Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Anthropic claims its engineers are shipping 8x as much code per quarter now as they did in 2022.

Anthropic claims its engineers are shipping 8x as much code per quarter now as they did in 2022.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
28 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

    Anthropic claims its engineers are shipping 8x as much code per quarter now as they did in 2022.

    Unless you have 8x as many reviewers, that's bad. Like not just a little bad, but really bad.

    This is such a house of cards built on debt and cheap power.

    jkb@gotosocial.jkbockstael.beJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jkb@gotosocial.jkbockstael.beJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jkb@gotosocial.jkbockstael.be
    wrote last edited by
    #18

    @wwahammy Sidenote: Anthropic claims many things all the time, many of which later turn out to be lies. I hope this one is a lie.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

      I don't know how to yell this any louder: EVERY LINE OF CODE IS A LIABILITY.

      W This user is from outside of this forum
      W This user is from outside of this forum
      woo@fosstodon.org
      wrote last edited by
      #19

      @wwahammy Code that writes code, exponentially so.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

        Anthropic claims its engineers are shipping 8x as much code per quarter now as they did in 2022.

        Unless you have 8x as many reviewers, that's bad. Like not just a little bad, but really bad.

        This is such a house of cards built on debt and cheap power.

        W This user is from outside of this forum
        W This user is from outside of this forum
        woo@fosstodon.org
        wrote last edited by
        #20

        @wwahammy And power is only cheap in monetary terms, and money is just debt in the form of promises, from people who can't be trusted.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

          Anthropic claims its engineers are shipping 8x as much code per quarter now as they did in 2022.

          Unless you have 8x as many reviewers, that's bad. Like not just a little bad, but really bad.

          This is such a house of cards built on debt and cheap power.

          aristot73@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
          aristot73@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
          aristot73@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #21

          @wwahammy it's only technical debt if coded by humans. AI agents create leverage 🙃

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

            Anthropic claims its engineers are shipping 8x as much code per quarter now as they did in 2022.

            Unless you have 8x as many reviewers, that's bad. Like not just a little bad, but really bad.

            This is such a house of cards built on debt and cheap power.

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #22

            @wwahammy but bad makes money faster and cheaper and money makes big man amodei happy!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dyrathror@mastodon.socialD dyrathror@mastodon.social

              @wwahammy
              The 'number of lines' count as measure of productivity was already wrong in the 80's ...

              marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
              marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
              marjolica@social.linux.pizza
              wrote last edited by
              #23

              @dyrathror @wwahammy I don't program seriously these days but back in the day (1980s) I used to code in APL.
              APL was famous for its one liners.
              So if Claude rewrote my APL code in Rust would it take up less than 8 times as many lines, and would it be as efficient and easier to read?
              Noting APL one liners were never very easy to read, which is why they were, or should have been, heavily commented.
              Just asking.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN n_dimension@infosec.exchange

                @wwahammy

                3 major errors in every 1000 lines of production code I think is the metric.

                bhtooefr@snack.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                bhtooefr@snack.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                bhtooefr@snack.social
                wrote last edited by
                #24

                @n_dimension@infosec.exchange @wwahammy@treehouse.systems That's assuming skilled programmers, not fancy autocorrect generating the code, though.

                n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                  Anthropic claims its engineers are shipping 8x as much code per quarter now as they did in 2022.

                  Unless you have 8x as many reviewers, that's bad. Like not just a little bad, but really bad.

                  This is such a house of cards built on debt and cheap power.

                  bhtooefr@snack.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bhtooefr@snack.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bhtooefr@snack.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #25

                  @wwahammy@treehouse.systems Suddenly reminded of this: https://www.folklore.org/Negative_2000_Lines_Of_Code.html

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                    Anthropic claims its engineers are shipping 8x as much code per quarter now as they did in 2022.

                    Unless you have 8x as many reviewers, that's bad. Like not just a little bad, but really bad.

                    This is such a house of cards built on debt and cheap power.

                    hedders@mas.toH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hedders@mas.toH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hedders@mas.to
                    wrote last edited by
                    #26

                    @wwahammy What was it Linus Torvalds said to Linus YouTube?

                    "Anyone who thinks lines of code is a useful metric is too stupid to run a tech company."

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • wwahammy@social.treehouse.systemsW wwahammy@social.treehouse.systems

                      I don't know how to yell this any louder: EVERY LINE OF CODE IS A LIABILITY.

                      kaasbaas@social.oevents.co.zaK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kaasbaas@social.oevents.co.zaK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kaasbaas@social.oevents.co.za
                      wrote last edited by
                      #27

                      @wwahammy 💯

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bhtooefr@snack.socialB bhtooefr@snack.social

                        @n_dimension@infosec.exchange @wwahammy@treehouse.systems That's assuming skilled programmers, not fancy autocorrect generating the code, though.

                        n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                        n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                        n_dimension@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #28

                        @bhtooefr @wwahammy

                        We don't know solid metrics for vibecode.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups