This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils
That's how for-profit businesses work, duh. -
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils
Digital capitalism is already dead... -
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils Youtube wins either way. Except when you don’t use YouTube or you download stuff using yt-dl in which case you get to see everything without ads and in this case you win.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils shareholder value 🤫
-
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils We are in the wrong line of work!
-
@cmconseils @lisamelton YouTube Premium pays 55% of its revenue to creators directly.
@JonathanGulbrandsen @cmconseils @lisamelton
No.
It pays 45% to 55% of the revenue *after YouTube has deducted its operating cost*.
That's a very different number
How Does YouTube Premium Pay Creators? - California Learning Resource Network
YouTube Premium offers users an enhanced viewing experience by removing advertisements, enabling offline downloads, and providing access to exclusive content. However, understanding the revenue distribution model behind this subscription service is crucial for content creators. This article delves into the intricacies of how YouTube Premium compensates its creators, exploring the various factors and calculations involved. […]
California Learning Resource Network (www.clrn.org)
-
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils *Laughs in NewPipe/PipePipe/Tubular/SmartTube/FreeTube/SkyTube*
-
@JonathanGulbrandsen @cmconseils @lisamelton
No.
It pays 45% to 55% of the revenue *after YouTube has deducted its operating cost*.
That's a very different number
How Does YouTube Premium Pay Creators? - California Learning Resource Network
YouTube Premium offers users an enhanced viewing experience by removing advertisements, enabling offline downloads, and providing access to exclusive content. However, understanding the revenue distribution model behind this subscription service is crucial for content creators. This article delves into the intricacies of how YouTube Premium compensates its creators, exploring the various factors and calculations involved. […]
California Learning Resource Network (www.clrn.org)
@nlarson830 @cmconseils @lisamelton sure. Still more than just ”pay to remove ads”.
-
@cmconseils
Deutsche Telekom charges consumers for broadband access and then also charges content providers for bandwidth to their customers. If you're the platform, nobody can afford not to do business there.And isn't Vodafone trying to pull the same thing?
-
@cmconseils yes and the next step is netflix, where companies pay to show ads and we pay to see those ads
@RedKoba @cmconseils
I'm so old that I remember when our state first got Cable Television. The big feature was that we could all watch movies with no ads. Pretty soon it was you could watch movies with no ads on certain channels. Then it was if you paid extra for premium channels, you could watch certain movies without ads sometimes. That's when I got rid of Cable. -
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils exactly.....its why i mostly use ways to jot see adds for free
-
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils With Firefox and Ublock Origin, I don't see ads ever.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils
#altText by AI isn't good, is it? -
@renardboy @Legit_Spaghetti @cmconseils add sponsorblock as well. It uses community notes to auto skip the YouTuber ad reads and promos.
Home
SponsorBlock is a crowdsourced browser extension to skip sponsor segments in YouTube videos.
(sponsor.ajay.app)
Its amazing how well it works. Right after any big youtuber releases a video, it skips over them. Even smaller youtubers will ad skip within a few minutes of release, and if not, the plugin let's you easy annotate the start - stop to help others.
@liquidlamp @renardboy @Legit_Spaghetti @cmconseils Sponsorblock is *magic*.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils This is the heart of #enshittification. Making a given platform crap for users is a side effect of making only one bridge between product and consumer and then sucking money out of both of them.
attn: @pluralistic
The meme, above, kinda captures your concept.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Well this one is for free as in free and 100% privacy first...
Shakira - Hips Don't Lie ft. Wyclef Jean
Shakira - Hips Don't Lie ft. Wyclef Jean
🇬🇧 Experience Shakira’s 2007 global smash “Hips Don’t Lie” featuring Wyclef Jean, a vibrant Latin‑pop anthem from Oral Fixation Tour that celebrates how rhythm and dance break language barriers. The...
u 2 Be | Video Sharing (u2be.ovh)
#shakira #WyclefJean #OralFixationTour #HipsDontLie #LatinPop #2000s #loveSongs #reggaeton #salsa #cumbia #u2be #youtubefree #googlefree #metafree #songoftheday #SOTD #MeinSongDesTages #MusicChannel #music #privacy #mypdns #peertube
-
@DenOfEarth @cmconseils @pluralistic Rentiers. Yup. They provide nothing. Only squat on a space and insist that no matter who's on it, they have to pay.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils This is an interesting question! I think of it as paying the creators I watch with my money. Of course I am also paying Google.
-
@DenOfEarth @cmconseils @pluralistic Rentiers. Yup. They provide nothing. Only squat on a space and insist that no matter who's on it, they have to pay.
@OrionKidder @DenOfEarth @cmconseils @pluralistic I don't think it's quite that simple. Plenty of others have tried to run video hosting platforms and failed--pretty much only TikTok and Instagram have survived, and they're both much worse from an advertising perspective. It's extremely expensive to do well.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@cmconseils how much is it to just never watch YouTube at all?
