The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante
Regulation of large corporations and obscenely rich Capitalist individuals. Applying of existing laws they break.
Both mostly think laws only apply to customers or average people. -
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante
This may be also because most software designers fail to put their ethics first...Artistic Intent
Are you curious about what all these " ethos " posts are about, and what they have to do with designing a software system? Well like most ...
(artinbsd.blogspot.com)
-
R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante There is a Laurie Anderson installation at the Hirschorn modern art museum in DC with this astute observation.

-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante Since December 2025, Spotify's premier engineers have not written code by hand, as reported by TechCrunch. We have gotten what we have always dreamed of.
-
E em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante This is what I've been saying.
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante human nature... He want more & more
-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante
Me using plaintext editors and considering a dedicated FreeDOS laptop. -
@tante There is a Laurie Anderson installation at the Hirschorn modern art museum in DC with this astute observation.

@wesgeorge @tante medtech can save lives, though. like, maybe not the creepy AI notetakers that every doc seems to be using out here now, but i would be dead or a completely different person if not for modern neuroscience and imaging technology
-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante
Like voting computers:
Local municipality went for these some years ago because they’re, like, shiny and “digital” and supposidly save time.CCC (hacker’s association, ie: who everyone expected to be maximally excited about this) sued against these and had them found unconsitutional!
Why? Well, the consitution requires the ballot process to be understande and comprehensible by lay persons so that there never can be a situation where a claims of the vote having been rigged are impossible to verify. (We’re talking about hard power interests here after all.)
A vote conducted using a computer is not comprehensible by lay persons. Period.
Nerds would often be like: “But, but we could use blinded tokens, we could use zero-knoweldge proofs. It be completely verifiable!”
Yes, to like 2 people on Earth maybe!To proof it to everyone else we’d need a papertrail and verify that. An activity generally refered to as “counting the votes”...
Might as well stick to that then. -
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante oh you mean we don’t need 400 calendar applications that work exactly the same and use the same standard but are front different companies and don’t interact well with each other? I’m appalled by your comment
-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante yes
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante yeah feature creep is a big problem. Mostly caused because of capitalism IMO.
-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_. -
@tante 100%, but also feels like a bit of a personal attack
@c0dec0dec0de @tante look, we each know what we did, and maybe we should just admit it
-
-
-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante you can't go wrong with coffee, pen and paper.

-
-
The answer to problems in sociotechnical systems is not always "more software", "better software" or "open source software".
A lot of the time the best solution is _less software_ and sometimes even _no software_.@tante Never automate anything before you have experience doing it manually.
-
