Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. every time I see this graph

every time I see this graph

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
solarisradical
34 Posts 12 Posters 28 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kimlockhartga@beige.partyK kimlockhartga@beige.party

    @susankayequinn I am waiting for it, but someone will point to the destruction of solar panels in last night's U.S. storms as some kind of evidence that they aren't useful. Okay, Brad, but weren't those homes and businesses useful, the ones that also got destroyed?

    People said the same inane thing after Hurricane Helene, when so many electric cars got inundated with salt water, and some of their batteries caught fire. Uh, I think that flood was destructive to everything, not just electric cars. πŸ™„

    It's maddening that people try to make caring about ourselves, our environment, the planet, and each other, is somehow something we don't want.

    susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
    susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
    susankayequinn@wandering.shop
    wrote last edited by
    #23

    @kimlockhartga the amount of energy they will put into resisting change rather than embracing it is astonishing and indicative that they really just cannot deal with a changing world.

    hamishb@mstdn.caH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

      @kimlockhartga the amount of energy they will put into resisting change rather than embracing it is astonishing and indicative that they really just cannot deal with a changing world.

      hamishb@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
      hamishb@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
      hamishb@mstdn.ca
      wrote last edited by
      #24

      All the while marketing *their* new products and technology as good, necessary and, indeed, inevitable.

      @susankayequinn @kimlockhartga

      kimlockhartga@beige.partyK 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

        every time I see this graph

        it reminds me that the status quo thinkers and talkers and powers are an oil slick in our minds

        telling us things can never change

        what they really mean: STOP THE CHANGE

        our answer: no
        #SolarIsRadical

        tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT This user is from outside of this forum
        tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT This user is from outside of this forum
        tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.com
        wrote last edited by
        #25

        @susankayequinn
        Yup, however this is installed capacity, i would be more optimistic if it was like that for the tera wathours production, and if the shift to more electric usage was following this. Because if you add clean energy but do not remove shitty sources like coal it has no climate impact mitigation, and this is what we need to survive.

        susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.com

          @susankayequinn
          Yup, however this is installed capacity, i would be more optimistic if it was like that for the tera wathours production, and if the shift to more electric usage was following this. Because if you add clean energy but do not remove shitty sources like coal it has no climate impact mitigation, and this is what we need to survive.

          susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
          susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
          susankayequinn@wandering.shop
          wrote last edited by
          #26

          @tykayn "no climate impact" is wildly pessimistic and falling prey to the same kind of thinking that led to these predictions.

          Yes, we need to remove shitty sources like coal (which we are doing at an astonishing rate) but this solar surge also allows better quality of life for people who skip over fossil fuels altogether and go straight to renewables. There are incredible (and a lot of unknown and unknowable) knock on effects.

          Pessimism is a comfortable place but it doesn't bring change.

          tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

            every time I see this graph

            it reminds me that the status quo thinkers and talkers and powers are an oil slick in our minds

            telling us things can never change

            what they really mean: STOP THE CHANGE

            our answer: no
            #SolarIsRadical

            th@social.v.stT This user is from outside of this forum
            th@social.v.stT This user is from outside of this forum
            th@social.v.st
            wrote last edited by
            #27

            @susankayequinn it's the opposite of the Itanium Sales Forecasts graph https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itanium#Expectations

            Link Preview Image
            susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • hamishb@mstdn.caH hamishb@mstdn.ca

              All the while marketing *their* new products and technology as good, necessary and, indeed, inevitable.

              @susankayequinn @kimlockhartga

              kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
              kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
              kimlockhartga@beige.party
              wrote last edited by
              #28

              @hamishb @susankayequinn I've seen people manipulated into believing that access to their own Healthcare is something they shouldn't want, so my faith in people is pretty limited.

              susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • th@social.v.stT th@social.v.st

                @susankayequinn it's the opposite of the Itanium Sales Forecasts graph https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itanium#Expectations

                Link Preview Image
                susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                susankayequinn@wandering.shop
                wrote last edited by
                #29

                @th huh, almost like the same forces of rapacious consumption are behind both the over/under predictions 🫑

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • kimlockhartga@beige.partyK kimlockhartga@beige.party

                  @hamishb @susankayequinn I've seen people manipulated into believing that access to their own Healthcare is something they shouldn't want, so my faith in people is pretty limited.

                  susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                  susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                  susankayequinn@wandering.shop
                  wrote last edited by
                  #30

                  @kimlockhartga @hamishb
                  That manipulation is necessary because the *default state* of humans is not actually to hate each other and be destructive. I maintain this is true simply because we couldn't have survived this long if the death-urge were the default mode and not an abberation fostered by the powerful to maintain control. (And that we've survived *despite* that constant effort at manipulation because the rest of our daily practices are much more humane and human).

                  kimlockhartga@beige.partyK 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

                    @kimlockhartga @hamishb
                    That manipulation is necessary because the *default state* of humans is not actually to hate each other and be destructive. I maintain this is true simply because we couldn't have survived this long if the death-urge were the default mode and not an abberation fostered by the powerful to maintain control. (And that we've survived *despite* that constant effort at manipulation because the rest of our daily practices are much more humane and human).

                    kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kimlockhartga@beige.party
                    wrote last edited by
                    #31

                    @susankayequinn @hamishb excellent analysis.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

                      every time I see this graph

                      it reminds me that the status quo thinkers and talkers and powers are an oil slick in our minds

                      telling us things can never change

                      what they really mean: STOP THE CHANGE

                      our answer: no
                      #SolarIsRadical

                      yianiris@kafeneio.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                      yianiris@kafeneio.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                      yianiris@kafeneio.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #32

                      The majority of tropical forest destruction today is due to "bio-energy" corporate needs, transforming public forest land to private non-edible farms for bio-diesel.
                      Bio-mass is another disaster, there has never been anywhere near enough to be significant raw material, so they engage in deforestation to burn fresh trees. Toxin emissions from such is much worse than the most obsolete oil/coal plant.

                      @susankayequinn

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

                        @tykayn "no climate impact" is wildly pessimistic and falling prey to the same kind of thinking that led to these predictions.

                        Yes, we need to remove shitty sources like coal (which we are doing at an astonishing rate) but this solar surge also allows better quality of life for people who skip over fossil fuels altogether and go straight to renewables. There are incredible (and a lot of unknown and unknowable) knock on effects.

                        Pessimism is a comfortable place but it doesn't bring change.

                        tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.com
                        wrote last edited by
                        #33

                        @susankayequinn
                        I prefer to say that i pays attention to plain greenwashing instead, i am not a passimistic person and toroughly read on the climate subject (ipcc, iea reports and our world in data sources are great with measures and i often see people amazed by solar stuff not being serious on the measures of impact)

                        Things are done and being changed but not at a satisfying pace.
                        Low carbon production is becoming more available, it must not make us forget how huge the work is left to be done, how strong we should pressure the politicians to stop being so unknowing the basic things, and there are more than 80% of the things in the world that are still high carbon, plus some facts about how solar punk is known to be more of a marketing movement than a science based view of possibilities.

                        To illustrate that, we have in france a minister who thought we can power easily the needs with people pushing on bikes all day. That would not provide enough for any country.

                        So yeah.
                        But still optimistic if people are able to get some eyes on some science vulgarisation.

                        susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.com

                          @susankayequinn
                          I prefer to say that i pays attention to plain greenwashing instead, i am not a passimistic person and toroughly read on the climate subject (ipcc, iea reports and our world in data sources are great with measures and i often see people amazed by solar stuff not being serious on the measures of impact)

                          Things are done and being changed but not at a satisfying pace.
                          Low carbon production is becoming more available, it must not make us forget how huge the work is left to be done, how strong we should pressure the politicians to stop being so unknowing the basic things, and there are more than 80% of the things in the world that are still high carbon, plus some facts about how solar punk is known to be more of a marketing movement than a science based view of possibilities.

                          To illustrate that, we have in france a minister who thought we can power easily the needs with people pushing on bikes all day. That would not provide enough for any country.

                          So yeah.
                          But still optimistic if people are able to get some eyes on some science vulgarisation.

                          susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                          susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                          susankayequinn@wandering.shop
                          wrote last edited by
                          #34

                          @tykayn ok, if you're gonna say solarpunk is marketing more than movement, I'm going to say you have no idea what you're talking about.

                          And literally no one said this one graph on mastodon was the totality of everything that we should do. You're not being serious, just an agitator.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups