Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
57 Posts 49 Posters 66 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

    Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

    Link Preview Image
    Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

    Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

    favicon

    road.cc (road.cc)

    stevenlawsonphotography@mastoart.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    stevenlawsonphotography@mastoart.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    stevenlawsonphotography@mastoart.social
    wrote last edited by
    #33

    @dangillmor Wait until the lawsuits start rolling in...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G gogojack@mastodon.social

      @dangillmor The idea that they're just going to run people and cyclists over willy nilly is absurd. I work in the industry (not for Waymo) and dealt with multiple scenarios where pedestrians would jump out in front of our cars on purpose.

      Is that a stupid thing to do? Yes, but the cars wouldn't hit them. Because it can't. The have collision detection that will stop the car. We even ran a test where we tried to make it hit a child-sized dummy, and it just wouldn't do it.

      bladecoder@androiddev.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bladecoder@androiddev.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bladecoder@androiddev.social
      wrote last edited by
      #34

      @gogojack @dangillmor The discussion is not about autonomous cars driving over people, it's about cyclists being "doored" by autonomous cars programmed to illegally stop in bike lanes.

      ovoao@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

        Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

        Link Preview Image
        Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

        Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

        favicon

        road.cc (road.cc)

        photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        photo55@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #35

        @dangillmor there might need to be some work on that. I wonder if crosshatching or colouring a section of cycleway and drawing a box in the other lane at suitable points on roads to require stopping Waymos to stop in the box and warning everyone there may be crossings of the bike lane would work. Otherwise it is floating stops etc.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

          Link Preview Image
          Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

          Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

          favicon

          road.cc (road.cc)

          nicelymanifest@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          nicelymanifest@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          nicelymanifest@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #36

          @dangillmor Ever the manic pursuit of ever more profit blinding the greedy to the plight of the rest of humanity.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

            Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

            Link Preview Image
            Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

            Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

            favicon

            road.cc (road.cc)

            dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dianea@lgbtqia.space
            wrote last edited by
            #37

            @dangillmor

            This may be why rogue bicyclists carry a keychain in hand with sharp brass keys exposed and aimed riding past techbro antonymous vehicles obstructing bicycle lanes

            fbausch@chaos.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jerrej@mastodon.socialJ jerrej@mastodon.social

              @yetzt @dangillmor

              waymo - noun from the verb "to waymow", coined from "to lawn-mow", but applied to road usage. Ex.: "His ride then waymowed across the bike lane to take a legal turn on red, cannoning directly into two crossing pedestrians."

              celeduc@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              celeduc@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              celeduc@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #38

              @jerrej @yetzt @dangillmor "If anyone is in the way, mow them down"

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                Link Preview Image
                Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                favicon

                road.cc (road.cc)

                elysembarek@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                elysembarek@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                elysembarek@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #39

                @dangillmor 👋

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                  Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                  Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                  favicon

                  road.cc (road.cc)

                  killick@dmv.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
                  killick@dmv.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
                  killick@dmv.community
                  wrote last edited by
                  #40

                  @dangillmor

                  Ok, for once in my life, I'm on Waymo's side on this. You're focusing on the car. Focus instead on the people. Taxis have been stopping in travel lanes to discharge and pick up passengers ever since we have had taxis. Now we're supposed to expect taxis to NOT drop off and pick up at the curb because bike lanes are somehow different from other travel lanes? If I'm driving a taxi, I'm going to let my PEDESTRIANS out at the sidewalk. I'm not going to ask them to get out of my cab in the middle of the street.Yes, it's a dedicated bike lane, but it's not sacrosanct. Waymo isn't in the bike lane just for the hell of it. Would you like to get out of a cab and step into a the path of a biker?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD dianea@lgbtqia.space

                    @dangillmor

                    This may be why rogue bicyclists carry a keychain in hand with sharp brass keys exposed and aimed riding past techbro antonymous vehicles obstructing bicycle lanes

                    fbausch@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fbausch@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fbausch@chaos.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #41

                    @dianea @dangillmor I guess the sales numbers of baseball bats with convenient bike holders are going to skyrocket...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • newint@todon.nlN newint@todon.nl

                      @dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.

                      andygates@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      andygates@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      andygates@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #42

                      @newint @dangillmor In theory a competent Jonnycab would have lighting fast senses and legal compliance, reducing meatbag driver mistakes.

                      Programming it to scoff the law eats away at that like molecular acid. It's just a grift now.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                        Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                        Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                        favicon

                        road.cc (road.cc)

                        gezza@mastodon.ieG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gezza@mastodon.ieG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gezza@mastodon.ie
                        wrote last edited by
                        #43

                        @dangillmor
                        Is it legitimate self defense if I carry a log splitter to clear the bike lane?

                        ovoao@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                          Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                          favicon

                          road.cc (road.cc)

                          r3wst3r@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                          r3wst3r@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                          r3wst3r@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #44

                          @dangillmor I really like when people burn these in the streets.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM mastodonmigration@mastodon.online

                            @dangillmor

                            They just keep leaning into the "be evil" don't they?

                            ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                            ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                            ovoao@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #45

                            @mastodonmigration @dangillmor

                            Are human taxi drivers also evil for letting you out by the roadside even if there is a bike lane?

                            I smell #fakeoutrage

                            d_reno@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • francoisprague@mastodon.socialF francoisprague@mastodon.social

                              @dangillmor so autonomous driving being as uncivil as a human driver removes the need for autonomous driving.

                              ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                              ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                              ovoao@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #46

                              @FrancoisPrague @dangillmor

                              People being outraged about it here would never be outraged about the human driver picking someone up by the roadside though.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                                Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                                Link Preview Image
                                Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                                Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                                favicon

                                road.cc (road.cc)

                                kim_balfour@zirk.usK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kim_balfour@zirk.usK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kim_balfour@zirk.us
                                wrote last edited by
                                #47

                                @dangillmor Laws for thee but not for me is, after all, the ethos of a rapidly encroaching religious techno fascism.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gezza@mastodon.ieG gezza@mastodon.ie

                                  @dangillmor
                                  Is it legitimate self defense if I carry a log splitter to clear the bike lane?

                                  ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ovoao@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #48

                                  @gezza @dangillmor

                                  Do you swear to never use pedestrian sidewalks with your bike?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • bladecoder@androiddev.socialB bladecoder@androiddev.social

                                    @gogojack @dangillmor The discussion is not about autonomous cars driving over people, it's about cyclists being "doored" by autonomous cars programmed to illegally stop in bike lanes.

                                    ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ovoao@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #49

                                    @bladecoder @gogojack @dangillmor

                                    Wouldn't it be the human passengers doing the dooring?

                                    bladecoder@androiddev.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kimlockhartga@beige.party
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #50

                                      @sgail @dangillmor Aren't these the same self-driving taxis that drove straight into water, onto train tracks, ran over children, etc?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ovoao@mastodon.socialO ovoao@mastodon.social

                                        @mastodonmigration @dangillmor

                                        Are human taxi drivers also evil for letting you out by the roadside even if there is a bike lane?

                                        I smell #fakeoutrage

                                        d_reno@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        d_reno@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        d_reno@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #51

                                        @ovoao @mastodonmigration @dangillmor

                                        People are begging for something to be outraged about nowadays.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF fenixmaster@mastodon.social

                                          @dangillmor Google shouldn’t put it like that; otherwise, their cars will end up being flipped upside down by an angry member of the public wielding a shovel.

                                          atleagle@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          atleagle@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          atleagle@mastodon.online
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #52

                                          @fenixmaster @dangillmor if convenience and "what I want" are the requirements for an action, then I see a LOT of damage to these cars soon

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups