviness
                  Add to this the surveillance/analysis/control (Palantir) that will be run on these systems.

                  @quixoticgeek

                  shivviness@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                  shivviness@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                  shivviness@beige.party
                  wrote last edited by
                  #53

                  @pst @quixoticgeek

                  Precisely.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                    @CppGuy you'd need 45km² of solar to generate 9GW or solar, but assuming the sun is only out for a ⅓rd of the time, you'd probably need closer to 135km², plus the battery storage...

                    moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    moopet@toot.cafe
                    wrote last edited by
                    #54

                    @quixoticgeek @CppGuy make the solar array 1km wide and run it around the equator. Punctuate it with datacentres every 45km and turn them on and off as the sun goes around. Simple.

                    quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • moopet@toot.cafeM moopet@toot.cafe

                      @quixoticgeek @CppGuy make the solar array 1km wide and run it around the equator. Punctuate it with datacentres every 45km and turn them on and off as the sun goes around. Simple.

                      quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                      quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                      quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                      wrote last edited by
                      #55

                      @moopet @CppGuy datacentre workloads are not despatchable. Also most of the equator is under water.

                      moopet@toot.cafeM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                        @moopet @CppGuy datacentre workloads are not despatchable. Also most of the equator is under water.

                        moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                        moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                        moopet@toot.cafe
                        wrote last edited by
                        #56

                        @quixoticgeek @CppGuy they can fill floats with natural gas and extend the road over the sea.

                        andniz@c.imA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                          Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                          Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                          The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                          timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                          timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                          timwardcam@c.im
                          wrote last edited by
                          #57

                          @quixoticgeek But if it's in a desert it's using locally produced solar power with zero emissions, isn't it?

                          vatvslpr@c.imV 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                            9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                            Link Preview Image
                            New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                            The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                            favicon

                            Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                            accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            accordionbruce@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #58

                            @quixoticgeek @inthehands
                            They just need to add a geothermal plant to run on the extreme heat generated by the data center

                            And feed that power back to run the data center ♻️

                            Free energy! ⚡️

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP peteriskrisjanis@toot.lv

                              @freya @quixoticgeek yeah this pretty much a scam project, considering that AI usage is falling and crash is inevitable

                              lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lovemakeshare@sunny.garden
                              wrote last edited by
                              #59

                              @peteriskrisjanis @freya @quixoticgeek This was my immediate reaction. Almost none of these projects are actually building anything - it's all an imitation of growth on paper.

                              I miss when these companies made things.

                              Also on behalf of Canada I apologize for Kevin O'Leary, although he has tried his best to distance himself from us for decades.

                              jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                Link Preview Image
                                New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                favicon

                                Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                twipped@twipped.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #60

                                @quixoticgeek it's running on methane, so it emits NOx and SOx instead of CO2.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mycotropic@beige.partyM mycotropic@beige.party

                                  @ehproque @quixoticgeek

                                  See the Colorado River is filled up with water from snow melt that's is eternal, neverending and limitless so.......

                                  ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ehproque@neopaquita.es
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #61

                                  @mycotropic @quixoticgeek as one of tens of non-Americans, I had to look it up and it looks like it's doing great!

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                    9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                    The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                    favicon

                                    Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                    freyjfreyj@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    freyjfreyj@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    freyjfreyj@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #62

                                    @quixoticgeek It's not approved yet. Let's hope it never gets approved.
                                    https://www.ksl.com/article/51489496/amid-questions-and-concerns-box-elder-county-leaders-delay-action-on-data-center-proposal

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                      9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                      The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                      favicon

                                      Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                      aznorth@framapiaf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      aznorth@framapiaf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      aznorth@framapiaf.org
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #63

                                      @quixoticgeek
                                      lmao wtf is this world mg ngl doomed we all are… T_T

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • remittancegirl@mstdn.socialR remittancegirl@mstdn.social

                                        @quixoticgeek And not a single panel of solar?

                                        And... when it fails, will they turn it into another detention centre for people they don't like?

                                        tubemeister@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tubemeister@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tubemeister@mstdn.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #64

                                        @Remittancegirl @quixoticgeek Covering the whole thing in solar panels would still be just a tiny drop in the ocean of that 9 GW though.

                                        Take one of those solar car ports as an example I happen to have some data for: Roughly 70x15 meter, with 360 solar panels. Its max power output ever is 164 kW. That's about 450W per panel, pretty much its theoretical maximum capacity.

                                        You'd need over 50000 of these things to get to 9 GW and that's before you factor in things like clouds, and nights.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ehproque@neopaquita.esE ehproque@neopaquita.es

                                          @mycotropic @quixoticgeek as one of tens of non-Americans, I had to look it up and it looks like it's doing great!

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mycotropic@beige.party
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #65

                                          @ehproque @quixoticgeek

                                          "Water for the Las Vegas valley is piped from the bottom of Lake Mead, through what is known as “the third straw.” The Southern Nevada Water Authority built that pipe at a cost of around $1.5 billion, and it is the only pipe operating now. The two others are no longer below the lake’s surface.

                                          The Colorado River supplies 90% of the water for Southern Nevada, and provides water for 40 million people on its course to the Mexican border and out to the Gulf of California."

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Water woes: Colorado River getting less snow, sending projections for Lake Mead lower

                                          Forecasts keep going from bad to worse for water in the West, and a new report released Friday brought more bad news for the outlook at Lake Mead.

                                          favicon

                                          KLAS (www.8newsnow.com)

                                          As long as the policy is "do not use water in any way" then I agree with that article!

                                          ehproque@neopaquita.esE quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups