Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. every time I see this graph

every time I see this graph

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
solarisradical
34 Posts 12 Posters 28 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

    This is so perfectly put
    @billmckibben.bsky.social

    Link Preview Image
    wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
    wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
    wifiwits@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @susankayequinn because there is no option other than oil or gas… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn877d27gndo

    Curiously all those rural homes that are not, and never will be, on the gas network do have electricity.

    brad@1040ste.netB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
    • wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW wifiwits@infosec.exchange

      @susankayequinn because there is no option other than oil or gas… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn877d27gndo

      Curiously all those rural homes that are not, and never will be, on the gas network do have electricity.

      brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
      brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
      brad@1040ste.net
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      @Wifiwits @susankayequinn Not mention they have roofs and, in many cases, a spot of land around them that could host a PV panel or 7.

      Imagine the effect turning on the money tap or shaking a few leaves from the magic money tree would have in bringing energy independence to people living in rural areas.

      wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • brad@1040ste.netB brad@1040ste.net

        @Wifiwits @susankayequinn Not mention they have roofs and, in many cases, a spot of land around them that could host a PV panel or 7.

        Imagine the effect turning on the money tap or shaking a few leaves from the magic money tree would have in bringing energy independence to people living in rural areas.

        wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
        wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
        wifiwits@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @susankayequinn @brad I do understand the capital outlay is too much for many, but there are creative ways around that.

        susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW wifiwits@infosec.exchange

          @susankayequinn @brad I do understand the capital outlay is too much for many, but there are creative ways around that.

          susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
          susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
          susankayequinn@wandering.shop
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @Wifiwits @brad
          the capital outlay is too much solely because we/they don't collectively make the government prioritize it

          Like you wouldn't say the people who live next to the bridge should come up with the capital outlay for the bridge

          somehow the clean energy transition is supposed to be different

          wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

            @Wifiwits @brad
            the capital outlay is too much solely because we/they don't collectively make the government prioritize it

            Like you wouldn't say the people who live next to the bridge should come up with the capital outlay for the bridge

            somehow the clean energy transition is supposed to be different

            wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
            wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
            wifiwits@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @susankayequinn @brad woah there communist… where I’m from we only do that collective thing if we’re burning wood pellets imported from irreplaceable Canadian forest… or nuclear.

            susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW wifiwits@infosec.exchange

              @susankayequinn @brad woah there communist… where I’m from we only do that collective thing if we’re burning wood pellets imported from irreplaceable Canadian forest… or nuclear.

              susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
              susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
              susankayequinn@wandering.shop
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @Wifiwits LOL

              @brad

              wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

                @Wifiwits LOL

                @brad

                wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                wifiwits@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @susankayequinn @brad I also wish there wasn’t quite so much truth in that.

                susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • wifiwits@infosec.exchangeW wifiwits@infosec.exchange

                  @susankayequinn @brad I also wish there wasn’t quite so much truth in that.

                  susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                  susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                  susankayequinn@wandering.shop
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  @Wifiwits don't get me started about how the only collective thing we do here is use tax money to fund war

                  @brad

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                  • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

                    every time I see this graph

                    it reminds me that the status quo thinkers and talkers and powers are an oil slick in our minds

                    telling us things can never change

                    what they really mean: STOP THE CHANGE

                    our answer: no
                    #SolarIsRadical

                    kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kimlockhartga@beige.party
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @susankayequinn I am waiting for it, but someone will point to the destruction of solar panels in last night's U.S. storms as some kind of evidence that they aren't useful. Okay, Brad, but weren't those homes and businesses useful, the ones that also got destroyed?

                    People said the same inane thing after Hurricane Helene, when so many electric cars got inundated with salt water, and some of their batteries caught fire. Uh, I think that flood was destructive to everything, not just electric cars. 🙄

                    It's maddening that people try to make caring about ourselves, our environment, the planet, and each other, is somehow something we don't want.

                    susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • kimlockhartga@beige.partyK kimlockhartga@beige.party

                      @susankayequinn I am waiting for it, but someone will point to the destruction of solar panels in last night's U.S. storms as some kind of evidence that they aren't useful. Okay, Brad, but weren't those homes and businesses useful, the ones that also got destroyed?

                      People said the same inane thing after Hurricane Helene, when so many electric cars got inundated with salt water, and some of their batteries caught fire. Uh, I think that flood was destructive to everything, not just electric cars. 🙄

                      It's maddening that people try to make caring about ourselves, our environment, the planet, and each other, is somehow something we don't want.

                      susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                      susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                      susankayequinn@wandering.shop
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @kimlockhartga the amount of energy they will put into resisting change rather than embracing it is astonishing and indicative that they really just cannot deal with a changing world.

                      hamishb@mstdn.caH 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

                        @kimlockhartga the amount of energy they will put into resisting change rather than embracing it is astonishing and indicative that they really just cannot deal with a changing world.

                        hamishb@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hamishb@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hamishb@mstdn.ca
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        All the while marketing *their* new products and technology as good, necessary and, indeed, inevitable.

                        @susankayequinn @kimlockhartga

                        kimlockhartga@beige.partyK 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

                          every time I see this graph

                          it reminds me that the status quo thinkers and talkers and powers are an oil slick in our minds

                          telling us things can never change

                          what they really mean: STOP THE CHANGE

                          our answer: no
                          #SolarIsRadical

                          tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.com
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @susankayequinn
                          Yup, however this is installed capacity, i would be more optimistic if it was like that for the tera wathours production, and if the shift to more electric usage was following this. Because if you add clean energy but do not remove shitty sources like coal it has no climate impact mitigation, and this is what we need to survive.

                          susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.com

                            @susankayequinn
                            Yup, however this is installed capacity, i would be more optimistic if it was like that for the tera wathours production, and if the shift to more electric usage was following this. Because if you add clean energy but do not remove shitty sources like coal it has no climate impact mitigation, and this is what we need to survive.

                            susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                            susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                            susankayequinn@wandering.shop
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            @tykayn "no climate impact" is wildly pessimistic and falling prey to the same kind of thinking that led to these predictions.

                            Yes, we need to remove shitty sources like coal (which we are doing at an astonishing rate) but this solar surge also allows better quality of life for people who skip over fossil fuels altogether and go straight to renewables. There are incredible (and a lot of unknown and unknowable) knock on effects.

                            Pessimism is a comfortable place but it doesn't bring change.

                            tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

                              every time I see this graph

                              it reminds me that the status quo thinkers and talkers and powers are an oil slick in our minds

                              telling us things can never change

                              what they really mean: STOP THE CHANGE

                              our answer: no
                              #SolarIsRadical

                              th@social.v.stT This user is from outside of this forum
                              th@social.v.stT This user is from outside of this forum
                              th@social.v.st
                              wrote last edited by
                              #27

                              @susankayequinn it's the opposite of the Itanium Sales Forecasts graph https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itanium#Expectations

                              Link Preview Image
                              susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • hamishb@mstdn.caH hamishb@mstdn.ca

                                All the while marketing *their* new products and technology as good, necessary and, indeed, inevitable.

                                @susankayequinn @kimlockhartga

                                kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kimlockhartga@beige.party
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                @hamishb @susankayequinn I've seen people manipulated into believing that access to their own Healthcare is something they shouldn't want, so my faith in people is pretty limited.

                                susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • th@social.v.stT th@social.v.st

                                  @susankayequinn it's the opposite of the Itanium Sales Forecasts graph https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itanium#Expectations

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  susankayequinn@wandering.shop
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #29

                                  @th huh, almost like the same forces of rapacious consumption are behind both the over/under predictions 🫡

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • kimlockhartga@beige.partyK kimlockhartga@beige.party

                                    @hamishb @susankayequinn I've seen people manipulated into believing that access to their own Healthcare is something they shouldn't want, so my faith in people is pretty limited.

                                    susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    susankayequinn@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    susankayequinn@wandering.shop
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #30

                                    @kimlockhartga @hamishb
                                    That manipulation is necessary because the *default state* of humans is not actually to hate each other and be destructive. I maintain this is true simply because we couldn't have survived this long if the death-urge were the default mode and not an abberation fostered by the powerful to maintain control. (And that we've survived *despite* that constant effort at manipulation because the rest of our daily practices are much more humane and human).

                                    kimlockhartga@beige.partyK 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

                                      @kimlockhartga @hamishb
                                      That manipulation is necessary because the *default state* of humans is not actually to hate each other and be destructive. I maintain this is true simply because we couldn't have survived this long if the death-urge were the default mode and not an abberation fostered by the powerful to maintain control. (And that we've survived *despite* that constant effort at manipulation because the rest of our daily practices are much more humane and human).

                                      kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kimlockhartga@beige.party
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #31

                                      @susankayequinn @hamishb excellent analysis.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

                                        every time I see this graph

                                        it reminds me that the status quo thinkers and talkers and powers are an oil slick in our minds

                                        telling us things can never change

                                        what they really mean: STOP THE CHANGE

                                        our answer: no
                                        #SolarIsRadical

                                        yianiris@kafeneio.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                        yianiris@kafeneio.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                        yianiris@kafeneio.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #32

                                        The majority of tropical forest destruction today is due to "bio-energy" corporate needs, transforming public forest land to private non-edible farms for bio-diesel.
                                        Bio-mass is another disaster, there has never been anywhere near enough to be significant raw material, so they engage in deforestation to burn fresh trees. Toxin emissions from such is much worse than the most obsolete oil/coal plant.

                                        @susankayequinn

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • susankayequinn@wandering.shopS susankayequinn@wandering.shop

                                          @tykayn "no climate impact" is wildly pessimistic and falling prey to the same kind of thinking that led to these predictions.

                                          Yes, we need to remove shitty sources like coal (which we are doing at an astonishing rate) but this solar surge also allows better quality of life for people who skip over fossil fuels altogether and go straight to renewables. There are incredible (and a lot of unknown and unknowable) knock on effects.

                                          Pessimism is a comfortable place but it doesn't bring change.

                                          tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tykayn@mastodon.cipherbliss.com
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #33

                                          @susankayequinn
                                          I prefer to say that i pays attention to plain greenwashing instead, i am not a passimistic person and toroughly read on the climate subject (ipcc, iea reports and our world in data sources are great with measures and i often see people amazed by solar stuff not being serious on the measures of impact)

                                          Things are done and being changed but not at a satisfying pace.
                                          Low carbon production is becoming more available, it must not make us forget how huge the work is left to be done, how strong we should pressure the politicians to stop being so unknowing the basic things, and there are more than 80% of the things in the world that are still high carbon, plus some facts about how solar punk is known to be more of a marketing movement than a science based view of possibilities.

                                          To illustrate that, we have in france a minister who thought we can power easily the needs with people pushing on bikes all day. That would not provide enough for any country.

                                          So yeah.
                                          But still optimistic if people are able to get some eyes on some science vulgarisation.

                                          susankayequinn@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups