Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
45 Posts 40 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

    I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

    There’s one silver lining in the mass layoffs, they can’t lay off their absurd investment in power, cooling, and hardware. Loss adjusters and liquidators are rubbing their hands with glee.

    Also, many silicon spinners are demanding 5 year agreements on production. It’s go big or go home time, and there will be some casualties.

    One org I reluctantly work with pivoted their entire operating model to AI and agents, and they royally screwed their staff over.

    They’re now hiring them as consultants at twice their original salary as everything fell on it’s arse, and who knew that go to market suits with a prompt can’t keep infrastructure or business running. Hilariously I know one engineer negotiated a one-sided 12 month contract notice period.

    These people are going to get desperate, fast. Fetch the s’mores and let em roast.

    matthewcroughan@social.defenestrate.itM This user is from outside of this forum
    matthewcroughan@social.defenestrate.itM This user is from outside of this forum
    matthewcroughan@social.defenestrate.it
    wrote last edited by
    #18
    I've seen so many AI CEOs or people with close relationships to projects driven by AI getting real mad at the lack of positive sentiment to their work too. See https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/10416 and https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/423186#issuecomment-3919469369
    jo@gts.zzncx.topJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

      I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

      There’s one silver lining in the mass layoffs, they can’t lay off their absurd investment in power, cooling, and hardware. Loss adjusters and liquidators are rubbing their hands with glee.

      Also, many silicon spinners are demanding 5 year agreements on production. It’s go big or go home time, and there will be some casualties.

      One org I reluctantly work with pivoted their entire operating model to AI and agents, and they royally screwed their staff over.

      They’re now hiring them as consultants at twice their original salary as everything fell on it’s arse, and who knew that go to market suits with a prompt can’t keep infrastructure or business running. Hilariously I know one engineer negotiated a one-sided 12 month contract notice period.

      These people are going to get desperate, fast. Fetch the s’mores and let em roast.

      numodular@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
      numodular@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
      numodular@c.im
      wrote last edited by
      #19

      @SecurityWriter #BoycottAI

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gparenti@mstdn.socialG gparenti@mstdn.social

        @gpshewan @ramsey @SecurityWriter And when insurers make sure that policies exclude loss caused by AI errors (and they will), the whole house of cards will collapse.

        spocko@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
        spocko@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
        spocko@mastodon.online
        wrote last edited by
        #20

        @gparenti @gpshewan @ramsey @SecurityWriter This is huge. But don't worry, the TOS & EULA you signed to start using the product means you can't sue, and your have to accept arbitration.
        The corp lawyers are covering their asses ( assets.)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gparenti@mstdn.socialG gparenti@mstdn.social

          @gpshewan @ramsey @SecurityWriter And when insurers make sure that policies exclude loss caused by AI errors (and they will), the whole house of cards will collapse.

          n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
          n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
          n_dimension@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #21

          @gparenti @gpshewan @ramsey @SecurityWriter

          Insurers don’t “forget” to exclude software and AI screw-upsn, they write those exclusions very carefully. Standard business insurance won’t touch losses caused by buggy code or rogue algorithms. If you want coverage for software mistakes, you have to explicitly buy it — otherwise it’s your problem.

          Commercial software for the last 65 years is EXCLUDED from insurance...Exclusions are usually on the first page of software manuals (You lucky this shit runs at all)

          Whats that other thing that makes shit up all the time... hallucination and all that?

          lperry2@mastodon.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

            I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

            There’s one silver lining in the mass layoffs, they can’t lay off their absurd investment in power, cooling, and hardware. Loss adjusters and liquidators are rubbing their hands with glee.

            Also, many silicon spinners are demanding 5 year agreements on production. It’s go big or go home time, and there will be some casualties.

            One org I reluctantly work with pivoted their entire operating model to AI and agents, and they royally screwed their staff over.

            They’re now hiring them as consultants at twice their original salary as everything fell on it’s arse, and who knew that go to market suits with a prompt can’t keep infrastructure or business running. Hilariously I know one engineer negotiated a one-sided 12 month contract notice period.

            These people are going to get desperate, fast. Fetch the s’mores and let em roast.

            artbysarahsammis@socialbc.caA This user is from outside of this forum
            artbysarahsammis@socialbc.caA This user is from outside of this forum
            artbysarahsammis@socialbc.ca
            wrote last edited by
            #22

            @SecurityWriter reminds me of the million dollar billboards dotcoms bought weeks before the bubble burst.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.socialP patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.social

              @anne_twain @SecurityWriter THEY are the ones that should be replaced by AI

              crovanian@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              crovanian@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              crovanian@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #23

              @patrick_h_lauke i know we’re all a bit biased here, but I have legit not heard a single good argument about any downside to replacing these dumbass ceos with an LLM agent. If everyone else keeps their jobs and works competently, in what way would a difference be detectable in the end?

              raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN n_dimension@infosec.exchange

                @gparenti @gpshewan @ramsey @SecurityWriter

                Insurers don’t “forget” to exclude software and AI screw-upsn, they write those exclusions very carefully. Standard business insurance won’t touch losses caused by buggy code or rogue algorithms. If you want coverage for software mistakes, you have to explicitly buy it — otherwise it’s your problem.

                Commercial software for the last 65 years is EXCLUDED from insurance...Exclusions are usually on the first page of software manuals (You lucky this shit runs at all)

                Whats that other thing that makes shit up all the time... hallucination and all that?

                lperry2@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                lperry2@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                lperry2@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #24

                @n_dimension @gparenti @gpshewan @ramsey @SecurityWriter Plenty of insurers are using AI themselves--but they cover their asses by running AI copy/contract terms past their in-house lawyers.

                vk6flab@mastodon.radioV 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                  I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

                  There’s one silver lining in the mass layoffs, they can’t lay off their absurd investment in power, cooling, and hardware. Loss adjusters and liquidators are rubbing their hands with glee.

                  Also, many silicon spinners are demanding 5 year agreements on production. It’s go big or go home time, and there will be some casualties.

                  One org I reluctantly work with pivoted their entire operating model to AI and agents, and they royally screwed their staff over.

                  They’re now hiring them as consultants at twice their original salary as everything fell on it’s arse, and who knew that go to market suits with a prompt can’t keep infrastructure or business running. Hilariously I know one engineer negotiated a one-sided 12 month contract notice period.

                  These people are going to get desperate, fast. Fetch the s’mores and let em roast.

                  ark@social.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
                  ark@social.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
                  ark@social.lol
                  wrote last edited by
                  #25

                  @SecurityWriter this really sounds familiar

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                    I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

                    There’s one silver lining in the mass layoffs, they can’t lay off their absurd investment in power, cooling, and hardware. Loss adjusters and liquidators are rubbing their hands with glee.

                    Also, many silicon spinners are demanding 5 year agreements on production. It’s go big or go home time, and there will be some casualties.

                    One org I reluctantly work with pivoted their entire operating model to AI and agents, and they royally screwed their staff over.

                    They’re now hiring them as consultants at twice their original salary as everything fell on it’s arse, and who knew that go to market suits with a prompt can’t keep infrastructure or business running. Hilariously I know one engineer negotiated a one-sided 12 month contract notice period.

                    These people are going to get desperate, fast. Fetch the s’mores and let em roast.

                    martyb4@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    martyb4@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    martyb4@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #26

                    @SecurityWriter Tried to tell a good friend that the AI bubble was a Tech Wreck 2.0 but he was not having it. Sigh.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gpshewan@mastodon.socialG gpshewan@mastodon.social

                      @ramsey @SecurityWriter For me it’s not just that, it’s the cost/revenue and ancillary stuff that folk just never think about. The environment, ethics, society impact, security and whether it does what it says on the tin are one thing (and valid). But when the sums don’t work out and confidence shifts…there’s no stopping that.

                      ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ramsey@phpc.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #27

                      @gpshewan @SecurityWriter That’s what I mean. The CEOs are already beginning the shift to spin what’s coming, to make it more palatable to investors, because the bill is about to come due, and the promises haven’t been kept.

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gpshewan@mastodon.socialG gpshewan@mastodon.social

                        @ramsey @SecurityWriter For me it’s not just that, it’s the cost/revenue and ancillary stuff that folk just never think about. The environment, ethics, society impact, security and whether it does what it says on the tin are one thing (and valid). But when the sums don’t work out and confidence shifts…there’s no stopping that.

                        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #28

                        @gpshewan @ramsey @SecurityWriter Another is that at least the US government won't be likely to toss a bailout with the amount of gridlock in DC, so they're not easily going to get dump trucks of free money.

                        overtondoors@infosec.exchangeO 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                          I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

                          There’s one silver lining in the mass layoffs, they can’t lay off their absurd investment in power, cooling, and hardware. Loss adjusters and liquidators are rubbing their hands with glee.

                          Also, many silicon spinners are demanding 5 year agreements on production. It’s go big or go home time, and there will be some casualties.

                          One org I reluctantly work with pivoted their entire operating model to AI and agents, and they royally screwed their staff over.

                          They’re now hiring them as consultants at twice their original salary as everything fell on it’s arse, and who knew that go to market suits with a prompt can’t keep infrastructure or business running. Hilariously I know one engineer negotiated a one-sided 12 month contract notice period.

                          These people are going to get desperate, fast. Fetch the s’mores and let em roast.

                          reverendd@mastodon.gamedev.placeR This user is from outside of this forum
                          reverendd@mastodon.gamedev.placeR This user is from outside of this forum
                          reverendd@mastodon.gamedev.place
                          wrote last edited by
                          #29

                          @SecurityWriter Told my boss I sincerely thought the AI bubble was on the verge of popping and he went home.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                            I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

                            There’s one silver lining in the mass layoffs, they can’t lay off their absurd investment in power, cooling, and hardware. Loss adjusters and liquidators are rubbing their hands with glee.

                            Also, many silicon spinners are demanding 5 year agreements on production. It’s go big or go home time, and there will be some casualties.

                            One org I reluctantly work with pivoted their entire operating model to AI and agents, and they royally screwed their staff over.

                            They’re now hiring them as consultants at twice their original salary as everything fell on it’s arse, and who knew that go to market suits with a prompt can’t keep infrastructure or business running. Hilariously I know one engineer negotiated a one-sided 12 month contract notice period.

                            These people are going to get desperate, fast. Fetch the s’mores and let em roast.

                            lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.brL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.brL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.br
                            wrote last edited by
                            #30
                            @baldur@toot.cafe, here's some hopeful evidence to counter a hopelessness thread you started the other day
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                              I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

                              There’s one silver lining in the mass layoffs, they can’t lay off their absurd investment in power, cooling, and hardware. Loss adjusters and liquidators are rubbing their hands with glee.

                              Also, many silicon spinners are demanding 5 year agreements on production. It’s go big or go home time, and there will be some casualties.

                              One org I reluctantly work with pivoted their entire operating model to AI and agents, and they royally screwed their staff over.

                              They’re now hiring them as consultants at twice their original salary as everything fell on it’s arse, and who knew that go to market suits with a prompt can’t keep infrastructure or business running. Hilariously I know one engineer negotiated a one-sided 12 month contract notice period.

                              These people are going to get desperate, fast. Fetch the s’mores and let em roast.

                              mlanger@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mlanger@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mlanger@mastodon.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #31

                              @SecurityWriter @User47 🍿🍿🍿

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                                I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

                                There’s one silver lining in the mass layoffs, they can’t lay off their absurd investment in power, cooling, and hardware. Loss adjusters and liquidators are rubbing their hands with glee.

                                Also, many silicon spinners are demanding 5 year agreements on production. It’s go big or go home time, and there will be some casualties.

                                One org I reluctantly work with pivoted their entire operating model to AI and agents, and they royally screwed their staff over.

                                They’re now hiring them as consultants at twice their original salary as everything fell on it’s arse, and who knew that go to market suits with a prompt can’t keep infrastructure or business running. Hilariously I know one engineer negotiated a one-sided 12 month contract notice period.

                                These people are going to get desperate, fast. Fetch the s’mores and let em roast.

                                ag100pct@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ag100pct@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ag100pct@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #32

                                @SecurityWriter
                                Some poor intern will eventually get blamed.

                                What happens when something goes wrong?
                                Who's gonna get blamed?
                                Who's responsible to fix it?
                                What happens when someone gets injured or killed and the lawyers enter the room?

                                What happens when they can't get someone to fix it because no one will touch it with a 3.048 m pole?

                                Link Preview Image
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                                  I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

                                  There’s one silver lining in the mass layoffs, they can’t lay off their absurd investment in power, cooling, and hardware. Loss adjusters and liquidators are rubbing their hands with glee.

                                  Also, many silicon spinners are demanding 5 year agreements on production. It’s go big or go home time, and there will be some casualties.

                                  One org I reluctantly work with pivoted their entire operating model to AI and agents, and they royally screwed their staff over.

                                  They’re now hiring them as consultants at twice their original salary as everything fell on it’s arse, and who knew that go to market suits with a prompt can’t keep infrastructure or business running. Hilariously I know one engineer negotiated a one-sided 12 month contract notice period.

                                  These people are going to get desperate, fast. Fetch the s’mores and let em roast.

                                  trabex@newsie.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  trabex@newsie.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  trabex@newsie.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #33

                                  @SecurityWriter

                                  One thing I learned, maybe it was this month? State government agencies, some of them, are forcing their employees to use AI stuff so the AI businesses can benefit from government contracts.

                                  A nice lady used AI, and I used my phone to search. I found more stuff than she did. 😛

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • unlofl@mstdn.socialU unlofl@mstdn.social

                                    @SecurityWriter luckily, I upgraded my home lab systems and added a bunch of memory a year or two ago.

                                    I'm biding my time, there's gonna be cheap gear for liquidation! $200 rack mount servers for everyone!

                                    raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    raphaelmorgan@disabled.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #34

                                    @unlofl @SecurityWriter this is a good point that's getting me kind of excited about the future of the web. If hardware floods the market because corporations give up on making AI profitable, and internet users are all tired of the shit those corporations have been pulling with it... I bet we're approaching a turning point towards decentralization and community infrastructure

                                    cadellin@mastodon.gamedev.placeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                                      I am LOVING seeing so many AI projects being paused or binned.

                                      There’s one silver lining in the mass layoffs, they can’t lay off their absurd investment in power, cooling, and hardware. Loss adjusters and liquidators are rubbing their hands with glee.

                                      Also, many silicon spinners are demanding 5 year agreements on production. It’s go big or go home time, and there will be some casualties.

                                      One org I reluctantly work with pivoted their entire operating model to AI and agents, and they royally screwed their staff over.

                                      They’re now hiring them as consultants at twice their original salary as everything fell on it’s arse, and who knew that go to market suits with a prompt can’t keep infrastructure or business running. Hilariously I know one engineer negotiated a one-sided 12 month contract notice period.

                                      These people are going to get desperate, fast. Fetch the s’mores and let em roast.

                                      hairylarry@gamerplus.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hairylarry@gamerplus.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hairylarry@gamerplus.org
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #35

                                      @SecurityWriter

                                      Also, the genius who figures out what to do with all that CPU they are building out will be in a good negotiating position.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • crovanian@mastodon.socialC crovanian@mastodon.social

                                        @patrick_h_lauke i know we’re all a bit biased here, but I have legit not heard a single good argument about any downside to replacing these dumbass ceos with an LLM agent. If everyone else keeps their jobs and works competently, in what way would a difference be detectable in the end?

                                        raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        raphaelmorgan@disabled.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #36

                                        @Crovanian @patrick_h_lauke the only downsides I can think of are the ecological downsides of using LLMs, the social implications of letting a technology with oppression built in make all the executive decisions, and extra money going to the shareholders
                                        Then again, considering CEOs tend to have private jets, be white supremacists, and be one of the shareholders... I'm not sure anything would actually change 😂

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • matthewcroughan@social.defenestrate.itM matthewcroughan@social.defenestrate.it
                                          I've seen so many AI CEOs or people with close relationships to projects driven by AI getting real mad at the lack of positive sentiment to their work too. See https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/10416 and https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/423186#issuecomment-3919469369
                                          jo@gts.zzncx.topJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jo@gts.zzncx.topJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jo@gts.zzncx.top
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #37

                                          @matthewcroughan @SecurityWriter whew, "Home Buyers" in a privacy policy

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups