Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
41 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

    Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

    For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

    oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
    oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
    oclsc@mstdn.ca
    wrote last edited by
    #19

    @cstross Such bugs are far older than that.

    The place I studied as an undergrad had a PDP-10 for campus-wide time sharing. ca. 1979 official IT staff (not that they were called that) moved most of their effort to getting new VAXes going as replacements. As part of that, they cancelled the weekly downtime to run diagnostics on the PDP-10.

    That revealed a long-standing bug in TOP-10: some internal counter (I forget what, can't have been simple uptime in clock ticks on a system with 36-bit words) overflowed after about a month of uptime, causing havoc.

    I forget whether DEC supplied a fix, IT staff (or us students helping keep the -10 running) rolled our own, or we just scheduled monthly reboots.

    oddhack@mstdn.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nske@ravenation.clubN nske@ravenation.club

      @cstross The System 7 Macs we used back then were doing well if they got to 49 minutes.

      cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
      cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
      cstross@wandering.shop
      wrote last edited by
      #20

      @nske I *never* managed to get a Windows 95/98/98SE/ME machine to stay up for more than 36 hours without crashing hard. There's a reason I migrated to Linux back in the kernel 1.2 era (then onto Mac OSX back when it was warmed-over NeXTStep rather than whatever bizarre horror show it has evolved into today, where I remain, trapped by apathy).

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

        RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

        Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

        For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

        hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
        hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
        hairyvisionary@fosstodon.org
        wrote last edited by
        #21

        @cstross Huh. I have got a 2008 Mac Mini running Lion (10.7) on my desk. It is reporting an uptime of 493 days 16:27. It's on the network enough to share filesystems with an adjacent newer 2020 Mini running 15.7.5, as in I just connected to it and can see the files.

        hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • darkling@mstdn.socialD darkling@mstdn.social

          @cstross Linux shook most of those bugs out fairly rapidly by simply setting the initial value of the counter to 0xffffff00, and letting it overflow in less than 5 minutes after boot...

          alister@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
          alister@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
          alister@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #22

          @darkling @cstross Yep, though AIR (and with some old posts that back up the numbers) the lore was that Linux crashed after 497 days - for the same reason as Windows - but that the 497 days issue was found before any windows machine had successfully made it to 49.7...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

            RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

            Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

            For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

            edavies@functional.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
            edavies@functional.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
            edavies@functional.cafe
            wrote last edited by
            #23

            @cstross https://www.theregister.com/2020/04/02/boeing_787_power_cycle_51_days_stale_data

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

              RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

              Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

              For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

              chigaze@cosocial.caC This user is from outside of this forum
              chigaze@cosocial.caC This user is from outside of this forum
              chigaze@cosocial.ca
              wrote last edited by
              #24

              @cstross This is definitely not every Mac. We have a number of Macs running as servers with way more uptime than that. Plus I'd definitely have noticed if our FileMaker server that I manage was dying every month and half. Also the media server in my basement has way more uptime than that.

              Edit: Seeing reports it may be Tahoe only.

              wraithe@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
              • jwz@mastodon.socialJ jwz@mastodon.social

                @cstross My various Macs currently have uptimes of 108, 94, 91, 83 and 55 days, so... no.

                Using their diagnostic on the machine I am typing this from: "Time until overflow: -1412h -52m -59s" and time_wait is 26.

                dpnash@c.imD This user is from outside of this forum
                dpnash@c.imD This user is from outside of this forum
                dpnash@c.im
                wrote last edited by
                #25

                @jwz @cstross

                Yeah, that’s more like my experience — sample size of one here, but it’s an M1 Mac Mini that stays up for months without anything like this happening. It only goes down when I turn it off to physically move it, which is uncommon.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                  RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                  Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                  For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                  cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cyberspice@oldbytes.space
                  wrote last edited by
                  #26

                  @cstross There must be an accidental work around because I’ve never hit it!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH hairyvisionary@fosstodon.org

                    @cstross Huh. I have got a 2008 Mac Mini running Lion (10.7) on my desk. It is reporting an uptime of 493 days 16:27. It's on the network enough to share filesystems with an adjacent newer 2020 Mini running 15.7.5, as in I just connected to it and can see the files.

                    hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hairyvisionary@fosstodon.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #27

                    @cstross First-gen white MacBook running Snow Leopard 10.6 (named "Tape Monitor 2" because ripping records and tapes is its primary purpose) needs a reboot every three months or so to sort out some weirdness with audio (a Griffin iMic and old version of Audacity are also involved)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • benjistokman@mast.benstokman.meB benjistokman@mast.benstokman.me

                      @mattblaze @cstross I saw on threadiverse that hibernating the system resets the clock

                      cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cyberspice@oldbytes.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #28

                      @benjistokman @mattblaze @cstross Ah that’s probably why I have never seen it. My devices go to sleep but have wake on LAN.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • timwardcam@c.imT timwardcam@c.im

                        @cstross I wrote one of those once.

                        We built some hardware, tested it using a daughter board with a PROM chip on it running some soak test software, and sent it to the customer. Who said:

                        "We accept that the contract says the board has to pass the soak test for 48 hours, and it does, but we are nonetheless curious to know, if you felt like telling us, why it crashes after 63 hours 22 minutes (or whatever it was)?"

                        It turned out to be a 32 bit counter overflow in the soak test software. Which we'd never run for more than 48 hours, because according to the contract we didn't have to.

                        Another one of those I came across was more subtle. There was a cross-language call, and there was a mismatch between the calling sequences expected on either side, such that four bytes more stack was allocated on each call than was freed. After several days this filled the maximum allowed stack size and crashed (always after the same number of days, hours, minutes). Not good in a system supposed to work 24/7 on a production line.

                        cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cyberspice@oldbytes.space
                        wrote last edited by
                        #29

                        @TimWardCam @cstross Many years ago I had a set top box which would crash regularly in the middle of the night so I used a time switch to restart it at like 04:00. Amusingly I’ve worked on a lot of STBs and Smart TVs since then and they nearly all have a middle of the night “maintenance slot” when they check for updates etc. Restarting bits of the stack is quite common!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • oclsc@mstdn.caO oclsc@mstdn.ca

                          @cstross Such bugs are far older than that.

                          The place I studied as an undergrad had a PDP-10 for campus-wide time sharing. ca. 1979 official IT staff (not that they were called that) moved most of their effort to getting new VAXes going as replacements. As part of that, they cancelled the weekly downtime to run diagnostics on the PDP-10.

                          That revealed a long-standing bug in TOP-10: some internal counter (I forget what, can't have been simple uptime in clock ticks on a system with 36-bit words) overflowed after about a month of uptime, causing havoc.

                          I forget whether DEC supplied a fix, IT staff (or us students helping keep the -10 running) rolled our own, or we just scheduled monthly reboots.

                          oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                          oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                          oddhack@mstdn.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #30

                          @oclsc @cstross TIMEVX:: forever! (I may boot up a VMS emulator and see if mined still compiles on it, someday).

                          oclsc@mstdn.caO 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • oddhack@mstdn.socialO oddhack@mstdn.social

                            @oclsc @cstross TIMEVX:: forever! (I may boot up a VMS emulator and see if mined still compiles on it, someday).

                            oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oclsc@mstdn.ca
                            wrote last edited by
                            #31

                            @oddhack @cstross I was happy to leave VMS behind when I left California. I wish I could do the same with Linux and return to something that really feels like Unix, but that doesn't exist any more.

                            Need to find time to assemble, at long last, my PiDP-11 and run 7/e on it.

                            oddhack@mstdn.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                              RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                              Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                              For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                              dheadshot@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dheadshot@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dheadshot@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #32

                              @cstross
                              Can we crash macOS by creating a folder called "con" inside another folder called "con" as well?

                              *Windows 95 peels off mask* "And I would have got away with it too if it wasn't for you meddling security researchers!"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • oclsc@mstdn.caO oclsc@mstdn.ca

                                @oddhack @cstross I was happy to leave VMS behind when I left California. I wish I could do the same with Linux and return to something that really feels like Unix, but that doesn't exist any more.

                                Need to find time to assemble, at long last, my PiDP-11 and run 7/e on it.

                                oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                oddhack@mstdn.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #33

                                @oclsc @cstross Free/OpenBSD do not count?

                                oclsc@mstdn.caO 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                  RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                                  Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                                  For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                                  tclark@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tclark@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tclark@mstdn.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #34

                                  @cstross I've had multiple uptime durations in excess of 90 days on my current Mac mini....

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                    RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                                    Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                                    For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                                    wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    wraithe@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #35

                                    @cstross Ok, I went and read it and I’m still tentatively gonna call bullshit on that dev.

                                    My primary laptop is currently running at over 4 months of uptime, I have over a dozen client (I’m in IT) machines with 5-9 months of uptime.

                                    My work laptop doesn’t sleep/hibernate as it’s tethered to a screen so that’s a continuous 127 days.

                                    I have an iMac Pro sitting next to me on the floor that’s been running for 245 days straight.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    wraithe@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • wraithe@mastodon.socialW wraithe@mastodon.social

                                      @cstross Ok, I went and read it and I’m still tentatively gonna call bullshit on that dev.

                                      My primary laptop is currently running at over 4 months of uptime, I have over a dozen client (I’m in IT) machines with 5-9 months of uptime.

                                      My work laptop doesn’t sleep/hibernate as it’s tethered to a screen so that’s a continuous 127 days.

                                      I have an iMac Pro sitting next to me on the floor that’s been running for 245 days straight.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wraithe@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #36

                                      @cstross And before anyone asks*, the client machines are wide spread of OS versions (because I’m kinda behind on bringing everything forward & I don’t quite trust macOS 26 fully yet 😁)

                                      *no one was going to ask. 😁

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • chigaze@cosocial.caC chigaze@cosocial.ca

                                        @cstross This is definitely not every Mac. We have a number of Macs running as servers with way more uptime than that. Plus I'd definitely have noticed if our FileMaker server that I manage was dying every month and half. Also the media server in my basement has way more uptime than that.

                                        Edit: Seeing reports it may be Tahoe only.

                                        wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wraithe@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #37

                                        @Chigaze @cstross Yeah, Michael Tsai is indicating it may be legit but Tahoe (26) only, although he’s not confirming fully either.
                                        In which case, it’ll get patched next update or two.
                                        (h/t to @ednl in the post thread)

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Michael Tsai - Blog - Tahoe TCP Overflow Bug

                                        favicon

                                        (mjtsai.com)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • oddhack@mstdn.socialO oddhack@mstdn.social

                                          @oclsc @cstross Free/OpenBSD do not count?

                                          oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          oclsc@mstdn.ca
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #38

                                          @oddhack @cstross Both have cat -v and worse.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups