Have you have heard of the saying "to read someone the Riot Act", in the sense of warning someone / telling someone off?
-
@neil I just selected my option, then inadvertently hit the "See Results" button. So I don't think my vote can now ever be recorded.
So ...
Heard of it, never read it.
@neil hmm. Had it open in another window, and maybe my response *has* been recorded.
Who knows ...
-
Have you have heard of the saying "to read someone the Riot Act", in the sense of warning someone / telling someone off?
Have you *actually read* the Riot Act?
Is that still a thing today? One assumes not, but perhaps it's just that the police ignore the requirement
-
Is that still a thing today? One assumes not, but perhaps it's just that the police ignore the requirement
@simonzerafa Not a thing in the UK; hasn't been for years.
-
@simonzerafa Not a thing in the UK; hasn't been for years.
Umm. I don't remember them doing so during the various 1980's riots so probably quite archaic.
Additional: The AI in my Internet search engine confidently states in was the Criminal Law Act 1967 for England and Wales and 1973 for Scotland and Northern Ireland.
That's might even be correct! Not as archaic as I thought
️ -
Have you have heard of the saying "to read someone the Riot Act", in the sense of warning someone / telling someone off?
Have you *actually read* the Riot Act?
Well, the proclamation, anyway...
-
Have you have heard of the saying "to read someone the Riot Act", in the sense of warning someone / telling someone off?
Have you *actually read* the Riot Act?
@neil Does reading about it, including Vimes' thoughts, in Terry Pratchet's Night Watch count?
-
Have you have heard of the saying "to read someone the Riot Act", in the sense of warning someone / telling someone off?
Have you *actually read* the Riot Act?
@neil Maybe that's a future audiobook? "Neil reads you the Riot Act".
-
Well, the proclamation, anyway...
In a voice full of pathos and gravitas Neil reads out the 1714 Riot Act Proclamation:
"Our sovereign lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the act made in the first year of King George, for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God save the King."
-
Well, the proclamation, anyway...
@neil Okay first of all, I expected a rick roll.
Second of all, I didn't expect you to sound so distinguished
-
@neil Okay first of all, I expected a rick roll.
Second of all, I didn't expect you to sound so distinguished
I can only apologise for disappointing you on so many levels in one toot.
-
Well, the proclamation, anyway...
@neil Oh. I think that was in last week's episode of For All Mankind
-
Have you have heard of the saying "to read someone the Riot Act", in the sense of warning someone / telling someone off?
Have you *actually read* the Riot Act?
@neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk I know the expression, but am not sure if I've heard it being used outside Jingo.
-
In a voice full of pathos and gravitas Neil reads out the 1714 Riot Act Proclamation:
"Our sovereign lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the act made in the first year of King George, for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God save the King."
@simonzerafa It is in the alt-text for the recording. I can see it on Tusky, but not in the Mastodon web client, but perhaps I am doing something wrong.
-
@simonzerafa It is in the alt-text for the recording. I can see it on Tusky, but not in the Mastodon web client, but perhaps I am doing something wrong.
I need to check if the ability to add alt text had any known bugs
️ -
I need to check if the ability to add alt text had any known bugs
️It added fine, but whether it is visible/accessible in all clients might be a different matter!
-
It added fine, but whether it is visible/accessible in all clients might be a different matter!
-
-
Umm. I don't remember them doing so during the various 1980's riots so probably quite archaic.
Additional: The AI in my Internet search engine confidently states in was the Criminal Law Act 1967 for England and Wales and 1973 for Scotland and Northern Ireland.
That's might even be correct! Not as archaic as I thought
️@simonzerafa @neil the text states the act was made in the first year of King George. I don't know which King George it's referring to, but Elizabeth II had been monarch for 15 years by 1967, so I'm going to go out on a limb and say the AI is spouting bollocks.
-
@simonzerafa @neil the text states the act was made in the first year of King George. I don't know which King George it's referring to, but Elizabeth II had been monarch for 15 years by 1967, so I'm going to go out on a limb and say the AI is spouting bollocks.
Those dates probably relate to the *revocation* of the Act, rather than the Act itself.
-
@simonzerafa I might have done that - I don't recall.
I've definitely done the Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace.
