Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #ScienceFiction is informed by #Science

#ScienceFiction is informed by #Science

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
sciencefictionsciencestarwarsdaymaythe4thmaythe4thbewith
41 Posts 13 Posters 7 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

    @rozeboosje

    yes!

    you can even have stable quadruple star systems

    Capella, the sixth brightest "star" is a binary system orbiting another binary system

    martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    martinvermeer@fediscience.org
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    @benroyce @rozeboosje This is not at all uncommon. Castor, Alpha in the Twins (Gemini) is sixfold. Stable systems like this typically are binaries of binaries, where the 'inner' binaries are small members of an 'outer' binary, so for the purpose of celestial mechanics, the may be treated almost as point masses. A bit like, when modelling the solar system as a whole, you may consider the Earth-Moon system a single planet.

    Link Preview Image
    Castor (star) - Wikipedia

    favicon

    (en.wikipedia.org)

    martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM benroyce@mastodon.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

      #ScienceFiction is informed by #Science

      And Science in turn stares at Science Fiction, nods, and smiles broadly

      "On ‘ #StarWarsDay’, researchers more than double the number of potential known ‘circumbinary’ planets like the fictional Tatooine, home to Luke Skywalker"

      A circumbinary planet is a planet that orbits two suns

      More than half of all stars exist in binary star systems or star systems with even more than two stars

      Link Preview Image
      Scientists discover 27 potential new planets that orbit two stars in solar systems far, far away

      On ‘Star Wars day’, researchers more than double the number of potential known ‘circumbinary’ planets like the fictional Tatooine, home to Luke Skywalker

      favicon

      the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

      #MayThe4th #MayThe4thBeWithYou

      johnlogic@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      johnlogic@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      johnlogic@sfba.social
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      @benroyce

      It seems worth noting that the film Star Wars was released before any planets had been discovered outside of our own solar system.

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
      • martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM martinvermeer@fediscience.org

        @benroyce @rozeboosje This is not at all uncommon. Castor, Alpha in the Twins (Gemini) is sixfold. Stable systems like this typically are binaries of binaries, where the 'inner' binaries are small members of an 'outer' binary, so for the purpose of celestial mechanics, the may be treated almost as point masses. A bit like, when modelling the solar system as a whole, you may consider the Earth-Moon system a single planet.

        Link Preview Image
        Castor (star) - Wikipedia

        favicon

        (en.wikipedia.org)

        martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
        martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
        martinvermeer@fediscience.org
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        @benroyce @rozeboosje And then there is Mizar. Astronomic history!

        Link Preview Image
        Mizar - Wikipedia

        favicon

        (en.wikipedia.org)

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • johnlogic@sfba.socialJ johnlogic@sfba.social

          @benroyce

          It seems worth noting that the film Star Wars was released before any planets had been discovered outside of our own solar system.

          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @johnlogic

          but it kind of makes sense doesn't it? it just follows logically

          unsupported as yet by science (we've only seen a few), but it just "makes sense":

          that interstellar space isn't empty, but riddled with gas giants

          stars, essentially, not massive enough to ignite. just sitting there in the dark

          they should outnumber the number of stars. just as a sheer result of gaussian distribution, and those that ignite are on the right side of the curve in size

          chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC riley@toot.catR 2 Replies Last reply
          2
          0
          • martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM martinvermeer@fediscience.org

            @benroyce @rozeboosje This is not at all uncommon. Castor, Alpha in the Twins (Gemini) is sixfold. Stable systems like this typically are binaries of binaries, where the 'inner' binaries are small members of an 'outer' binary, so for the purpose of celestial mechanics, the may be treated almost as point masses. A bit like, when modelling the solar system as a whole, you may consider the Earth-Moon system a single planet.

            Link Preview Image
            Castor (star) - Wikipedia

            favicon

            (en.wikipedia.org)

            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

            it's alien to us. with our single star

            but in the wider galaxy, we are the alien ones

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM martinvermeer@fediscience.org

              @benroyce @rozeboosje And then there is Mizar. Astronomic history!

              Link Preview Image
              Mizar - Wikipedia

              favicon

              (en.wikipedia.org)

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              benroyce@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

              did you hear about this one?

              septuple system

              (!)

              Link Preview Image
              Nu Scorpii - Wikipedia

              favicon

              (en.wikipedia.org)

              martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                @johnlogic

                but it kind of makes sense doesn't it? it just follows logically

                unsupported as yet by science (we've only seen a few), but it just "makes sense":

                that interstellar space isn't empty, but riddled with gas giants

                stars, essentially, not massive enough to ignite. just sitting there in the dark

                they should outnumber the number of stars. just as a sheer result of gaussian distribution, and those that ignite are on the right side of the curve in size

                chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                chuckmcmanis@chaos.social
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @benroyce It's an interesting hypothesis, and testable! Given that we're all orbiting the giant black hole at the center of the Milky Way, and orbits closer to the center are faster than ours. Stars closer to the center would occasionally be occluded by these 'dark giants'. That would show up in our repeated observations. Those occlusions would completely block the star, unlike planets orbiting the star.

                @johnlogic

                benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                  @johnlogic

                  but it kind of makes sense doesn't it? it just follows logically

                  unsupported as yet by science (we've only seen a few), but it just "makes sense":

                  that interstellar space isn't empty, but riddled with gas giants

                  stars, essentially, not massive enough to ignite. just sitting there in the dark

                  they should outnumber the number of stars. just as a sheer result of gaussian distribution, and those that ignite are on the right side of the curve in size

                  riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                  riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                  riley@toot.cat
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @benroyce There's all sorts of things that can make dark gas glow. Even gravitational interactions. If dark gas existed in such huge lumps, we should be able to occasionally see the glow even if the stars don't get ignited up properly.

                  @johnlogic

                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC chuckmcmanis@chaos.social

                    @benroyce It's an interesting hypothesis, and testable! Given that we're all orbiting the giant black hole at the center of the Milky Way, and orbits closer to the center are faster than ours. Stars closer to the center would occasionally be occluded by these 'dark giants'. That would show up in our repeated observations. Those occlusions would completely block the star, unlike planets orbiting the star.

                    @johnlogic

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @ChuckMcManis @johnlogic

                    not only testable, but in 4 months NASA is launching a craft to look for rogue planets/ brown dwarfs/ solitary gas giants sitting there in the dark (among other things)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Unveiling Rogue Planets With NASA’s Roman Space Telescope - NASA

                    New simulations show that NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will be able to reveal myriad rogue planets – freely floating bodies that drift through our

                    favicon

                    NASA (www.nasa.gov)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope - Wikipedia

                    favicon

                    (en.wikipedia.org)

                    named after Nancy Roman:

                    Link Preview Image
                    Nancy Roman - Wikipedia

                    favicon

                    (en.wikipedia.org)

                    chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    0
                    • riley@toot.catR riley@toot.cat

                      @benroyce There's all sorts of things that can make dark gas glow. Even gravitational interactions. If dark gas existed in such huge lumps, we should be able to occasionally see the glow even if the stars don't get ignited up properly.

                      @johnlogic

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @riley @johnlogic

                      that's rather creepy

                      "why is there a faint glow nearby... and why does it seem to trace a path heading towards us"

                      😱

                      riley@toot.catR 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                        @riley @johnlogic

                        that's rather creepy

                        "why is there a faint glow nearby... and why does it seem to trace a path heading towards us"

                        😱

                        riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                        riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                        riley@toot.cat
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @benroyce Must be the Sky Coyote's bright eyes on their way to some new tricksting!

                        @johnlogic

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                          @ChuckMcManis @johnlogic

                          not only testable, but in 4 months NASA is launching a craft to look for rogue planets/ brown dwarfs/ solitary gas giants sitting there in the dark (among other things)

                          Link Preview Image
                          Unveiling Rogue Planets With NASA’s Roman Space Telescope - NASA

                          New simulations show that NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will be able to reveal myriad rogue planets – freely floating bodies that drift through our

                          favicon

                          NASA (www.nasa.gov)

                          Link Preview Image
                          Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope - Wikipedia

                          favicon

                          (en.wikipedia.org)

                          named after Nancy Roman:

                          Link Preview Image
                          Nancy Roman - Wikipedia

                          favicon

                          (en.wikipedia.org)

                          chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          chuckmcmanis@chaos.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          @benroyce
                          ooh, neat. Yeah if you could see the lensing you'd be MUCH more likely to see one as that would eliminate the need for a conjunction. Still I'm wondering if we could sift through snaps from Kepler and get lucky.

                          @johnlogic

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                            @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

                            did you hear about this one?

                            septuple system

                            (!)

                            Link Preview Image
                            Nu Scorpii - Wikipedia

                            favicon

                            (en.wikipedia.org)

                            martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                            martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                            martinvermeer@fediscience.org
                            wrote last edited by
                            #27

                            @benroyce @rozeboosje Yep. But this is a young system - under five million years, and still associated with the galactic clouds it likely formed from - so perhaps not long-term stable.

                            Young, known-unstable multiple star systems are often called 'trapezia' after the Trapezium in the Orion nebula. But that is perhaps better described as an open star cluster in formation.

                            Link Preview Image
                            The star formation history of Upper Scorpius and Ophiuchus

                            Abstract page for arXiv paper 2209.12938: The star formation history of Upper Scorpius and Ophiuchus

                            favicon

                            arXiv.org (arxiv.org)

                            Link Preview Image
                            Trapezium Cluster - Wikipedia

                            favicon

                            (en.wikipedia.org)

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM martinvermeer@fediscience.org

                              @benroyce @rozeboosje Yep. But this is a young system - under five million years, and still associated with the galactic clouds it likely formed from - so perhaps not long-term stable.

                              Young, known-unstable multiple star systems are often called 'trapezia' after the Trapezium in the Orion nebula. But that is perhaps better described as an open star cluster in formation.

                              Link Preview Image
                              The star formation history of Upper Scorpius and Ophiuchus

                              Abstract page for arXiv paper 2209.12938: The star formation history of Upper Scorpius and Ophiuchus

                              favicon

                              arXiv.org (arxiv.org)

                              Link Preview Image
                              Trapezium Cluster - Wikipedia

                              favicon

                              (en.wikipedia.org)

                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #28

                              @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

                              so like the pleiades!

                              also seven sisters

                              rozeboosje@masto.aiR martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC chuckmcmanis@chaos.social

                                @benroyce
                                ooh, neat. Yeah if you could see the lensing you'd be MUCH more likely to see one as that would eliminate the need for a conjunction. Still I'm wondering if we could sift through snaps from Kepler and get lucky.

                                @johnlogic

                                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                benroyce@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #29

                                @ChuckMcManis @johnlogic

                                it's probably the difference between

                                "there's one... and there's one"

                                and

                                "holy shit, in this field of view... that's a lot"

                                😅

                                chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                  @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

                                  so like the pleiades!

                                  also seven sisters

                                  rozeboosje@masto.aiR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rozeboosje@masto.aiR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rozeboosje@masto.ai
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #30

                                  @benroyce @martinvermeer At least one of them is a blue giant so yeah, it's young and it won't be long lived ...

                                  martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • nomenloony@nomenloony.comN nomenloony@nomenloony.com

                                    @benroyce I always remember reading "our sun is a very average yellow star" and now we say "our sun is an uncommon lone star, unlike most stars which exist in multiple systems"

                                    nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #31

                                    @nomenloony @benroyce Telescopes got muuuch better.

                                    And we collectivly took a step into a larger world.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                      @martinvermeer @rozeboosje

                                      so like the pleiades!

                                      also seven sisters

                                      martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      martinvermeer@fediscience.org
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #32

                                      @benroyce @rozeboosje Yep. On long-exposure photographs, also the Pleiades show a dust nebula containing the cluster, and illuminated by it in reflected light.

                                      The Pleiades are a bit older but not very old, some 100 million years. How do we know? From its colour-magnitude diagram. The cluster contains hot, bright blue stars that are still burning hydrogen, which would have branched off and turned into red giants burning helium, if the cluster were older.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • rozeboosje@masto.aiR rozeboosje@masto.ai

                                        @benroyce @martinvermeer At least one of them is a blue giant so yeah, it's young and it won't be long lived ...

                                        martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        martinvermeer@fediscience.org
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #33

                                        @rozeboosje @benroyce They are all B type, but you mean component A which is B3V?

                                        rozeboosje@masto.aiR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                          #ScienceFiction is informed by #Science

                                          And Science in turn stares at Science Fiction, nods, and smiles broadly

                                          "On ‘ #StarWarsDay’, researchers more than double the number of potential known ‘circumbinary’ planets like the fictional Tatooine, home to Luke Skywalker"

                                          A circumbinary planet is a planet that orbits two suns

                                          More than half of all stars exist in binary star systems or star systems with even more than two stars

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Scientists discover 27 potential new planets that orbit two stars in solar systems far, far away

                                          On ‘Star Wars day’, researchers more than double the number of potential known ‘circumbinary’ planets like the fictional Tatooine, home to Luke Skywalker

                                          favicon

                                          the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                                          #MayThe4th #MayThe4thBeWithYou

                                          scrimshaw9@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          scrimshaw9@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          scrimshaw9@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #34

                                          @benroyce Star Wars is science fiction? I always thought it was consumerism and merchandising based on awful fantasy movies with a weak allegory of the Vietnam conflict and ripped off Authurian legend, annoying characters and bad romance writing.

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups