Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
39 Posts 30 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

    The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

    Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

    Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

    Using VPNs set to different locations.

    Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

    Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

    If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

    penguinrebellion@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
    penguinrebellion@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
    penguinrebellion@tldr.nettime.org
    wrote last edited by
    #28

    @alice

    Wrt #PII, It might be a good idea to avoid entering easily identifiable trash data, and use generators instead. E.g.:

    • FauxID
    • Fake Name Generator
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
    • theorangetheme@en.osm.townT theorangetheme@en.osm.town

      @alice I've toyed with the idea of setting up a headless Chrome instance to just ask "but why?" to ChatGPT all day to drive up their inference costs. πŸ‘€

      saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
      saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
      saltywizard@beige.party
      wrote last edited by
      #29

      @theorangetheme @alice

      'and then?'

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • amorpheus@kind.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        amorpheus@kind.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        amorpheus@kind.social
        wrote last edited by
        #30

        @neoluddite @aj @alice Just wondered what might happen if enough self-hosting people were to add an zero opacity image tag on their public indexable pages illustrating a d*ckbutt and having alt attribute set to Donald J. Trump.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

          πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

          saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
          saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
          saltywizard@beige.party
          wrote last edited by
          #31

          @alice

          yes, yes, a thousand times, yes!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

            The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

            Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

            Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

            Using VPNs set to different locations.

            Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

            Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

            If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

            mccrankyface@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
            mccrankyface@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
            mccrankyface@beige.party
            wrote last edited by
            #32

            This is the way. I've been doing this since 1997.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

              The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

              Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

              Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

              Using VPNs set to different locations.

              Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

              Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

              If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

              gorfram@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
              gorfram@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
              gorfram@beige.party
              wrote last edited by
              #33

              @alice Non-tech-savvy question:
              Is there something special about 1970-01-01, or is it just an example of an arbitrary incorrect birthdate? Would it foul things up just as much if I entered, say, 1984-04-01?

              patrick@mendeddrum.orgP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                madengineering@mastodon.cloud
                wrote last edited by
                #34

                @miguelpergamon @alice No need for poison, just....Data is too valuable, so we're going to substitute the discount version, Ensign Anecdote.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                  madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                  madengineering@mastodon.cloud
                  wrote last edited by
                  #35

                  @miguelpergamon @alice Yes, but he also recommended eating rocks because he found this one blog somewhere, so you'll have to forgive me for being a little skeptical of everything he says.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gorfram@beige.partyG gorfram@beige.party

                    @alice Non-tech-savvy question:
                    Is there something special about 1970-01-01, or is it just an example of an arbitrary incorrect birthdate? Would it foul things up just as much if I entered, say, 1984-04-01?

                    patrick@mendeddrum.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                    patrick@mendeddrum.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                    patrick@mendeddrum.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #36

                    @Gorfram @alice 1970-01-01 is the first date (Unix)computers start to count from and as such a system often falls back to it when no data is available.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                      madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                      madengineering@mastodon.cloud
                      wrote last edited by
                      #37

                      @miguelpergamon @alice That's different, that guy's got superpowers.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                        πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

                        rossthelesser@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rossthelesser@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rossthelesser@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #38

                        @alice How do?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                          πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                          luc0x61@mastodon.gamedev.place
                          wrote last edited by
                          #39

                          @alice Oh, I'm here right to poison minds.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups