Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Loads of chat and even discourse about so-called AI literacy, but I don't think most realise you need to teach things from quite a few angles and zoomed out.

Loads of chat and even discourse about so-called AI literacy, but I don't think most realise you need to teach things from quite a few angles and zoomed out.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
27 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

    I have a lot of thoughts as to what this means, but it's too long form for here and I will share in due course. But trust me, for adults for sure, that's enough. And if any of those words confuses you, Wikipedia is very good for mathematical concepts.

    3/n

    olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    olivia@scholar.social
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    The real AI literacy is not to understand any specific maths.

    Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

    CAIL = prerequisite knowledge for a critical perspective, such as to tell apart nonsense hype from true theoretical computer scientific claims. For example, the idea that human-like systems are a sensible or possible goal is the result of circular reasoning and anthropomorphism. https://olivia.science/ai

    favicon

    Scholar Social (scholar.social)

    4/

    olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

      The real AI literacy is not to understand any specific maths.

      Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

      CAIL = prerequisite knowledge for a critical perspective, such as to tell apart nonsense hype from true theoretical computer scientific claims. For example, the idea that human-like systems are a sensible or possible goal is the result of circular reasoning and anthropomorphism. https://olivia.science/ai

      favicon

      Scholar Social (scholar.social)

      4/

      olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      olivia@scholar.social
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      Some of critical AI literacy is to understand the purposeful dodging of semantic clarity: https://scholar.social/@olivia/115157825722674869

      5/

      olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

        Some of critical AI literacy is to understand the purposeful dodging of semantic clarity: https://scholar.social/@olivia/115157825722674869

        5/

        olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
        olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
        olivia@scholar.social
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        Some of critical AI literacy is to spot how thinking in any serious or meaningful way has broken down and instead non-arguments or just pure nonsense are presented as sensible statements. If this is done constantly critical thinking itself stops happening...

        Link Preview Image
        Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

        Attached: 1 image 4. the disregard for the corrosive power of anthropomorphism, which is taken advantage of by industry to sell & steal our data, in the base case scenario, and in the worst to abuse and push vulnerable groups to dependance and worse. (Section 3.4 here https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17065099) 6/n

        favicon

        Scholar Social (scholar.social)

        6/

        olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

          Some of critical AI literacy is to spot how thinking in any serious or meaningful way has broken down and instead non-arguments or just pure nonsense are presented as sensible statements. If this is done constantly critical thinking itself stops happening...

          Link Preview Image
          Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

          Attached: 1 image 4. the disregard for the corrosive power of anthropomorphism, which is taken advantage of by industry to sell & steal our data, in the base case scenario, and in the worst to abuse and push vulnerable groups to dependance and worse. (Section 3.4 here https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17065099) 6/n

          favicon

          Scholar Social (scholar.social)

          6/

          olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
          olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
          olivia@scholar.social
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          Some of critical AI literacy is to say "hey, you know not all computers pollute or are AI nonsense machines?"

          It's not that everyone specifically needs to decolonise computation actively immediately, but just to take a first step and learn to look around us properly.

          🐯 Tipu's tiger is amazing; sadly stolen & now in the V&A, created in India & depicting a tiger mauling an English man.

          7/

          Link Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview Image
          olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

            Some of critical AI literacy is to say "hey, you know not all computers pollute or are AI nonsense machines?"

            It's not that everyone specifically needs to decolonise computation actively immediately, but just to take a first step and learn to look around us properly.

            🐯 Tipu's tiger is amazing; sadly stolen & now in the V&A, created in India & depicting a tiger mauling an English man.

            7/

            Link Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview Image
            olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
            olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
            olivia@scholar.social
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            Also the antikythera mechanism and the Mayan calendar, both ways of modelling time passing, the earth and planets, and sun, etc. are wonderful examples of again computers with no pollution inherently and fun for kids:

            See more: https://maya.nmai.si.edu/sites/default/files/resources/The%20Maya%20Calendar%20System.pdf
            https://www.mayaarchaeologist.co.uk/public-resources/maya-world/maya-calendar-system/

            8/

            olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

              Also the antikythera mechanism and the Mayan calendar, both ways of modelling time passing, the earth and planets, and sun, etc. are wonderful examples of again computers with no pollution inherently and fun for kids:

              See more: https://maya.nmai.si.edu/sites/default/files/resources/The%20Maya%20Calendar%20System.pdf
              https://www.mayaarchaeologist.co.uk/public-resources/maya-world/maya-calendar-system/

              8/

              olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              olivia@scholar.social
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              For older learners, yes there are important steps to take including self-reflection such as in this work with @abebab — self-critical AI literacy:

              Birhane, A. & Guest, O. (2021). Towards Decolonising Computational Sciences. Women, Gender & Research. https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v29i2.124899

              9/

              Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
              olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                For older learners, yes there are important steps to take including self-reflection such as in this work with @abebab — self-critical AI literacy:

                Birhane, A. & Guest, O. (2021). Towards Decolonising Computational Sciences. Women, Gender & Research. https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v29i2.124899

                9/

                Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                olivia@scholar.social
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                Also another thing for teachers of programming is this — think about how, who, and what you teach and why to and whom. Women like computers too:

                Link Preview Image
                Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

                Attached: 4 images Excited to share this short & sweet article I wrote with @samhforbes! Teaching coding inclusively: if this, then what? https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/3r2ez The title perhaps says it all; we show through arguments and examples what women experience in programming class and what to do to remedy it.

                favicon

                Scholar Social (scholar.social)

                10/

                olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                  Also another thing for teachers of programming is this — think about how, who, and what you teach and why to and whom. Women like computers too:

                  Link Preview Image
                  Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

                  Attached: 4 images Excited to share this short & sweet article I wrote with @samhforbes! Teaching coding inclusively: if this, then what? https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/3r2ez The title perhaps says it all; we show through arguments and examples what women experience in programming class and what to do to remedy it.

                  favicon

                  Scholar Social (scholar.social)

                  10/

                  olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  olivia@scholar.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  respecting expertise, and I mean all kinds, is something that degrades significantly under rising fascism... so many depressing and war crime/crimes against humanity-related examples in/from the USA lately https://scholar.social/@olivia/116357060362504588

                  11/

                  olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                    respecting expertise, and I mean all kinds, is something that degrades significantly under rising fascism... so many depressing and war crime/crimes against humanity-related examples in/from the USA lately https://scholar.social/@olivia/116357060362504588

                    11/

                    olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    olivia@scholar.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    it's also happening WITHIN science, e.g. https://scholar.social/@olivia/115315385419626564

                    notice how we say:

                    > assuming the mantle of the non-expert is innapropriate

                    12/

                    olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                      it's also happening WITHIN science, e.g. https://scholar.social/@olivia/115315385419626564

                      notice how we say:

                      > assuming the mantle of the non-expert is innapropriate

                      12/

                      olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                      olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                      olivia@scholar.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      also for academics, they need to take certain facts seriously on LLMs:

                      1️⃣ LLMs are usefully seen as lossy content-addressable systems

                      2️⃣ we can't automatically detect plagiarism

                      3️⃣ LLMs automate plagiarism & paper mills

                      4️⃣ we must protect literature from pollution

                      5️⃣ LLM use is a CoI

                      6️⃣ prompts do not cause output in authorial sense

                      https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkrgj_v1

                      13/

                      olivia@scholar.socialO L 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                        also for academics, they need to take certain facts seriously on LLMs:

                        1️⃣ LLMs are usefully seen as lossy content-addressable systems

                        2️⃣ we can't automatically detect plagiarism

                        3️⃣ LLMs automate plagiarism & paper mills

                        4️⃣ we must protect literature from pollution

                        5️⃣ LLM use is a CoI

                        6️⃣ prompts do not cause output in authorial sense

                        https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkrgj_v1

                        13/

                        olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                        olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                        olivia@scholar.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        Some of critical AI literacy is to say "did you know we can do science without so much interpersonal and structural harm?"

                        The actual best source for all of this is Isabelle Stengers — and NO it's not just about slowing down and she in fact critiques that strongly in her book:

                        favicon

                        (www.politybooks.com)

                        14/

                        olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                          Some of critical AI literacy is to say "did you know we can do science without so much interpersonal and structural harm?"

                          The actual best source for all of this is Isabelle Stengers — and NO it's not just about slowing down and she in fact critiques that strongly in her book:

                          favicon

                          (www.politybooks.com)

                          14/

                          olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                          olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                          olivia@scholar.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          Slow science is centred on RECLAIMING the present to save the future from foreclosure, another thing AI fascists require. We push back against this fully because for all but fascists it's existential: we want to survive in the here and now and not destroy the planet, etc.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

                          Attached: 2 images We end on "Machine Yearning for a Better Present" because why can't we dream? Why accept that universities are not places of learning? Nothing, except industry and their paid shills amongst us, force us to accept this & this force is not one of reason, but one of regressive values & profit. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17065099 10/n

                          favicon

                          Scholar Social (scholar.social)

                          15/

                          olivia@scholar.socialO stephaniemoore@mastodon.onlineS 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                            Slow science is centred on RECLAIMING the present to save the future from foreclosure, another thing AI fascists require. We push back against this fully because for all but fascists it's existential: we want to survive in the here and now and not destroy the planet, etc.

                            Link Preview Image
                            Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

                            Attached: 2 images We end on "Machine Yearning for a Better Present" because why can't we dream? Why accept that universities are not places of learning? Nothing, except industry and their paid shills amongst us, force us to accept this & this force is not one of reason, but one of regressive values & profit. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17065099 10/n

                            favicon

                            Scholar Social (scholar.social)

                            15/

                            olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                            olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                            olivia@scholar.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            Slow science also lets you do your work in peace so the excuse of "forgetting" to cite women is out the window...

                            Link Preview Image
                            Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

                            Attached: 1 image I wrote something (not directly about AI) on cryptogyny — sorry still depressing, BUT ☺️ I do end on actionable things and some fun examples along the way, such as "Comparing [the 108 women scholars until 1800] with 58,995 [men], we find that they were on average better"‼️ https://olivia.science/cryptogyny

                            favicon

                            Scholar Social (scholar.social)

                            16/

                            olivia@scholar.socialO phillmv@hachyderm.ioP 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                              Slow science also lets you do your work in peace so the excuse of "forgetting" to cite women is out the window...

                              Link Preview Image
                              Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

                              Attached: 1 image I wrote something (not directly about AI) on cryptogyny — sorry still depressing, BUT ☺️ I do end on actionable things and some fun examples along the way, such as "Comparing [the 108 women scholars until 1800] with 58,995 [men], we find that they were on average better"‼️ https://olivia.science/cryptogyny

                              favicon

                              Scholar Social (scholar.social)

                              16/

                              olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                              olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                              olivia@scholar.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #17

                              Which of course by the way OF COURSE is no excuse at all, but a systematic exclusion — mutatis mutandis for people of colour and more — cryptogyny, the hiding of women's contributions to science, technology, engineering, and medicine:

                              "although three men received the Nobel Prize for penicillin, women participated significantly in the team effort that brought the drug to medical usefulness."

                              Link Preview Image
                              JSTOR: Access Check

                              JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources.

                              favicon

                              (www.jstor.org)

                              17/

                              Link Preview Image
                              olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                                Which of course by the way OF COURSE is no excuse at all, but a systematic exclusion — mutatis mutandis for people of colour and more — cryptogyny, the hiding of women's contributions to science, technology, engineering, and medicine:

                                "although three men received the Nobel Prize for penicillin, women participated significantly in the team effort that brought the drug to medical usefulness."

                                Link Preview Image
                                JSTOR: Access Check

                                JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources.

                                favicon

                                (www.jstor.org)

                                17/

                                Link Preview Image
                                olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                olivia@scholar.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #18

                                anyway ending on Ada since she started Critical AI Literacy in the 1840s

                                Link Preview Image
                                Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

                                Attached: 2 images "The Analytical Engine has no pretensions whatever to originate any thing. It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform. It [cannot] anticipat[e] any analytical relations or truths. Its province is to assist us in making available what we are already acquainted with." — Ada Lovelace, 1843 https://archive.org/details/adaenchantressof00tool/page/n191/mode/2up

                                favicon

                                Scholar Social (scholar.social)

                                18/

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                                  RE: https://scholar.social/@olivia/116357032470708831

                                  Loads of chat and even discourse about so-called AI literacy, but I don't think most realise you need to teach things from quite a few angles and zoomed out.

                                  If people want to just know how the models work, that's not always possible without a much wider base anyway...

                                  Our offering below:

                                  1/n

                                  f_spin@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  f_spin@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  f_spin@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #19

                                  Wow!, thank you very much @olivia & colleagues for this amazing work.

                                  I don't have words to express my gratitude. I'm trying to educate myself on this matter so I can pass through all what I learn to folks I work with and other that are less inclined to use "tech".

                                  And very often I can't find the right words to express why or how a lot of our IT assumptions are based on false premises and propaganda.

                                  Your work, folks, throw a lot of light on all this matters. Again: thank you very much!

                                  olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                                    also for academics, they need to take certain facts seriously on LLMs:

                                    1️⃣ LLMs are usefully seen as lossy content-addressable systems

                                    2️⃣ we can't automatically detect plagiarism

                                    3️⃣ LLMs automate plagiarism & paper mills

                                    4️⃣ we must protect literature from pollution

                                    5️⃣ LLM use is a CoI

                                    6️⃣ prompts do not cause output in authorial sense

                                    https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkrgj_v1

                                    13/

                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    luminos@eupolicy.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #20

                                    @olivia

                                    > 5️⃣ LLM use is a CoI

                                    What is a "CoI"? Is there some part of a word missing?

                                    Thanks for the thread. You raised some important points.

                                    olivia@scholar.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • olivia@scholar.socialO olivia@scholar.social

                                      Slow science also lets you do your work in peace so the excuse of "forgetting" to cite women is out the window...

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ (@olivia@scholar.social)

                                      Attached: 1 image I wrote something (not directly about AI) on cryptogyny — sorry still depressing, BUT ☺️ I do end on actionable things and some fun examples along the way, such as "Comparing [the 108 women scholars until 1800] with 58,995 [men], we find that they were on average better"‼️ https://olivia.science/cryptogyny

                                      favicon

                                      Scholar Social (scholar.social)

                                      16/

                                      phillmv@hachyderm.ioP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      phillmv@hachyderm.ioP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      phillmv@hachyderm.io
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @olivia cryptogyny is an interesting word! is there a similarly pithy name for the process of pushing women out?

                                      you mention great man theorizing, whereby popular retellings obscure or reattribute contributions to the target of the story; i had an experience this weekend that made me think of other emergent behaviour…

                                      phillmv@hachyderm.ioP 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • f_spin@mastodon.socialF f_spin@mastodon.social

                                        Wow!, thank you very much @olivia & colleagues for this amazing work.

                                        I don't have words to express my gratitude. I'm trying to educate myself on this matter so I can pass through all what I learn to folks I work with and other that are less inclined to use "tech".

                                        And very often I can't find the right words to express why or how a lot of our IT assumptions are based on false premises and propaganda.

                                        Your work, folks, throw a lot of light on all this matters. Again: thank you very much!

                                        olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        olivia@scholar.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        olivia@scholar.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #22

                                        @f_spin you're super welcome!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • phillmv@hachyderm.ioP phillmv@hachyderm.io

                                          @olivia cryptogyny is an interesting word! is there a similarly pithy name for the process of pushing women out?

                                          you mention great man theorizing, whereby popular retellings obscure or reattribute contributions to the target of the story; i had an experience this weekend that made me think of other emergent behaviour…

                                          phillmv@hachyderm.ioP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          phillmv@hachyderm.ioP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          phillmv@hachyderm.io
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @olivia (bear with me here) at queer dance parties i’ve been to, gay guys like to dance near other gay guys, and once a critical mass forms they exert a gravitational pull that draws in more gay guys like a horny black hole

                                          but in trying to be near men in the process they push out the women, who don’t tend to like to rub up against each other in quite the same way

                                          so women often end up relegated to the back of the dancefloor, to say nothing how there’s fewer of us at events in general

                                          phillmv@hachyderm.ioP 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups