Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y.

I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
llmgenaiacademiaresearchresearchintegri
37 Posts 32 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

    I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

    #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

    djm62@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
    djm62@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
    djm62@beige.party
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @ElenLeFoll Chris Morris would be proud:

    Just a moment...

    favicon

    (publications.parliament.uk)

    Link Preview Image
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

      I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

      #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

      meneerdebruin@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
      meneerdebruin@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
      meneerdebruin@mastodon.nl
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @ElenLeFoll Good. Poison as much as possible, let it eat its own crap and dance while it burns to the ground.

      naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

        I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

        #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

        pa27@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        pa27@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        pa27@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @ElenLeFoll Yes, saw this at the time - but it's good to remind everyone of what comes out of artificial idiocy LLMs!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

          I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

          #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

          seharinsights@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          seharinsights@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          seharinsights@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @ElenLeFoll incredible post

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pineywoozle@masto.aiP pineywoozle@masto.ai

            @ElenLeFoll I love this quote about the original article. “Acknowledgments also thanked “Professor Sideshow Bob” and a professor from the Starfleet Academy for access to a lab aboard the USS Enterprise” 🤣 🤣 🤣 #AI #AiSlop

            czarbucks@vmst.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
            czarbucks@vmst.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
            czarbucks@vmst.io
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @Pineywoozle @ElenLeFoll

            Wow. It couldn't be more obvious, but this dreck is infiltrating *everything.*

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
            • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

              I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

              #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

              mkljczk@pl.fediverse.plM This user is from outside of this forum
              mkljczk@pl.fediverse.plM This user is from outside of this forum
              mkljczk@pl.fediverse.pl
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org

              a Google spokesperson said such results reflected the performance of an earlier model. They added, “We have always been transparent about the limitations of generative AI and provide in-app prompts to encourage users to double-check information. For sensitive matters such as medical advice, Gemini recommends users consult with qualified professionals.”

              that would mostly work well if they released 'AI overview' as an opt-in feature instead of forcing it on users who have some trust in Google built over the past decades and don't expect it to suddenly start making stuff up lol

              urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • drajt@fosstodon.orgD drajt@fosstodon.org shared this topic
              • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                kolya@social.cologneK This user is from outside of this forum
                kolya@social.cologneK This user is from outside of this forum
                kolya@social.cologne
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @ElenLeFoll that iMac is approaching his 30s. he's earned the right to be a hypochondriac sometimes.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • kunev@blewsky.socialK kunev@blewsky.social

                  @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org the "reasercher"'s name Lazljiv Izgubljenovic to a speaker of most slavic languages would read sort of like "Lying Loser" 😆😆😆

                  oranger@piaille.frO This user is from outside of this forum
                  oranger@piaille.frO This user is from outside of this forum
                  oranger@piaille.fr
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @ElenLeFoll @kunev
                  😂
                  🎯

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                    I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                    #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                    savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    savvyhomestead@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @ElenLeFoll

                    Some do it, DELIBERATELY with a lot of other subjects too. AI is amoral especially if the material it is fed is amoral and we know a lot of those tech guys and politicians ARE amoral.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mkljczk@pl.fediverse.plM mkljczk@pl.fediverse.pl

                      @ElenLeFoll@fediscience.org

                      a Google spokesperson said such results reflected the performance of an earlier model. They added, “We have always been transparent about the limitations of generative AI and provide in-app prompts to encourage users to double-check information. For sensitive matters such as medical advice, Gemini recommends users consult with qualified professionals.”

                      that would mostly work well if they released 'AI overview' as an opt-in feature instead of forcing it on users who have some trust in Google built over the past decades and don't expect it to suddenly start making stuff up lol

                      urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                      urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                      urban_hermit@mstdn.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @mkljczk @ElenLeFoll
                      Good point.

                      Google, if Gemini is as useful as you hope it will be, it is inevitable that it will just come to be known as "Google" and AI answers to direct questions is just a feature of Google search.

                      Google, if Gemini is unreliable and can not be reliable, why are you letting it tarnish your brand?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bms48@mastodon.socialB bms48@mastodon.social

                        @ElenLeFoll Yeah that's totally getting ingested into my Zotero along with all the other corroborating evidence for "The only way is down". But to falsify I am looking at what working code generation studies there actually are.

                        mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mycotropic@beige.party
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @bms48 @ElenLeFoll

                        Johnathan Swift described The Machine (for writing) in 1726; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Engine

                        nev@flipping.rocksN 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mycotropic@beige.party
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @bencourtice @FediThing @ElenLeFoll

                          We have a whole module on how to cite and also how AI works (ethics, errors, foundational knowledge, all that) for our freshman public health students. We STILL had over 10% academic affairs referrals for using hidden prompts and hallucinated citations and that's with a requirement that they give us annotated PDF copies of every cited paper.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                            I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                            #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                            j12i@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            j12i@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            j12i@weirder.earth
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            boost with CN: "AI"

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                              I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                              #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                              savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              savvyhomestead@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              savvyhomestead@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @ElenLeFoll

                              The obvious end goal of AI is centralized control of information that can be used to bend public opinion, win elections for pedophiles, criminals and set trends.

                              Attention Required! | Cloudflare

                              favicon

                              (cybernews.com)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                villavelius@mastodon.onlineV This user is from outside of this forum
                                villavelius@mastodon.onlineV This user is from outside of this forum
                                villavelius@mastodon.online
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @ElenLeFoll LLMs, like seagulls, swallow anything that's thrown at them. It's known as 'gullibility' for a good reason.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                  I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                  #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                  grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  grimalkina@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @ElenLeFoll I'm sorry, they put up fake preprints and then said other researchers citing these preprints are the problem? Standing up a fake preprint is absurdly unethical

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                    I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                    #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                    djl@mastodon.mit.eduD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    djl@mastodon.mit.eduD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    djl@mastodon.mit.edu
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @ElenLeFoll

                                    This is a rerun of the Sokal Hoax.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Sokal affair - Wikipedia

                                    favicon

                                    (en.wikipedia.org)

                                    Like some here, some folks thought the Sokal hoax was ethically problematic, but the postmodernists needed a wake up call, as do the LLM fans.

                                    Really: the LLM idea is the stupidest* thing to come out of Computer Science ever. We need to be embarrassed.

                                    *: Unnecessary explanation: the idea that random text generation has something to do with intelligence is really really stupid.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                      I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                      #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                      mage_of_chaos@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mage_of_chaos@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mage_of_chaos@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @ElenLeFoll

                                      That's something the government does every few years already. Nothing new.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                        I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                        #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        agreeable_landfall@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @ElenLeFoll I'm convinced one of the main reasons we die is that we get too old or too sick to manage our own healthcare. We can't do the research to find the right studies, we can't read or understand those studies, and we can't question our providers to be sure they actually understand what's wrong with us.

                                        Once we are dependent on mere employees, the quality of care goes way down, and mistakes get made, or our treatment is just ineffective.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • elenlefoll@fediscience.orgE elenlefoll@fediscience.org

                                          I was only made aware of this (frankly awesome) case of LLM poisoning today: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y. A researcher made up a disease and published two evidently fake preprints about it (including sentences such as “this entire paper is made up” and “Fifty made-up individuals aged between 20 and 50 years were recruited for the exposure group”), which were almost immediately picked up by LLMs and documented in their output. Worse, actual – supposedly serious – medical papers also started citing the preprints, demonstrating that academics relying on LLMs to do their work is a genuine problem! Not that I had my doubts but, if anyone did, this seems like the perfect demonstration of the problem. Article immediately added to the syllabus of the class I am co-teaching with Iris Ferrazzo on LLMs for Romance Studies/Humanities!

                                          #LLM #GenAI #academia #research #ResearchIntegrity #humanities

                                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                                          failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @ElenLeFoll

                                          as a scientist, you are surely aware of bias

                                          such as the bias on social media, where if AI does something bad, it gets widely disseminated (goes viral)

                                          whereas if AI does something good, no one talks about it

                                          also,
                                          PSA
                                          when I was a baby PhD student in 1985, my teachers warned me over and over, don't trust something just cause it is published in a peer reviewed journal
                                          be careful of all that you read !!!!!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups