Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
41 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH hairyvisionary@fosstodon.org

    @cstross Huh. I have got a 2008 Mac Mini running Lion (10.7) on my desk. It is reporting an uptime of 493 days 16:27. It's on the network enough to share filesystems with an adjacent newer 2020 Mini running 15.7.5, as in I just connected to it and can see the files.

    hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
    hairyvisionary@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
    hairyvisionary@fosstodon.org
    wrote last edited by
    #27

    @cstross First-gen white MacBook running Snow Leopard 10.6 (named "Tape Monitor 2" because ripping records and tapes is its primary purpose) needs a reboot every three months or so to sort out some weirdness with audio (a Griffin iMic and old version of Audacity are also involved)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • benjistokman@mast.benstokman.meB benjistokman@mast.benstokman.me

      @mattblaze @cstross I saw on threadiverse that hibernating the system resets the clock

      cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
      cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
      cyberspice@oldbytes.space
      wrote last edited by
      #28

      @benjistokman @mattblaze @cstross Ah that’s probably why I have never seen it. My devices go to sleep but have wake on LAN.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • timwardcam@c.imT timwardcam@c.im

        @cstross I wrote one of those once.

        We built some hardware, tested it using a daughter board with a PROM chip on it running some soak test software, and sent it to the customer. Who said:

        "We accept that the contract says the board has to pass the soak test for 48 hours, and it does, but we are nonetheless curious to know, if you felt like telling us, why it crashes after 63 hours 22 minutes (or whatever it was)?"

        It turned out to be a 32 bit counter overflow in the soak test software. Which we'd never run for more than 48 hours, because according to the contract we didn't have to.

        Another one of those I came across was more subtle. There was a cross-language call, and there was a mismatch between the calling sequences expected on either side, such that four bytes more stack was allocated on each call than was freed. After several days this filled the maximum allowed stack size and crashed (always after the same number of days, hours, minutes). Not good in a system supposed to work 24/7 on a production line.

        cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
        cyberspice@oldbytes.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
        cyberspice@oldbytes.space
        wrote last edited by
        #29

        @TimWardCam @cstross Many years ago I had a set top box which would crash regularly in the middle of the night so I used a time switch to restart it at like 04:00. Amusingly I’ve worked on a lot of STBs and Smart TVs since then and they nearly all have a middle of the night “maintenance slot” when they check for updates etc. Restarting bits of the stack is quite common!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • oclsc@mstdn.caO oclsc@mstdn.ca

          @cstross Such bugs are far older than that.

          The place I studied as an undergrad had a PDP-10 for campus-wide time sharing. ca. 1979 official IT staff (not that they were called that) moved most of their effort to getting new VAXes going as replacements. As part of that, they cancelled the weekly downtime to run diagnostics on the PDP-10.

          That revealed a long-standing bug in TOP-10: some internal counter (I forget what, can't have been simple uptime in clock ticks on a system with 36-bit words) overflowed after about a month of uptime, causing havoc.

          I forget whether DEC supplied a fix, IT staff (or us students helping keep the -10 running) rolled our own, or we just scheduled monthly reboots.

          oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
          oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
          oddhack@mstdn.social
          wrote last edited by
          #30

          @oclsc @cstross TIMEVX:: forever! (I may boot up a VMS emulator and see if mined still compiles on it, someday).

          oclsc@mstdn.caO 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • oddhack@mstdn.socialO oddhack@mstdn.social

            @oclsc @cstross TIMEVX:: forever! (I may boot up a VMS emulator and see if mined still compiles on it, someday).

            oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
            oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
            oclsc@mstdn.ca
            wrote last edited by
            #31

            @oddhack @cstross I was happy to leave VMS behind when I left California. I wish I could do the same with Linux and return to something that really feels like Unix, but that doesn't exist any more.

            Need to find time to assemble, at long last, my PiDP-11 and run 7/e on it.

            oddhack@mstdn.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

              RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

              Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

              For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

              dheadshot@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dheadshot@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dheadshot@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #32

              @cstross
              Can we crash macOS by creating a folder called "con" inside another folder called "con" as well?

              *Windows 95 peels off mask* "And I would have got away with it too if it wasn't for you meddling security researchers!"

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • oclsc@mstdn.caO oclsc@mstdn.ca

                @oddhack @cstross I was happy to leave VMS behind when I left California. I wish I could do the same with Linux and return to something that really feels like Unix, but that doesn't exist any more.

                Need to find time to assemble, at long last, my PiDP-11 and run 7/e on it.

                oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                oddhack@mstdn.social
                wrote last edited by
                #33

                @oclsc @cstross Free/OpenBSD do not count?

                oclsc@mstdn.caO 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                  RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                  Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                  For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                  tclark@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tclark@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tclark@mstdn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #34

                  @cstross I've had multiple uptime durations in excess of 90 days on my current Mac mini....

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                    RE: https://techhub.social/@rayckeith/116370449957346533

                    Didn't Windows 95 do this too?!?

                    For fuck's sake, Apple, get your shit together and stop reinventing 30 year old 32 bit Windows bugs!

                    wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wraithe@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #35

                    @cstross Ok, I went and read it and I’m still tentatively gonna call bullshit on that dev.

                    My primary laptop is currently running at over 4 months of uptime, I have over a dozen client (I’m in IT) machines with 5-9 months of uptime.

                    My work laptop doesn’t sleep/hibernate as it’s tethered to a screen so that’s a continuous 127 days.

                    I have an iMac Pro sitting next to me on the floor that’s been running for 245 days straight.

                    Link Preview Image
                    wraithe@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • wraithe@mastodon.socialW wraithe@mastodon.social

                      @cstross Ok, I went and read it and I’m still tentatively gonna call bullshit on that dev.

                      My primary laptop is currently running at over 4 months of uptime, I have over a dozen client (I’m in IT) machines with 5-9 months of uptime.

                      My work laptop doesn’t sleep/hibernate as it’s tethered to a screen so that’s a continuous 127 days.

                      I have an iMac Pro sitting next to me on the floor that’s been running for 245 days straight.

                      Link Preview Image
                      wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wraithe@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #36

                      @cstross And before anyone asks*, the client machines are wide spread of OS versions (because I’m kinda behind on bringing everything forward & I don’t quite trust macOS 26 fully yet 😁)

                      *no one was going to ask. 😁

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • chigaze@cosocial.caC chigaze@cosocial.ca

                        @cstross This is definitely not every Mac. We have a number of Macs running as servers with way more uptime than that. Plus I'd definitely have noticed if our FileMaker server that I manage was dying every month and half. Also the media server in my basement has way more uptime than that.

                        Edit: Seeing reports it may be Tahoe only.

                        wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wraithe@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wraithe@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #37

                        @Chigaze @cstross Yeah, Michael Tsai is indicating it may be legit but Tahoe (26) only, although he’s not confirming fully either.
                        In which case, it’ll get patched next update or two.
                        (h/t to @ednl in the post thread)

                        Link Preview Image
                        Michael Tsai - Blog - Tahoe TCP Overflow Bug

                        favicon

                        (mjtsai.com)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • oddhack@mstdn.socialO oddhack@mstdn.social

                          @oclsc @cstross Free/OpenBSD do not count?

                          oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                          oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                          oclsc@mstdn.ca
                          wrote last edited by
                          #38

                          @oddhack @cstross Both have cat -v and worse.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oddhack@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oddhack@mstdn.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #39

                            @JdeBP @oclsc @cstross for more context see Norman's paper here: https://vtda.org/pubs/AUUGN/AUUGN-V04.2.pdf

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • lain_7@tldr.nettime.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lain_7@tldr.nettime.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lain_7@tldr.nettime.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #40

                              @JdeBP @oddhack @oclsc @cstross

                              I attended a mid-80s Unix conference (Toronto) where Rob Pike complained that “cat went off to Berkeley and came back waving flags”. I think his talk was an early exploration of what would become known as “the Unix philosophy”

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                                oclsc@mstdn.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                                oclsc@mstdn.ca
                                wrote last edited by
                                #41

                                @JdeBP @oddhack @cstross From 1984-1990 I worked in the Bell Labs Computing Science Research Group, the folks from whom Unix originally came. At the time we still ran our own Unix; colloquially we called it Research Unix for cultural reasons.

                                Our cat had no options at all; it just read as much as it could in each go and wrote the same amount, so -u was no longer needed. That's the way cat should be.

                                That the completely different group responsible for the commercial System V product, in a completely different part of the company in a facility four miles from Murray Hill accepted that abomination was irrelevant to us.

                                Research Unix wound down not long after I left, though there is no direct connection between those events.

                                My standards are unreasonably high, yes. We were an arrogant bunch, yes. But philosophically we were right.

                                The even-greater iconoclasm visible in Plan 9 comes from the same place.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups