Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Great timing.

Great timing.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
applegoogle
31 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

    @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven Do you really trust Google with the infrastructure to make that decision?

    tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tillbtc@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven You are using their software? Thats my point. No, no I dont. So I dont use their software. That simple.

    You wanna be open and private and free but have android you should be close with a degoogled aosp anyway. 🤷‍♂️

    epic_null@infosec.exchangeE dademurphy@toot.communityD 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

      @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven I have 36 apps installed through FDroid right now, plus FDroid.

      tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tillbtc@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven Ok so the next one you install you’ll have to wait 24 hours then never think about it again. I just don’t understand the level of rage does not equal the level of inconvience.

      epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

        @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven You are using their software? Thats my point. No, no I dont. So I dont use their software. That simple.

        You wanna be open and private and free but have android you should be close with a degoogled aosp anyway. 🤷‍♂️

        epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
        epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
        epic_null@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven I have checked multiple times for a degoogled OS that supports my hardware. Turns out, not everyone has a supported device by default.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

          @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven Ok so the next one you install you’ll have to wait 24 hours then never think about it again. I just don’t understand the level of rage does not equal the level of inconvience.

          epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
          epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
          epic_null@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven Let me ask you this: when was the last time an "inconvienience" was this intentionally added that was not a precursor to things getting worse later?

          tillbtc@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

            @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven Let me ask you this: when was the last time an "inconvienience" was this intentionally added that was not a precursor to things getting worse later?

            tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            tillbtc@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven I’m not trying to be a jerk or argumentative. This is how social gets toxic. It was just a question. What about this change drastically changes your current Android experience. You answered. Is it a slippery slope? Sure. But you could say that about so many things Google implemented or otherwise. We live on a slippery slope now. 🫣

            epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

              @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven I’m not trying to be a jerk or argumentative. This is how social gets toxic. It was just a question. What about this change drastically changes your current Android experience. You answered. Is it a slippery slope? Sure. But you could say that about so many things Google implemented or otherwise. We live on a slippery slope now. 🫣

              epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
              epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
              epic_null@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven

              But you could say that about so many things Google implemented or otherwise.

              Like how Google cut off third party email readers? Yeah, you sure could! It's a PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR that tells you not to give them the benefit of the doubt.

              We live on a slippery slope now.

              That alone sounds like valid reason to be upset and raise a ruckus for any inch you slip.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • aakl@infosec.exchangeA aakl@infosec.exchange

                @tillbtc @Epic_Null @dademurphy @theregister @lproven This isn't about sideloading, per se, but what the restrictions actually mean. We are unlikely to agree on this, but maybe this explains the objections better. It's a good assessment:

                "from open-by-default to identity-gated."

                Android Sideloading Restrictions Explained: Why Even Supporters Object https://android.gadgethacks.com/news/android-sideloading-restrictions-explained-why-even-supporters-object/

                @dademurphy

                dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                dademurphy@toot.community
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @AAKL @tillbtc @Epic_Null @theregister @lproven it’s still “open by default “, you just have to identify yourself first, not a big deal.

                epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                  @AAKL @Epic_Null @dademurphy @theregister @lproven I just read this is a one time advanced flow. What’s the issue? As anyone that sideloads apps this creates a one time flow across your account to verify you accept side loading risk. Then you’re done? What am I missing?

                  dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dademurphy@toot.community
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  @tillbtc @AAKL @Epic_Null @theregister @lproven nothing, but Android users have gotten used to a certain level of freedom and they think this in some way hinders that..🤷🏻‍♂️

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dademurphy@toot.communityD dademurphy@toot.community

                    @AAKL @tillbtc @Epic_Null @theregister @lproven it’s still “open by default “, you just have to identify yourself first, not a big deal.

                    epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                    epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                    epic_null@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @dademurphy @AAKL @tillbtc @theregister @lproven

                    1. HUGE DEAL actually, if you want to make anything with any level of controvercy (say... because it has a rainbow in it).
                    2. You also have to pay google money
                    3. This is the infrastructure needed to CLOSE it.
                    tillbtc@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                      @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven You are using their software? Thats my point. No, no I dont. So I dont use their software. That simple.

                      You wanna be open and private and free but have android you should be close with a degoogled aosp anyway. 🤷‍♂️

                      dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dademurphy@toot.community
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @tillbtc @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven degoogled software is still AOSP, so you’re still using their software. 🤦🏻‍♂️

                      Even graphene uses AOSP so they are also using Google’s software.

                      tillbtc@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dademurphy@toot.communityD dademurphy@toot.community

                        @tillbtc @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven degoogled software is still AOSP, so you’re still using their software. 🤦🏻‍♂️

                        Even graphene uses AOSP so they are also using Google’s software.

                        tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tillbtc@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @dademurphy @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven So chromium is the same as Chrome? Brave, built on Chromium I believe, includes all of Googles tracking?

                        Please don’t face palm me like I don’t know what I’m talking about. You know the difference and if you don’t I don’t care to explain it.

                        And no, people don’t NEED to ID themselves. Is anyone listening to this is a one time sideloading delay for the life of your account across devices? I feel like I’m yelling into a bottomless pit.

                        epic_null@infosec.exchangeE dademurphy@toot.communityD 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

                          @dademurphy @AAKL @tillbtc @theregister @lproven

                          1. HUGE DEAL actually, if you want to make anything with any level of controvercy (say... because it has a rainbow in it).
                          2. You also have to pay google money
                          3. This is the infrastructure needed to CLOSE it.
                          tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tillbtc@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven You act like sideloading is gone. Do you understand how it works. Must not. If you did, “HUGE DEAL” wouldn’t be the descriptor. Unrecognized apps will require a 1 time over your Google accounts life cooling off period to accept unsigned apps for 24 hours. The infastructure? Friend Google owns the whole software stack. If this is what set you over it’s surprising.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                            @dademurphy @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven So chromium is the same as Chrome? Brave, built on Chromium I believe, includes all of Googles tracking?

                            Please don’t face palm me like I don’t know what I’m talking about. You know the difference and if you don’t I don’t care to explain it.

                            And no, people don’t NEED to ID themselves. Is anyone listening to this is a one time sideloading delay for the life of your account across devices? I feel like I’m yelling into a bottomless pit.

                            epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                            epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                            epic_null@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven A one time step designed to discourage people from doing so today. But will it still be that next year? When it breaks, is the inscentive not to simply remove the feature?

                            If it seems like no one is hearing you, it's because what they hear in your words is that Google's PR trick has worked. That you believe that Google means what they say, even though this is the beginning of an all-to-familiar slight of hand.

                            Google is altering the deal. Why wouldn't they alter it further? Why wouldn't they move closer to what appears to be their end goal?

                            tillbtc@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

                              @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven A one time step designed to discourage people from doing so today. But will it still be that next year? When it breaks, is the inscentive not to simply remove the feature?

                              If it seems like no one is hearing you, it's because what they hear in your words is that Google's PR trick has worked. That you believe that Google means what they say, even though this is the beginning of an all-to-familiar slight of hand.

                              Google is altering the deal. Why wouldn't they alter it further? Why wouldn't they move closer to what appears to be their end goal?

                              tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tillbtc@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #27

                              @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven If your biggest concern with Google is back pedaling on side loading it’s my belief you need to reasses your priorities. Enjoy your what appears to be passionate hate for user safeguards in a world of bad actors, that’s fine. Everyone can 💯 be them. Please understand the conversation is going no where therefore it’s best it fizzles. 😂 Cheers.

                              epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                                @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven If your biggest concern with Google is back pedaling on side loading it’s my belief you need to reasses your priorities. Enjoy your what appears to be passionate hate for user safeguards in a world of bad actors, that’s fine. Everyone can 💯 be them. Please understand the conversation is going no where therefore it’s best it fizzles. 😂 Cheers.

                                epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                epic_null@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven I believe in safeguards. I just don't believe this is one of them. If it were, it would be tried on the playstore first, and the playstore wouldn't have a malware problem.

                                tillbtc@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                                  @dademurphy @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven So chromium is the same as Chrome? Brave, built on Chromium I believe, includes all of Googles tracking?

                                  Please don’t face palm me like I don’t know what I’m talking about. You know the difference and if you don’t I don’t care to explain it.

                                  And no, people don’t NEED to ID themselves. Is anyone listening to this is a one time sideloading delay for the life of your account across devices? I feel like I’m yelling into a bottomless pit.

                                  dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dademurphy@toot.community
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #29

                                  @tillbtc @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven I have forgotten more about android then you’ll ever know. You’re the one talking about running your own software, I am simply pointing out that your software is still using Google’s to function.

                                  tillbtc@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • dademurphy@toot.communityD dademurphy@toot.community

                                    @tillbtc @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven I have forgotten more about android then you’ll ever know. You’re the one talking about running your own software, I am simply pointing out that your software is still using Google’s to function.

                                    tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tillbtc@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #30

                                    @dademurphy @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven None of this I care about, respectfully. My response was simply to point out the reporting was incorrect. That’s all. Period. I never wanted to get into an AOSP vs Android debate. Open sourced is not closed source. That is arguably and factually provable. I don’t know if you know how AOSP works but it isn’t just Google building Android..

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

                                      @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven I believe in safeguards. I just don't believe this is one of them. If it were, it would be tried on the playstore first, and the playstore wouldn't have a malware problem.

                                      tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tillbtc@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #31

                                      @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven 👍

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups