Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
39 Posts 30 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

    The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

    Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

    Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

    Using VPNs set to different locations.

    Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

    Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

    If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

    aj@gts.sadauskas.id.auA This user is from outside of this forum
    aj@gts.sadauskas.id.auA This user is from outside of this forum
    aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au
    wrote last edited by
    #20

    @alice NULL is also a good answer for when you don't want to give out a particular personal detail.

    Aside from phone, date of birth, and email, most of the time the front end form fields will accept NULL as an answer.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_(SQL)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

      πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

      gabboman@gabboman.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
      gabboman@gabboman.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
      gabboman@gabboman.xyz
      wrote last edited by
      #21

      Sorry accidentally poisoned cuzco instead


      #With-the-poison #the-poison-for-cuzco #the-poison-made-specifically-for-cuzco
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

        The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

        Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

        Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

        Using VPNs set to different locations.

        Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

        Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

        If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

        phloggen@expressional.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        phloggen@expressional.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        phloggen@expressional.social
        wrote last edited by
        #22

        @alice

        We should tax corporations by the GigaByte of storage the own.

        It doesn't matter what they use it for, it should have a tangible yearly cost, to make them think about how much they store.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

          The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

          Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

          Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

          Using VPNs set to different locations.

          Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

          Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

          If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

          agturcz@circumstances.runA This user is from outside of this forum
          agturcz@circumstances.runA This user is from outside of this forum
          agturcz@circumstances.run
          wrote last edited by
          #23

          @alice Enter your name as [object Object] and let them try to find a bug.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

            πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

            themightygit@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            themightygit@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            themightygit@mstdn.social
            wrote last edited by
            #24

            @alice a friend of mine changed his middle name to 'undefined', it caused so many problems he had to change it back within a year.

            kirtai@tech.lgbtK 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • theorangetheme@en.osm.townT theorangetheme@en.osm.town

              @alice I've toyed with the idea of setting up a headless Chrome instance to just ask "but why?" to ChatGPT all day to drive up their inference costs. πŸ‘€

              asprinkleofsage@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              asprinkleofsage@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              asprinkleofsage@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #25

              @theorangetheme @alice lol somebody has a toddler

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

                Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

                Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

                Using VPNs set to different locations.

                Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

                Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

                If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

                badrihippo@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                badrihippo@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                badrihippo@fosstodon.org
                wrote last edited by
                #26

                @alice thank you! I've always wondered whether to put random made-up data but hearing the reasoning and logic spelt out like this is convincing me to actually start. Especially commonsense things like "mess with the fields that don't matter in their service to you"

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • themightygit@mstdn.socialT themightygit@mstdn.social

                  @alice a friend of mine changed his middle name to 'undefined', it caused so many problems he had to change it back within a year.

                  kirtai@tech.lgbtK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kirtai@tech.lgbtK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kirtai@tech.lgbt
                  wrote last edited by
                  #27

                  @TheMightyGit @alice
                  Reminds me of someone who had the last name "Null" and had similar problems.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                    The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

                    Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

                    Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

                    Using VPNs set to different locations.

                    Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

                    Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

                    If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

                    penguinrebellion@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                    penguinrebellion@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                    penguinrebellion@tldr.nettime.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #28

                    @alice

                    Wrt #PII, It might be a good idea to avoid entering easily identifiable trash data, and use generators instead. E.g.:

                    • FauxID
                    • Fake Name Generator
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                    • theorangetheme@en.osm.townT theorangetheme@en.osm.town

                      @alice I've toyed with the idea of setting up a headless Chrome instance to just ask "but why?" to ChatGPT all day to drive up their inference costs. πŸ‘€

                      saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                      saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                      saltywizard@beige.party
                      wrote last edited by
                      #29

                      @theorangetheme @alice

                      'and then?'

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • amorpheus@kind.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        amorpheus@kind.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        amorpheus@kind.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #30

                        @neoluddite @aj @alice Just wondered what might happen if enough self-hosting people were to add an zero opacity image tag on their public indexable pages illustrating a d*ckbutt and having alt attribute set to Donald J. Trump.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                          πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

                          saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                          saltywizard@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                          saltywizard@beige.party
                          wrote last edited by
                          #31

                          @alice

                          yes, yes, a thousand times, yes!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                            The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

                            Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

                            Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

                            Using VPNs set to different locations.

                            Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

                            Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

                            If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

                            mccrankyface@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mccrankyface@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mccrankyface@beige.party
                            wrote last edited by
                            #32

                            This is the way. I've been doing this since 1997.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                              The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

                              Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

                              Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

                              Using VPNs set to different locations.

                              Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

                              Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

                              If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

                              gorfram@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gorfram@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gorfram@beige.party
                              wrote last edited by
                              #33

                              @alice Non-tech-savvy question:
                              Is there something special about 1970-01-01, or is it just an example of an arbitrary incorrect birthdate? Would it foul things up just as much if I entered, say, 1984-04-01?

                              patrick@mendeddrum.orgP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                madengineering@mastodon.cloud
                                wrote last edited by
                                #34

                                @miguelpergamon @alice No need for poison, just....Data is too valuable, so we're going to substitute the discount version, Ensign Anecdote.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  madengineering@mastodon.cloud
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #35

                                  @miguelpergamon @alice Yes, but he also recommended eating rocks because he found this one blog somewhere, so you'll have to forgive me for being a little skeptical of everything he says.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • gorfram@beige.partyG gorfram@beige.party

                                    @alice Non-tech-savvy question:
                                    Is there something special about 1970-01-01, or is it just an example of an arbitrary incorrect birthdate? Would it foul things up just as much if I entered, say, 1984-04-01?

                                    patrick@mendeddrum.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    patrick@mendeddrum.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    patrick@mendeddrum.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #36

                                    @Gorfram @alice 1970-01-01 is the first date (Unix)computers start to count from and as such a system often falls back to it when no data is available.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      madengineering@mastodon.cloud
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #37

                                      @miguelpergamon @alice That's different, that guy's got superpowers.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                                        πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

                                        rossthelesser@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rossthelesser@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rossthelesser@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #38

                                        @alice How do?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                                          πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

                                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                                          luc0x61@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #39

                                          @alice Oh, I'm here right to poison minds.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups