Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber?

Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
mastodon
356 Posts 173 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

    Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber? This post from @carnage4life has me questioning our community. The Mastodon team is finally getting some traction, the product improvements are increasing, The #UX is improving, yet people posting on multiple platforms are making comments like this. It's confusing.

    I *know* people here don't want this to be a classic social media-clone but we'd *like* journalists to be here right? They aren't coming with examples like this!

    Link Preview Image
    geffrey@id.geff.reG This user is from outside of this forum
    geffrey@id.geff.reG This user is from outside of this forum
    geffrey@id.geff.re
    wrote last edited by
    #215

    @scottjenson @carnage4life Welp, this whole comment section was a trip!

    I don’t give these things enough thought to make an helpful comment. So I won’t.

    Let’s be kind to each other peeps. We’ve got enough actual bigotry, racism, genocide, and hate speech.

    Let’s show the world we can have intelligent discussion and target the topic, not the speakers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • isagalaev@mastodon.socialI isagalaev@mastodon.social

      @scottjenson @carnage4life I'm astonished you're trying to make generalizations based on basically one data point. Sure, the followers numbers are statistically meaningful, but these are all people following one specific person. It's not representative of any one network.

      As a counter-example, my corner of Mastodon is *very* political. Nothing lukewarm about it.

      corbden@defcon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      corbden@defcon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      corbden@defcon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #216

      @isagalaev @scottjenson @carnage4life @devlord I can guess at a sample bias as well. If they're posting positively or neutrally about AI, they're likely not getting the kinds of politically active people in my bubble, who, like me, tend to unfollow or tune out that POV. I'd guess that folks positive towards AI might be more satisfied with the "status quo" (if you can call it that) or current direction of politics, because it's going their way right now, and perhaps be less likely to engage politically or have their outrage buttons pressed.

      mabande@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

        Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber? This post from @carnage4life has me questioning our community. The Mastodon team is finally getting some traction, the product improvements are increasing, The #UX is improving, yet people posting on multiple platforms are making comments like this. It's confusing.

        I *know* people here don't want this to be a classic social media-clone but we'd *like* journalists to be here right? They aren't coming with examples like this!

        Link Preview Image
        urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
        urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
        urlyman@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #217

        @scottjenson I too would greatly like Mastodon to be more inclusive but network effects are emergent properties and a particular stance towards AI is likely to be one of them on a platform that skews nerdy.

        Fwiw there is no shortage of politics in my feed here.

        As with Twitter, I find journalists in social media spaces to be among people who like to broadcast more than to engage or publicly self reflect.

        I don’t know that this predicament has a solution

        @carnage4life

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • corbden@defcon.socialC corbden@defcon.social

          @isagalaev @scottjenson @carnage4life @devlord I can guess at a sample bias as well. If they're posting positively or neutrally about AI, they're likely not getting the kinds of politically active people in my bubble, who, like me, tend to unfollow or tune out that POV. I'd guess that folks positive towards AI might be more satisfied with the "status quo" (if you can call it that) or current direction of politics, because it's going their way right now, and perhaps be less likely to engage politically or have their outrage buttons pressed.

          mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mabande@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #218

          @corbden @isagalaev @scottjenson @devlord A part of the sample bias is the self selection of the interactions: on fedi the are quite a few who do not boost/repost images without alt text _as part of their political stance_, and from what I've seen @carnage4life pretty much never use alt even when others provide it for him.
          So it's a path of anti-interaction that could easily be changed to get more engagement.

          teflontrout@beige.partyT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mabande@mastodon.socialM mabande@mastodon.social

            @corbden @isagalaev @scottjenson @devlord A part of the sample bias is the self selection of the interactions: on fedi the are quite a few who do not boost/repost images without alt text _as part of their political stance_, and from what I've seen @carnage4life pretty much never use alt even when others provide it for him.
            So it's a path of anti-interaction that could easily be changed to get more engagement.

            teflontrout@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
            teflontrout@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
            teflontrout@beige.party
            wrote last edited by
            #219

            @Mabande @corbden @isagalaev @scottjenson @devlord @carnage4life

            Welp, carnage has taken their personal experience in a network where everybody curates their own experience, found it wanting, and instead of doing what it takes to get what you want, has decided to whine about it. And now we are talking about it.

            Like, go follow people and hashtags you goof, get a grip

            mabande@mastodon.socialM carnage4life@mas.toC misusecase@twit.socialM 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • ? Guest

              @aura i don't understand where being white factors in.

              to be completely clear about the point i'm making, the group of "AI users" as of April 2026 is broad and currently includes people of color, disadvantaged, and other traditionally marginalized people. i know this because i work with them.

              in the context of this thread, what i'm wondering is whether the people who would exclude "AI users" from their community here mean that to include these groups, as well.

              you are trans. i am interested in your point of view on this.

              revoltergeist@sunny.gardenR This user is from outside of this forum
              revoltergeist@sunny.gardenR This user is from outside of this forum
              revoltergeist@sunny.garden
              wrote last edited by
              #220

              @toddsundsted @aura there are marginalized cops and it's still acab

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

                Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber? This post from @carnage4life has me questioning our community. The Mastodon team is finally getting some traction, the product improvements are increasing, The #UX is improving, yet people posting on multiple platforms are making comments like this. It's confusing.

                I *know* people here don't want this to be a classic social media-clone but we'd *like* journalists to be here right? They aren't coming with examples like this!

                Link Preview Image
                ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                ciarani@mastodon.green
                wrote last edited by
                #221

                @scottjenson I'm not sure this is the best example of Mastodon gatekeeping. I suspect the person you cite (I won't tag him, to not bother him. I follow him. He doesn't follow me) has a different definition of 'engagement' than many on Mastodon. He has 19,000 followers. He follows just over 200. He never ever engages with anyone. He posts one-way toots. He never uses Alt Text. The Fediverse is a chatty place full of engagement, if you choose to take part yourself, to chat, to boost, to reply.

                davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD awfulwoman@indieweb.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • teflontrout@beige.partyT teflontrout@beige.party

                  @Mabande @corbden @isagalaev @scottjenson @devlord @carnage4life

                  Welp, carnage has taken their personal experience in a network where everybody curates their own experience, found it wanting, and instead of doing what it takes to get what you want, has decided to whine about it. And now we are talking about it.

                  Like, go follow people and hashtags you goof, get a grip

                  mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mabande@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #222

                  @TeflonTrout @corbden @isagalaev @scottjenson @devlord @carnage4life If you didn't want to talk about it you could've so very easily just ignored the thread.

                  valent@defcon.socialV teflontrout@beige.partyT 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • mabande@mastodon.socialM mabande@mastodon.social

                    @TeflonTrout @corbden @isagalaev @scottjenson @devlord @carnage4life If you didn't want to talk about it you could've so very easily just ignored the thread.

                    valent@defcon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                    valent@defcon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                    valent@defcon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #223

                    @Mabande
                    I have come to realize that my insistence on reserving friendship for people I actually like has turned my rl circle of friends into an echo chamber. If only I'd trusted algorithms instead 🙄
                    @TeflonTrout @corbden @isagalaev @scottjenson @devlord @carnage4life

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

                      Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber? This post from @carnage4life has me questioning our community. The Mastodon team is finally getting some traction, the product improvements are increasing, The #UX is improving, yet people posting on multiple platforms are making comments like this. It's confusing.

                      I *know* people here don't want this to be a classic social media-clone but we'd *like* journalists to be here right? They aren't coming with examples like this!

                      Link Preview Image
                      armstrong@mastodon.designA This user is from outside of this forum
                      armstrong@mastodon.designA This user is from outside of this forum
                      armstrong@mastodon.design
                      wrote last edited by
                      #224

                      @scottjenson I love Mastodon because it feels like “old” twitter, a bunch of clever people sharing stuff they’ve made or found or figured out… not to build a “following”, but because they’re passionate about it.

                      That said, lately I’ve noticed my feed getting filled with more negativity around certain topics, and people I respect getting radicalised in one direction or another (signs of an echo chamber).

                      Rather than muting entire people or topics, I kinda want to mute the negativity itself.

                      armstrong@mastodon.designA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                        @scottjenson I'm not sure this is the best example of Mastodon gatekeeping. I suspect the person you cite (I won't tag him, to not bother him. I follow him. He doesn't follow me) has a different definition of 'engagement' than many on Mastodon. He has 19,000 followers. He follows just over 200. He never ever engages with anyone. He posts one-way toots. He never uses Alt Text. The Fediverse is a chatty place full of engagement, if you choose to take part yourself, to chat, to boost, to reply.

                        davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                        davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                        davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
                        wrote last edited by
                        #225

                        @CiaraNi @scottjenson

                        This is exactly it.

                        People like to be talked to, not talked at.

                        Accounts in "broadcast mode" do better on other platforms, with different styles of use.

                        People get ridiculous cognitive dissonance when they don't do numbers.

                        I remember in 22 an account for a housing activist group was blasting out pronouncements that nobody was disagreeing with but they weren't doing numbers so they went to back to Twitter to tell everyone we were all landlords.

                        ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • armstrong@mastodon.designA armstrong@mastodon.design

                          @scottjenson I love Mastodon because it feels like “old” twitter, a bunch of clever people sharing stuff they’ve made or found or figured out… not to build a “following”, but because they’re passionate about it.

                          That said, lately I’ve noticed my feed getting filled with more negativity around certain topics, and people I respect getting radicalised in one direction or another (signs of an echo chamber).

                          Rather than muting entire people or topics, I kinda want to mute the negativity itself.

                          armstrong@mastodon.designA This user is from outside of this forum
                          armstrong@mastodon.designA This user is from outside of this forum
                          armstrong@mastodon.design
                          wrote last edited by
                          #226

                          @scottjenson I’m also wary that chasing “engagement” is what led Twitter to actively encourage things that provoke arguments.

                          Are we able to differentiate positive engagement (bringing people together) from negative engagement (divisive) in a universal way?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD davey_cakes@mastodon.ie

                            @CiaraNi @scottjenson

                            This is exactly it.

                            People like to be talked to, not talked at.

                            Accounts in "broadcast mode" do better on other platforms, with different styles of use.

                            People get ridiculous cognitive dissonance when they don't do numbers.

                            I remember in 22 an account for a housing activist group was blasting out pronouncements that nobody was disagreeing with but they weren't doing numbers so they went to back to Twitter to tell everyone we were all landlords.

                            ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                            ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                            ciarani@mastodon.green
                            wrote last edited by
                            #227

                            @davey_cakes @scottjenson Agreed. I'm reminded of a science journalist who turns up about once a year to post one-way toots for a few days before disappearing again. Last time, she complained that she was 'screaming into a void'. Literally hundreds of people replied from 'the void', welcoming her. She responded to 0 of them. 2000 people follow her. She follows 0. She's never replied, boosted or engaged with anyone. Fediverse held the gate wide open for her, but she just shouted at us and left.

                            reynir@social.data.coopR 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mabande@mastodon.socialM mabande@mastodon.social

                              @TeflonTrout @corbden @isagalaev @scottjenson @devlord @carnage4life If you didn't want to talk about it you could've so very easily just ignored the thread.

                              teflontrout@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                              teflontrout@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                              teflontrout@beige.party
                              wrote last edited by
                              #228

                              @Mabande @corbden @isagalaev @scottjenson @devlord @carnage4life

                              on the same token, if you don't like what I say you can ignore or block me, it goes both ways.

                              mabande@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                                @davey_cakes @scottjenson Agreed. I'm reminded of a science journalist who turns up about once a year to post one-way toots for a few days before disappearing again. Last time, she complained that she was 'screaming into a void'. Literally hundreds of people replied from 'the void', welcoming her. She responded to 0 of them. 2000 people follow her. She follows 0. She's never replied, boosted or engaged with anyone. Fediverse held the gate wide open for her, but she just shouted at us and left.

                                reynir@social.data.coopR This user is from outside of this forum
                                reynir@social.data.coopR This user is from outside of this forum
                                reynir@social.data.coop
                                wrote last edited by
                                #229

                                @CiaraNi @davey_cakes @scottjenson I think if I was concerned about bringing more voices to fedi journalists wouldn't be a high priority considering they have quite a voice (reach) already by nature of their occupation. Not that I have anything against journalists or am opposed to them being here…

                                ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • reynir@social.data.coopR reynir@social.data.coop

                                  @CiaraNi @davey_cakes @scottjenson I think if I was concerned about bringing more voices to fedi journalists wouldn't be a high priority considering they have quite a voice (reach) already by nature of their occupation. Not that I have anything against journalists or am opposed to them being here…

                                  ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ciarani@mastodon.green
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #230

                                  @reynir @davey_cakes @scottjenson Agreed. I don't think anyone has anything against journalists being here, but they can't expect much more than disinterest if they only ever broadcast one-way toots.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • teflontrout@beige.partyT teflontrout@beige.party

                                    @Mabande @corbden @isagalaev @scottjenson @devlord @carnage4life

                                    on the same token, if you don't like what I say you can ignore or block me, it goes both ways.

                                    mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mabande@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #231

                                    @TeflonTrout As you wish.

                                    @corbden @isagalaev @scottjenson @devlord @carnage4life

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • scottjenson@social.coopS scottjenson@social.coop

                                      Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber? This post from @carnage4life has me questioning our community. The Mastodon team is finally getting some traction, the product improvements are increasing, The #UX is improving, yet people posting on multiple platforms are making comments like this. It's confusing.

                                      I *know* people here don't want this to be a classic social media-clone but we'd *like* journalists to be here right? They aren't coming with examples like this!

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      kim@social.gfsc.studioK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kim@social.gfsc.studioK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kim@social.gfsc.studio
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #232

                                      @scottjenson @carnage4life i have been feeling a lot like this. i think theres 2 phenomena here:

                                      1. people here don't seem to be able to distinguish between "capitalism" and the vague and general concept of "AI" - i sense most people are libs/centrists

                                      2. mastodon is 80% programmers. programmers as a class have spent the last 3 decades taking everyone elses job. now its come for theirs they are perhaps unsuprisingly a bit touchy about it (see point 1)

                                      its logical fallacies everywhere rn tho

                                      kim@social.gfsc.studioK 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • kim@social.gfsc.studioK kim@social.gfsc.studio

                                        @scottjenson @carnage4life i have been feeling a lot like this. i think theres 2 phenomena here:

                                        1. people here don't seem to be able to distinguish between "capitalism" and the vague and general concept of "AI" - i sense most people are libs/centrists

                                        2. mastodon is 80% programmers. programmers as a class have spent the last 3 decades taking everyone elses job. now its come for theirs they are perhaps unsuprisingly a bit touchy about it (see point 1)

                                        its logical fallacies everywhere rn tho

                                        kim@social.gfsc.studioK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kim@social.gfsc.studioK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kim@social.gfsc.studio
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #233

                                        @scottjenson @carnage4life but yeah as a disabled trans woman maintaining 2 communtiy platforms and a tech nonprofit, claude has been pretty transformative for me in terms of being able to keep on top of workloads, get bids in, advance our codebases, and so on. and im very very tired of coming on here every day to read people think im scum for using it. some of the people who replied to this thread i am extremely dissapointed by and it makes me judge them poorly as people.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                                          @scottjenson I'm not sure this is the best example of Mastodon gatekeeping. I suspect the person you cite (I won't tag him, to not bother him. I follow him. He doesn't follow me) has a different definition of 'engagement' than many on Mastodon. He has 19,000 followers. He follows just over 200. He never ever engages with anyone. He posts one-way toots. He never uses Alt Text. The Fediverse is a chatty place full of engagement, if you choose to take part yourself, to chat, to boost, to reply.

                                          awfulwoman@indieweb.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          awfulwoman@indieweb.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          awfulwoman@indieweb.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #234

                                          @CiaraNi @scottjenson yeah this nails it for me. Folks like this want a broadcast medium - that’s not what I’m here for. I could subscribe to an RSS feed if I wanted that.

                                          yosh@toot.yosh.isY 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups