Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Sigh.

Sigh.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
87 Posts 54 Posters 16 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    Sigh.

    So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

    Link Preview Image
    FlyWire

    favicon

    (flywire.ai)

    Pop-sci explainer here:

    Link Preview Image
    Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

    Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

    favicon

    RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

    Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

    "The wiring is the computation".

    /1

    temptoetiam@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
    temptoetiam@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
    temptoetiam@eldritch.cafe
    wrote last edited by
    #38

    @cstross The popsci writeup stopped me in my tracks at the second paragraph
    "The first successful polymerase chain reaction was run in a car on a California highway." Certainly not! PCR was thought out during a car drive, a *very* different thing!
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction#cite_ref-Mullis_97-0

    Link Preview Image
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
      rootwyrm@weird.autos
      wrote last edited by
      #39

      @cstross and while hypothetically one could potentially prolong this with intensive, continuous mental health treatment? It won't succeed, because it literally can't succeed. Unavoidably at some point you have to address the facts of the matter. Which is that they are effectively just instructions on processors, and the possibility of returning to their prior body - or any truly autonomous capability - just doesn't exist.
      And now you have a system with severe psychosis and homicidal urges.

      cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

        @cstross and while hypothetically one could potentially prolong this with intensive, continuous mental health treatment? It won't succeed, because it literally can't succeed. Unavoidably at some point you have to address the facts of the matter. Which is that they are effectively just instructions on processors, and the possibility of returning to their prior body - or any truly autonomous capability - just doesn't exist.
        And now you have a system with severe psychosis and homicidal urges.

        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
        cstross@wandering.shop
        wrote last edited by
        #40

        @rootwyrm I predict that you're going to love my next novel (the one my agent's looking at right now—a few months late due to writing with cataracts).

        rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
          rootwyrm@weird.autos
          wrote last edited by
          #41

          @cstross I did, in fact. Said fly exists wholly within a simulated universe with limited sensor perception and no interaction with the 'real' world.

          If you want useful or workable output from any sort of machine intelligence, interaction with the 'real' world is inevitable. Doubly so higher orders which may quickly key in to manipulated 'events.' Nevermind the computational requirements.
          And once you cross that line, welp. Now you've got Marvin + Skynet.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

            @mwl Also very cool, the Indian sci/tech news website that ran that feature! (From the writing style I initially thought it might be AI slop, but no: Indian English is just a bit different.)

            pwassonchat@eldritch.cafeP This user is from outside of this forum
            pwassonchat@eldritch.cafeP This user is from outside of this forum
            pwassonchat@eldritch.cafe
            wrote last edited by
            #42

            @cstross @mwl this may not be a coincidence: many LLMs were trained by humans in English-speaking countries with lower labor costs, and some common wordings we associate with LLMs actually come from the variants of English spoken in those countries.

            rachel@transitory.socialR contaminase@wandering.shopC raffkarva@sunny.gardenR 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

              @rootwyrm I predict that you're going to love my next novel (the one my agent's looking at right now—a few months late due to writing with cataracts).

              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
              rootwyrm@weird.autos
              wrote last edited by
              #43

              @cstross how about I let you know if you write something I don't like? 😉
              I'd say the same, but my brain can't get back into the space for The Other One. A brain-in-a-box features fairly heavily, but that's the one that needs a LOT of chainsaw editing. 😞

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                rootwyrm@weird.autos
                wrote last edited by
                #44

                @cstross mine is semi-hard far-future where a society, in a fit of collective stupidity, spent money until they could turn a comprehensive non-destructive scan of a legend who was late in her life, who has been dead *centuries*, into a one-off thinkybox.

                And now it's in a two-layer Faraday cage with four redundant guillotine power cuts, a long list of 'never say' items, you don't turn it on for more than an hour. Worse, they modified by request, and now have no idea how ANY of the system works.

                rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                  @future_upbeat

                  I absolutely agree.

                  At best, what current LLMs are is evidence that linguistic processing follows statistically modelable rules.

                  weekend_editor@mathstodon.xyzW This user is from outside of this forum
                  weekend_editor@mathstodon.xyzW This user is from outside of this forum
                  weekend_editor@mathstodon.xyz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #45

                  @cstross @future_upbeat

                  And that a facility with language is sufficient to bamboozle most people into perceiving it as thinking.

                  In spite of a total lack of *any* world modeling or logical processing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                    Sigh.

                    So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                    Link Preview Image
                    FlyWire

                    favicon

                    (flywire.ai)

                    Pop-sci explainer here:

                    Link Preview Image
                    Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                    Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                    favicon

                    RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                    Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                    "The wiring is the computation".

                    /1

                    agentultra@types.plA This user is from outside of this forum
                    agentultra@types.plA This user is from outside of this forum
                    agentultra@types.pl
                    wrote last edited by
                    #46

                    @cstross it’s neat stuff but still simulation. We don’t simulate a black hole in a computer and expect to shift the local gravity.

                    Very cool none the less. Reminds me of @gregeganSF and Permutation City. 😬

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                      Sigh.

                      So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                      Link Preview Image
                      FlyWire

                      favicon

                      (flywire.ai)

                      Pop-sci explainer here:

                      Link Preview Image
                      Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                      Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                      favicon

                      RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                      Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                      "The wiring is the computation".

                      /1

                      wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.hostW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.hostW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.host
                      wrote last edited by
                      #47

                      @cstross I mean, kinda obviously. The purpose of a nuerological system is to execute motor functions. If the connections aren't correct, the motors don't function, and the animal doesn't move. Doesn't breath, crawl, fly, eat, piss, nothing. This aligns precisely with the studies showing coral polyps to be unique indivduals based on the variety of neurological pathways that achieve the SAME result - the movement of the organism.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                        But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

                        ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

                        /6 (ends)

                        bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bashstkid@mastodon.online
                        wrote last edited by
                        #48

                        @cstross I’d have to read the paper, but fundamentally, that doesn’t sound very different to what you’d find in Rumelhart & McClelland (now celebrating its 40th birthday!)
                        If they now have a complete model, it can be tested to see where it’s reducible to a simpler but logically identical connectome, and probably more interestingly, where that is not possible; that may point to a minimum level of complexity to encode certain general functions.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                          @cstross mine is semi-hard far-future where a society, in a fit of collective stupidity, spent money until they could turn a comprehensive non-destructive scan of a legend who was late in her life, who has been dead *centuries*, into a one-off thinkybox.

                          And now it's in a two-layer Faraday cage with four redundant guillotine power cuts, a long list of 'never say' items, you don't turn it on for more than an hour. Worse, they modified by request, and now have no idea how ANY of the system works.

                          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rootwyrm@weird.autos
                          wrote last edited by
                          #49

                          @cstross worse, this is a system that has now been running for literal centuries. And they keep sticking to the 'brain in a box' story. So answering the question "what year is it" instantly sends them into an extreme psychological tailspin with suicidal depression and severe psychosis. They have to pull redundant storage before turning it on, because multiple times people have said the wrong thing and caused it to *self-delete*. And it's even worse when they know the redundant storage is gone.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                            @Antiqueight Naah, the ice crystals forming in your synapses would mush them into un-digitizable soup.

                            shovemedia@triangletoot.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                            shovemedia@triangletoot.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                            shovemedia@triangletoot.party
                            wrote last edited by
                            #50

                            @cstross @Antiqueight one please ☝️

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                              But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

                              ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

                              /6 (ends)

                              krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              krnlg@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #51

                              @cstross
                              Welp. More evidence for the "we don't know when to stop" hypothesis. It may take a while but I find it very hard to imagine a good outcome from that research path for society. It even scares me when people say stuff like this is "cool" or "interesting". To me, it's like, yes of course it is theoretically possible therefore we should not be trying to do it!

                              Profoundly depressing, in all honesty. I cannot get excited about this stuff.

                              krnlg@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • krnlg@mastodon.socialK krnlg@mastodon.social

                                @cstross
                                Welp. More evidence for the "we don't know when to stop" hypothesis. It may take a while but I find it very hard to imagine a good outcome from that research path for society. It even scares me when people say stuff like this is "cool" or "interesting". To me, it's like, yes of course it is theoretically possible therefore we should not be trying to do it!

                                Profoundly depressing, in all honesty. I cannot get excited about this stuff.

                                krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                krnlg@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #52

                                @cstross
                                In some ways researching this kind of thing represents a really bad inclination we have as a species. We are so clever we forget to be human. We forget to treat each other as living beings, because we get too caught up in the details. We invent super clever ways of surveilling each other and forget to be nice and caring to our neighbours. We research how our brains work so we can build robot humans at some future point, rather than enjoying the magic of being alive.

                                krnlg@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • krnlg@mastodon.socialK krnlg@mastodon.social

                                  @cstross
                                  In some ways researching this kind of thing represents a really bad inclination we have as a species. We are so clever we forget to be human. We forget to treat each other as living beings, because we get too caught up in the details. We invent super clever ways of surveilling each other and forget to be nice and caring to our neighbours. We research how our brains work so we can build robot humans at some future point, rather than enjoying the magic of being alive.

                                  krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  krnlg@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #53

                                  @cstross
                                  The two ways of thinking are not compatible for me. I know not everyone thinks that way, but I just can't combine the two mindsets and the further we move down these paths the bigger the divide seems.

                                  krnlg@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • krnlg@mastodon.socialK krnlg@mastodon.social

                                    @cstross
                                    The two ways of thinking are not compatible for me. I know not everyone thinks that way, but I just can't combine the two mindsets and the further we move down these paths the bigger the divide seems.

                                    krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    krnlg@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #54

                                    @cstross
                                    But I suppose I'm talking about myself really. I don't mean that a scientist researching this stuff can't be kind. I mean that to me, going down the rabbit hole of the technical details of how a creature's mind works is not compatible with treating the creature as a being.

                                    I rescue flies if they get stuck in water. I hate this research.

                                    solitha@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                      Sigh.

                                      So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      FlyWire

                                      favicon

                                      (flywire.ai)

                                      Pop-sci explainer here:

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                                      Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                                      favicon

                                      RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                                      Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                                      "The wiring is the computation".

                                      /1

                                      androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      androcat@toot.cat
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #55

                                      @cstross "The wiring is the computation" has been my working assumption for 30 years now.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                        Sigh.

                                        So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        FlyWire

                                        favicon

                                        (flywire.ai)

                                        Pop-sci explainer here:

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                                        Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                                        favicon

                                        RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                                        Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                                        "The wiring is the computation".

                                        /1

                                        phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        phl@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #56

                                        @cstross Reading this I suddenly remembered qntm's https://qntm.org/mmacevedo story.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                          Sigh.

                                          So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          FlyWire

                                          favicon

                                          (flywire.ai)

                                          Pop-sci explainer here:

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                                          Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                                          favicon

                                          RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                                          Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                                          "The wiring is the computation".

                                          /1

                                          beaiouns@is.nota.liveB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          beaiouns@is.nota.liveB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          beaiouns@is.nota.live
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #57

                                          @cstross they're putting bugs in computers now!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups