Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 9GW datacentre approved.

9GW datacentre approved.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
109 Posts 68 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • seb1982@norden.socialS seb1982@norden.social

    @quixoticgeek I would like to bring in a completely different aspect:
    As the data centre runs entirely on natural gas, sabotaging the whole facility seems to be quite an easy thing to do.

    P This user is from outside of this forum
    P This user is from outside of this forum
    phosphenes@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    @Seb1982 @quixoticgeek

    It's a sitting duck for drones.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

      Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

      Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

      The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

      freya@social.highenergymagic.netF This user is from outside of this forum
      freya@social.highenergymagic.netF This user is from outside of this forum
      freya@social.highenergymagic.net
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      @quixoticgeek lol 9GW, that'll never get built. they can barely get 1GW DCs off the bloody ground, half of them are literally piles of scrap metal and construction trash, last I checked. worst this'll do, funnel a bunch of bloody money to some kind of AI DC construction company that's entirely a scam, and go precisely nowhere.

      peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

        @CppGuy you'd need 45km² of solar to generate 9GW or solar, but assuming the sun is only out for a ⅓rd of the time, you'd probably need closer to 135km², plus the battery storage...

        syklemil@snabelen.noS This user is from outside of this forum
        syklemil@snabelen.noS This user is from outside of this forum
        syklemil@snabelen.no
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        @quixoticgeek
        Solar & wind are still cheaper than gas though, so still a weird choice
        @CppGuy

        cppguy@infosec.spaceC brokar@mastodon.socialB mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • freya@social.highenergymagic.netF freya@social.highenergymagic.net

          @quixoticgeek lol 9GW, that'll never get built. they can barely get 1GW DCs off the bloody ground, half of them are literally piles of scrap metal and construction trash, last I checked. worst this'll do, funnel a bunch of bloody money to some kind of AI DC construction company that's entirely a scam, and go precisely nowhere.

          peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP This user is from outside of this forum
          peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP This user is from outside of this forum
          peteriskrisjanis@toot.lv
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @freya @quixoticgeek yeah this pretty much a scam project, considering that AI usage is falling and crash is inevitable

          lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

            9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

            Link Preview Image
            New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

            The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

            favicon

            Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

            ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
            ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
            ferricoxide@blahaj.zone
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            @quixoticgeek@v.st

            Sounds not unlike what's going on in the US.

            Datacenter builders love deserts:

            * Land is cheap

            * Large, contiguous chunks of land are easier to come by

            * Fewer neighbors to contend with

            * Generally less stuff that needs to be bulldozed to build the datacenter, itself, and the infrastructure that feeds it.

            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF ferricoxide@blahaj.zone

              @quixoticgeek@v.st

              Sounds not unlike what's going on in the US.

              Datacenter builders love deserts:

              * Land is cheap

              * Large, contiguous chunks of land are easier to come by

              * Fewer neighbors to contend with

              * Generally less stuff that needs to be bulldozed to build the datacenter, itself, and the infrastructure that feeds it.

              quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quixoticgeek@social.v.st
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @ferricoxide Utah being in the US. Yes, it's very similar to what's going on in the US...

              ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                Link Preview Image
                New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                favicon

                Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
                mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
                mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @quixoticgeek that's ~45 CERNs?! WTF?

                Forty five of the thing they joked might be able to create a black hole and end the world, in a single site?

                ~ one Saturn 5 F1 main engine burning constantly for the life time of the site not just a few hundred seconds

                This is a stupid amount of energy use.

                mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                  @ferricoxide Utah being in the US. Yes, it's very similar to what's going on in the US...

                  ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                  ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                  ferricoxide@blahaj.zone
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @quixoticgeek@v.st

                  Oop. I saw the UK mention and didn't see that my instance had hidden the link behind a "more" button. So, assumed reference was to the UK allowing similar idiocy to what's going on in the US.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                    Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                    Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                    The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                    woe2you@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                    woe2you@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                    woe2you@beige.party
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    @quixoticgeek Cast iron proof that it's a boondoggle: they're powering it with fossil fuels because they know the bubble will burst before the TTBE of renewables.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo

                      @quixoticgeek that's ~45 CERNs?! WTF?

                      Forty five of the thing they joked might be able to create a black hole and end the world, in a single site?

                      ~ one Saturn 5 F1 main engine burning constantly for the life time of the site not just a few hundred seconds

                      This is a stupid amount of energy use.

                      mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @quixoticgeek hang on the thing runs on gas, so an f1 engine gives a vague idea of how much gas its going to need. ~A Saturn five first stage fuel tank every fifteen minutes (rounding to a nice round number)

                      If you've ever seen a person standing next to a Saturn five you have an idea how utterly absurd an amount of fuel that is.

                      With out the pipeline that places shuts down. And we thought the back hoe through the fiber link was a bad problem.

                      profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF ferricoxide@blahaj.zone

                        @quixoticgeek@v.st

                        Sounds not unlike what's going on in the US.

                        Datacenter builders love deserts:

                        * Land is cheap

                        * Large, contiguous chunks of land are easier to come by

                        * Fewer neighbors to contend with

                        * Generally less stuff that needs to be bulldozed to build the datacenter, itself, and the infrastructure that feeds it.

                        marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                        marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                        marjolica@social.linux.pizza
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        @ferricoxide @quixoticgeek "Datacenter builders love deserts"

                        ..and deserts usually have such a plentiful supply of water for cooling.

                        Presumably they will take the water from Lake Powell?

                        Link Preview Image
                        The costs of surging water into drought-depleted Lake Powell will be widespread

                        Lake Powell is at just 23% capacity and approaching the point where water won't be able to flow into its hydroelectric turbines without air causing damage.

                        favicon

                        KUER (www.kuer.org)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • syklemil@snabelen.noS syklemil@snabelen.no

                          @quixoticgeek
                          Solar & wind are still cheaper than gas though, so still a weird choice
                          @CppGuy

                          cppguy@infosec.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cppguy@infosec.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cppguy@infosec.space
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          @syklemil @quixoticgeek

                          They're building the thing in a desert, i.e. an expanse of unused space. If they had to build this monstrosity at all, they could have used some of that space for renewable energy generation.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • syklemil@snabelen.noS syklemil@snabelen.no

                            @quixoticgeek
                            Solar & wind are still cheaper than gas though, so still a weird choice
                            @CppGuy

                            brokar@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            brokar@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            brokar@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #22

                            @syklemil @quixoticgeek @CppGuy

                            They will be building power plants for that because no state has 9GW power lying around or spare, not even talking about the cables and infrastructure you'd need to even get the energy there.
                            And since this is a desert, i assume there isn't much water around for cooling.
                            Also, i can only guess the number of backup generators they'd need to secure operation. Gas powered of course. And are they talking about carbon neutrality? Being the good greenwashing company?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                              9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                              Link Preview Image
                              New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                              The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                              favicon

                              Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                              artemis@climatejustice.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                              artemis@climatejustice.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                              artemis@climatejustice.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              @quixoticgeek and isn't 'natural gas' just the most newspeak name for a fossil fuel.

                              quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • artemis@climatejustice.socialA artemis@climatejustice.social

                                @quixoticgeek and isn't 'natural gas' just the most newspeak name for a fossil fuel.

                                quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                @artemis ok. So natural gas is because for many years the gas network in most places was derived from coal gas, or town gas, whereby coal was heated up to produce coke, which was used in things like steel production, and the gas was then piped locally to homes and businesses. Natural gas as a fuel source is relatively recent. In the UK we're talking later half of the 20th century.

                                artemis@climatejustice.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                  9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                  The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                  favicon

                                  Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                  shivviness@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  shivviness@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  shivviness@beige.party
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @quixoticgeek

                                  People need to understand that these datacentres are not just for generating fun pics, they're intended to replace workers en masse, and they're going to ultimately replaces wages.

                                  And there's no way Universal Basic Income will be even considered, and notwithstanding the BS that Musk has been spouting recently in favour of UBI.

                                  pst@tldr.nettime.orgP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • seb1982@norden.socialS seb1982@norden.social

                                    @quixoticgeek I would like to bring in a completely different aspect:
                                    As the data centre runs entirely on natural gas, sabotaging the whole facility seems to be quite an easy thing to do.

                                    quoidian@mastodon.onlineQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    quoidian@mastodon.onlineQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    quoidian@mastodon.online
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @Seb1982 @quixoticgeek
                                    Disable the cooling system.

                                    mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                      9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                      The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                      favicon

                                      Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                      carstenfranke@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      carstenfranke@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      carstenfranke@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #27

                                      @quixoticgeek and there is an even bigger one planned .. link in the article.
                                      I am really not sure where the money will be to pay for all this computing...

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                        9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                        The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                        favicon

                                        Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                        phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        phl@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #28

                                        @quixoticgeek Just the thing we need in the middle of a climate crisis.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                          9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                          The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                          favicon

                                          Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                          marud@social.marud.frM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          marud@social.marud.frM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          marud@social.marud.fr
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #29

                                          @quixoticgeek this is so painful to read 😢

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups