Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It's a Good Cloud Day.

It's a Good Cloud Day.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
74 Posts 50 Posters 23 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

    That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

    SpaceX is awful.

    pascal@norden.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
    pascal@norden.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
    pascal@norden.social
    wrote last edited by
    #44

    @sundogplanets
    unintended terraforming?
    "Scientists are eager to understand how these particles of aerospace debris interact with other aerosols in the stratosphere because of anticipated increases in space traffic and their potential impact on the ozone layer. They also want to explore the impact of possible future proposals to seed the stratosphere with millions of tons of sulfur aerosols to slow the rate of global warming by reflecting sunlight back to space."
    https://research.noaa.gov/noaa-scientists-link-exotic-metal-particles-in-the-upper-atmosphere-to-rockets-satellites/

    cy@fedicy.us.toC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA angelastella@social.treehouse.systems

      @Photo55 @Perrin42 @sundogplanets

      Remembering now! yeah, I really must read the book.

      photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      photo55@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #45

      @angelastella
      It is really quite good.

      Separately, one of the discussions I've seen in #SciFi is of the minimum size of society for prolonged survival in Space.
      Large.

      angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

        That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

        SpaceX is awful.

        samloonie@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
        samloonie@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
        samloonie@mstdn.ca
        wrote last edited by
        #46

        @sundogplanets Also, every piece of aluminum that they burn or drop in the ocean is aluminum that could be used for other things.
        A very productive mine in Australia is closing because it's run out of ore. Copper mines are extracting ever larger amounts of rock to get smaller specks of copper sulphate.
        There's no thought for the future.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

          @angelastella
          It is really quite good.

          Separately, one of the discussions I've seen in #SciFi is of the minimum size of society for prolonged survival in Space.
          Large.

          angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
          angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
          angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
          wrote last edited by
          #47

          @Photo55

          I remember a good discussion about that topic on Charles Stross' weblog. If the idea is having modern industry, it could run to millions.

          photo55@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

            That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

            SpaceX is awful.

            eetschrijver@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
            eetschrijver@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
            eetschrijver@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #48

            @sundogplanets Horrible!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nixzhu@mastodon.socialN nixzhu@mastodon.social

              @sundogplanets As a Chinese citizen, I hope to one day use Starlink to bypass the GFW and access the open Internet. SpaceX is doing amazing work!

              paulmckrcu@social.kernel.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
              paulmckrcu@social.kernel.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
              paulmckrcu@social.kernel.org
              wrote last edited by
              #49
              @nixzhu @sundogplanets We just need heavy industry in orbit so that the potential and kinetic energy of those satellites can be recycled. 😉
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA angelastella@social.treehouse.systems

                @Photo55

                I remember a good discussion about that topic on Charles Stross' weblog. If the idea is having modern industry, it could run to millions.

                photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                photo55@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #50

                @angelastella
                That's the one.
                Various scifi authors have introduced ideas - rather deus ex machina ones - to reduce the number of bodies required to hold thouse skills and functions.
                I suppose now YouTube etc is a bit of a start 😉

                angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • spottyfox@pounced-on.meS spottyfox@pounced-on.me

                  @albertcardona @sundogplanets Also have an animated version

                  - YouTube

                  Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.

                  favicon

                  (www.youtube.com)

                  davefischer@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davefischer@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davefischer@hachyderm.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #51

                  @spottyfox @albertcardona @sundogplanets

                  Apparently Bradbury was very popular in the Eastern Bloc. There's also a live-action Soviet Martian Chronicles. (And a bunch more. Low-budget not-very-good F 451, decent Veldt, etc.)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

                    @angelastella
                    That's the one.
                    Various scifi authors have introduced ideas - rather deus ex machina ones - to reduce the number of bodies required to hold thouse skills and functions.
                    I suppose now YouTube etc is a bit of a start 😉

                    angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                    angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                    angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
                    wrote last edited by
                    #52

                    @Photo55

                    Sharing practical knowledge is a must. And it's the kind of thing we already do, not like molecular nanotechnology enabling cornucopia machines, or either versatile robots, or something else.

                    photo55@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      @nixzhu I'm sorry that's what you are forced to depend on. Enjoy it before SpaceX starts Kessler Syndrome, I guess?

                      nixzhu@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nixzhu@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nixzhu@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #53

                      @sundogplanets If the Kessler Syndrome actually triggers, we’ll just have to launch a fleet of specialized 'cleaner satellites' to clear the debris field and restore the orbit.

                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                        @sundogplanets

                        August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

                        "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
                        https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

                        #scifi

                        yamabikko@theforkiverse.comY This user is from outside of this forum
                        yamabikko@theforkiverse.comY This user is from outside of this forum
                        yamabikko@theforkiverse.com
                        wrote last edited by
                        #54

                        @albertcardona @sundogplanets Love this! Love Bradbury's crisp writing style and searing cynicism. Thanks!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • nixzhu@mastodon.socialN nixzhu@mastodon.social

                          @sundogplanets If the Kessler Syndrome actually triggers, we’ll just have to launch a fleet of specialized 'cleaner satellites' to clear the debris field and restore the orbit.

                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #55

                          @nixzhu Good luck inventing that.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • pascal@norden.socialP pascal@norden.social

                            @sundogplanets
                            unintended terraforming?
                            "Scientists are eager to understand how these particles of aerospace debris interact with other aerosols in the stratosphere because of anticipated increases in space traffic and their potential impact on the ozone layer. They also want to explore the impact of possible future proposals to seed the stratosphere with millions of tons of sulfur aerosols to slow the rate of global warming by reflecting sunlight back to space."
                            https://research.noaa.gov/noaa-scientists-link-exotic-metal-particles-in-the-upper-atmosphere-to-rockets-satellites/

                            cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cy@fedicy.us.to
                            wrote last edited by
                            #56
                            Yeah that uh... sulfur aerosols idea was clearly thought up by people who said "I saw The Matrix, and that version of the future looked just so much fun for humans to live in."
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                              That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                              SpaceX is awful.

                              refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                              refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                              refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyz
                              wrote last edited by
                              #57

                              It makes me think of a recent proposal for terraforming mars by introducing tiny amounts of aluminium to the atmosphere.

                              @sundogplanets

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                                @sundogplanets

                                August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

                                "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
                                https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

                                #scifi

                                phooky@hexa.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
                                phooky@hexa.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
                                phooky@hexa.club
                                wrote last edited by
                                #58

                                @albertcardona @sundogplanets i didn't realize that There Will Come Soft Rains day is coming! I've got to get all my home automation stuff set up!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA angelastella@social.treehouse.systems

                                  @Photo55

                                  Sharing practical knowledge is a must. And it's the kind of thing we already do, not like molecular nanotechnology enabling cornucopia machines, or either versatile robots, or something else.

                                  photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  photo55@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #59

                                  @angelastella
                                  #JohnBrunner with Eptification - with a bad result - and #JoeHaldeman with some sort of overlays in #WorldsApart and assorted authors with "memory tapes and of course #TheMatrix "now I do!"

                                  And in a less friendly way #LarryNiven with #Corpsicles and #RichardMorgan with the #DigitallyStoredHumans and #DigitallyFreightedHumans and uploading into a sleeve.

                                  And a bunch more.

                                  #SciFi

                                  angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

                                    @angelastella
                                    #JohnBrunner with Eptification - with a bad result - and #JoeHaldeman with some sort of overlays in #WorldsApart and assorted authors with "memory tapes and of course #TheMatrix "now I do!"

                                    And in a less friendly way #LarryNiven with #Corpsicles and #RichardMorgan with the #DigitallyStoredHumans and #DigitallyFreightedHumans and uploading into a sleeve.

                                    And a bunch more.

                                    #SciFi

                                    angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #60

                                    @Photo55

                                    Yes, shortcuts to make the most of limited bodies. But to keep a closed ecology plus the mechanical part of the habitat and some mining/manufacturing capability there's no easy substitute for those bodies, and I'm afraid the number needed is still higher than expected.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                      That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                      SpaceX is awful.

                                      shiitaketoast@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      shiitaketoast@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      shiitaketoast@beige.party
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #61

                                      @sundogplanets what is the GHG factor of aluminum?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                        That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                        SpaceX is awful.

                                        hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hansbot@mastodon.green
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #62

                                        @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Now imagine having a million data centers in orbit, from musk alone. Before long, every few seconds a satellite will come down – with all its payload burning into the atmosphere

                                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                          A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                          That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                          SpaceX is awful.

                                          guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #63

                                          @sundogplanets as I understand it, it’s even worse

                                          https://youtu.be/iDaG4zt0NKc

                                          These alloys don’t vanish, their chemical components mix with the air, they keep floating high up and they cause changes

                                          /cc @keithdpatch

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups