Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
57 Posts 49 Posters 66 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

    Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

    Link Preview Image
    Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

    Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

    favicon

    road.cc (road.cc)

    yetzt@social.yetzt.meY This user is from outside of this forum
    yetzt@social.yetzt.meY This user is from outside of this forum
    yetzt@social.yetzt.me
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    @dangillmor antonymous? are they meaning the opposite of what they say?

    jerrej@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

      Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

      Link Preview Image
      Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

      Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

      favicon

      road.cc (road.cc)

      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
      mastodonmigration@mastodon.online
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      @dangillmor

      They just keep leaning into the "be evil" don't they?

      tomtom@pouet.chapril.orgT ovoao@mastodon.socialO 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • yetzt@social.yetzt.meY yetzt@social.yetzt.me

        @dangillmor antonymous? are they meaning the opposite of what they say?

        jerrej@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jerrej@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jerrej@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        @yetzt @dangillmor

        waymo - noun from the verb "to waymow", coined from "to lawn-mow", but applied to road usage. Ex.: "His ride then waymowed across the bike lane to take a legal turn on red, cannoning directly into two crossing pedestrians."

        celeduc@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

          Link Preview Image
          Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

          Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

          favicon

          road.cc (road.cc)

          cgudrian@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
          cgudrian@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
          cgudrian@social.tchncs.de
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @dangillmor I guess society is no longer bound to laws either, then? “What a nice autonomous taxi you have there. Would be a shame if anything happened to it…”

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

            Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

            Link Preview Image
            Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

            Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

            favicon

            road.cc (road.cc)

            kowalski@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kowalski@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kowalski@chaos.social
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            Why we don’t build autonomous walking Robots by our own? They may not be able to respect these self-driving cars. They may not know that a hammer hand has another primary function. But who cares!

            @dangillmor

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM mastodonmigration@mastodon.online

              @dangillmor

              They just keep leaning into the "be evil" don't they?

              tomtom@pouet.chapril.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
              tomtom@pouet.chapril.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
              tomtom@pouet.chapril.org
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @mastodonmigration @dangillmor they've been swimming in it for a few years, and they don't care.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                Link Preview Image
                Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                favicon

                road.cc (road.cc)

                ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                ovoao@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @dangillmor

                If I understand correctly, this is just for picking people up and dropping them off. Every normal taxi would also do that.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                  Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                  Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                  favicon

                  road.cc (road.cc)

                  fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fenixmaster@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @dangillmor Google shouldn’t put it like that; otherwise, their cars will end up being flipped upside down by an angry member of the public wielding a shovel.

                  fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF atleagle@mastodon.onlineA 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF fenixmaster@mastodon.social

                    @dangillmor Google shouldn’t put it like that; otherwise, their cars will end up being flipped upside down by an angry member of the public wielding a shovel.

                    fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fenixmaster@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    @dangillmor The tires, it is always the tires, the weakest point of a car.

                    peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                      Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                      Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                      favicon

                      road.cc (road.cc)

                      nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nakedgerry@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.

                      paulk@writing.exchangeP 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF fenixmaster@mastodon.social

                        @dangillmor The tires, it is always the tires, the weakest point of a car.

                        peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        peter_slwk@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        @fenixmaster @dangillmor Or just some chalk (or salt) ...

                        Link Preview Image
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                          Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                          favicon

                          road.cc (road.cc)

                          newint@todon.nlN This user is from outside of this forum
                          newint@todon.nlN This user is from outside of this forum
                          newint@todon.nl
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          @dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.

                          tkissing@mastodon.socialT andygates@mastodon.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                            Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                            Link Preview Image
                            Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                            Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                            favicon

                            road.cc (road.cc)

                            windsheep@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                            windsheep@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                            windsheep@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #22

                            @dangillmor finally. A robot takes care of them. Where can I buy the anti cyclist feature

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                              Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                              Link Preview Image
                              Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                              Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                              favicon

                              road.cc (road.cc)

                              leberschnitzel@existiert.chL This user is from outside of this forum
                              leberschnitzel@existiert.chL This user is from outside of this forum
                              leberschnitzel@existiert.ch
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              @dangillmor I'm not surprised about this seeing where they trained...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              0
                              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                              • nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN nakedgerry@mastodon.social

                                @dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.

                                paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                paulk@writing.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                @nakedgerry People don't matter, clearly.

                                @dangillmor

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                                  Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                                  Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                                  favicon

                                  road.cc (road.cc)

                                  paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  paulk@writing.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @dangillmor "Terminator". It just looks different, but it's coming.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN nakedgerry@mastodon.social

                                    @dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.

                                    paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    paulk@writing.exchange
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @nakedgerry It's "Terminator". It just looks different.

                                    @dangillmor

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • newint@todon.nlN newint@todon.nl

                                      @dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.

                                      tkissing@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tkissing@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tkissing@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #27

                                      @newint @dangillmor The "problem" is that humans need to eat and therefore don't act as drivers for free, which means their pay reduces the profits of the broligarchs.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                                        Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                                        Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                                        favicon

                                        road.cc (road.cc)

                                        kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kkarhan@jorts.horse
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #28

                                        @dangillmor TBH, I'd consider any Cyclist poppin' 9x19mm +P+ SJHP (regular 9mm.won't go through tires) into any of those shit vehicles' tires an act of "self & mutual defense" against murder by car…

                                        • Or just place Calthrops on the markings if not sprinkle them before said cars.

                                        #Sarcasm #Commentary #NotLegalAdvice #Waymo #CarBrain #CarCentrism #cycling #safety #RoadSafety

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                                          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Expecting driverless taxis to respect bike lanes “too high a bar” – because customers want to be dropped off in them, autonomous vehicle firm Waymo tells cyclists

                                          Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has allegedly told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.But Waymo has denied making such a claim, instead pointing ... Read more

                                          favicon

                                          road.cc (road.cc)

                                          webidebi@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          webidebi@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          webidebi@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #29

                                          @dangillmor if this is the future count me out.

                                          But also... this makes a stronger argument for separate zones and bike lanes protected by some kind of barrier. I'm also strongly in favour of less space to be given to cars altogether - the emphasis for future planning should be more pedestrian / cycle and public transport.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups