Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Han Unification: not violent, just really inconvenient

Han Unification: not violent, just really inconvenient

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
unicodechinesehistoryclassicalchineslinguistics
5 Posts 3 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
    0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
    0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Han Unification: not violent, just really inconvenient

    #unicode #chinese #history #classicalchinese #linguistics

    Link Preview Image
    owlor@meow.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

      Han Unification: not violent, just really inconvenient

      #unicode #chinese #history #classicalchinese #linguistics

      Link Preview Image
      owlor@meow.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      owlor@meow.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      owlor@meow.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @0xabad1dea Those are some very white faces for representing a group of people making decisions about how to best map chinese, japanese and korean characters.

      0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • owlor@meow.socialO owlor@meow.social

        @0xabad1dea Those are some very white faces for representing a group of people making decisions about how to best map chinese, japanese and korean characters.

        0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
        0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
        0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @Owlor just to be 100% clear, this isn't literally the meeting where it happened a few decades ago, just the first photo I found of a Unicode meeting where there's a sign saying it's a Unicode meeting.

        I don't know who was involved in the decision, though there's probably a record somewhere.

        eggrobin@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

          @Owlor just to be 100% clear, this isn't literally the meeting where it happened a few decades ago, just the first photo I found of a Unicode meeting where there's a sign saying it's a Unicode meeting.

          I don't know who was involved in the decision, though there's probably a record somewhere.

          eggrobin@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          eggrobin@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          eggrobin@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @0xabad1dea A lot of the CJK work is on the ISO side, see https://www.unicode.org/irg/.

          On the UTC side, see the relevant WG https://www.unicode.org/consortium/cjkunihan.html.

          On the history see https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode17.0.0/core-spec/appendix-e/.

          Henry Chan (now IRG ORT manager) had a interesting thread on Twitter on the necessity of unification, see https://web.archive.org/web/20220115002546/https://twitter.com/FakeUnicode/status/1455676926568271873. See also https://www.unicode.org/notes/tn26/.

          eggrobin@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • eggrobin@mastodon.socialE eggrobin@mastodon.social

            @0xabad1dea A lot of the CJK work is on the ISO side, see https://www.unicode.org/irg/.

            On the UTC side, see the relevant WG https://www.unicode.org/consortium/cjkunihan.html.

            On the history see https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode17.0.0/core-spec/appendix-e/.

            Henry Chan (now IRG ORT manager) had a interesting thread on Twitter on the necessity of unification, see https://web.archive.org/web/20220115002546/https://twitter.com/FakeUnicode/status/1455676926568271873. See also https://www.unicode.org/notes/tn26/.

            eggrobin@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
            eggrobin@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
            eggrobin@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @0xabad1dea I don’t know if there are photos online of the CJK-JRG 1991 Tokyo meeting. The earliest IRG meeting with group photos on https://www.unicode.org/irg/meetings.html is Macao 2002. So « what actually happened » might look more like this, although that photo is still ten years later:

            Link Preview Image
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups