Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Sigh.

Sigh.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
87 Posts 54 Posters 16 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

    ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

    /6 (ends)

    bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
    bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
    bashstkid@mastodon.online
    wrote last edited by
    #48

    @cstross I’d have to read the paper, but fundamentally, that doesn’t sound very different to what you’d find in Rumelhart & McClelland (now celebrating its 40th birthday!)
    If they now have a complete model, it can be tested to see where it’s reducible to a simpler but logically identical connectome, and probably more interestingly, where that is not possible; that may point to a minimum level of complexity to encode certain general functions.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

      @cstross mine is semi-hard far-future where a society, in a fit of collective stupidity, spent money until they could turn a comprehensive non-destructive scan of a legend who was late in her life, who has been dead *centuries*, into a one-off thinkybox.

      And now it's in a two-layer Faraday cage with four redundant guillotine power cuts, a long list of 'never say' items, you don't turn it on for more than an hour. Worse, they modified by request, and now have no idea how ANY of the system works.

      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
      rootwyrm@weird.autos
      wrote last edited by
      #49

      @cstross worse, this is a system that has now been running for literal centuries. And they keep sticking to the 'brain in a box' story. So answering the question "what year is it" instantly sends them into an extreme psychological tailspin with suicidal depression and severe psychosis. They have to pull redundant storage before turning it on, because multiple times people have said the wrong thing and caused it to *self-delete*. And it's even worse when they know the redundant storage is gone.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

        @Antiqueight Naah, the ice crystals forming in your synapses would mush them into un-digitizable soup.

        shovemedia@triangletoot.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
        shovemedia@triangletoot.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
        shovemedia@triangletoot.party
        wrote last edited by
        #50

        @cstross @Antiqueight one please ☝️

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

          But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

          ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

          /6 (ends)

          krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          krnlg@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #51

          @cstross
          Welp. More evidence for the "we don't know when to stop" hypothesis. It may take a while but I find it very hard to imagine a good outcome from that research path for society. It even scares me when people say stuff like this is "cool" or "interesting". To me, it's like, yes of course it is theoretically possible therefore we should not be trying to do it!

          Profoundly depressing, in all honesty. I cannot get excited about this stuff.

          krnlg@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • krnlg@mastodon.socialK krnlg@mastodon.social

            @cstross
            Welp. More evidence for the "we don't know when to stop" hypothesis. It may take a while but I find it very hard to imagine a good outcome from that research path for society. It even scares me when people say stuff like this is "cool" or "interesting". To me, it's like, yes of course it is theoretically possible therefore we should not be trying to do it!

            Profoundly depressing, in all honesty. I cannot get excited about this stuff.

            krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            krnlg@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #52

            @cstross
            In some ways researching this kind of thing represents a really bad inclination we have as a species. We are so clever we forget to be human. We forget to treat each other as living beings, because we get too caught up in the details. We invent super clever ways of surveilling each other and forget to be nice and caring to our neighbours. We research how our brains work so we can build robot humans at some future point, rather than enjoying the magic of being alive.

            krnlg@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • krnlg@mastodon.socialK krnlg@mastodon.social

              @cstross
              In some ways researching this kind of thing represents a really bad inclination we have as a species. We are so clever we forget to be human. We forget to treat each other as living beings, because we get too caught up in the details. We invent super clever ways of surveilling each other and forget to be nice and caring to our neighbours. We research how our brains work so we can build robot humans at some future point, rather than enjoying the magic of being alive.

              krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              krnlg@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #53

              @cstross
              The two ways of thinking are not compatible for me. I know not everyone thinks that way, but I just can't combine the two mindsets and the further we move down these paths the bigger the divide seems.

              krnlg@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • krnlg@mastodon.socialK krnlg@mastodon.social

                @cstross
                The two ways of thinking are not compatible for me. I know not everyone thinks that way, but I just can't combine the two mindsets and the further we move down these paths the bigger the divide seems.

                krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                krnlg@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #54

                @cstross
                But I suppose I'm talking about myself really. I don't mean that a scientist researching this stuff can't be kind. I mean that to me, going down the rabbit hole of the technical details of how a creature's mind works is not compatible with treating the creature as a being.

                I rescue flies if they get stuck in water. I hate this research.

                solitha@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                  Sigh.

                  So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                  Link Preview Image
                  FlyWire

                  favicon

                  (flywire.ai)

                  Pop-sci explainer here:

                  Link Preview Image
                  Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                  Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                  favicon

                  RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                  Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                  "The wiring is the computation".

                  /1

                  androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                  androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                  androcat@toot.cat
                  wrote last edited by
                  #55

                  @cstross "The wiring is the computation" has been my working assumption for 30 years now.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                    Sigh.

                    So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                    Link Preview Image
                    FlyWire

                    favicon

                    (flywire.ai)

                    Pop-sci explainer here:

                    Link Preview Image
                    Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                    Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                    favicon

                    RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                    Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                    "The wiring is the computation".

                    /1

                    phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    phl@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #56

                    @cstross Reading this I suddenly remembered qntm's https://qntm.org/mmacevedo story.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                      Sigh.

                      So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                      Link Preview Image
                      FlyWire

                      favicon

                      (flywire.ai)

                      Pop-sci explainer here:

                      Link Preview Image
                      Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                      Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                      favicon

                      RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                      Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                      "The wiring is the computation".

                      /1

                      beaiouns@is.nota.liveB This user is from outside of this forum
                      beaiouns@is.nota.liveB This user is from outside of this forum
                      beaiouns@is.nota.live
                      wrote last edited by
                      #57

                      @cstross they're putting bugs in computers now!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                        @Antiqueight Naah, the ice crystals forming in your synapses would mush them into un-digitizable soup.

                        antiqueight@mastodon.ieA This user is from outside of this forum
                        antiqueight@mastodon.ieA This user is from outside of this forum
                        antiqueight@mastodon.ie
                        wrote last edited by
                        #58

                        @cstross You can tell I've kept up with the technology - they haven't resolved that yet??!?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                          But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

                          ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

                          /6 (ends)

                          tho99@mendeddrum.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tho99@mendeddrum.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tho99@mendeddrum.org
                          wrote last edited by
                          #59

                          @cstross Dancing rodents for your manuscript.

                          But even apart from that, this would have been impossible not that long ago. Truly incredible

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dr2chase@ohai.socialD dr2chase@ohai.social

                            @cstross "the wiring is the computer" is not too surprising. Years ago playing w/ algorithms for FPGA, needed to invent a bit-string perfect hash table. One way of doing a perfect hash function/table involves a matrix and offset, H = Mx + v, but our math needed to be boolean (AND, XOR), a "1" coefficient was a wire, and if we wanted a one-cycle hash index, then we needed no more 1's in a row than maximum inputs to an FPGA XOR. So, a sparse boolean matrix. The wiring was the computation..

                            flippac@types.plF This user is from outside of this forum
                            flippac@types.plF This user is from outside of this forum
                            flippac@types.pl
                            wrote last edited by
                            #60

                            @dr2chase @cstross while we jokingly call it "pointless" rather than point-free style, functional programmers can write a lot of code with only "wiring" in the text!

                            (in principle you can do it all that way)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                              ... The next step on from Drosophila, the mouse brain, is 560 times larger—never mind a vastly more complex human brain. And to get the murine connectome we'll have to chop up *a lot* of brains: a human upload won't pass any kind of medical ethics review at this point!

                              But near-term, it's expected to yield "fundamentally new architectural principles for AI systems that are more sample-efficient, more robust, and more capable of behavioral generalization than current approaches"

                              /5

                              boydstephensmithjr@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                              boydstephensmithjr@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                              boydstephensmithjr@hachyderm.io
                              wrote last edited by
                              #61

                              RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/116210321731463885

                              BTW, we can already preserve a large-mammal-scale connectome after death: https://www.brainpreservation.org/tech-prize/

                              Related, if you haven't seen AMC's Pantheon, you might want to take a look. It involves uploaded human intelligence via destructive brain scan.

                              cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                Sigh.

                                So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                                Link Preview Image
                                FlyWire

                                favicon

                                (flywire.ai)

                                Pop-sci explainer here:

                                Link Preview Image
                                Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                                Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                                favicon

                                RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                                Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                                "The wiring is the computation".

                                /1

                                zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                zimzat@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #62

                                @cstross Interesting; I've suspected that the first AGI would have to be modeled after our own brain and would have to go through the same growing and learning and sensory feedback loops we do, and at probably the same rate we do. Any benefit of an AGI, over a human, would be inherent to the medium (cloning, save/restore) and not innately super intelligence. It would also come with its own challenges and limitations (no human has ever lived 200 years, would recall become a limiting factor?).

                                cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                  Sigh.

                                  So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  FlyWire

                                  favicon

                                  (flywire.ai)

                                  Pop-sci explainer here:

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                                  Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                                  favicon

                                  RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                                  Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                                  "The wiring is the computation".

                                  /1

                                  breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  breathoflife@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #63

                                  @cstross

                                  that's... interesting.

                                  but can someone make an asic of this brain and get it to run doom
                                  on debian linux
                                  with an xfce desktop environment?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                    Sigh.

                                    So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    FlyWire

                                    favicon

                                    (flywire.ai)

                                    Pop-sci explainer here:

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                                    Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                                    favicon

                                    RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                                    Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                                    "The wiring is the computation".

                                    /1

                                    ross@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ross@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ross@hachyderm.io
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #64

                                    @cstross Considering I'm re-reading Iain M. Banks right now, this is quite relevant, though I'm struggling to remember what book it was that had the "if you simulate perfectly every neurone" argument for sentience of drones.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      breathoflife@infosec.exchange
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #65

                                      @petealexharris @cstross

                                      it's a base 4 system, since you can have adenine-thymine, thymine-adenine, cytosine-guanine and guanine-cytosine pairs, so automatically you're storing far more information within a single place value compared to binary.

                                      drwho@masto.hackers.townD 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                        But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

                                        ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

                                        /6 (ends)

                                        resuna@ohai.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        resuna@ohai.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        resuna@ohai.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #66

                                        @cstross

                                        Kind of the backstory for @gregeganSF's "Permutation City" scaled down a few dozen orders of magnitude.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                          @mwl Also very cool, the Indian sci/tech news website that ran that feature! (From the writing style I initially thought it might be AI slop, but no: Indian English is just a bit different.)

                                          solitha@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          solitha@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          solitha@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #67

                                          @cstross Oh, so that wasn't just me.

                                          Between that and the crawler at the top I had to give up trying to read it. A shame, it seemed interesting.

                                          @mwl

                                          cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups