Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y.

I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
llmgenaiacademiaresearchresearchintegri
37 Posts 32 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

    I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

    #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

    meneerdebruin@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
    meneerdebruin@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
    meneerdebruin@mastodon.nl
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @ElenLeFoll Good. Poison as much as possible, let it eat its own crap and dance while it burns to the ground.

    naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

      I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

      #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

      pa27@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      pa27@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      pa27@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      @ElenLeFoll Yes, saw this at the time - but it's good to remind everyone of what comes out of artificial idiocy LLMs!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

        I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

        #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

        seharinsights@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        seharinsights@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        seharinsights@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @ElenLeFoll incredible post

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pineywoozle@masto.aiP pineywoozle@masto.ai

          @ElenLeFoll I love this quote about the original article. “Acknowledgments also thanked “Professor Sideshow Bob” and a professor from the Starfleet Academy for access to a lab aboard the USS Enterprise” 🤣 🤣 🤣 #AI #AiSlop

          czarbucks@vmst.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
          czarbucks@vmst.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
          czarbucks@vmst.io
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @Pineywoozle @ElenLeFoll

          Wow. It couldn't be more obvious, but this dreck is infiltrating *everything.*

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
          • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

            I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

            #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

            mkljczk@pl.fediverse.plM This user is from outside of this forum
            mkljczk@pl.fediverse.plM This user is from outside of this forum
            mkljczk@pl.fediverse.pl
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org

            a Google spokesperson said such results reflected the performance of an earlier model. They added, “We have always been transparent about the limitations of generative AI and provide in-app prompts to encourage users to double-check information. For sensitive matters such as medical advice, Gemini recommends users consult with qualified professionals.”

            that would mostly work well if they released 'AI overview' as an opt-in feature instead of forcing it on users who have some trust in Google built over the past decades and don't expect it to suddenly start making stuff up lol

            urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • drajt@fosstodon.orgD drajt@fosstodon.org shared this topic
            • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

              I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

              #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

              kolya@social.cologneK This user is from outside of this forum
              kolya@social.cologneK This user is from outside of this forum
              kolya@social.cologne
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @ElenLeFoll that iMac is approaching his 30s. he's earned the right to be a hypochondriac sometimes.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • kunev@blewsky.socialK kunev@blewsky.social

                @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org the "reasercher"'s name Lazljiv Izgubljenovic to a speaker of most slavic languages would read sort of like "Lying Loser" 😆😆😆

                oranger@piaille.frO This user is from outside of this forum
                oranger@piaille.frO This user is from outside of this forum
                oranger@piaille.fr
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @ElenLeFoll @kunev
                😂
                🎯

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                  I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                  #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                  savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  savvyhomestead@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @ElenLeFoll

                  Some do it, DELIBERATELY with a lot of other subjects too. AI is amoral especially if the material it is fed is amoral and we know a lot of those tech guys and politicians ARE amoral.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mkljczk@pl.fediverse.plM mkljczk@pl.fediverse.pl

                    @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org

                    a Google spokesperson said such results reflected the performance of an earlier model. They added, “We have always been transparent about the limitations of generative AI and provide in-app prompts to encourage users to double-check information. For sensitive matters such as medical advice, Gemini recommends users consult with qualified professionals.”

                    that would mostly work well if they released 'AI overview' as an opt-in feature instead of forcing it on users who have some trust in Google built over the past decades and don't expect it to suddenly start making stuff up lol

                    urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                    urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                    urban_hermit@mstdn.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    @mkljczk @ElenLeFoll
                    Good point.

                    Google, if Gemini is as useful as you hope it will be, it is inevitable that it will just come to be known as "Google" and AI answers to direct questions is just a feature of Google search.

                    Google, if Gemini is unreliable and can not be reliable, why are you letting it tarnish your brand?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • bms48@mastodon.socialB bms48@mastodon.social

                      @ElenLeFoll Yeah that's totally getting ingested into my Zotero along with all the other corroborating evidence for "The only way is down". But to falsify I am looking at what working code generation studies there actually are.

                      mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mycotropic@beige.party
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      @bms48 @ElenLeFoll

                      Johnathan Swift described The Machine (for writing) in 1726; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Engine

                      nev@flipping.rocksN 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mycotropic@beige.party
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        @bencourtice @FediThing @ElenLeFoll

                        We have a whole module on how to cite and also how AI works (ethics, errors, foundational knowledge, all that) for our freshman public health students. We STILL had over 10% academic affairs referrals for using hidden prompts and hallucinated citations and that's with a requirement that they give us annotated PDF copies of every cited paper.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                          I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                          #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                          j12i@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          j12i@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          j12i@weirder.earth
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          boost with CN: "AI"

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                            I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                            #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                            savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            savvyhomestead@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            @ElenLeFoll

                            The obvious end goal of AI is centralized control of information that can be used to bend public opinion, win elections for pedophiles, criminals and set trends.

                            Attention Required! | Cloudflare

                            favicon

                            (cybernews.com)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                              I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                              #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                              villavelius@mastodon.onlineV This user is from outside of this forum
                              villavelius@mastodon.onlineV This user is from outside of this forum
                              villavelius@mastodon.online
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              @ElenLeFoll LLMs, like seagulls, swallow anything that's thrown at them. It's known as 'gullibility' for a good reason.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              0
                              • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                grimalkina@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23

                                @ElenLeFoll I'm sorry, they put up fake preprints and then said other researchers citing these preprints are the problem? Standing up a fake preprint is absurdly unethical

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                  I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                  #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                  djl@mastodon.mit.eduD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  djl@mastodon.mit.eduD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  djl@mastodon.mit.edu
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24

                                  @ElenLeFoll

                                  This is a rerun of the Sokal Hoax.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Sokal affair - Wikipedia

                                  favicon

                                  (en.wikipedia.org)

                                  Like some here, some folks thought the Sokal hoax was ethically problematic, but the postmodernists needed a wake up call, as do the LLM fans.

                                  Really: the LLM idea is the stupidest* thing to come out of Computer Science ever. We need to be embarrassed.

                                  *: Unnecessary explanation: the idea that random text generation has something to do with intelligence is really really stupid.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                    I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                    #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                    mage_of_chaos@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mage_of_chaos@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mage_of_chaos@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #25

                                    @ElenLeFoll

                                    That's something the government does every few years already. Nothing new.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                      I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                      #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      agreeable_landfall@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #26

                                      @ElenLeFoll I'm convinced one of the main reasons we die is that we get too old or too sick to manage our own healthcare. We can't do the research to find the right studies, we can't read or understand those studies, and we can't question our providers to be sure they actually understand what's wrong with us.

                                      Once we are dependent on mere employees, the quality of care goes way down, and mistakes get made, or our treatment is just ineffective.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                        I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                        #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                                        failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #27

                                        @ElenLeFoll

                                        as a scientist, you are surely aware of bias

                                        such as the bias on social media, where if AI does something bad, it gets widely disseminated (goes viral)

                                        whereas if AI does something good, no one talks about it

                                        also,
                                        PSA
                                        when I was a baby PhD student in 1985, my teachers warned me over and over, don't trust something just cause it is published in a peer reviewed journal
                                        be careful of all that you read !!!!!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                          I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                          #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                          mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mhoye@cosocial.ca
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #28

                                          @ElenLeFoll You might enjoy my recent experience with raclette maximalism.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Lies, Damned Lies And Stochastics | blarg

                                          favicon

                                          (exple.tive.org)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups