Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Great timing.

Great timing.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
applegoogle
31 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

    @AAKL @theregister @lproven There is so much misinformation about this whole #Android change going around. Yes, I think it is a bummer. Yes, it goes against what I have always loved about Android personally. But in reality, the normal person does not care. Full stop. And that is who google is targeting now whether us #enthusiasts like it or not. But this reporting on you will never be able to side load an app is just wrong reporting.

    tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tillbtc@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @AAKL @theregister @lproven #Google is doing what they think is best, presumably, for user #security. Right now my Grandma could go to a site and sideload an app that walked her through it without blinking an eye. Now, she has to wait. Android is becomming more mainsteam. It is what it is. But don't false report. And if you don't like it I should point you here: https://source.android.com.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

      @AAKL @theregister @lproven There is so much misinformation about this whole #Android change going around. Yes, I think it is a bummer. Yes, it goes against what I have always loved about Android personally. But in reality, the normal person does not care. Full stop. And that is who google is targeting now whether us #enthusiasts like it or not. But this reporting on you will never be able to side load an app is just wrong reporting.

      dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
      dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
      dademurphy@toot.community
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @tillbtc @AAKL @theregister @lproven I really don’t understand the issue if all they are asking for is developer ID’s. Apple/google does a fairly good job keeping bad apps out of the store, this just reinforces the belief that if the developer had to give their proper ID in order to sell their product in the store, they would be less inclided to upload malicious apps.

      epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dademurphy@toot.communityD dademurphy@toot.community

        @tillbtc @AAKL @theregister @lproven I really don’t understand the issue if all they are asking for is developer ID’s. Apple/google does a fairly good job keeping bad apps out of the store, this just reinforces the belief that if the developer had to give their proper ID in order to sell their product in the store, they would be less inclided to upload malicious apps.

        epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
        epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
        epic_null@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @dademurphy @tillbtc @AAKL @theregister @lproven This would be fine as an argument if they were rolling it out in their store. Their store their rules.

        It's the "Outside the store" that deeply bothers me.

        tillbtc@mastodon.socialT dademurphy@toot.communityD 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

          @dademurphy @tillbtc @AAKL @theregister @lproven This would be fine as an argument if they were rolling it out in their store. Their store their rules.

          It's the "Outside the store" that deeply bothers me.

          tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          tillbtc@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven What about it? How many apps do you download 3rd party and install on a regular basis? If it’s a lot I might recommend you learn adb. Interestingly just saying that makes me wonder if we can simulate an environment to “adb push” an apk to the apps folder from on the phone. I digress. People that are upset should share their use case otherwise it doesn’t make sense to be upset.

          dademurphy@toot.communityD aakl@infosec.exchangeA epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

            @dademurphy @tillbtc @AAKL @theregister @lproven This would be fine as an argument if they were rolling it out in their store. Their store their rules.

            It's the "Outside the store" that deeply bothers me.

            dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
            dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
            dademurphy@toot.community
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @Epic_Null you may not be using their store but you’re still using their software and if they want developers to identify themselves, regardless of where you downloaded the app, that is well within their right to do so.

            It’s not like you’re being restricted as to what you can and can’t install, they just want to verify who you are downloading and installing it from first.

            If anyone should be complaining, it’s the developers not the users..🤷🏻‍♂️

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

              @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven What about it? How many apps do you download 3rd party and install on a regular basis? If it’s a lot I might recommend you learn adb. Interestingly just saying that makes me wonder if we can simulate an environment to “adb push” an apk to the apps folder from on the phone. I digress. People that are upset should share their use case otherwise it doesn’t make sense to be upset.

              dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
              dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
              dademurphy@toot.community
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @tillbtc @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven I highly doubt it would be that easy. If custom roms can keep pirated apps from installing, Google can stop you from installing unauthorized apps.

              tillbtc@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven What about it? How many apps do you download 3rd party and install on a regular basis? If it’s a lot I might recommend you learn adb. Interestingly just saying that makes me wonder if we can simulate an environment to “adb push” an apk to the apps folder from on the phone. I digress. People that are upset should share their use case otherwise it doesn’t make sense to be upset.

                aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                aakl@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @tillbtc @Epic_Null @dademurphy @theregister @lproven This isn't about sideloading, per se, but what the restrictions actually mean. We are unlikely to agree on this, but maybe this explains the objections better. It's a good assessment:

                "from open-by-default to identity-gated."

                Android Sideloading Restrictions Explained: Why Even Supporters Object https://android.gadgethacks.com/news/android-sideloading-restrictions-explained-why-even-supporters-object/

                @dademurphy

                tillbtc@mastodon.socialT dademurphy@toot.communityD 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • aakl@infosec.exchangeA aakl@infosec.exchange

                  @tillbtc @Epic_Null @dademurphy @theregister @lproven This isn't about sideloading, per se, but what the restrictions actually mean. We are unlikely to agree on this, but maybe this explains the objections better. It's a good assessment:

                  "from open-by-default to identity-gated."

                  Android Sideloading Restrictions Explained: Why Even Supporters Object https://android.gadgethacks.com/news/android-sideloading-restrictions-explained-why-even-supporters-object/

                  @dademurphy

                  tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tillbtc@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @AAKL @Epic_Null @dademurphy @theregister @lproven I just read this is a one time advanced flow. What’s the issue? As anyone that sideloads apps this creates a one time flow across your account to verify you accept side loading risk. Then you’re done? What am I missing?

                  dademurphy@toot.communityD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dademurphy@toot.communityD dademurphy@toot.community

                    @tillbtc @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven I highly doubt it would be that easy. If custom roms can keep pirated apps from installing, Google can stop you from installing unauthorized apps.

                    tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tillbtc@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    @dademurphy @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven Yeah. Not needed. This is a one time account level process. What’s the issue? 24hrs? 1 time?

                    epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                      @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven What about it? How many apps do you download 3rd party and install on a regular basis? If it’s a lot I might recommend you learn adb. Interestingly just saying that makes me wonder if we can simulate an environment to “adb push” an apk to the apps folder from on the phone. I digress. People that are upset should share their use case otherwise it doesn’t make sense to be upset.

                      epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                      epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                      epic_null@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven I have 36 apps installed through FDroid right now, plus FDroid.

                      tillbtc@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                        @dademurphy @Epic_Null @AAKL @theregister @lproven Yeah. Not needed. This is a one time account level process. What’s the issue? 24hrs? 1 time?

                        epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                        epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                        epic_null@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven Do you really trust Google with the infrastructure to make that decision?

                        tillbtc@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

                          @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven Do you really trust Google with the infrastructure to make that decision?

                          tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tillbtc@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven You are using their software? Thats my point. No, no I dont. So I dont use their software. That simple.

                          You wanna be open and private and free but have android you should be close with a degoogled aosp anyway. 🤷‍♂️

                          epic_null@infosec.exchangeE dademurphy@toot.communityD 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

                            @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven I have 36 apps installed through FDroid right now, plus FDroid.

                            tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tillbtc@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #15

                            @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven Ok so the next one you install you’ll have to wait 24 hours then never think about it again. I just don’t understand the level of rage does not equal the level of inconvience.

                            epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                              @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven You are using their software? Thats my point. No, no I dont. So I dont use their software. That simple.

                              You wanna be open and private and free but have android you should be close with a degoogled aosp anyway. 🤷‍♂️

                              epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                              epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                              epic_null@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #16

                              @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven I have checked multiple times for a degoogled OS that supports my hardware. Turns out, not everyone has a supported device by default.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                                @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven Ok so the next one you install you’ll have to wait 24 hours then never think about it again. I just don’t understand the level of rage does not equal the level of inconvience.

                                epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                epic_null@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #17

                                @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven Let me ask you this: when was the last time an "inconvienience" was this intentionally added that was not a precursor to things getting worse later?

                                tillbtc@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

                                  @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven Let me ask you this: when was the last time an "inconvienience" was this intentionally added that was not a precursor to things getting worse later?

                                  tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tillbtc@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tillbtc@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven I’m not trying to be a jerk or argumentative. This is how social gets toxic. It was just a question. What about this change drastically changes your current Android experience. You answered. Is it a slippery slope? Sure. But you could say that about so many things Google implemented or otherwise. We live on a slippery slope now. 🫣

                                  epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                                    @Epic_Null @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven I’m not trying to be a jerk or argumentative. This is how social gets toxic. It was just a question. What about this change drastically changes your current Android experience. You answered. Is it a slippery slope? Sure. But you could say that about so many things Google implemented or otherwise. We live on a slippery slope now. 🫣

                                    epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    epic_null@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @tillbtc @dademurphy @AAKL @theregister @lproven

                                    But you could say that about so many things Google implemented or otherwise.

                                    Like how Google cut off third party email readers? Yeah, you sure could! It's a PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR that tells you not to give them the benefit of the doubt.

                                    We live on a slippery slope now.

                                    That alone sounds like valid reason to be upset and raise a ruckus for any inch you slip.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    • aakl@infosec.exchangeA aakl@infosec.exchange

                                      @tillbtc @Epic_Null @dademurphy @theregister @lproven This isn't about sideloading, per se, but what the restrictions actually mean. We are unlikely to agree on this, but maybe this explains the objections better. It's a good assessment:

                                      "from open-by-default to identity-gated."

                                      Android Sideloading Restrictions Explained: Why Even Supporters Object https://android.gadgethacks.com/news/android-sideloading-restrictions-explained-why-even-supporters-object/

                                      @dademurphy

                                      dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dademurphy@toot.community
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #20

                                      @AAKL @tillbtc @Epic_Null @theregister @lproven it’s still “open by default “, you just have to identify yourself first, not a big deal.

                                      epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                                        @AAKL @Epic_Null @dademurphy @theregister @lproven I just read this is a one time advanced flow. What’s the issue? As anyone that sideloads apps this creates a one time flow across your account to verify you accept side loading risk. Then you’re done? What am I missing?

                                        dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        dademurphy@toot.communityD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        dademurphy@toot.community
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #21

                                        @tillbtc @AAKL @Epic_Null @theregister @lproven nothing, but Android users have gotten used to a certain level of freedom and they think this in some way hinders that..🤷🏻‍♂️

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dademurphy@toot.communityD dademurphy@toot.community

                                          @AAKL @tillbtc @Epic_Null @theregister @lproven it’s still “open by default “, you just have to identify yourself first, not a big deal.

                                          epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          epic_null@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #22

                                          @dademurphy @AAKL @tillbtc @theregister @lproven

                                          1. HUGE DEAL actually, if you want to make anything with any level of controvercy (say... because it has a rainbow in it).
                                          2. You also have to pay google money
                                          3. This is the infrastructure needed to CLOSE it.
                                          tillbtc@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups