Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
41 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jwz@mastodon.socialJ jwz@mastodon.social

    @cstross My various Macs currently have uptimes of 108, 94, 91, 83 and 55 days, so... no.

    Using their diagnostic on the machine I am typing this from: "Time until overflow: -1412h -52m -59s" and time_wait is 26.

    jwz@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jwz@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jwz@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #13

    @cstross Also the company reporting this seems to be in the business of creating AI-chatbot-to-iMessage spam firehoses, so one has to assume that their whole operation is vibe-coded...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

      @cstross While I can believe there is a bug somewhere in the mac network stack, it definitely doesn't always cause things to crash after 49 days all the time. The machine i'm typing this on has been up for 170 days (and is due for a software update, come to think of it).

      benjistokman@mast.benstokman.meB This user is from outside of this forum
      benjistokman@mast.benstokman.meB This user is from outside of this forum
      benjistokman@mast.benstokman.me
      wrote last edited by
      #14

      @mattblaze @cstross I saw on threadiverse that hibernating the system resets the clock

      mattblaze@federate.socialM cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • cinebox@masto.hackers.townC cinebox@masto.hackers.town

        @darkling @cstross oooh that’s a good solution I like that

        darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        darkling@mstdn.social
        wrote last edited by
        #15

        @cinebox @cstross (Of course, I've got the number wrong... that'd be 2.5 seconds at 100 Hz, or ¼s at 1kHz. The method still worked, even if I can't get that detail right.)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE etchedpixels@mastodon.social

          @rootwyrm @cstross Linux was generally 497 days or so which of course people discovered.

          Windows was 10x quicker at dying but less people noticed 😎

          For a long time Linux then made sure it didn't happen again much by starting the timer close to the wrap value so it would fall over promptly.

          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
          rootwyrm@weird.autos
          wrote last edited by
          #16

          @etchedpixels @cstross nope and nope. I'd have to go dredging archives, but Linux has fucked up multiple, multiple times. Because there's multiple timers.
          Also systemd has been the root of several incidents because it is the work of complete idiots.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • benjistokman@mast.benstokman.meB benjistokman@mast.benstokman.me

            @mattblaze @cstross I saw on threadiverse that hibernating the system resets the clock

            mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mattblaze@federate.social
            wrote last edited by
            #17

            @benjistokman @cstross Ah. That would explain it not affecting laptops in practice.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

              RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

              Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

              For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

              nske@ravenation.clubN This user is from outside of this forum
              nske@ravenation.clubN This user is from outside of this forum
              nske@ravenation.club
              wrote last edited by
              #18

              @cstross The System 7 Macs we used back then were doing well if they got to 49 minutes.

              cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                oclsc@mstdn.ca
                wrote last edited by
                #19

                @cstross Such bugs are far older than that.

                The place I studied as an undergrad had a PDP-10 for campus-wide time sharing. ca. 1979 official IT staff (not that they were called that) moved most of their effort to getting new VAXes going as replacements. As part of that, they cancelled the weekly downtime to run diagnostics on the PDP-10.

                That revealed a long-standing bug in TOP-10: some internal counter (I forget what, can't have been simple uptime in clock ticks on a system with 36-bit words) overflowed after about a month of uptime, causing havoc.

                I forget whether DEC supplied a fix, IT staff (or us students helping keep the -10 running) rolled our own, or we just scheduled monthly reboots.

                oddhack@mstdn.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • nske@ravenation.clubN nske@ravenation.club

                  @cstross The System 7 Macs we used back then were doing well if they got to 49 minutes.

                  cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cstross@wandering.shop
                  wrote last edited by
                  #20

                  @nske I *never* managed to get a Windows 95/98/98SE/ME machine to stay up for more than 36 hours without crashing hard. There's a reason I migrated to Linux back in the kernel 1.2 era (then onto Mac OSX back when it was warmed-over NeXTStep rather than whatever bizarre horror show it has evolved into today, where I remain, trapped by apathy).

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                    RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                    Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                    For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                    hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hairyvisionary@fosstodon.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #21

                    @cstross Huh. I have got a 2008 Mac Mini running Lion (10.7) on my desk. It is reporting an uptime of 493 days 16:27. It's on the network enough to share filesystems with an adjacent newer 2020 Mini running 15.7.5, as in I just connected to it and can see the files.

                    hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • darkling@mstdn.socialD darkling@mstdn.social

                      @cstross Linux shook most of those bugs out fairly rapidly by simply setting the initial value of the counter to 0xffffff00, and letting it overflow in less than 5 minutes after boot...

                      alister@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                      alister@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                      alister@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22

                      @darkling @cstross Yep, though AIR (and with some old posts that back up the numbers) the lore was that Linux crashed after 497 days - for the same reason as Windows - but that the 497 days issue was found before any windows machine had successfully made it to 49.7...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                        RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                        Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                        For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                        edavies@functional.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                        edavies@functional.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                        edavies@functional.cafe
                        wrote last edited by
                        #23

                        @cstross https://www.theregister.com/2020/04/02/boeing_787_power_cycle_51_days_stale_data

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                          RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                          Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                          For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                          chigaze@cosocial.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                          chigaze@cosocial.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                          chigaze@cosocial.ca
                          wrote last edited by
                          #24

                          @cstross This is definitely not every Mac. We have a number of Macs running as servers with way more uptime than that. Plus I'd definitely have noticed if our FileMaker server that I manage was dying every month and half. Also the media server in my basement has way more uptime than that.

                          Edit: Seeing reports it may be Tahoe only.

                          wraithe@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                          • jwz@mastodon.socialJ jwz@mastodon.social

                            @cstross My various Macs currently have uptimes of 108, 94, 91, 83 and 55 days, so... no.

                            Using their diagnostic on the machine I am typing this from: "Time until overflow: -1412h -52m -59s" and time_wait is 26.

                            dpnash@c.imD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dpnash@c.imD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dpnash@c.im
                            wrote last edited by
                            #25

                            @jwz @cstross

                            Yeah, that’s more like my experience — sample size of one here, but it’s an M1 Mac Mini that stays up for months without anything like this happening. It only goes down when I turn it off to physically move it, which is uncommon.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                              RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                              Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                              For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                              cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cyberspice@oldbytes.space
                              wrote last edited by
                              #26

                              @cstross There must be an accidental work around because I’ve never hit it!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH hairyvisionary@fosstodon.org

                                @cstross Huh. I have got a 2008 Mac Mini running Lion (10.7) on my desk. It is reporting an uptime of 493 days 16:27. It's on the network enough to share filesystems with an adjacent newer 2020 Mini running 15.7.5, as in I just connected to it and can see the files.

                                hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hairyvisionary@fosstodon.org
                                wrote last edited by
                                #27

                                @cstross First-gen white MacBook running Snow Leopard 10.6 (named "Tape Monitor 2" because ripping records and tapes is its primary purpose) needs a reboot every three months or so to sort out some weirdness with audio (a Griffin iMic and old version of Audacity are also involved)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • benjistokman@mast.benstokman.meB benjistokman@mast.benstokman.me

                                  @mattblaze @cstross I saw on threadiverse that hibernating the system resets the clock

                                  cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cyberspice@oldbytes.space
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #28

                                  @benjistokman @mattblaze @cstross Ah that’s probably why I have never seen it. My devices go to sleep but have wake on LAN.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • timwardcam@c.imT timwardcam@c.im

                                    @cstross I wrote one of those once.

                                    We built some hardware, tested it using a daughter board with a PROM chip on it running some soak test software, and sent it to the customer. Who said:

                                    "We accept that the contract says the board has to pass the soak test for 48 hours, and it does, but we are nonetheless curious to know, if you felt like telling us, why it crashes after 63 hours 22 minutes (or whatever it was)?"

                                    It turned out to be a 32 bit counter overflow in the soak test software. Which we'd never run for more than 48 hours, because according to the contract we didn't have to.

                                    Another one of those I came across was more subtle. There was a cross-language call, and there was a mismatch between the calling sequences expected on either side, such that four bytes more stack was allocated on each call than was freed. After several days this filled the maximum allowed stack size and crashed (always after the same number of days, hours, minutes). Not good in a system supposed to work 24/7 on a production line.

                                    cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cyberspice@oldbytes.space
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #29

                                    @TimWardCam @cstross Many years ago I had a set top box which would crash regularly in the middle of the night so I used a time switch to restart it at like 04:00. Amusingly I’ve worked on a lot of STBs and Smart TVs since then and they nearly all have a middle of the night “maintenance slot” when they check for updates etc. Restarting bits of the stack is quite common!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • oclsc@mstdn.caO oclsc@mstdn.ca

                                      @cstross Such bugs are far older than that.

                                      The place I studied as an undergrad had a PDP-10 for campus-wide time sharing. ca. 1979 official IT staff (not that they were called that) moved most of their effort to getting new VAXes going as replacements. As part of that, they cancelled the weekly downtime to run diagnostics on the PDP-10.

                                      That revealed a long-standing bug in TOP-10: some internal counter (I forget what, can't have been simple uptime in clock ticks on a system with 36-bit words) overflowed after about a month of uptime, causing havoc.

                                      I forget whether DEC supplied a fix, IT staff (or us students helping keep the -10 running) rolled our own, or we just scheduled monthly reboots.

                                      oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                      oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                      oddhack@mstdn.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #30

                                      @oclsc @cstross TIMEVX:: forever! (I may boot up a VMS emulator and see if mined still compiles on it, someday).

                                      oclsc@mstdn.caO 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • oddhack@mstdn.socialO oddhack@mstdn.social

                                        @oclsc @cstross TIMEVX:: forever! (I may boot up a VMS emulator and see if mined still compiles on it, someday).

                                        oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        oclsc@mstdn.ca
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #31

                                        @oddhack @cstross I was happy to leave VMS behind when I left California. I wish I could do the same with Linux and return to something that really feels like Unix, but that doesn't exist any more.

                                        Need to find time to assemble, at long last, my PiDP-11 and run 7/e on it.

                                        oddhack@mstdn.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                          RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                                          Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                                          For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                                          dheadshot@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dheadshot@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dheadshot@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #32

                                          @cstross
                                          Can we crash macOS by creating a folder called "con" inside another folder called "con" as well?

                                          *Windows 95 peels off mask* "And I would have got away with it too if it wasn't for you meddling security researchers!"

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups