Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Wow: you can knock out a plant with anesthetics - the same anesthetics that work on people!

Wow: you can knock out a plant with anesthetics - the same anesthetics that work on people!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
35 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • izzychambers@social.vivaldi.netI izzychambers@social.vivaldi.net

    @elexia @johncarlosbaez Maybe, but given that we don't have a clear understanding of what consciousness is or how plants process information, I don't think we can rule it out.

    elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
    elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
    elexia@catcatnya.com
    wrote last edited by
    #26

    @IzzyChambers @johncarlosbaez I wouldn't rule it out, just think it's very improbable given what we currently know about these things.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • maxpool@mathstodon.xyzM maxpool@mathstodon.xyz

      @johncarlosbaez

      The weird thing is that plant cells have discrete action potentials, but C. elegans (the roundworm) does not[1].

      C. elegans has a nervous system made of 302 neurons with graded potentials (no spikes, meaning they are 'analog') and no myelin to work as wire insulation. Its signaling is slow. C. Elegans cognition is mix of of mechanical, chemical and electrical signals.

      Mechanical stetching opens ion channels in the neurons, generating signals. Neurons can react external touching or internal movement. Internal mechanical feedback is part of its thinking and movement.

      [1]: as far as I know.

      tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
      tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
      tpfto@mathstodon.xyz
      wrote last edited by
      #27

      @maxpool I noted this in a different response to this thread, but for what little we know about how inhalational anesthetics work, we at least know that the more lipophilic (that is, how well they dissolve in fats) they are, the more potent their effect is; for the noble gases, this is then also correlated with their atomic polarizability (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizability). So, helium, neon, and argon display almost no anesthetic activity, but krypton and xenon do. In fact, argon will only display anesthetic activity at hyperbaric (pressure greater than atmospheric pressure) conditions, where its solubility in fats is enhanced. See the survey of Winkler and others, e.g. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.02.002 and https://doi.org/10.3390/oxygen4040026 . (cc. @johncarlosbaez @heptapodEnthusiast)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

        @jmcclure @ClimateJenny - thanks, Jenny and Jesse! The research on anesthetics has caused a controversy on whether plants are "conscious". I didn't want to mention that in my main post because I find most discussions of consciousness very irritating: people don't define their terms and some treat consciousness, sentience and awareness as the same while others don't, etc., and it become just as bad as "interpretations of quantum mechanics". But I enjoy learning actual facts about how animals and plants behave!

        jmcclure@sciences.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jmcclure@sciences.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jmcclure@sciences.social
        wrote last edited by
        #28

        @johncarlosbaez @ClimateJenny

        Indeed - I've been a fly on the wall of such debates. Plant capabilities themselves are stunning and worthy of note.

        But discussions of "consciousness" / "sentience" always devolve into semantic nonsense. Often a pseudo-resolution comes with something like "For any *reasonable* definition of (consciousness / sentience) plants ..."

        But as a behavioral neuroscientist, I can tell you I've yet to encounter a reasonable definition of either of these terms.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT tpfto@mathstodon.xyz

          @johncarlosbaez very interesting, thanks for pulling that one up! It's wild that lidocaine actually works on plants that move. Indeed, the inhalational anesthetics are poorly understood with respect to their mechanism of action, but we at least know that their being lipophilic (i.e., how well they dissolve in fats and other non-aqueous media) correlates well with their potency.

          heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
          heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
          heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyz
          wrote last edited by
          #29

          @tpfto @johncarlosbaez My personal amateur guess is that the gaseous anaesthetics are disrupting the formation or dissolution of lipid rafts, which regulate a lot of the traffic through the cell membrane. AIUI, lipid rafts more or less work by locally changing the stiffness and hydrophobicity of the patch of membrane they form on. If the gas dissolves into the lipid bilayer and changes either property, it could alter ion channels, endo/exocytosis, and more. Any eukaryotic cell would be vulnerable to an effect like that. (And perhaps bacteria and archaea too, but I don't remember enough of their membrane chemistry to say anything reliable.)

          And regardless of how such anaesthetics affect the cell membrane, I suspect their narrow therapeutic index comes from disrupting the function of the mitochondrial membrane. Depolarizing the mitochondria (by making them leaky or by blocking their proton pumps) is lethal for most eukaryotic cells, since the H+ gradient across the inner membrane is what powers aerobic ATP synthesis.

          tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • elexia@catcatnya.comE elexia@catcatnya.com

            @IzzyChambers @johncarlosbaez consciousness is still a very different matter and not something we even would know how to measure. we can only go off what seems to produce it in humans and how other living things might act similarly. plants don't just lack nerve cells, they also lack something analogous to a central nervous system to integrate information. far as I understand it if plants possess consciousness we're either very very wrong about the prerequisites and purpose of consciousness or very very wrong about how plants function. and we wouldn't really be able to test it either way.

            heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
            heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
            heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyz
            wrote last edited by
            #30

            @elexia @IzzyChambers @johncarlosbaez My personal bet is that, when we say "consciousness" without mysticism, what we really mean is "awake" aka "able to perceive and react to external stimuli". In which case, single cells are absolutely capable of being conscious, and the difference from our own experience is one of size scale and complexity.

            Even for animal life, animals of different body sizes have radically different types of situational awareness, so it's not surprising we struggle to imagine what a single-celled organism like *Stentor coeruleus* "thinks" of its experiences.

            It's a little humbling to think of your individual cells having their own opinions about how "the weather" (your metabolic inner life) has been lately.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyz

              @tpfto @johncarlosbaez My personal amateur guess is that the gaseous anaesthetics are disrupting the formation or dissolution of lipid rafts, which regulate a lot of the traffic through the cell membrane. AIUI, lipid rafts more or less work by locally changing the stiffness and hydrophobicity of the patch of membrane they form on. If the gas dissolves into the lipid bilayer and changes either property, it could alter ion channels, endo/exocytosis, and more. Any eukaryotic cell would be vulnerable to an effect like that. (And perhaps bacteria and archaea too, but I don't remember enough of their membrane chemistry to say anything reliable.)

              And regardless of how such anaesthetics affect the cell membrane, I suspect their narrow therapeutic index comes from disrupting the function of the mitochondrial membrane. Depolarizing the mitochondria (by making them leaky or by blocking their proton pumps) is lethal for most eukaryotic cells, since the H+ gradient across the inner membrane is what powers aerobic ATP synthesis.

              tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
              tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
              tpfto@mathstodon.xyz
              wrote last edited by
              #31

              @heptapodEnthusiast regarding the lipid rafts, there is in fact a (relatively recent) paper that posits this theory: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004259117 . Perhaps you've seen it already? (cc. @johncarlosbaez)

              heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT tpfto@mathstodon.xyz

                @heptapodEnthusiast regarding the lipid rafts, there is in fact a (relatively recent) paper that posits this theory: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004259117 . Perhaps you've seen it already? (cc. @johncarlosbaez)

                heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
                heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
                heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyz
                wrote last edited by
                #32

                @tpfto I don't recall reading it directly, but I have certainly read material that was influenced by it. Thank you for sharing!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                  Wow: you can knock out a plant with anesthetics - the same anesthetics that work on people!

                  It's easist to see for plants that move, like a Venus fly trap. But experiments have shown it's true for others too.

                  We're still struggling to figure out what this means. We don't really know how anesthetics work, but here's a clue: you don't need to have neurons to get anesthetized!

                  Link Preview Image
                  furrybeta@shark.communityF This user is from outside of this forum
                  furrybeta@shark.communityF This user is from outside of this forum
                  furrybeta@shark.community
                  wrote last edited by
                  #33

                  @johncarlosbaez This is wild!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                    Wow: you can knock out a plant with anesthetics - the same anesthetics that work on people!

                    It's easist to see for plants that move, like a Venus fly trap. But experiments have shown it's true for others too.

                    We're still struggling to figure out what this means. We don't really know how anesthetics work, but here's a clue: you don't need to have neurons to get anesthetized!

                    Link Preview Image
                    lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.net
                    wrote last edited by
                    #34

                    @johncarlosbaez On the downside we may have hurt a lot of life before.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                      Wow: you can knock out a plant with anesthetics - the same anesthetics that work on people!

                      It's easist to see for plants that move, like a Venus fly trap. But experiments have shown it's true for others too.

                      We're still struggling to figure out what this means. We don't really know how anesthetics work, but here's a clue: you don't need to have neurons to get anesthetized!

                      Link Preview Image
                      stevewfolds@mastodon.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                      stevewfolds@mastodon.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                      stevewfolds@mastodon.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #35

                      @johncarlosbaez
                      I remember the Yellow Shell No-Pest strips and other insecticides. Your could feel them as soon as you walked into a place that had one or been sprayed with Raid.

                      Link Preview Image
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups