Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. You are here

You are here

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
climatechange
19 Posts 17 Posters 20 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

    You are here.
    We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
    #climatechange

    Link Preview Image
    kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
    kimlockhartga@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
    kimlockhartga@beige.party
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @petergleick no wonder we all have hacking coughs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

      You are here.
      We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
      #climatechange

      Link Preview Image
      npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      npars01@mstdn.social
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @petergleick

      The fossil fuel industry is funding an extinction level event.

      nytimes.com

      favicon

      (www.nytimes.com)

      nanowiz@vmst.ioN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

        You are here.
        We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
        #climatechange

        Link Preview Image
        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @petergleick

        Emissions keep going up, and more and more of the planet continues to be pillaged, poisoned, razed or paved over. The insects are dying. The animals are dying. The plants are dying. The soil is dying, which happens to have twice as much carbon and water in it relative to the vegetation on top so the productive capacity, the biomass, is collapsing, along with the hydrological and carbon cycling this implies. And these crazy huge dams which turn countryside into methane

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

          @petergleick

          The fossil fuel industry is funding an extinction level event.

          nytimes.com

          favicon

          (www.nytimes.com)

          nanowiz@vmst.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
          nanowiz@vmst.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
          nanowiz@vmst.io
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @Npars01 @petergleick

          Roberts court owns this Financial obscenity

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
            R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
            R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
          • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

            You are here.
            We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
            #climatechange

            Link Preview Image
            abdulzefir@social.vivaldi.netA This user is from outside of this forum
            abdulzefir@social.vivaldi.netA This user is from outside of this forum
            abdulzefir@social.vivaldi.net
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @petergleick for planet it's nothing. humans are no more than ants and threaten nothing but themselves.

            jackemled@furry.engineerJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

              You are here.
              We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
              #climatechange

              Link Preview Image
              crumbletiltskin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              crumbletiltskin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              crumbletiltskin@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @petergleick 6 points in 2 years?

              https://www.statista.com/statistics/1091926/atmospheric-concentration-of-co2-historic/

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

                You are here.
                We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
                #climatechange

                Link Preview Image
                erissire@discordian.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                erissire@discordian.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                erissire@discordian.social
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @petergleick looking Stable!

                bruce@darkmoon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

                  You are here.
                  We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
                  #climatechange

                  Link Preview Image
                  the5thcolumnist@mstdn.caT This user is from outside of this forum
                  the5thcolumnist@mstdn.caT This user is from outside of this forum
                  the5thcolumnist@mstdn.ca
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @petergleick

                  <<so what's the problem it's been going up and down for the last thousand years>>

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                  • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

                    You are here.
                    We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
                    #climatechange

                    Link Preview Image
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    slotos@toot.community
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @petergleick So we’re rushing into territory where human cognitive capabilities measurably suffer, aren’t we?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

                      You are here.
                      We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
                      #climatechange

                      Link Preview Image
                      pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pizzademon@mastodon.online
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @petergleick

                      Link Preview Image
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • erissire@discordian.socialE erissire@discordian.social

                        @petergleick looking Stable!

                        bruce@darkmoon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bruce@darkmoon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bruce@darkmoon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @ErisSire @petergleick

                        Maybe if you turn the graph sideways

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • abdulzefir@social.vivaldi.netA abdulzefir@social.vivaldi.net

                          @petergleick for planet it's nothing. humans are no more than ants and threaten nothing but themselves.

                          jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jackemled@furry.engineer
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @Abdulzefir @petergleick I think dodo birds would argue otherwise.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

                            You are here.
                            We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
                            #climatechange

                            Link Preview Image
                            knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            knowprose@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @petergleick yup. 870 ppmv is getting mighty close with that gradient.

                            This from 2023:

                            "...That would be edging close to the average CO2 concentrations (870 ppmv) associated with huge crashes in marine biodiversity over the last 534 million years, according to a study published June 22 in the journal Earth's Future..."

                            Link Preview Image
                            19 'mass extinctions' had CO2 levels we're now veering toward, study warns

                            The research looked at peaks in biodiversity loss and their relationship with atmospheric CO2, finding 50 events over the last 534 million years that can be considered mass extinctions.

                            favicon

                            Live Science (www.livescience.com)

                            knowprose@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • knowprose@mastodon.socialK knowprose@mastodon.social

                              @petergleick yup. 870 ppmv is getting mighty close with that gradient.

                              This from 2023:

                              "...That would be edging close to the average CO2 concentrations (870 ppmv) associated with huge crashes in marine biodiversity over the last 534 million years, according to a study published June 22 in the journal Earth's Future..."

                              Link Preview Image
                              19 'mass extinctions' had CO2 levels we're now veering toward, study warns

                              The research looked at peaks in biodiversity loss and their relationship with atmospheric CO2, finding 50 events over the last 534 million years that can be considered mass extinctions.

                              favicon

                              Live Science (www.livescience.com)

                              knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              knowprose@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              @petergleick my brain catching up with what i read today before bed...

                              Oxygen levels can be increased by nuclear reactors... but that isn't really a solution because it does so by electrolyzing water. It's too late for me to math, but glancing at estimates isn' giving me high optimism, particularly against thst gradient (and implicit ratio of atmosphere is in that ppmv)...

                              We need to STAHP BURNING DA STUFFS.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

                                You are here.
                                We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
                                #climatechange

                                Link Preview Image
                                iveyline@mastodon.nzI This user is from outside of this forum
                                iveyline@mastodon.nzI This user is from outside of this forum
                                iveyline@mastodon.nz
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @petergleick And its still going up.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

                                  You are here.
                                  We've breached 430 ppm CO2.
                                  #climatechange

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  nick44@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nick44@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nick44@social.vivaldi.net
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @petergleick the problem isnt' the absolute value of 430pm (or in future much more) becasue millions year ago it was so much higher.

                                  the real problem is the rapid change: animals and environments hasn't enought time to adapt

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  efialto@mastodon.onlineE 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • nick44@social.vivaldi.netN nick44@social.vivaldi.net

                                    @petergleick the problem isnt' the absolute value of 430pm (or in future much more) becasue millions year ago it was so much higher.

                                    the real problem is the rapid change: animals and environments hasn't enought time to adapt

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    efialto@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    efialto@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    efialto@mastodon.online
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @Nick44 Oh yes it is the problem. Millions years ago humans DID NOT EXIST.

                                    nick44@social.vivaldi.netN 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • efialto@mastodon.onlineE efialto@mastodon.online

                                      @Nick44 Oh yes it is the problem. Millions years ago humans DID NOT EXIST.

                                      nick44@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nick44@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nick44@social.vivaldi.net
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      @efialto humans can live with higher co2 concentration, we van adapt. Animals and plant dont and we're losing biodiversity, not human beings

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups