Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
57 Posts 49 Posters 66 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

    Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

    Link Preview Image
    Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

    Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

    favicon

    road.cc (road.cc)

    francoisprague@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    francoisprague@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    francoisprague@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @dangillmor so autonomous driving being as uncivil as a human driver removes the need for autonomous driving.

    ovoao@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

      Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

      Link Preview Image
      Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

      Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

      favicon

      road.cc (road.cc)

      cascheranno@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
      cascheranno@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
      cascheranno@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @dangillmor ah, because ‘the system’s programming supersedes a law’ is a widely-recognized and legitimate legal defense.

      toriver@mas.toT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • System shared this topic
      • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

        Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

        Link Preview Image
        Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

        Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

        favicon

        road.cc (road.cc)

        hadewych@mastodon.nlH This user is from outside of this forum
        hadewych@mastodon.nlH This user is from outside of this forum
        hadewych@mastodon.nl
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @dangillmor we wisten toch al dat ict boven de wet staat?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

          Link Preview Image
          Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

          Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

          favicon

          road.cc (road.cc)

          drs1969@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          drs1969@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          drs1969@mstdn.social
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @dangillmor Well they gonna have a great time with London’s traffic cameras and the even more feared traffic wardens. And then London’s cycling community will probably want to have a chew on them as well.

          Idiots.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cascheranno@hachyderm.ioC cascheranno@hachyderm.io

            @dangillmor ah, because ‘the system’s programming supersedes a law’ is a widely-recognized and legitimate legal defense.

            toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
            toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
            toriver@mas.to
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @cascheranno @dangillmor The «code is law» bros from the crypto scene have moved over to the autonomous industry?

            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

              Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

              Link Preview Image
              Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

              Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

              favicon

              road.cc (road.cc)

              drewtowler@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
              drewtowler@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
              drewtowler@mas.to
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @dangillmor Expecting me not to stick a knife into a waymo tyre is just too high a bar.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                Link Preview Image
                Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                favicon

                road.cc (road.cc)

                renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                renardboy@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @dangillmor caltrops.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toriver@mas.toT toriver@mas.to

                  @cascheranno @dangillmor The «code is law» bros from the crypto scene have moved over to the autonomous industry?

                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @toriver @cascheranno @dangillmor

                  They were always there

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                    Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                    Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                    favicon

                    road.cc (road.cc)

                    yetzt@social.yetzt.meY This user is from outside of this forum
                    yetzt@social.yetzt.meY This user is from outside of this forum
                    yetzt@social.yetzt.me
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @dangillmor antonymous? are they meaning the opposite of what they say?

                    jerrej@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                      Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                      Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                      favicon

                      road.cc (road.cc)

                      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mastodonmigration@mastodon.online
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @dangillmor

                      They just keep leaning into the "be evil" don't they?

                      tomtom@pouet.chapril.orgT ovoao@mastodon.socialO 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • yetzt@social.yetzt.meY yetzt@social.yetzt.me

                        @dangillmor antonymous? are they meaning the opposite of what they say?

                        jerrej@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jerrej@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jerrej@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @yetzt @dangillmor

                        waymo - noun from the verb "to waymow", coined from "to lawn-mow", but applied to road usage. Ex.: "His ride then waymowed across the bike lane to take a legal turn on red, cannoning directly into two crossing pedestrians."

                        celeduc@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                          Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                          favicon

                          road.cc (road.cc)

                          cgudrian@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cgudrian@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cgudrian@social.tchncs.de
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @dangillmor I guess society is no longer bound to laws either, then? “What a nice autonomous taxi you have there. Would be a shame if anything happened to it…”

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                            Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                            Link Preview Image
                            Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                            Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                            favicon

                            road.cc (road.cc)

                            kowalski@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kowalski@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kowalski@chaos.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            Why we don’t build autonomous walking Robots by our own? They may not be able to respect these self-driving cars. They may not know that a hammer hand has another primary function. But who cares!

                            @dangillmor

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM mastodonmigration@mastodon.online

                              @dangillmor

                              They just keep leaning into the "be evil" don't they?

                              tomtom@pouet.chapril.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tomtom@pouet.chapril.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tomtom@pouet.chapril.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              @mastodonmigration @dangillmor they've been swimming in it for a few years, and they don't care.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                                Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                                Link Preview Image
                                Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                                Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                                favicon

                                road.cc (road.cc)

                                ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                ovoao@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @dangillmor

                                If I understand correctly, this is just for picking people up and dropping them off. Every normal taxi would also do that.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                                  Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                                  Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                                  favicon

                                  road.cc (road.cc)

                                  fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fenixmaster@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @dangillmor Google shouldn’t put it like that; otherwise, their cars will end up being flipped upside down by an angry member of the public wielding a shovel.

                                  fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF atleagle@mastodon.onlineA 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF fenixmaster@mastodon.social

                                    @dangillmor Google shouldn’t put it like that; otherwise, their cars will end up being flipped upside down by an angry member of the public wielding a shovel.

                                    fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fenixmaster@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @dangillmor The tires, it is always the tires, the weakest point of a car.

                                    peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                                      Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                                      Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                                      favicon

                                      road.cc (road.cc)

                                      nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nakedgerry@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      @dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.

                                      paulk@writing.exchangeP 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF fenixmaster@mastodon.social

                                        @dangillmor The tires, it is always the tires, the weakest point of a car.

                                        peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        peter_slwk@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @fenixmaster @dangillmor Or just some chalk (or salt) ...

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                                          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                                          Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                                          favicon

                                          road.cc (road.cc)

                                          newint@todon.nlN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          newint@todon.nlN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          newint@todon.nl
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.

                                          tkissing@mastodon.socialT andygates@mastodon.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups