Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Replying to Uta Frith's views, one by one.

Replying to Uta Frith's views, one by one.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
researchneurodivergentactuallyautistiautisticautism
128 Posts 29 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

    @miaoue

    Absolutely!

    I'm in the middle of a really interesting book by Paul Bloom called 'Against Empathy' which talks quite a bit about the concepts - theory of mind, and so-called 'cognitive empathy' (which I had also found issue with, and mentioned in my article about empathy).

    @joshsusser @SecondUniverse @adelinej

    miaoue@neurodifferent.meM This user is from outside of this forum
    miaoue@neurodifferent.meM This user is from outside of this forum
    miaoue@neurodifferent.me
    wrote last edited by
    #90

    @KatyElphinstone i'm putting that book on my (very long) reading list, thank you.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • seconduniverse@autistics.lifeS seconduniverse@autistics.life

      @KatyElphinstone I think the problem is "theory of mind" is a poetic term. It resonates with researchers. It SHOULD mean something. It attracts emotional engagement. But it doesn't mean anything specific.

      joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ This user is from outside of this forum
      joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ This user is from outside of this forum
      joshsusser@autistics.life
      wrote last edited by
      #91

      @SecondUniverse @KatyElphinstone I think the allistic/neurotypical* struggle with Theory of Mind reveals something of their neurotype's fundamental nature. My take is they are good at inferring another's emotional state from non-verbal signals, and from that they believe they can effectively read minds and know what other people really think. (Perhaps this is why the Telepathy Tapes nonsense caught on - they think mind reading is a real thing.) So it's easy for them to think ToM is about knowing *what* someone else is thinking, rather than knowing they are thinking their own thoughts that are different from yours.

      *: there's no better word for the actual neurotype that usually gets called neurotypical or allistic. we need a better Venn diagram!

      fizzfizzpopop@veganism.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • simondassow@masto.aiS simondassow@masto.ai

        @joshsusser @KatyElphinstone @SecondUniverse @adelinej This is sort of why I started calling it neuroconvergent instead of neurotypical after reading the Double Empathy paper.

        berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        berniedoesit@mstdn.social
        wrote last edited by
        #92

        @simondassow @joshsusser @KatyElphinstone @SecondUniverse @adelinej NT and autistic do seem to be strange attractors in neurotype space.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • simondassow@masto.aiS simondassow@masto.ai

          @joshsusser @KatyElphinstone @SecondUniverse @adelinej This is sort of why I started calling it neuroconvergent instead of neurotypical after reading the Double Empathy paper.

          joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          joshsusser@autistics.life
          wrote last edited by
          #93

          @simondassow @KatyElphinstone @SecondUniverse @adelinej Yes, we need better terminology! I get the appeal of that word, but I don't think it's an accurate description or that it solves the problem of that neurotype's name implying some special status. I think we can do better, but to do that we have to actually characterize that neurotype instead of assuming it's the one with all the traits dialed to "normal". Maybe someday...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ joshsusser@autistics.life

            @SecondUniverse @KatyElphinstone I think the allistic/neurotypical* struggle with Theory of Mind reveals something of their neurotype's fundamental nature. My take is they are good at inferring another's emotional state from non-verbal signals, and from that they believe they can effectively read minds and know what other people really think. (Perhaps this is why the Telepathy Tapes nonsense caught on - they think mind reading is a real thing.) So it's easy for them to think ToM is about knowing *what* someone else is thinking, rather than knowing they are thinking their own thoughts that are different from yours.

            *: there's no better word for the actual neurotype that usually gets called neurotypical or allistic. we need a better Venn diagram!

            fizzfizzpopop@veganism.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            fizzfizzpopop@veganism.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            fizzfizzpopop@veganism.social
            wrote last edited by
            #94

            @joshsusser @SecondUniverse @KatyElphinstone *neuro average?

            joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • fizzfizzpopop@veganism.socialF fizzfizzpopop@veganism.social

              @joshsusser @SecondUniverse @KatyElphinstone *neuro average?

              joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ This user is from outside of this forum
              joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ This user is from outside of this forum
              joshsusser@autistics.life
              wrote last edited by
              #95

              @Fizzfizzpopop @SecondUniverse @KatyElphinstone I'd like a term that describes the neurotype based on its character, not that it is common. There are a lot of ways to say it's typical but they all say "neurosupremacy" to me.

              fizzfizzpopop@veganism.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                Replying to Uta Frith's views, one by one.

                With thanks to all the members of the autistic community who've informed me & inspired me to write this thread.

                For those lucky not to know about her article in The Times, and various other related statements, links at the end.

                CW: it's upsetting 😟

                A thread 🧵

                #UtaFrith #Research #Autism #Autistic #ActuallyAutistic #Neurodivergent

                danimo@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                danimo@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                danimo@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #96

                @KatyElphinstone Never heard of this lady, just read a few things and came to the conclusion that we are looking at an old woman with borderline theories who is afraid of her own insignificance. Apart from the self-preserving duty to contradict bullshit, I think we can just ignore the old lady, like the other bullshit that neurotypical freaks pull out of their asses.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                  @lizzard

                  Yes, all the assumptions... Awful to think on. No wonder trauma is so common.

                  berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  berniedoesit@mstdn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #97

                  @KatyElphinstone @lizzard I still can't believe they did that to me. I'm glad I can't remember it, but still, so barbaric!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                    @quidcumque

                    Yes that's a very good point! In fact there's evidence other populations suffer similarly, as you say.

                    But masking isn't a diagnostic category for autism, anyway. It's more about just recognising that it's a common thing that happens.

                    @lizzard

                    berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    berniedoesit@mstdn.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #98

                    @KatyElphinstone @quidcumque @lizzard I'm not convinced that masking is wholely different from what NTs do to fit it. Some aspects are unique but a lot of it is just the amount and difficulty level.

                    lizzard@social.tchncs.deL katyelphinstone@mas.toK 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • petraphoenix@beige.partyP petraphoenix@beige.party

                      @KatyElphinstone

                      The particular family member I am thinking about (mum) was always going to be difficult to tell, when I told her about my ADHD diagnosis a few years ago her response was "don't be ridiculous, everyone is like that". At which point I decided this was probably not the point to mention that these things often run in families and noped out of the conversation.

                      She already thinks you can't be autistic without speech and language difficulties, so very little I say is going to make any difference

                      berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      berniedoesit@mstdn.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #99

                      @PetraPhoenix @KatyElphinstone TBF she's only 30 years out of date on the speech and language issues.

                      petraphoenix@beige.partyP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB berniedoesit@mstdn.social

                        @PetraPhoenix @KatyElphinstone TBF she's only 30 years out of date on the speech and language issues.

                        petraphoenix@beige.partyP This user is from outside of this forum
                        petraphoenix@beige.partyP This user is from outside of this forum
                        petraphoenix@beige.party
                        wrote last edited by
                        #100

                        @BernieDoesIt @KatyElphinstone

                        Yeah but at least 2 of her grandchildren are Autistic, and none of them are that old so 🤷

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                          Her view: Autism in women has gone too far.

                          Reply: Interesting. Has freedom in women gone too far, too?

                          _________

                          Her view: We must categorise autism into smaller subgroups.

                          Reply: Interesting also - a bit like how Hans Asperger did in Nazi Germany? I think, in this case, the purpose is to exclude a lot of people from the category "autism" and to divide the autistic community.

                          ⬇️

                          #Autism #Research #Neurodiversity

                          berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          berniedoesit@mstdn.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #101

                          @KatyElphinstone She's right that autism isn't just one thing, but I think C.L. Lynch said it best: it's a "collection of related neurological conditions that are so intertwined and so impossible to pick apart that professionals have stopped trying."

                          katyelphinstone@mas.toK jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB berniedoesit@mstdn.social

                            @KatyElphinstone She's right that autism isn't just one thing, but I think C.L. Lynch said it best: it's a "collection of related neurological conditions that are so intertwined and so impossible to pick apart that professionals have stopped trying."

                            katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                            katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                            katyelphinstone@mas.to
                            wrote last edited by
                            #102

                            @BernieDoesIt

                            Nicely put 😊

                            Autistic people are more heterogeneous within the group than non-autistics. I've been finding this really interesting!

                            We are more different from each other than neurotypical people are from one another. Even epigenetically, apparently. Which I think is quite cool 😎

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB berniedoesit@mstdn.social

                              @KatyElphinstone She's right that autism isn't just one thing, but I think C.L. Lynch said it best: it's a "collection of related neurological conditions that are so intertwined and so impossible to pick apart that professionals have stopped trying."

                              jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.place
                              wrote last edited by
                              #103

                              @KatyElphinstone Somehow to me the phrasing "collection of related neurological conditions that are so intertwined and so impossible to pick apart that professionals have stopped trying" could also be used to describe a personality, any personality really (including but not limited to those of dogs, cats, and birds).

                              @BernieDoesIt

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB berniedoesit@mstdn.social

                                @KatyElphinstone @quidcumque @lizzard I'm not convinced that masking is wholely different from what NTs do to fit it. Some aspects are unique but a lot of it is just the amount and difficulty level.

                                lizzard@social.tchncs.deL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lizzard@social.tchncs.deL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lizzard@social.tchncs.de
                                wrote last edited by
                                #104

                                @BernieDoesIt agree completely. The amount *is* what causes problems.

                                @KatyElphinstone @quidcumque

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ joshsusser@autistics.life

                                  @Fizzfizzpopop @SecondUniverse @KatyElphinstone I'd like a term that describes the neurotype based on its character, not that it is common. There are a lot of ways to say it's typical but they all say "neurosupremacy" to me.

                                  fizzfizzpopop@veganism.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fizzfizzpopop@veganism.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fizzfizzpopop@veganism.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #105

                                  @joshsusser @SecondUniverse @KatyElphinstone I don't know, I think average is not a term for anyone outstanding. Perhaps we should designate neuro average and neuro outstanding? Hehehe

                                  fizzfizzpopop@veganism.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • fizzfizzpopop@veganism.socialF fizzfizzpopop@veganism.social

                                    @joshsusser @SecondUniverse @KatyElphinstone I don't know, I think average is not a term for anyone outstanding. Perhaps we should designate neuro average and neuro outstanding? Hehehe

                                    fizzfizzpopop@veganism.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fizzfizzpopop@veganism.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fizzfizzpopop@veganism.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #106

                                    @joshsusser @SecondUniverse @KatyElphinstone I'll bagsi a self description as neuro outstanding, sometimes in a *good* way hahahaha

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB berniedoesit@mstdn.social

                                      @KatyElphinstone @quidcumque @lizzard I'm not convinced that masking is wholely different from what NTs do to fit it. Some aspects are unique but a lot of it is just the amount and difficulty level.

                                      katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      katyelphinstone@mas.to
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #107

                                      @BernieDoesIt

                                      Yes, it's about the extent of it, and the impact on your life. How much of yourself do you have to hide just to get by? And how much effort does it take to do so?

                                      @quidcumque @lizzard

                                      berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                                        @BernieDoesIt

                                        Yes, it's about the extent of it, and the impact on your life. How much of yourself do you have to hide just to get by? And how much effort does it take to do so?

                                        @quidcumque @lizzard

                                        berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        berniedoesit@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        berniedoesit@mstdn.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #108

                                        @KatyElphinstone @quidcumque @lizzard That's more for some NTs than others but significantly more for NDs.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          katyelphinstone@mas.to
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #109

                                          @Tooden

                                          Yes 😢

                                          It troubles me that so often they wheel out women to support the dominant paradigm, and essentially very patriarchal views & interests.

                                          I think it's not a coincidence. It's just too convenient. I think they're being played. I never really want to attack the individual, just the views.

                                          zombiecide@polyglot.cityZ nini@oldbytes.spaceN 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups