Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y.

I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
llmgenaiacademiaresearchresearchintegri
37 Posts 32 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

    I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

    #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

    savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    savvyhomestead@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #16

    @ElenLeFoll

    Some do it, DELIBERATELY with a lot of other subjects too. AI is amoral especially if the material it is fed is amoral and we know a lot of those tech guys and politicians ARE amoral.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mkljczk@pl.fediverse.plM mkljczk@pl.fediverse.pl

      @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org

      a Google spokesperson said such results reflected the performance of an earlier model. They added, “We have always been transparent about the limitations of generative AI and provide in-app prompts to encourage users to double-check information. For sensitive matters such as medical advice, Gemini recommends users consult with qualified professionals.”

      that would mostly work well if they released 'AI overview' as an opt-in feature instead of forcing it on users who have some trust in Google built over the past decades and don't expect it to suddenly start making stuff up lol

      urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
      urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
      urban_hermit@mstdn.social
      wrote last edited by
      #17

      @mkljczk @ElenLeFoll
      Good point.

      Google, if Gemini is as useful as you hope it will be, it is inevitable that it will just come to be known as "Google" and AI answers to direct questions is just a feature of Google search.

      Google, if Gemini is unreliable and can not be reliable, why are you letting it tarnish your brand?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • bms48@mastodon.socialB bms48@mastodon.social

        @ElenLeFoll Yeah that's totally getting ingested into my Zotero along with all the other corroborating evidence for "The only way is down". But to falsify I am looking at what working code generation studies there actually are.

        mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
        mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
        mycotropic@beige.party
        wrote last edited by
        #18

        @bms48 @ElenLeFoll

        Johnathan Swift described The Machine (for writing) in 1726; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Engine

        nev@flipping.rocksN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
          mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
          mycotropic@beige.party
          wrote last edited by
          #19

          @bencourtice @FediThing @ElenLeFoll

          We have a whole module on how to cite and also how AI works (ethics, errors, foundational knowledge, all that) for our freshman public health students. We STILL had over 10% academic affairs referrals for using hidden prompts and hallucinated citations and that's with a requirement that they give us annotated PDF copies of every cited paper.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

            I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

            #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

            j12i@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
            j12i@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
            j12i@weirder.earth
            wrote last edited by
            #20

            boost with CN: "AI"

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

              I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

              #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

              savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              savvyhomestead@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #21

              @ElenLeFoll

              The obvious end goal of AI is centralized control of information that can be used to bend public opinion, win elections for pedophiles, criminals and set trends.

              Attention Required! | Cloudflare

              favicon

              (cybernews.com)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                villavelius@mastodon.onlineV This user is from outside of this forum
                villavelius@mastodon.onlineV This user is from outside of this forum
                villavelius@mastodon.online
                wrote last edited by
                #22

                @ElenLeFoll LLMs, like seagulls, swallow anything that's thrown at them. It's known as 'gullibility' for a good reason.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                  I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                  #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                  grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  grimalkina@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #23

                  @ElenLeFoll I'm sorry, they put up fake preprints and then said other researchers citing these preprints are the problem? Standing up a fake preprint is absurdly unethical

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                    I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                    #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                    djl@mastodon.mit.eduD This user is from outside of this forum
                    djl@mastodon.mit.eduD This user is from outside of this forum
                    djl@mastodon.mit.edu
                    wrote last edited by
                    #24

                    @ElenLeFoll

                    This is a rerun of the Sokal Hoax.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Sokal affair - Wikipedia

                    favicon

                    (en.wikipedia.org)

                    Like some here, some folks thought the Sokal hoax was ethically problematic, but the postmodernists needed a wake up call, as do the LLM fans.

                    Really: the LLM idea is the stupidest* thing to come out of Computer Science ever. We need to be embarrassed.

                    *: Unnecessary explanation: the idea that random text generation has something to do with intelligence is really really stupid.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                      I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                      #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                      mage_of_chaos@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mage_of_chaos@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mage_of_chaos@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #25

                      @ElenLeFoll

                      That's something the government does every few years already. Nothing new.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                        I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                        #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        agreeable_landfall@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #26

                        @ElenLeFoll I'm convinced one of the main reasons we die is that we get too old or too sick to manage our own healthcare. We can't do the research to find the right studies, we can't read or understand those studies, and we can't question our providers to be sure they actually understand what's wrong with us.

                        Once we are dependent on mere employees, the quality of care goes way down, and mistakes get made, or our treatment is just ineffective.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                          I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                          #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to
                          wrote last edited by
                          #27

                          @ElenLeFoll

                          as a scientist, you are surely aware of bias

                          such as the bias on social media, where if AI does something bad, it gets widely disseminated (goes viral)

                          whereas if AI does something good, no one talks about it

                          also,
                          PSA
                          when I was a baby PhD student in 1985, my teachers warned me over and over, don't trust something just cause it is published in a peer reviewed journal
                          be careful of all that you read !!!!!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                            I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                            #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                            mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mhoye@cosocial.ca
                            wrote last edited by
                            #28

                            @ElenLeFoll You might enjoy my recent experience with raclette maximalism.

                            Link Preview Image
                            Lies, Damned Lies And Stochastics | blarg

                            favicon

                            (exple.tive.org)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • pineywoozle@masto.aiP pineywoozle@masto.ai

                              @ElenLeFoll I love this quote about the original article. “Acknowledgments also thanked “Professor Sideshow Bob” and a professor from the Starfleet Academy for access to a lab aboard the USS Enterprise” 🤣 🤣 🤣 #AI #AiSlop

                              naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                              naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                              naturemc@mastodon.online
                              wrote last edited by
                              #29

                              @Pineywoozle Yes, big cinema ! 🤣🍿 @ElenLeFoll

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mycotropic@beige.partyM mycotropic@beige.party

                                @bms48 @ElenLeFoll

                                Johnathan Swift described The Machine (for writing) in 1726; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Engine

                                nev@flipping.rocksN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nev@flipping.rocksN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nev@flipping.rocks
                                wrote last edited by
                                #30

                                @mycotropic @bms48 @ElenLeFoll shout-out to Ramon Llull: http://www.computer-timeline.com/timeline/ramon-llull/

                                mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • meneerdebruin@mastodon.nlM meneerdebruin@mastodon.nl

                                  @ElenLeFoll Good. Poison as much as possible, let it eat its own crap and dance while it burns to the ground.

                                  naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  naturemc@mastodon.online
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #31

                                  @MeneerDeBruin As a professional 100% human writer, I'm indeed interested in how we could use our creativity for that goal! 😁 @ElenLeFoll

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                    I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                    #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                    the_turtle@mastodon.sdf.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    the_turtle@mastodon.sdf.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    the_turtle@mastodon.sdf.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #32

                                    @ElenLeFoll i *like it a lot* when people teach AI... wrong stuff. Piss in the well at every opportunity, folks.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                      I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                      #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                      number6@fosstodon.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      number6@fosstodon.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      number6@fosstodon.org
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #33

                                      @ElenLeFoll

                                      It seems like the real underlying problem is the "publish or perish" syndrome, where the value of a researcher is based on how many papers they write, or how often they're reference.

                                      So there's a proliferation of papers, many of which are meaningless, and which no one has time to actually read, being referenced in other papers by other researchers who don't have time to read and evaluate all these other papers.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                        I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                        #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                        christianschwaegerl@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        christianschwaegerl@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        christianschwaegerl@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #34

                                        @ElenLeFoll The whole thing is like an oil spill.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • nev@flipping.rocksN nev@flipping.rocks

                                          @mycotropic @bms48 @ElenLeFoll shout-out to Ramon Llull: http://www.computer-timeline.com/timeline/ramon-llull/

                                          mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mycotropic@beige.party
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #35

                                          @nev @bms48 @ElenLeFoll

                                          That's an amazing history and I'll include llull in my "History of AI/LLM" lecture! Thanks!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups