Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. You are here

You are here

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
climatechange
19 Posts 17 Posters 20 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

    You are here.
    We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
    #climatechange

    the5thcolumnist@mstdn.caT This user is from outside of this forum
    the5thcolumnist@mstdn.caT This user is from outside of this forum
    the5thcolumnist@mstdn.ca
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @petergleick

    <<so what's the problem it's been going up and down for the last thousand years>>

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
    • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

      You are here.
      We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
      #climatechange

      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      slotos@toot.community
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      @petergleick So we’re rushing into territory where human cognitive capabilities measurably suffer, aren’t we?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

        You are here.
        We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
        #climatechange

        pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
        pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
        pizzademon@mastodon.online
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @petergleick

        Link Preview Image
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • erissire@discordian.socialE erissire@discordian.social

          @petergleick looking Stable!

          bruce@darkmoon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bruce@darkmoon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bruce@darkmoon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @ErisSire @petergleick

          Maybe if you turn the graph sideways

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • abdulzefir@social.vivaldi.netA abdulzefir@social.vivaldi.net

            @petergleick for planet it's nothing. humans are no more than ants and threaten nothing but themselves.

            jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jackemled@furry.engineer
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @Abdulzefir @petergleick I think dodo birds would argue otherwise.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

              You are here.
              We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
              #climatechange

              knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              knowprose@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @petergleick yup. 870 ppmv is getting mighty close with that gradient.

              This from 2023:

              "...That would be edging close to the average CO2 concentrations (870 ppmv) associated with huge crashes in marine biodiversity over the last 534 million years, according to a study published June 22 in the journal Earth's Future..."

              Link Preview Image
              19 'mass extinctions' had CO2 levels we're now veering toward, study warns

              The research looked at peaks in biodiversity loss and their relationship with atmospheric CO2, finding 50 events over the last 534 million years that can be considered mass extinctions.

              favicon

              Live Science (www.livescience.com)

              knowprose@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • knowprose@mastodon.socialK knowprose@mastodon.social

                @petergleick yup. 870 ppmv is getting mighty close with that gradient.

                This from 2023:

                "...That would be edging close to the average CO2 concentrations (870 ppmv) associated with huge crashes in marine biodiversity over the last 534 million years, according to a study published June 22 in the journal Earth's Future..."

                Link Preview Image
                19 'mass extinctions' had CO2 levels we're now veering toward, study warns

                The research looked at peaks in biodiversity loss and their relationship with atmospheric CO2, finding 50 events over the last 534 million years that can be considered mass extinctions.

                favicon

                Live Science (www.livescience.com)

                knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                knowprose@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @petergleick my brain catching up with what i read today before bed...

                Oxygen levels can be increased by nuclear reactors... but that isn't really a solution because it does so by electrolyzing water. It's too late for me to math, but glancing at estimates isn' giving me high optimism, particularly against thst gradient (and implicit ratio of atmosphere is in that ppmv)...

                We need to STAHP BURNING DA STUFFS.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

                  You are here.
                  We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
                  #climatechange

                  iveyline@mastodon.nzI This user is from outside of this forum
                  iveyline@mastodon.nzI This user is from outside of this forum
                  iveyline@mastodon.nz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @petergleick And its still going up.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

                    You are here.
                    We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
                    #climatechange

                    nick44@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nick44@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nick44@social.vivaldi.net
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    @petergleick the problem isnt' the absolute value of 430pm (or in future much more) becasue millions year ago it was so much higher.

                    the real problem is the rapid change: animals and environments hasn't enought time to adapt

                    Link Preview Image
                    efialto@mastodon.onlineE 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • nick44@social.vivaldi.netN nick44@social.vivaldi.net

                      @petergleick the problem isnt' the absolute value of 430pm (or in future much more) becasue millions year ago it was so much higher.

                      the real problem is the rapid change: animals and environments hasn't enought time to adapt

                      Link Preview Image
                      efialto@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                      efialto@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                      efialto@mastodon.online
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      @Nick44 Oh yes it is the problem. Millions years ago humans DID NOT EXIST.

                      nick44@social.vivaldi.netN 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • efialto@mastodon.onlineE efialto@mastodon.online

                        @Nick44 Oh yes it is the problem. Millions years ago humans DID NOT EXIST.

                        nick44@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nick44@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nick44@social.vivaldi.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        @efialto humans can live with higher co2 concentration, we van adapt. Animals and plant dont and we're losing biodiversity, not human beings

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups