You are here
-
You are here.
We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
#climatechange
The fossil fuel industry is funding an extinction level event.
-
You are here.
We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
#climatechangeEmissions keep going up, and more and more of the planet continues to be pillaged, poisoned, razed or paved over. The insects are dying. The animals are dying. The plants are dying. The soil is dying, which happens to have twice as much carbon and water in it relative to the vegetation on top so the productive capacity, the biomass, is collapsing, along with the hydrological and carbon cycling this implies. And these crazy huge dams which turn countryside into methane
-
The fossil fuel industry is funding an extinction level event.
Roberts court owns this Financial obscenity
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topicR relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topicR relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
-
You are here.
We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
#climatechange@petergleick for planet it's nothing. humans are no more than ants and threaten nothing but themselves.
-
You are here.
We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
#climatechange -
You are here.
We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
#climatechange@petergleick looking Stable!
-
You are here.
We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
#climatechange<<so what's the problem it's been going up and down for the last thousand years>>
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
-
You are here.
We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
#climatechange@petergleick So we’re rushing into territory where human cognitive capabilities measurably suffer, aren’t we?
-
You are here.
We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
#climatechange -
@petergleick looking Stable!
Maybe if you turn the graph sideways
-
@petergleick for planet it's nothing. humans are no more than ants and threaten nothing but themselves.
@Abdulzefir @petergleick I think dodo birds would argue otherwise.
-
You are here.
We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
#climatechange@petergleick yup. 870 ppmv is getting mighty close with that gradient.
This from 2023:
"...That would be edging close to the average CO2 concentrations (870 ppmv) associated with huge crashes in marine biodiversity over the last 534 million years, according to a study published June 22 in the journal Earth's Future..."
19 'mass extinctions' had CO2 levels we're now veering toward, study warns
The research looked at peaks in biodiversity loss and their relationship with atmospheric CO2, finding 50 events over the last 534 million years that can be considered mass extinctions.
Live Science (www.livescience.com)
-
@petergleick yup. 870 ppmv is getting mighty close with that gradient.
This from 2023:
"...That would be edging close to the average CO2 concentrations (870 ppmv) associated with huge crashes in marine biodiversity over the last 534 million years, according to a study published June 22 in the journal Earth's Future..."
19 'mass extinctions' had CO2 levels we're now veering toward, study warns
The research looked at peaks in biodiversity loss and their relationship with atmospheric CO2, finding 50 events over the last 534 million years that can be considered mass extinctions.
Live Science (www.livescience.com)
@petergleick my brain catching up with what i read today before bed...
Oxygen levels can be increased by nuclear reactors... but that isn't really a solution because it does so by electrolyzing water. It's too late for me to math, but glancing at estimates isn' giving me high optimism, particularly against thst gradient (and implicit ratio of atmosphere is in that ppmv)...
We need to STAHP BURNING DA STUFFS.
-
You are here.
We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
#climatechange@petergleick And its still going up.
-
You are here.
We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
#climatechange@petergleick the problem isnt' the absolute value of 430pm (or in future much more) becasue millions year ago it was so much higher.
the real problem is the rapid change: animals and environments hasn't enought time to adapt
-
@petergleick the problem isnt' the absolute value of 430pm (or in future much more) becasue millions year ago it was so much higher.
the real problem is the rapid change: animals and environments hasn't enought time to adapt
@Nick44 Oh yes it is the problem. Millions years ago humans DID NOT EXIST.
-
@Nick44 Oh yes it is the problem. Millions years ago humans DID NOT EXIST.
@efialto humans can live with higher co2 concentration, we van adapt. Animals and plant dont and we're losing biodiversity, not human beings
