Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. > The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

> The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
69 Posts 55 Posters 11 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

    > The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

    Link Preview Image

    favicon

    X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

    this looks sustainable, datacenters are a one-time cost... right?!?

    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
    wrote last edited by
    #38

    @cwebber

    Reality only about 5% of 10% of all the data centers announced are actually being built. They don’t have the customers and they don’t have the energy to run the chips. If they do run, they last about 18 months.

    That’s 18 months to make a return on investment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

      > The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

      Link Preview Image

      favicon

      X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

      this looks sustainable, datacenters are a one-time cost... right?!?

      wronglang@bayes.clubW This user is from outside of this forum
      wronglang@bayes.clubW This user is from outside of this forum
      wronglang@bayes.club
      wrote last edited by
      #39

      @cwebber yeah that should've gone into railroads, railroads and healthcare

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

        > The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

        Link Preview Image

        favicon

        X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

        this looks sustainable, datacenters are a one-time cost... right?!?

        cassandravert@indieweb.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        cassandravert@indieweb.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        cassandravert@indieweb.social
        wrote last edited by
        #40

        Future projections will be influenced by whether they can escape liability for the damage they cause.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • faoluin@chitter.xyzF faoluin@chitter.xyz

          @cwebber I'm sure this won't come back to haunt the average taxpayers in any way.

          wilbr@glitch.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
          wilbr@glitch.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
          wilbr@glitch.social
          wrote last edited by
          #41

          @faoluin @cwebber we won't need "taxes" when the water wars start, just copies of Paolo Bacigalupi's book "Water Knife", a weapon, and the holy guiding hand of Jesus himself

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • neilk@xoxo.zoneN neilk@xoxo.zone

            @cwebber Adjusted for GDP, it is still pretty respectable

            Not quite the Marshall Plan, way behind railroads https://x.com/finmoorhouse/status/2044985359281381690?s=20

            Still it just seems impossible. Does this represent orgs with committed budgets or actual spend? We can make warehouse style buildings almost instantly but we can’t make GPUs that fast.

            gladtherescake@todon.nlG This user is from outside of this forum
            gladtherescake@todon.nlG This user is from outside of this forum
            gladtherescake@todon.nl
            wrote last edited by
            #42

            @neilk @cwebber But GDP rises because of any investment, if you have a huge investment that leverages a huge part of your economy and then compare it to GDP it's going to mostly cancel out because you're putting two correlated variables at both ends of the equation. So I don't think that's a reasonable thing to do at all.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • buermann@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              buermann@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              buermann@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #43

              @Spirit @cwebber

              We can recycle the silicon and steel into the solar panels and wind mills we couldn't afford to build instead.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                > The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

                Link Preview Image

                favicon

                X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

                this looks sustainable, datacenters are a one-time cost... right?!?

                buermann@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                buermann@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                buermann@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #44

                @cwebber

                What index did they use for the inflation adjustment?

                buermann@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                  > The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

                  Link Preview Image

                  favicon

                  X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

                  this looks sustainable, datacenters are a one-time cost... right?!?

                  catmisgivings@stranger.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  catmisgivings@stranger.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  catmisgivings@stranger.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #45

                  @cwebber now I'm looking at us railroads through the lens of a bubble investment and wondering if after all the loss of life and resettlement we could even call them a success from our standpoint in 2026

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                    > The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

                    Link Preview Image

                    favicon

                    X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

                    this looks sustainable, datacenters are a one-time cost... right?!?

                    mayintoronto@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mayintoronto@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mayintoronto@beige.party
                    wrote last edited by
                    #46

                    @cwebber What are we even doing here?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • buermann@mastodon.socialB buermann@mastodon.social

                      @cwebber

                      What index did they use for the inflation adjustment?

                      buermann@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      buermann@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      buermann@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #47

                      @cwebber

                      Weird to adjust historic spending on infrastructure projects by a consumer price index. This is better.

                      Link Preview Image

                      favicon

                      X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      shaknais@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • buermann@mastodon.socialB buermann@mastodon.social

                        @cwebber

                        Weird to adjust historic spending on infrastructure projects by a consumer price index. This is better.

                        Link Preview Image

                        favicon

                        X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

                        Link Preview Image
                        shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        shaknais@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #48

                        @buermann

                        Percentage of GDP, for privately led projects doesn't seem a good index for me.

                        buermann@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                          > The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

                          Link Preview Image

                          favicon

                          X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

                          this looks sustainable, datacenters are a one-time cost... right?!?

                          criticalangle@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          criticalangle@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          criticalangle@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #49

                          @cwebber bubble

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • shaknais@mastodon.socialS shaknais@mastodon.social

                            @buermann

                            Percentage of GDP, for privately led projects doesn't seem a good index for me.

                            buermann@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            buermann@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            buermann@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #50

                            @shaknais

                            It's a better proxy for productive capacity than a price index based on wildly different baskets of consumer goods over the centuries.

                            And since when were apollo or the Manhattan project or the international space station or the interstate highway system private programs?

                            shaknais@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • buermann@mastodon.socialB buermann@mastodon.social

                              @shaknais

                              It's a better proxy for productive capacity than a price index based on wildly different baskets of consumer goods over the centuries.

                              And since when were apollo or the Manhattan project or the international space station or the interstate highway system private programs?

                              shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              shaknais@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #51

                              @buermann

                              That's my point. None of those programs are private. However, the data centers _are_. It is unusual when the spending of private corporations outstrips that of their own government, on infrastructure.

                              Which is why GDP seems a bad fit, here. Because it uses the investments by private corps as part of its calculation, but doesn't fully cover government spending in the same period.

                              buermann@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                > The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

                                Link Preview Image

                                favicon

                                X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

                                this looks sustainable, datacenters are a one-time cost... right?!?

                                iank@hostux.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                iank@hostux.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                iank@hostux.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #52

                                @cwebber I suspect there is something important that is misleading about that graph, and I don't know quite what it is, but here are clues. A "data center" in practical / technical terms, is not defined by the computers inside it, but by a building (real estate), and the power & network connected to it. I walk through a floor of a data center in the Boston area every few weeks, for the past 5 years. I see maybe 200 racks, and room for 200 more. A large empty room, extremely little change. (1/2)

                                iank@hostux.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • iank@hostux.socialI iank@hostux.social

                                  @cwebber I suspect there is something important that is misleading about that graph, and I don't know quite what it is, but here are clues. A "data center" in practical / technical terms, is not defined by the computers inside it, but by a building (real estate), and the power & network connected to it. I walk through a floor of a data center in the Boston area every few weeks, for the past 5 years. I see maybe 200 racks, and room for 200 more. A large empty room, extremely little change. (1/2)

                                  iank@hostux.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  iank@hostux.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  iank@hostux.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #53

                                  @cwebber The company, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Tower , has 27 data centers, 10 billion in revenue, it is not a small player, and its revenue and stock price have been flat over the past few years. So, I have to wonder how much of this kind of this stuff is at the same level of reporting as science reporting constantly telling us about the breakthrough that is about to cure cancer.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD darkuncle@infosec.exchange

                                    @cwebber wish we had LHC on that graph

                                    marcel@waldvogel.familyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    marcel@waldvogel.familyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    marcel@waldvogel.family
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #54

                                    @darkuncle @cwebber
                                    It's a measly 4 or 5 billion USD (4.3*10⁹ CHF)
                                    https://home.cern/resources/faqs/facts-and-figures-about-lhc

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                      > The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

                                      Link Preview Image

                                      favicon

                                      X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

                                      this looks sustainable, datacenters are a one-time cost... right?!?

                                      bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bms48@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #55

                                      @cwebber OOPSIE!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                        > The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects

                                        Link Preview Image

                                        favicon

                                        X (formerly Twitter) (x.com)

                                        this looks sustainable, datacenters are a one-time cost... right?!?

                                        mhartle@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mhartle@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mhartle@mastodon.online
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #56

                                        @cwebber Contrast this with current revenue generated by AI providers running on top of these and future necessary revenue these providers would need to generate during the lifetime of these data centers for a positive ROI.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • shaknais@mastodon.socialS shaknais@mastodon.social

                                          @buermann

                                          That's my point. None of those programs are private. However, the data centers _are_. It is unusual when the spending of private corporations outstrips that of their own government, on infrastructure.

                                          Which is why GDP seems a bad fit, here. Because it uses the investments by private corps as part of its calculation, but doesn't fully cover government spending in the same period.

                                          buermann@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          buermann@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          buermann@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #57

                                          @shaknais

                                          Government spending is included in GDP. Public and private investment recruit from the same pool of capital.

                                          shaknais@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups