Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Sigh.

Sigh.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
87 Posts 54 Posters 16 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    Sigh.

    So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

    Link Preview Image
    FlyWire

    favicon

    (flywire.ai)

    Pop-sci explainer here:

    Link Preview Image
    Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

    Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

    favicon

    RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

    Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

    "The wiring is the computation".

    /1

    agentultra@types.plA This user is from outside of this forum
    agentultra@types.plA This user is from outside of this forum
    agentultra@types.pl
    wrote last edited by
    #46

    @cstross it’s neat stuff but still simulation. We don’t simulate a black hole in a computer and expect to shift the local gravity.

    Very cool none the less. Reminds me of @gregeganSF and Permutation City. 😬

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

      Sigh.

      So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

      Link Preview Image
      FlyWire

      favicon

      (flywire.ai)

      Pop-sci explainer here:

      Link Preview Image
      Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

      Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

      favicon

      RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

      Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

      "The wiring is the computation".

      /1

      wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.hostW This user is from outside of this forum
      wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.hostW This user is from outside of this forum
      wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.host
      wrote last edited by
      #47

      @cstross I mean, kinda obviously. The purpose of a nuerological system is to execute motor functions. If the connections aren't correct, the motors don't function, and the animal doesn't move. Doesn't breath, crawl, fly, eat, piss, nothing. This aligns precisely with the studies showing coral polyps to be unique indivduals based on the variety of neurological pathways that achieve the SAME result - the movement of the organism.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

        But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

        ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

        /6 (ends)

        bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
        bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
        bashstkid@mastodon.online
        wrote last edited by
        #48

        @cstross I’d have to read the paper, but fundamentally, that doesn’t sound very different to what you’d find in Rumelhart & McClelland (now celebrating its 40th birthday!)
        If they now have a complete model, it can be tested to see where it’s reducible to a simpler but logically identical connectome, and probably more interestingly, where that is not possible; that may point to a minimum level of complexity to encode certain general functions.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

          @cstross mine is semi-hard far-future where a society, in a fit of collective stupidity, spent money until they could turn a comprehensive non-destructive scan of a legend who was late in her life, who has been dead *centuries*, into a one-off thinkybox.

          And now it's in a two-layer Faraday cage with four redundant guillotine power cuts, a long list of 'never say' items, you don't turn it on for more than an hour. Worse, they modified by request, and now have no idea how ANY of the system works.

          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
          rootwyrm@weird.autos
          wrote last edited by
          #49

          @cstross worse, this is a system that has now been running for literal centuries. And they keep sticking to the 'brain in a box' story. So answering the question "what year is it" instantly sends them into an extreme psychological tailspin with suicidal depression and severe psychosis. They have to pull redundant storage before turning it on, because multiple times people have said the wrong thing and caused it to *self-delete*. And it's even worse when they know the redundant storage is gone.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

            @Antiqueight Naah, the ice crystals forming in your synapses would mush them into un-digitizable soup.

            shovemedia@triangletoot.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
            shovemedia@triangletoot.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
            shovemedia@triangletoot.party
            wrote last edited by
            #50

            @cstross @Antiqueight one please ☝️

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

              But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

              ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

              /6 (ends)

              krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              krnlg@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #51

              @cstross
              Welp. More evidence for the "we don't know when to stop" hypothesis. It may take a while but I find it very hard to imagine a good outcome from that research path for society. It even scares me when people say stuff like this is "cool" or "interesting". To me, it's like, yes of course it is theoretically possible therefore we should not be trying to do it!

              Profoundly depressing, in all honesty. I cannot get excited about this stuff.

              krnlg@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • krnlg@mastodon.socialK krnlg@mastodon.social

                @cstross
                Welp. More evidence for the "we don't know when to stop" hypothesis. It may take a while but I find it very hard to imagine a good outcome from that research path for society. It even scares me when people say stuff like this is "cool" or "interesting". To me, it's like, yes of course it is theoretically possible therefore we should not be trying to do it!

                Profoundly depressing, in all honesty. I cannot get excited about this stuff.

                krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                krnlg@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #52

                @cstross
                In some ways researching this kind of thing represents a really bad inclination we have as a species. We are so clever we forget to be human. We forget to treat each other as living beings, because we get too caught up in the details. We invent super clever ways of surveilling each other and forget to be nice and caring to our neighbours. We research how our brains work so we can build robot humans at some future point, rather than enjoying the magic of being alive.

                krnlg@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • krnlg@mastodon.socialK krnlg@mastodon.social

                  @cstross
                  In some ways researching this kind of thing represents a really bad inclination we have as a species. We are so clever we forget to be human. We forget to treat each other as living beings, because we get too caught up in the details. We invent super clever ways of surveilling each other and forget to be nice and caring to our neighbours. We research how our brains work so we can build robot humans at some future point, rather than enjoying the magic of being alive.

                  krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  krnlg@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #53

                  @cstross
                  The two ways of thinking are not compatible for me. I know not everyone thinks that way, but I just can't combine the two mindsets and the further we move down these paths the bigger the divide seems.

                  krnlg@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • krnlg@mastodon.socialK krnlg@mastodon.social

                    @cstross
                    The two ways of thinking are not compatible for me. I know not everyone thinks that way, but I just can't combine the two mindsets and the further we move down these paths the bigger the divide seems.

                    krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    krnlg@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #54

                    @cstross
                    But I suppose I'm talking about myself really. I don't mean that a scientist researching this stuff can't be kind. I mean that to me, going down the rabbit hole of the technical details of how a creature's mind works is not compatible with treating the creature as a being.

                    I rescue flies if they get stuck in water. I hate this research.

                    solitha@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                      Sigh.

                      So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                      Link Preview Image
                      FlyWire

                      favicon

                      (flywire.ai)

                      Pop-sci explainer here:

                      Link Preview Image
                      Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                      Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                      favicon

                      RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                      Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                      "The wiring is the computation".

                      /1

                      androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                      androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                      androcat@toot.cat
                      wrote last edited by
                      #55

                      @cstross "The wiring is the computation" has been my working assumption for 30 years now.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                        Sigh.

                        So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                        Link Preview Image
                        FlyWire

                        favicon

                        (flywire.ai)

                        Pop-sci explainer here:

                        Link Preview Image
                        Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                        Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                        favicon

                        RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                        Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                        "The wiring is the computation".

                        /1

                        phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        phl@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #56

                        @cstross Reading this I suddenly remembered qntm's https://qntm.org/mmacevedo story.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                          Sigh.

                          So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                          Link Preview Image
                          FlyWire

                          favicon

                          (flywire.ai)

                          Pop-sci explainer here:

                          Link Preview Image
                          Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                          Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                          favicon

                          RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                          Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                          "The wiring is the computation".

                          /1

                          beaiouns@is.nota.liveB This user is from outside of this forum
                          beaiouns@is.nota.liveB This user is from outside of this forum
                          beaiouns@is.nota.live
                          wrote last edited by
                          #57

                          @cstross they're putting bugs in computers now!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                            @Antiqueight Naah, the ice crystals forming in your synapses would mush them into un-digitizable soup.

                            antiqueight@mastodon.ieA This user is from outside of this forum
                            antiqueight@mastodon.ieA This user is from outside of this forum
                            antiqueight@mastodon.ie
                            wrote last edited by
                            #58

                            @cstross You can tell I've kept up with the technology - they haven't resolved that yet??!?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                              But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

                              ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

                              /6 (ends)

                              tho99@mendeddrum.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tho99@mendeddrum.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tho99@mendeddrum.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #59

                              @cstross Dancing rodents for your manuscript.

                              But even apart from that, this would have been impossible not that long ago. Truly incredible

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • dr2chase@ohai.socialD dr2chase@ohai.social

                                @cstross "the wiring is the computer" is not too surprising. Years ago playing w/ algorithms for FPGA, needed to invent a bit-string perfect hash table. One way of doing a perfect hash function/table involves a matrix and offset, H = Mx + v, but our math needed to be boolean (AND, XOR), a "1" coefficient was a wire, and if we wanted a one-cycle hash index, then we needed no more 1's in a row than maximum inputs to an FPGA XOR. So, a sparse boolean matrix. The wiring was the computation..

                                flippac@types.plF This user is from outside of this forum
                                flippac@types.plF This user is from outside of this forum
                                flippac@types.pl
                                wrote last edited by
                                #60

                                @dr2chase @cstross while we jokingly call it "pointless" rather than point-free style, functional programmers can write a lot of code with only "wiring" in the text!

                                (in principle you can do it all that way)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                  ... The next step on from Drosophila, the mouse brain, is 560 times larger—never mind a vastly more complex human brain. And to get the murine connectome we'll have to chop up *a lot* of brains: a human upload won't pass any kind of medical ethics review at this point!

                                  But near-term, it's expected to yield "fundamentally new architectural principles for AI systems that are more sample-efficient, more robust, and more capable of behavioral generalization than current approaches"

                                  /5

                                  boydstephensmithjr@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  boydstephensmithjr@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  boydstephensmithjr@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #61

                                  RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/116210321731463885

                                  BTW, we can already preserve a large-mammal-scale connectome after death: https://www.brainpreservation.org/tech-prize/

                                  Related, if you haven't seen AMC's Pantheon, you might want to take a look. It involves uploaded human intelligence via destructive brain scan.

                                  cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                    Sigh.

                                    So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    FlyWire

                                    favicon

                                    (flywire.ai)

                                    Pop-sci explainer here:

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                                    Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                                    favicon

                                    RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                                    Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                                    "The wiring is the computation".

                                    /1

                                    zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    zimzat@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #62

                                    @cstross Interesting; I've suspected that the first AGI would have to be modeled after our own brain and would have to go through the same growing and learning and sensory feedback loops we do, and at probably the same rate we do. Any benefit of an AGI, over a human, would be inherent to the medium (cloning, save/restore) and not innately super intelligence. It would also come with its own challenges and limitations (no human has ever lived 200 years, would recall become a limiting factor?).

                                    cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                      Sigh.

                                      So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      FlyWire

                                      favicon

                                      (flywire.ai)

                                      Pop-sci explainer here:

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                                      Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                                      favicon

                                      RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                                      Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                                      "The wiring is the computation".

                                      /1

                                      breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      breathoflife@infosec.exchange
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #63

                                      @cstross

                                      that's... interesting.

                                      but can someone make an asic of this brain and get it to run doom
                                      on debian linux
                                      with an xfce desktop environment?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                        Sigh.

                                        So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        FlyWire

                                        favicon

                                        (flywire.ai)

                                        Pop-sci explainer here:

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                                        Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                                        favicon

                                        RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                                        Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                                        "The wiring is the computation".

                                        /1

                                        ross@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ross@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ross@hachyderm.io
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #64

                                        @cstross Considering I'm re-reading Iain M. Banks right now, this is quite relevant, though I'm struggling to remember what book it was that had the "if you simulate perfectly every neurone" argument for sentience of drones.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          breathoflife@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #65

                                          @petealexharris @cstross

                                          it's a base 4 system, since you can have adenine-thymine, thymine-adenine, cytosine-guanine and guanine-cytosine pairs, so automatically you're storing far more information within a single place value compared to binary.

                                          drwho@masto.hackers.townD 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups