Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #ScienceFiction is informed by #Science

#ScienceFiction is informed by #Science

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
sciencefictionsciencestarwarsdaymaythe4thmaythe4thbewith
41 Posts 13 Posters 7 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM martinvermeer@fediscience.org

    @benroyce @rozeboosje This is not at all uncommon. Castor, Alpha in the Twins (Gemini) is sixfold. Stable systems like this typically are binaries of binaries, where the 'inner' binaries are small members of an 'outer' binary, so for the purpose of celestial mechanics, the may be treated almost as point masses. A bit like, when modelling the solar system as a whole, you may consider the Earth-Moon system a single planet.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castor_(star)

    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #19

    @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

    it's alien to us. with our single star

    but in the wider galaxy, we are the alien ones

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM martinvermeer@fediscience.org

      @benroyce @rozeboosje And then there is Mizar. Astronomic history!

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mizar

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #20

      @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

      did you hear about this one?

      septuple system

      (!)

      Link Preview Image
      Nu Scorpii - Wikipedia

      favicon

      (en.wikipedia.org)

      martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

        @johnlogic

        but it kind of makes sense doesn't it? it just follows logically

        unsupported as yet by science (we've only seen a few), but it just "makes sense":

        that interstellar space isn't empty, but riddled with gas giants

        stars, essentially, not massive enough to ignite. just sitting there in the dark

        they should outnumber the number of stars. just as a sheer result of gaussian distribution, and those that ignite are on the right side of the curve in size

        chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        chuckmcmanis@chaos.social
        wrote last edited by
        #21

        @benroyce It's an interesting hypothesis, and testable! Given that we're all orbiting the giant black hole at the center of the Milky Way, and orbits closer to the center are faster than ours. Stars closer to the center would occasionally be occluded by these 'dark giants'. That would show up in our repeated observations. Those occlusions would completely block the star, unlike planets orbiting the star.

        @johnlogic

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

          @johnlogic

          but it kind of makes sense doesn't it? it just follows logically

          unsupported as yet by science (we've only seen a few), but it just "makes sense":

          that interstellar space isn't empty, but riddled with gas giants

          stars, essentially, not massive enough to ignite. just sitting there in the dark

          they should outnumber the number of stars. just as a sheer result of gaussian distribution, and those that ignite are on the right side of the curve in size

          riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
          riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
          riley@toot.cat
          wrote last edited by
          #22

          @benroyce There's all sorts of things that can make dark gas glow. Even gravitational interactions. If dark gas existed in such huge lumps, we should be able to occasionally see the glow even if the stars don't get ignited up properly.

          @johnlogic

          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC chuckmcmanis@chaos.social

            @benroyce It's an interesting hypothesis, and testable! Given that we're all orbiting the giant black hole at the center of the Milky Way, and orbits closer to the center are faster than ours. Stars closer to the center would occasionally be occluded by these 'dark giants'. That would show up in our repeated observations. Those occlusions would completely block the star, unlike planets orbiting the star.

            @johnlogic

            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #23

            @ChuckMcManis @johnlogic

            not only testable, but in 4 months NASA is launching a craft to look for rogue planets/ brown dwarfs/ solitary gas giants sitting there in the dark (among other things)

            https://www.nasa.gov/missions/roman-space-telescope/unveiling-rogue-planets-with-nasas-roman-space-telescope/

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Grace_Roman_Space_Telescope

            named after Nancy Roman:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Roman

            chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            0
            • riley@toot.catR riley@toot.cat

              @benroyce There's all sorts of things that can make dark gas glow. Even gravitational interactions. If dark gas existed in such huge lumps, we should be able to occasionally see the glow even if the stars don't get ignited up properly.

              @johnlogic

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              benroyce@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #24

              @riley @johnlogic

              that's rather creepy

              "why is there a faint glow nearby... and why does it seem to trace a path heading towards us"

              😱

              riley@toot.catR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                @riley @johnlogic

                that's rather creepy

                "why is there a faint glow nearby... and why does it seem to trace a path heading towards us"

                😱

                riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                riley@toot.cat
                wrote last edited by
                #25

                @benroyce Must be the Sky Coyote's bright eyes on their way to some new tricksting!

                @johnlogic

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                  @ChuckMcManis @johnlogic

                  not only testable, but in 4 months NASA is launching a craft to look for rogue planets/ brown dwarfs/ solitary gas giants sitting there in the dark (among other things)

                  https://www.nasa.gov/missions/roman-space-telescope/unveiling-rogue-planets-with-nasas-roman-space-telescope/

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Grace_Roman_Space_Telescope

                  named after Nancy Roman:

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Roman

                  chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chuckmcmanis@chaos.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #26

                  @benroyce
                  ooh, neat. Yeah if you could see the lensing you'd be MUCH more likely to see one as that would eliminate the need for a conjunction. Still I'm wondering if we could sift through snaps from Kepler and get lucky.

                  @johnlogic

                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                    @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

                    did you hear about this one?

                    septuple system

                    (!)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Nu Scorpii - Wikipedia

                    favicon

                    (en.wikipedia.org)

                    martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                    martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                    martinvermeer@fediscience.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #27

                    @benroyce @rozeboosje Yep. But this is a young system - under five million years, and still associated with the galactic clouds it likely formed from - so perhaps not long-term stable.

                    Young, known-unstable multiple star systems are often called 'trapezia' after the Trapezium in the Orion nebula. But that is perhaps better described as an open star cluster in formation.

                    Link Preview Image
                    The star formation history of Upper Scorpius and Ophiuchus

                    Abstract page for arXiv paper 2209.12938: The star formation history of Upper Scorpius and Ophiuchus

                    favicon

                    arXiv.org (arxiv.org)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Trapezium Cluster - Wikipedia

                    favicon

                    (en.wikipedia.org)

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM martinvermeer@fediscience.org

                      @benroyce @rozeboosje Yep. But this is a young system - under five million years, and still associated with the galactic clouds it likely formed from - so perhaps not long-term stable.

                      Young, known-unstable multiple star systems are often called 'trapezia' after the Trapezium in the Orion nebula. But that is perhaps better described as an open star cluster in formation.

                      Link Preview Image
                      The star formation history of Upper Scorpius and Ophiuchus

                      Abstract page for arXiv paper 2209.12938: The star formation history of Upper Scorpius and Ophiuchus

                      favicon

                      arXiv.org (arxiv.org)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Trapezium Cluster - Wikipedia

                      favicon

                      (en.wikipedia.org)

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #28

                      @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

                      so like the pleiades!

                      also seven sisters

                      rozeboosje@masto.aiR martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC chuckmcmanis@chaos.social

                        @benroyce
                        ooh, neat. Yeah if you could see the lensing you'd be MUCH more likely to see one as that would eliminate the need for a conjunction. Still I'm wondering if we could sift through snaps from Kepler and get lucky.

                        @johnlogic

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #29

                        @ChuckMcManis @johnlogic

                        it's probably the difference between

                        "there's one... and there's one"

                        and

                        "holy shit, in this field of view... that's a lot"

                        😅

                        chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                          @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

                          so like the pleiades!

                          also seven sisters

                          rozeboosje@masto.aiR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rozeboosje@masto.aiR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rozeboosje@masto.ai
                          wrote last edited by
                          #30

                          @benroyce @martinvermeer At least one of them is a blue giant so yeah, it's young and it won't be long lived ...

                          martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • nomenloony@nomenloony.comN nomenloony@nomenloony.com

                            @benroyce I always remember reading "our sun is a very average yellow star" and now we say "our sun is an uncommon lone star, unlike most stars which exist in multiple systems"

                            nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
                            nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
                            nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                            wrote last edited by
                            #31

                            @nomenloony @benroyce Telescopes got muuuch better.

                            And we collectivly took a step into a larger world.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                              @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

                              so like the pleiades!

                              also seven sisters

                              martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                              martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                              martinvermeer@fediscience.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #32

                              @benroyce @rozeboosje Yep. On long-exposure photographs, also the Pleiades show a dust nebula containing the cluster, and illuminated by it in reflected light.

                              The Pleiades are a bit older but not very old, some 100 million years. How do we know? From its colour-magnitude diagram. The cluster contains hot, bright blue stars that are still burning hydrogen, which would have branched off and turned into red giants burning helium, if the cluster were older.

                              Link Preview Image
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • rozeboosje@masto.aiR rozeboosje@masto.ai

                                @benroyce @martinvermeer At least one of them is a blue giant so yeah, it's young and it won't be long lived ...

                                martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                martinvermeer@fediscience.org
                                wrote last edited by
                                #33

                                @rozeboosje @benroyce They are all B type, but you mean component A which is B3V?

                                rozeboosje@masto.aiR 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                  #ScienceFiction is informed by #Science

                                  And Science in turn stares at Science Fiction, nods, and smiles broadly

                                  "On ‘ #StarWarsDay’, researchers more than double the number of potential known ‘circumbinary’ planets like the fictional Tatooine, home to Luke Skywalker"

                                  A circumbinary planet is a planet that orbits two suns

                                  More than half of all stars exist in binary star systems or star systems with even more than two stars

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Scientists discover 27 potential new planets that orbit two stars in solar systems far, far away

                                  On ‘Star Wars day’, researchers more than double the number of potential known ‘circumbinary’ planets like the fictional Tatooine, home to Luke Skywalker

                                  favicon

                                  the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                                  #MayThe4th #MayThe4thBeWithYou

                                  scrimshaw9@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  scrimshaw9@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  scrimshaw9@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #34

                                  @benroyce Star Wars is science fiction? I always thought it was consumerism and merchandising based on awful fantasy movies with a weak allegory of the Vietnam conflict and ripped off Authurian legend, annoying characters and bad romance writing.

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • scrimshaw9@mastodon.socialS scrimshaw9@mastodon.social

                                    @benroyce Star Wars is science fiction? I always thought it was consumerism and merchandising based on awful fantasy movies with a weak allegory of the Vietnam conflict and ripped off Authurian legend, annoying characters and bad romance writing.

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #35

                                    @Scrimshaw9

                                    well, truthfully, it's more space opera than science fiction

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • rozeboosje@masto.aiR rozeboosje@masto.ai

                                      @benroyce I read an article recently that explained that such systems are inherently unstable and such planets are bound to either end up being swallowed by one of the stars or yeeted out of the system. But do you think I can find it now? Can I 'eck.... sorry

                                      rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rupert@mastodon.nz
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #36

                                      @rozeboosje @benroyce Technically our solar system is unstable, too.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                        @ChuckMcManis @johnlogic

                                        it's probably the difference between

                                        "there's one... and there's one"

                                        and

                                        "holy shit, in this field of view... that's a lot"

                                        😅

                                        chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        chuckmcmanis@chaos.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #37

                                        @benroyce
                                        Well if there are a lot of planets it's gonna put a big crimp in interstellar travel. 😉
                                        @johnlogic

                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM martinvermeer@fediscience.org

                                          @rozeboosje @benroyce They are all B type, but you mean component A which is B3V?

                                          rozeboosje@masto.aiR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rozeboosje@masto.aiR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rozeboosje@masto.ai
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #38

                                          @martinvermeer @benroyce possibly.... I lost the link where I read that 😬

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups