Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "Zelensky says allies asked him to scale back attacks on Russian energy"

"Zelensky says allies asked him to scale back attacks on Russian energy"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
oilgasclimatecrisiszelenskyrussia
72 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • clot27@mastodon.socialC clot27@mastodon.social

    @benroyce lol

    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #37

    @clot27

    i know right? russia is a fucking joke

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

      @Tattered @roblosricos @Npars01

      yes china delivered those things

      with capitalism. combined with no human rights. totalitarian capitalism

      and so i look at your bio and i am struck at the contrast. between someone who proclaims rights, and yet is so eager to betray rights. and i wonder. is it a troll? do you lack the capacity to understand your profound hypocrisy?

      i sniffed you out as a tankie from the get go. i just had to confirm it. and you did

      my friend:

      jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.net
      wrote last edited by
      #38

      @benroyce@mastodon.social @Npars01@mstdn.social @Tattered@social.vivaldi.net @roblosricos@mastodon.social I was ... "wait what" so looked to see what was going on with the thread above this, and man... I don't have the time to read, but man... Ah well. I guess I'll find out after this what my experience is. Thanks for giving me a hint, that became much more than a hint...

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.netJ jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.net

        @benroyce@mastodon.social @Npars01@mstdn.social @Tattered@social.vivaldi.net @roblosricos@mastodon.social I was ... "wait what" so looked to see what was going on with the thread above this, and man... I don't have the time to read, but man... Ah well. I guess I'll find out after this what my experience is. Thanks for giving me a hint, that became much more than a hint...

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #39

        @JigmeDatse @Npars01 @Tattered @roblosricos

        Fucking tankies

        Working hard for fascism

        Pretending they are on the left

        jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

          @JigmeDatse @Npars01 @Tattered @roblosricos

          Fucking tankies

          Working hard for fascism

          Pretending they are on the left

          jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.net
          wrote last edited by
          #40

          @benroyce@mastodon.social @Npars01@mstdn.social @Tattered@social.vivaldi.net @roblosricos@mastodon.social I'll admit, that I sort of felt that you could combine progressivism, and authoritarianism, until I sat down and thought about it ... in part through discussion with Soviet Communists. (and a Chinese Communist, who didn't participate that well). I still go, "why can't we just make them think better..." from time to time. Just you know keep those thoughts largely private (like in person with friends/family sometimes), because while I have them, and sometimes feel the need to express them. Most of that is because if I don't. I don't get that, "Oh right, that just doesn't work does it..."

          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.netJ jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.net

            @benroyce@mastodon.social @Npars01@mstdn.social @Tattered@social.vivaldi.net @roblosricos@mastodon.social I'll admit, that I sort of felt that you could combine progressivism, and authoritarianism, until I sat down and thought about it ... in part through discussion with Soviet Communists. (and a Chinese Communist, who didn't participate that well). I still go, "why can't we just make them think better..." from time to time. Just you know keep those thoughts largely private (like in person with friends/family sometimes), because while I have them, and sometimes feel the need to express them. Most of that is because if I don't. I don't get that, "Oh right, that just doesn't work does it..."

            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #41

            @JigmeDatse @Npars01 @Tattered @roblosricos

            concentration of power in the hands of the few inevitably results in destruction of rights

            for someone to point at china, which is totalitarian capitalism, as a triumph of socialism, is peak delusional or a straight hard sociopathic lie

            so anyone putting their faith in authoritarian control for the people's rights is a moron of the highest order, or an icy liar working hard against people's rights

            the idea is to cure sick democracy. not abandon it

            jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

              @JigmeDatse @Npars01 @Tattered @roblosricos

              concentration of power in the hands of the few inevitably results in destruction of rights

              for someone to point at china, which is totalitarian capitalism, as a triumph of socialism, is peak delusional or a straight hard sociopathic lie

              so anyone putting their faith in authoritarian control for the people's rights is a moron of the highest order, or an icy liar working hard against people's rights

              the idea is to cure sick democracy. not abandon it

              jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.net
              wrote last edited by
              #42

              @benroyce@mastodon.social @Npars01@mstdn.social @Tattered@social.vivaldi.net @roblosricos@mastodon.social Ah, these folk I was talking to, very much we ended up agreeing that what they saw as "good" and what we could agree was the reality, were not the same thing. This was probably 15-20 years ago, and even then things both in China and Russia were not anything like the promise (hm, nor were they 100 years ago from what I can tell).

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.netJ jigmedatse@social.openpsychology.net

                @benroyce@mastodon.social @Npars01@mstdn.social @Tattered@social.vivaldi.net @roblosricos@mastodon.social Ah, these folk I was talking to, very much we ended up agreeing that what they saw as "good" and what we could agree was the reality, were not the same thing. This was probably 15-20 years ago, and even then things both in China and Russia were not anything like the promise (hm, nor were they 100 years ago from what I can tell).

                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #43

                @JigmeDatse @Npars01 @Tattered @roblosricos

                china's rise is just abandonment of all of it's communist principles, embracing capitalism, but keeping the authoritarianism. that's a fucking nightmare, fuck all the shilling tankies and their lies about that

                russia meanwhile is the straight simple tragedy of how rosy ideals are betrayed by sociopaths (ie, stalin)

                and democracy fucking sucks

                it's just that, there's no better option. we need to fix it

                photo55@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                  "Zelensky says allies asked him to scale back attacks on Russian energy"

                  Link Preview Image
                  Zelensky says allies asked him to scale back attacks on Russian energy

                  Ukraine's president says partners asked if the attacks could be "reduced" as prices soar due to the Iran war.

                  favicon

                  (www.bbc.com)

                  Yeah, fuck that

                  Fuck any country in Europe still stuck on #oil and #gas

                  Fuck bigot Americans in giant low fuel economy pickup trucks whining

                  Fuck you India, Fuck you China

                  Fuck you all

                  All countries:

                  Get the fuck off oil and gas. Period. End of story

                  Addressing the #climatecrisis and defunding vile regimes is job #1

                  #Zelensky:

                  Pulverize #Russia's #energy sector to oblivion

                  #UkraineWar

                  txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  txtx@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #44

                  @benroyce If we in Europe don't send troops to fight Russians in Ukraine, the least we can do is to dump those shitty gas guzzling BMW/Mercedes SUVs.

                  It's such a small inconvenience and it's never been easier.

                  If European companies are unwilling to do the right thing, I'd rather we go all-in on EVs and solar panels from China than continue funding Russia.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    txtx@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #45

                    @mike805 You mention Russia as if anyone here had even the faintest impression that they are part of this discussion.

                    This is about bombing the shit out of Russia's oil infrastructure, not asking what *they* think about renewables.

                    @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce

                    txtx@mastodon.socialT photo55@mastodon.socialP 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

                      @mike805 You mention Russia as if anyone here had even the faintest impression that they are part of this discussion.

                      This is about bombing the shit out of Russia's oil infrastructure, not asking what *they* think about renewables.

                      @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce

                      txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      txtx@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #46

                      @mike805 Let's move to renewables*

                      * so that Ukraine can continue to bomb Russia to pieces.

                      There's your 80pt asterisk.

                      @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                        "Zelensky says allies asked him to scale back attacks on Russian energy"

                        Link Preview Image
                        Zelensky says allies asked him to scale back attacks on Russian energy

                        Ukraine's president says partners asked if the attacks could be "reduced" as prices soar due to the Iran war.

                        favicon

                        (www.bbc.com)

                        Yeah, fuck that

                        Fuck any country in Europe still stuck on #oil and #gas

                        Fuck bigot Americans in giant low fuel economy pickup trucks whining

                        Fuck you India, Fuck you China

                        Fuck you all

                        All countries:

                        Get the fuck off oil and gas. Period. End of story

                        Addressing the #climatecrisis and defunding vile regimes is job #1

                        #Zelensky:

                        Pulverize #Russia's #energy sector to oblivion

                        #UkraineWar

                        phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        phl@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #47

                        @benroyce But they never reprimand Russia for blowing up Ukraine's energy infrastructure. That's, apparently, just normal.

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          photo55@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #48

                          @mike805 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce
                          The damage to the climate is already expensive.
                          More so than not burning oil for heat and traction.

                          Electrochemical nitrogen fixation is in early stages, and feeding the world may require fossil feedstock for a while yet. Alas.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

                            @mike805 You mention Russia as if anyone here had even the faintest impression that they are part of this discussion.

                            This is about bombing the shit out of Russia's oil infrastructure, not asking what *they* think about renewables.

                            @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce

                            photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            photo55@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #49

                            @txtx @mike805 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce making their oil less valuable has an end effect akin to bombing bits of the infrastructure. Which among other things leaves the bombs available to direct to other deserving targets.

                            txtx@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tattered@social.vivaldi.netT tattered@social.vivaldi.net

                              @benroyce @roblosricos @Npars01

                              I think it would be fair to say that we would agree that the Republican Party, or the UK Conservative Party, and the Murdoch press are working counter to the interests of the working people.

                              Capitalism exists everywhere. Social projects are the only way that socialist governments can operate *within* a capitalist economy, like the Uruguayan example. Xi’s domestic policies are socialist in much the same way.

                              Do I think Xi should be President for life? No.
                              Do I think he deserves credit for lifting millions of people out of poverty and for increasing commitment to renewable energy? Yes.

                              I think I’d even praise DJT if he did these things. But we both know it’s a safe bet that he never would.

                              Do I trust the Chinese system to keep the working class safe under any leader? No (See the Cultural Revolution).
                              Do I trust capitalist parliamentarianism? Also no.

                              I am, I hope, not entirely a fool. 🙂

                              I know we have differences of opinion. We also share many of the same hopes.

                              I think it’s important to celebrate gains that are made towards those goals, even in systems we cannot wholeheartedly support.

                              Do I trust Xi entirely? No.
                              Do I think he has done more good for the people of the world than DJT, Netanyahu, MBS, or Putin? Yes.

                              photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              photo55@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #50

                              @Tattered @benroyce @roblosricos @Npars01
                              "Working people".
                              Let's consider those who do not yet work, those who did work, but retired, those who would but cannot work, those who would and could, but are not provided an opportunity, as well.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tattered@social.vivaldi.netT tattered@social.vivaldi.net

                                @benroyce @roblosricos @Npars01 There are as many problems with democracy, as far as I can see.

                                No British Prime Minister has supported broad socialist policies since Wilson.

                                Democracies have been responsible for far more wars of aggression in my lifetime than autocracies.

                                European democracies are tending toward fascism, on a sliding scale from Orban to Macron deliberately obstructing the public choice of a socialist prime minister.

                                If we compare Xi with Obama, one of these leaders was engaged in overseas wars of aggression, in which he oversaw the use of drone warfare, with resultant civilian casualties. One of these leaders has also raised millions of his citizens out of abject poverty.

                                Democracy as an ideal is better than authoritarianism as an ideal. However, a number of fascist dictators have been installed by the democratic process, including Hitler. I live in a democracy that has had single-party rule for all but two short periods in its postwar history.

                                1/2

                                photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                photo55@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #51

                                @Tattered @benroyce @roblosricos @Npars01
                                The worst possible system, except for all the others.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                  @JigmeDatse @Npars01 @Tattered @roblosricos

                                  china's rise is just abandonment of all of it's communist principles, embracing capitalism, but keeping the authoritarianism. that's a fucking nightmare, fuck all the shilling tankies and their lies about that

                                  russia meanwhile is the straight simple tragedy of how rosy ideals are betrayed by sociopaths (ie, stalin)

                                  and democracy fucking sucks

                                  it's just that, there's no better option. we need to fix it

                                  photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  photo55@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #52

                                  @benroyce
                                  China has a very long history.

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

                                    @txtx @mike805 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce making their oil less valuable has an end effect akin to bombing bits of the infrastructure. Which among other things leaves the bombs available to direct to other deserving targets.

                                    txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    txtx@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #53

                                    @Photo55 A blown up barrel of oil has a value of zero dollars, so I agree with you there!

                                    @mike805 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce

                                    photo55@mastodon.socialP M 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

                                      @Photo55 A blown up barrel of oil has a value of zero dollars, so I agree with you there!

                                      @mike805 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce

                                      photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      photo55@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #54

                                      @txtx
                                      A barrel nobody wants is worth even less.
                                      Demand destruction is tidier than supply destruction.

                                      txtx@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • roblosricos@mastodon.socialR roblosricos@mastodon.social

                                        @Npars01 @benroyce

                                        Uruguay did what most nations still call impossible: it built a power grid that runs almost entirely on renewables—at half the cost of fossil fuels. The physicist who led that transformation says the same playbook could work anywhere—if governments have the courage to change the rules.

                                        forbes.com

                                        favicon

                                        (www.forbes.com)

                                        muzicofiel@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        muzicofiel@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        muzicofiel@mastodon.nl
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #55

                                        @ErikJonker een tip voor #Jetten

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

                                          @benroyce
                                          China has a very long history.

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #56

                                          @Photo55

                                          of course, as a culture

                                          but we speak of "china" in this context in terms of it as a political entity, which only dates to 1949

                                          and the shift that led to its embrace of capitalism and its economic rise is even more recent, 1978 and deng xiaoping

                                          photo55@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups