Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It's a Good Cloud Day.

It's a Good Cloud Day.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
74 Posts 50 Posters 23 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • spottyfox@pounced-on.meS spottyfox@pounced-on.me

    @albertcardona @sundogplanets Also have an animated version

    - YouTube

    Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.

    favicon

    (www.youtube.com)

    davefischer@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
    davefischer@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
    davefischer@hachyderm.io
    wrote last edited by
    #51

    @spottyfox @albertcardona @sundogplanets

    Apparently Bradbury was very popular in the Eastern Bloc. There's also a live-action Soviet Martian Chronicles. (And a bunch more. Low-budget not-very-good F 451, decent Veldt, etc.)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

      @angelastella
      That's the one.
      Various scifi authors have introduced ideas - rather deus ex machina ones - to reduce the number of bodies required to hold thouse skills and functions.
      I suppose now YouTube etc is a bit of a start 😉

      angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
      angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
      angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
      wrote last edited by
      #52

      @Photo55

      Sharing practical knowledge is a must. And it's the kind of thing we already do, not like molecular nanotechnology enabling cornucopia machines, or either versatile robots, or something else.

      photo55@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        @nixzhu I'm sorry that's what you are forced to depend on. Enjoy it before SpaceX starts Kessler Syndrome, I guess?

        nixzhu@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        nixzhu@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        nixzhu@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #53

        @sundogplanets If the Kessler Syndrome actually triggers, we’ll just have to launch a fleet of specialized 'cleaner satellites' to clear the debris field and restore the orbit.

        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

          @sundogplanets

          August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

          "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
          https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

          #scifi

          yamabikko@theforkiverse.comY This user is from outside of this forum
          yamabikko@theforkiverse.comY This user is from outside of this forum
          yamabikko@theforkiverse.com
          wrote last edited by
          #54

          @albertcardona @sundogplanets Love this! Love Bradbury's crisp writing style and searing cynicism. Thanks!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • nixzhu@mastodon.socialN nixzhu@mastodon.social

            @sundogplanets If the Kessler Syndrome actually triggers, we’ll just have to launch a fleet of specialized 'cleaner satellites' to clear the debris field and restore the orbit.

            sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            sundogplanets@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #55

            @nixzhu Good luck inventing that.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • pascal@norden.socialP pascal@norden.social

              @sundogplanets
              unintended terraforming?
              "Scientists are eager to understand how these particles of aerospace debris interact with other aerosols in the stratosphere because of anticipated increases in space traffic and their potential impact on the ozone layer. They also want to explore the impact of possible future proposals to seed the stratosphere with millions of tons of sulfur aerosols to slow the rate of global warming by reflecting sunlight back to space."
              https://research.noaa.gov/noaa-scientists-link-exotic-metal-particles-in-the-upper-atmosphere-to-rockets-satellites/

              cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
              cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
              cy@fedicy.us.to
              wrote last edited by
              #56
              Yeah that uh... sulfur aerosols idea was clearly thought up by people who said "I saw The Matrix, and that version of the future looked just so much fun for humans to live in."
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                SpaceX is awful.

                refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyz
                wrote last edited by
                #57

                It makes me think of a recent proposal for terraforming mars by introducing tiny amounts of aluminium to the atmosphere.

                @sundogplanets

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                  @sundogplanets

                  August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

                  "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
                  https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

                  #scifi

                  phooky@hexa.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
                  phooky@hexa.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
                  phooky@hexa.club
                  wrote last edited by
                  #58

                  @albertcardona @sundogplanets i didn't realize that There Will Come Soft Rains day is coming! I've got to get all my home automation stuff set up!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA angelastella@social.treehouse.systems

                    @Photo55

                    Sharing practical knowledge is a must. And it's the kind of thing we already do, not like molecular nanotechnology enabling cornucopia machines, or either versatile robots, or something else.

                    photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    photo55@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #59

                    @angelastella
                    #JohnBrunner with Eptification - with a bad result - and #JoeHaldeman with some sort of overlays in #WorldsApart and assorted authors with "memory tapes and of course #TheMatrix "now I do!"

                    And in a less friendly way #LarryNiven with #Corpsicles and #RichardMorgan with the #DigitallyStoredHumans and #DigitallyFreightedHumans and uploading into a sleeve.

                    And a bunch more.

                    #SciFi

                    angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

                      @angelastella
                      #JohnBrunner with Eptification - with a bad result - and #JoeHaldeman with some sort of overlays in #WorldsApart and assorted authors with "memory tapes and of course #TheMatrix "now I do!"

                      And in a less friendly way #LarryNiven with #Corpsicles and #RichardMorgan with the #DigitallyStoredHumans and #DigitallyFreightedHumans and uploading into a sleeve.

                      And a bunch more.

                      #SciFi

                      angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                      angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                      angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
                      wrote last edited by
                      #60

                      @Photo55

                      Yes, shortcuts to make the most of limited bodies. But to keep a closed ecology plus the mechanical part of the habitat and some mining/manufacturing capability there's no easy substitute for those bodies, and I'm afraid the number needed is still higher than expected.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                        That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                        SpaceX is awful.

                        shiitaketoast@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                        shiitaketoast@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                        shiitaketoast@beige.party
                        wrote last edited by
                        #61

                        @sundogplanets what is the GHG factor of aluminum?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                          That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                          SpaceX is awful.

                          hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                          hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                          hansbot@mastodon.green
                          wrote last edited by
                          #62

                          @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Now imagine having a million data centers in orbit, from musk alone. Before long, every few seconds a satellite will come down – with all its payload burning into the atmosphere

                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                            That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                            SpaceX is awful.

                            guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                            guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                            guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #63

                            @sundogplanets as I understand it, it’s even worse

                            https://youtu.be/iDaG4zt0NKc

                            These alloys don’t vanish, their chemical components mix with the air, they keep floating high up and they cause changes

                            /cc @keithdpatch

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • hansbot@mastodon.greenH hansbot@mastodon.green

                              @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Now imagine having a million data centers in orbit, from musk alone. Before long, every few seconds a satellite will come down – with all its payload burning into the atmosphere

                              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #64

                              @hansbot @mastodonmigration It's every 3 minutes for a million satellites with 5 year lifetimes 😭

                              hansbot@mastodon.greenH 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                @hansbot @mastodonmigration It's every 3 minutes for a million satellites with 5 year lifetimes 😭

                                hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hansbot@mastodon.green
                                wrote last edited by
                                #65

                                @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Yes. And it will likely not become a monopoly. Two competitors in the US, one in the EU, one in China, one in India, and it’s down to 2/min. To replace these, they would need a dozen or so launches per day, adding to the looming environmental disaster

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                  That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                  SpaceX is awful.

                                  nrmacdonald@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nrmacdonald@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nrmacdonald@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #66

                                  @sundogplanets
                                  Being an old man, when you say v1 and v2 my first mental images are these.
                                  Whilst the effect of these are decidedly different in detail, their destructive nature is not.

                                  Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                                    @sundogplanets

                                    August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

                                    "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
                                    https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

                                    #scifi

                                    karen5lund@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    karen5lund@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    karen5lund@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #67

                                    @albertcardona @sundogplanets Story downloaded. Calendar marked.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                      That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                      SpaceX is awful.

                                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                                      chuckbenz@techhub.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #68

                                      @sundogplanets any simple numbers yet to indicate whether Elon > Thomas Midgley Jr (leaded gas, cfcs) in terms of environmental impact? Or are we unwilling part of the experiment that will find out?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                                        @sundogplanets

                                        August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

                                        "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
                                        https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

                                        #scifi

                                        saguarolynx@c.imS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        saguarolynx@c.imS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        saguarolynx@c.im
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #69

                                        @sundogplanets @albertcardona

                                        Ooh, this must be from the original edition of "The Martian Chronicles", published in 1950.

                                        This past spring, we read & analyzed this story for a college writing course. Our version is set in the year 2057.

                                        Wikipedia shows that the dates in the book, including this story, "advanced" by 31 years during the 1997 edition.

                                        I first read this story on my own during high school (last decade of the Cold War).
                                        It registered strongly then and still does so today!

                                        8- )

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizza
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #70

                                          @lin11c @sundogplanets, well, given that they'll be burnt up on re-entry (entirely? If not, I can think of a few places where I'd like them to land), I don't think that they'll be in suitable condition to be sent back up…

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups